And Another Thing – Apr Archive

AND ANOTHER THING…

April 2009

Self appraisals

FROM TIME TO TIME, if you work for yourself, it is advisable to review your performance. It has to be you because there is simply no one else to do it. If you are in traditional employment, you will receive an appraisal from the next person in the chain of command. When you work for yourself, you are the next person in the chain, and the next after that and so on right up to the managing director. You can buy a plaque and put it in on your door if you so wish declaring that you are the big cheese, the head honcho, the man with whom the buck rolls to a stop.

None of this will make the slightest difference of course because you are just a bloke that has an office attached to his house, who wears a hole in the carpet whilst he tries to figure out how he is going to pay his car tax. So you can call yourself what you like, the fact remains you are some sort of wheeler-dealer trying to beat the system. The only way you make money is to take a slice of someone else’s share; this applies when you work for yourself whatever your chosen vocation. When you work for someone else (unless for the government in its various guises), you are less exposed to such a reality, as you are the tool of the mastermind that buys for X and sells for Y. You are protected from the unpleasantness, rather as the man who tucks into a steak is spared the grizzly details of how it arrived upon his plate.

My unofficial title at present is part-time writer, race-reader and gambler. Put like that it does not sound so great. I like the writing because it is different. I know I make a few crashing errors with my grammar. In my defence, I have to self-edit and that is difficult. Self-criticism is one of the hardest things for anyone. You will find extreme cases on Britain Has Got Talent and the X Factor. On these shows, there are always would-be singers that cannot sing – and I mean really cannot sing. They would have trouble with Jack and Jill. There are crazies with spotty faces and ill-fitting trousers that look as if they have just escaped from somewhere – mad-eyed women that seem likely to produce an axe out of their jumpers at any moment. These people should be pitied I suppose, because in their delusional state they really think they have a gift. Unfortunately, the only gift they possess is the one to make people laugh at them rather than with them.

Most of us struggle to see ourselves for what we are. I believe I read somewhere that nine out of ten people are inclined to dislike you. Turned on its head, if that statistic is true, it means only one in ten people you meet are in the least bit inclined to find you tolerable. It strikes me we need some careful screening from time to time just to put us straight so that we know where we are going wrong.

I decided to conduct my appraisal yesterday after having made a couple of what could only be described as gaffes. I backed two horses that I should not have; therefore, I asked to see myself in my office and made myself stand in front of the desk whilst the boss had a quiet word.

He wanted to know why I had considered Coiled Spring and Tikka Masala bets. The first had shown an awkward streak at Newmarket that I had put down to bad luck. No, said the boss, it was not bad luck. The horse has a temperament issue, or at least there was enough of a suggestion that he had one to mean deletion from any list of horses to back. Tikka Masala was a more clear-cut case. She pulls too hard and is a One Cool Cat, many of whom develop attitude problems. So what made you think they would be on their best behaviour today? And if they were, at the prices what did it matter? Taking a chance is commensurate with the odds on offer and neither were exactly overpriced. You fancied Aypeeyes, correctly identified he was taking a drop in grade, thought he represented a 9/4 chance and yet could have backed him at 7/2. Why didn’t you? Not what you would call a good effort from someone that purports to be – let me check, what is it you call yourself – yes… a professional gambler. Not very professional for a gambler is it?

No. I ignore the obvious and not very professional reference to the Paul Merton line in that annoying advert he does with Stephen Fry.

Then we come to Stone Of Scone later in the day. You fancied the horse, had a good confirmed message for it, yet let it run at three times the price you expected. Just clarify the situation for me. Why did you do that?

I thought the price suggested he wouldn’t win. There are drifters and drifters; this was more like a raft in the Bay of Biscay.

I am having difficulty with your thought processes here. As I understand it, according to you, punters should not be influenced by the price of a horse. If anything, the bigger the price, the more they should have on. Correct me if I am wrong, you had nothing whatsoever on Stone Of Scone.

That is correct.

Not very convincing then are you?

He looked like he was carrying condition and needed the run. He was not aggressively ridden in the race, tending to reinforce he was there to win but such an eventuality was not the be all and end all.

That may be but win he did. As did Aypeeyes, the two horses you chose not to back in favour of two that did not. Let me put it this way: I shall be keeping a close eye on you from now on. This is not the first time such mistakes have been made and I cannot afford passengers. Close the door on your way out and check that your P45 is up to date.

Tough interview! Who do I think I am talking to? I don’t have to take this sort of thing lying down. I have a good mind to go back in there and give myself a piece of my mind. Who do I think I am?

Oh, hang on, I know. That is the trouble with this business – there is no hiding place.

Even so, I am miffed. They need people on the night shift at Tesco; so as a warning, I had better look out or else I might be looking for a replacement…


AND ANOTHER THING…

April 2009

TODAY BELONGS TO GEORGE. No, you are not awaking from some dreadful dream. It is not King George: Kauto Star is not about to make his seasonal reappearance at Kempton, neither is Ascot staging its midsummer showpiece. It is St George’s Day, hardly an appropriate occasion for some of the news that we have endured over the last twenty-four hours.

It seems impossible to pen a piece without at least some reference to the Budget and the Branston’s we seem to be in. No, it is worse than being in a pickle; we are sailing in the frozen quiet on the Titanic within striking distance of the iceberg. Some of the newspapers seem to have prematurely jumped ship. The Daily Express has assumed the possible temporary mantle of doom-monger with their headline of: They’ve Ruined Britain.

I am skating on thin ice when discussing politics and economics. However, it strikes me that success in both is largely dependent on common sense. One has to question the wisdom of borrowing our way out of financial difficulty. Surely, such a concept breaks all rules. If we cannot pay our credit cards, the answer is not to apply for another one to pay back the company we owe. Maybe global economy transcends such elementary rules.

My own political leanings are left of centre but I would support any government that is doing its best for its citizens. This present government has a lot they can take pride in. The health service is better, so I believe is education. Money invested in this nation’s infrastructure has resulted in many of our cities adopting a glistening 21st century look.

On the down side, we are living beyond our means by fighting two wars. We appear hamstrung by The Court of Human Rights. We give away too much in benefits to people that turn up at our borders, having travelled the length of Europe, claiming asylum in the one country that doles out money as if there is no tomorrow. It appears tomorrow has arrived – something it does every twenty-four hours.

Politicians are privileged. Their salaries do not compete with those that can be earned in the private sector, but the spin-off can be enormous. The salary is just the start. They are similarly positioned to the doorman at the Ritz, in that the job is almost worth doing for nothing. Like the racecourse commentators who then write columns in newspapers, run tipping lines and appear on chat shows, politicians receive considerable perks and an influx of cash from several quarters. They pay no tax, can be on the board of companies without actually doing anything, command large sums for after-diner speaking, etc. It is not a bad life with more holidays than a teacher – all  we ask in return is that they play the game. When greed creeps in and they even have to fiddle expenses to watch Sky, they are taking us for fools. It was Abraham Lincoln that stated, ‘You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.’

Darling does not seem a bad bloke despite a name that conjures up past editions of Blackadder. I am not sure about Brown. But as we move towards the iceberg, possibly it would help if we all took an oar and tried to steer the ship around it. To an extent, we are all to blame for the current situation. It has been a great ride since Labour took office and for those who foresaw disaster, well their prophecies have been realised, which must be comforting for them. Predicting adversity is rather like those who said that Muhammad Ali and Ribot would both meet their matches one day. It the case of Ali, defeat visited him five times, but only twice in his golden heyday. On the other hand, Ribot retired undefeated, proving that the law of averages will not always make doomists seem correct.

Right now, most of us have benefitted to a degree from Tony Blair’s government and his legacy. Those of us that did not feel the constant urge to splash brick walls with urine had a chance to salvage wages and invest in property we may not have owned pre 1999. Maybe it is time to stop the bickering. It is tempting if you have a platform to be clever and kick the other team. It is the job of the Conservatives to strap on their boots and good luck to them. Maybe they will do a better job, maybe not. But am I the only one that is starting to tire of the tabloid sniping?

As another quote, Paul Simon in his wonderful song, American Tune, ponders the downfall of his country at the time. In that choirboy tone for which he is so well known he sings, ‘It’s all right for we lived so well so long.’ And as a finale, ‘Still tomorrow’s going to be another working day and I’m trying to get some rest, that’s all I’m trying to get some rest.’

So for now, Ribot is unbeaten, the iceberg looms but is yet to be struck.

I had thought about making a cheap-shot joke about being all right as I can manage the fifty percent tax; but that is what it is all about. Whatever our politics, whatever our calling, this is a time to pull together. It is something we have had little practice in, but Ali shrugged off his defeats and came back – until the end that is – maybe we can do the same…


AND ANOTHER THING…

April 2009

READING BETWEEN THE LINES

I LIKE Reading Between The Lines  – as a title I mean. I thought I would try it out as an alternative to And Another Thing to see if my words flowed differently with a change of emphasis. This is merely a trial you understand; it does not mean that I am dumping my former epithet. I might even alternate between the two alter egos to see if it brings me out of my shell a little, allows me to emerge from the closet for a while. Not that I am gay, in truth I am not even remotely happy at present. The Scots have a word for it which, not being fluent in Scottish, I cannot spell. So I will just say it phonetically. It is dreek. As it is Scottish National Day at Ayr, I thought a word from the same language that gives you neeps, tatties and haggis might be appropriate. Trying to master a semi-abbreviated tongue seems easier than solving the Scottish Grand National.

Yesterday I was at Newbury and it was more like the Hennessy meeting than the first Flat meeting of the year. The runners swirled out of the mist down the straight and many of them went up and down on the spot as if they had just clouted the last ditch. Although I lent the bookmakers some of my cash, which is always galling when you have suffered for your art as well, I came away with a few definite pointers for the future.

If you are prepared to get blobs of rain on your glasses and shuffle from one foot to another to stamp out the chill, paddock watching is rewarding. Spotting horses that are not fully fit and then seeing them run with a great deal of promise is a sure-fire way of recognising future winners. Of course, each of us that pursue such a path is convinced they have seen something missed by others. They may not have missed it but chosen to ignore it based on the fact they knew more than you did. That is the game – the game of reading between the lines. And reading between the lines is something of a British pastime, so it is something we are accustomed to. How many times do you have a conservation with an Englishman and then have to slip away quietly to decipher what was intended? Contrast that with the upfront approach of the Americans. They seem capable of bluntly expressing what they mean in two minutes whilst we bluster all round the houses to intimate at a point. We use such phrases as, just remind me, or, so to recap. Our American cousins seem to hit the nail on the head and move on.

So I read between the lines at Newbury yesterday and came to various conclusions which appear in Track Notes. There is a small race in Lofthouse, Sonny Red should win a big handicap, Brief Encounter is of interest next time, Candy Ride and Dhushan look nailed on for their maidens. What’s that? You thought the same but didn’t have to stand in the drizzle to arrive at such conclusions. Well, good for you!

There is more reading between the lines required today. Trainers make statements in the Racing Post as to the chances of their runners. They use a kind of code which is universal in racing circles and once cracked can be easily translated. They say they are looking forward to running their horse. That means they think it will be fun day out for all concerned until the bills arrive. We all look forward to plenty of things, most of which never materialise.

Then there is the trainer that gives with one hand and takes with another. He will love the trip but I am not sure about the ground means he probably won’t win.

I have him as fit as I can for his first run translates to he definitely won’t win.

He really is better of six than today’s five means he is being prepared for something else.

I couldn’t be more happy with him is not quite the dollop of encouragement it sounds. Being happy with a horse is distinct from thinking he will win.

No, give me the Mick Easterby approach. I laid this ‘oss out for two years. He is sixteen pounds lower than he should be, is in the form of his life and I am having my bollocks on him. How many bollocks do you get for the pound by the way? What with deflation and the crunch (no, not a good choice of word in the same sentence I know), I suspect they have dropped in value somewhat. However, it still equates to a serious wager.

No such luck with the clues today. The always-informative Saeed Bin Suroor (why does he call even hacks sir?) suggests Shaweel will improve for the run.

Brian Meehan tells us nothing about Neshri except that he has a Guineas entry.

Marcus Tregoning doesn’t really wish to run Finjaan on poor ground – which is what he will get. He as good as tells us it won’t win, but sums up by saying he likes the horse a lot. Does that mean they will be sharing a whisky tonight and having a game of backgammon?

Reading between the lines, there is a lot of it about at this stage of the season…


AND ANOTHER THING…

April 2009

WELL, IT IS ANOTHER WEEK, although strangely not many THINGS are occurring, save for the fact that the usual spray of messages from Newmarket seem to be costing punters money. Maybe the title of this should be MORE OF THE SAME, or for Motown fans, IT’S THE SAME OLD SONG.

Cynical? Not me; resigned more like. It happens every year. The Derby horse we have waited half the winter to see gets beaten; second strings from big yards beat the first strings. That is the Craven meeting, but we flock to it every year like migrating starlings. And every year we say: let’s wait and see how things develop – which yards are performing and have the ammunition before we get the wallet out; but every year a case that is so strong is constructed for the likes of Native Ruler and Invisible Man that we fall for them. We know we shouldn’t, we have heard it all before, but somehow this time it is different. Messages, whispers, talk, call them what you like, are only the opinions of others. Just as boxers do not spar with champions, good horses often work with those that will stretch them but are not in their league. Therefore, unless work-watchers are au fait with work patterns, what they see, or even take part in, can mislead. For example, Cover Up used to work with some of the best colts at Michael Stoute’s yard, but he was a two-mile handicapper. Messages can be a boon; equally, they can lead the punter down a rocky road and if they are not careful over a craggy cliff.

On the plus side, the Craven Meeting is a celebration of the proper return of Flat racing, but like uncorked vintage wine, a season needs to be savoured and not gulped down in one go. A long term looms. The first Newmarket meeting should be treated as a showcase rather than a licence to strap on those betting boots and start punting as if the end is nigh. Of course the end may well be nigh, but I suspect it will wait a little longer than next week or next month or at least until after the St Leger. Not so long ago people used to parade outside racecourses hoisting placards warning of the evils of gambling. Now such a pursuit as tame as placing money on a horse must rank in the bottom half of a list of sins to avoid. They seem to have invented plenty of new ones since then.

The trouble with messages at Newmarket is that they tend to be in the public domain. Information is most effective when only a limited number knows the content. So when the Gosdens, the Cecils and the Stoutes fancy a horse, particularly if it is running at Newmarket, it is safe to say most people who make it their business to seek out such information will know it. Therein lies the problem for the punter. Because only the privileged few know the best information, it is more likely to emanate from a small or unpopular yard. And unless that yard harbours a Group 1 winner camouflaged in a maiden, chances are it will not win. Therefore, we have a conundrum – because at the Craven Meeting everybody seems to know everything. It is a matter of pride. Flat racing aficionados have had all winter to prepare for this. Under no circumstances are they about to let it slip by without them being fully informed. As the season progresses, enthusiasm and betting banks dwindle, attention wanders to other matters, but right now, there is no value unless the process of original thought is invoked.

Therefore, we group on day one, regroup on day two, and if we are lucky break even, remember where we left our respective cars, find they have not been vandalised and return to our homes relatively unscathed.

This year the trials went according to the script. Fantasia won impressively despite reservations that she was not fully wound up. Delegator was fully wound up, it showed when the spring was uncoiled, and he ran away with the Craven. There were hiccups along the way. I fear Native Ruler will not be a player in the Epsom Derby and that Invisible Man is no Raven’s Pass. I liked Rockhampton and would back any Ballydoyle representative that is his superior.

The Wood Ditton continues to attract woolly mammoths. This year’s herd looked unlikely to cause a betting stampede. Certainly, Errol Flynn will not be assuming a starring role if his run was anything to go by.

The two-year-olds looked okay. I thought the maidens were a little disappointing.

The weather was nice, even if the wind was a bit keen. After a winter on the all-weather, it felt strange having to check if it had rained as the forecasters said it would. Of course it didn’t, meaning they were hopelessly inaccurate yet again.

Now the circus moves to Newbury for the Greenham and the Dubai Duty Free. In three weeks time they will run the Guineas. That means two Classics will be settled before we have had time to sort out our summer wardrobe and paint that fence.

I wonder if the government will consider bringing forward that five grand offer for anyone buying an electric car. I don’t want one of course. Who does? People with shares in electric companies, milkmen, burglars planning silent getaways in the middle of the night. Can you imagine all these overgrown milk floats abandoned, uncharged on the sides of roads like discarded fridges?

But the five grand. Now, there has to be an angle somewhere there. Buy the car, assume it does not depreciate that amount in a year and sell it on. Take the five grand, say you will buy a car and open another Betfair account instead.

Nice one Gordon, I think it could catch on…


AND ANOTHER THING…

April 2009

HERE WE ARE AGAIN, bank holidays loom, two of them in the space of four days. For racing folk, bank holidays – or public holidays as they are now I suppose – do not mean extra leisure time. They normally mean a bottleneck of race meetings, more work, more stress as all around everyone else winds down – the paper shop opens later – the papers may or may not turn up on time, but we have to work all the harder to keep pace.

I don’t expect anyone to organise a collection here. But I am sitting in my office flicking through the Racing Post on Thursday and thinking the authorities have made an effort to ensure that we have a little time between the end of racing on Thursday and the resumption on Saturday. Folkestone start early – at 1.40 – and finish at 4.10. Wincanton have a similar approach, starting at 1.50 and ending at 4.20. This is unprecedented. Racing is over at about the time schools finish. For once stable staff and punters alike can eat at a reasonable time, with no night racing enjoy a glass of wine or two, maybe even spend an uninterrupted evening with the wife and get to know her again. Perhaps she will dust off that old PVC nurse’s outfit and bring out those high-heels the way she used to in the old days when she wanted something…

But hang on, there is Ludlow lurking in the background. They start at 2.30 with a selling hurdle and end at 5.30 with a hunter chase. I have a choice and shall watch neither race. To be frank I would prefer to see a Columbo re-run. But for those working in betting offices or having to attend the Shropshire track for one reason or another, it strikes me this is a piece of Luddism by the Ludlow executive who seem determined to throw a spanner in the machinery. Perhaps they are concerned about a low sun or a high moon in Shropshire. Perhaps they are on a different time zone there. Maybe they forgot to put their clocks forward for spring.

Stable and betting office staff are worked to the edge. They treasure every hour they can spend away from their desks or on the road. This doesn’t mean they dislike their jobs, but in an industry in which they are overworked it makes sense to grant them free time where possible. A break, however small, will be welcome now and then. An early finish today at least gives them a chance to enjoy a flying start to a precious free day tomorrow. Then along comes Ludlow to ensure some racing employees will be engaged in the usual rush before a whole day of rest. Are we back in the Middle Ages here?

Possibly unaware that racing folk have little leisure time, www. DoubleDateFirst.com has decided to use the Racing Post’s classified section to advertise their services. The idea is that you muster up a friend and this company arranges a double date free of charge. How generous of them.

This is a quiet day. I am not placing any bets, so I access the website. It contains photographs of men and women that form the dual packages. I didn’t spend too much time looking at the men. But the women are all ridiculously attractive. I mean, where is the fat bird that no one dances with and last had a date when she was in primary school? Where is Ugly Betty? She is not there. Melanie, Stacey, Catwoman and Brandi are. They don’t look as if they would have any trouble arranging dates to me. I would imagine most of them would only have to walk down the street or sit on the Tube for some hapless male to make an approach of sorts. Perched on a stool in Starbucks, I would give it about five minutes before some city dealer is asking how they like their mocha. So what are they doing on a website looking for dates? And what is this agency doing offering such a bonanza of beauties for free? Could it be the Racing Post has been duped here?

I often flick through the classifieds even though I know I am unemployable on any number of counts. I am not looking for a job as I have one, or at least what passes as one. As I do not have a property to sell or lease, am not qualified to work for the Bloomsbury Stud or do not wish to apply for the position of Senior Trader in Leeds, my attention was drawn to this Doubledate stuff.

Just as I am not qualified to work for a company, it strikes me that, even if this ad is on the level, I would have a problem with its double date concept. Right now, what with my car languishing in a commercial garage racking up a bill, my one mate lounging around in Marbella for reasons best known to himself, I find myself as the original Billy No mates. Only my name is not Billy. But even if I could get in touch with Brandi or Catwoman, how could I meet them when I have no one to go with?


AND ANOTHER THING…

April 2009

WELL THAT’S IT THEN: next stop Newmarket for the Craven. The Grand National meeting, sponsored by the John Smith’s company, has to go down as a success – for the bookmakers that is.

John Smith’s have made an excellent job of sponsoring this meeting, although I suppose it is a sign of the times that they were showing re-runs of those rather amusing, ‘You’re Barred’ adverts rather than any newly shot ones. That is rather a shame as they have hit on a winning formula: ‘No bleepin’ gadgets, no women’s telly’…Pity someone did not bar me from picking up the phone.

We went into day three all square, punters having punched bookmakers to the ropes on the opening day. Day Two went to the layers, but Day Three was a knockout.

Bouggler (I could think of another name for him) was an unconsidered winner of the first race, foiling Copper Bleu. Kalahari King was a sensible winner of the Grade 1 Novice but was weak in the market as support developed for Tatenen, Made in Taipan and Song Of Songs. Solwit (again I could think of another name that would fit) was entitled to be thereabouts in the Aintree Hurdle but was not the choice of most punters. Don’t Push It was only one for those that kept the faith. Then the killer blows: 100/1 winner of the Grand National, followed by two 66/1 shots to round off the card.

Mon Mome is a strange name for a National winner. By a stallion known as Passing Sale out of Star Of Lion [English translation], a better title than one meaning My Blockhead or My Urchin could possibly have been found. Still, I don’t suppose he cares too much. He returned to the packed enclosures to race-goers thumbing wildly through their race cards to see if there had been a mistake in the colours. He was number 15 on the card. To the left of his name were his form figures, resembling hieroglyphics or maybe a New York telephone number- 872812. But hang on, with the benefit of hindsight there were a few clues hidden away in this particular urchin or blockhead’s history. He had won five races, one of them at Aintree. He had beaten Star de Mohaison at Cheltenham and twice bumped into Racing Post runner-up Possol, beating him once and finishing second to him on the other occasion. Maybe he wasn’t the total buffoon after all! But carrying eleven stone; no, he could not win. This makes me wonder whether we should have a panel of adjudicators that sit after every race. If they fail to make any sense of the result, they just alter it. In this case the National would be awarded to Comply Or Die from My Will and State Of Play with Mon Mome placed a homeless fourth. They seem to have this power in Formula One but I can’t see it catching on in the sport of horseracing. So Mon Mome it is then. Venetia Williams seemed to take it all in her immaculately crafted brocade jacket stride, and jockey Liam Treadwell looked as bemused as the rest of us.

Culcabock was the first of the 66/1 winners, beating Issaquah. Both were unconsidered by those in possession of a form book. Both are also places. Culcabock is located in Inverness where a group of four-and-twenty chaste women were reported to have come from – whereas Issaquah is a town in Washington that’s literal meaning in native Indian is “the sound of birds”. It sounds and seems like a nice place if you are a bird or a sightseer.

In keeping with the craziness of the day, Sitting Tennant – nothing to do with The Pet Shop Boys – but a concocted name incorporating one of the owners, A Mr or Mrs Tennant, rounded off things and provided another female trainer with a winner at this meeting. I mention this because as well as Venetia Williams’s National triumph, on Friday Mrs Wadham and Mrs Robeson were appropriately responsible for two winners on Ladies’ Day.

So its been a good meeting for the girls, the bookmakers and horses with Spanish names [Voy Por Ustedes, El Dancer], place names and horses with just plain unpronounceable titles like Comhla Ri Coig.

How was it for you?


And Another Thing – Mar Achive

AND ANOTHER THING…

THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY WEEK! Aintree is always easier than Cheltenham, which stands to reason when you consider it; we are in a better position to assess jumpers now as events at the Festival dispensed with some of the guesswork. To a degree, we know the pecking order; all we have to decide is which horses will adapt best to a faster track on quicker ground. Some Cheltenham runners had Aintree written all over them – the Triumph Hurdle third is one that springs to mind. To make it easier, Aintree is a word comprising of only seven letters, making it simpler to spot than Cheltenham, which does not always fit along a horse’s bridle.

For many, this is the last major jumping fixture of the year. I know Punchestown is to come but there are limits! Let’s just leave it here shall we? Whereas at Cheltenham we were looking for horses that could cope with an undulating track and races run from trap to wire, now, on the Mildmay course, we want animals with a bit of sense; horses that are not all brute force and bravado, but that can bunny-hop and produce acceleration from the last. There is no punishing hill, no downhill fences to survive when they are travelling at their fastest. Aintree places more of an emphasis on speed, even in the event of rain-softened ground – something that is looking increasingly unlikely at this stage.

As for the Grand National itself, that is a one-off. For this, a mixture of a hunter chaser with the turn of foot of a two-miler is ideal. Most hunter chasers are on the wane so that rules them out, but the ability for a horse to get into a lobbing rhythm and just hunt round for a circuit and a half as if riding out with the Thorn, or whatever those red-coated tally-ho boys call themselves, is an attribute. A horse that can shrug off the parade, laugh at the absurdity that is the Chair, hop over Becher’s Brook and skip over Valentines while still on the bridle has it made.

Those that tear across the Melling Road towards the first fence as if they were carrying a Lancer at Balaclava are doomed. They will use up too much energy and if surviving the first gradually wilt as the race unfolds.

The Grand National is very much a tale of tortoise and hare and in this case, for a race that can last in excess of ten minutes, the tortoise often has his day. Having identified the tortoise as being Comply or Die last year, it seems unlikely I shall repeat the feat this time round. I shall attempt to pull it off even so; it is tradition after all and nominating the Grand National to all your non-racing friends, who invariably think you only have to look at a racecard to identify winners, means you will dine out for a week or two. Frankly, I could do with that.

And I am cheap. I don’t need a Clement Freud-style dinner; it doesn’t have to be Marylebone either: a curry or Sunday lunch at the local golf club will do fine. I do not need turbot poached in pears, quails’ eggs in wine or Benedictine. Just a couple of square meals would do.

With that in mind, I have looked at the race. The first thing that strikes me is that it doesn’t look to be a quality field. Most years the race contains an apparently well-handicapped horse – something the handicapper would require to carry in the region of an extra ten pounds if he could based on updated figures. It does not make them win, but to anyone with a formbook such a presence is off-putting. I remember going for a punt on Garrison Savannah who was about a stone light and he could only finish second.

The formbook and official figures are all very well in conventional races, but winning the National requires a special type of horse. Very often, such an animal is not apparent until it has floated over a few Aintree fences as if born for the task. Although those that have run in the race have a record of returning to the scene of the crime successfully, it is my contention, you want a horse jumping the fences for the first time. Those that take to it can offset any weight differential with rivals. Those that have endured the marathon that is the race often remember and can fret beforehand. But there is one other vital component required because good fortune – the wings of luck – are crucial.

Backing the winner of the National is all about putting your money where The Archangel Gabriel has put his because divine intervention of some sort is essential. I have it on high authority he is the celestial body that bets. This is apparently his one weakness. Now, I do not know why the Archangel Gabriel should bet, after all he does not need the money. But bet he does. And whatever the Archangel Gabriel backs has a charmed run. His selection lobs along, taking the fences in its stride, avoiding stricken rivals and is always in exactly the right place. Consequently, it can often be named as the winner a long way out.

The angel did get it wrong a couple of times and had to cheat. You remember that incident that occurred to Devon Loch in 1956? The Archangel Gabriel had backed ESB. Rumour has it he engineered Devon Loch to do those infamous splits in order for ESB to gallop past his rival on that cruel run-in.

Eleven years later, there was that pile-up at the Canal Turn when Foinavon escaped all the trouble. Gabriel made a mistake that year. Apparently, he mixed up the colours and thought his selection, Honey End, had made a bad blunder at Becher’s. In his attempt to provide his selection with a second chance, he overdid his tactics, but that is another story. Suffice to say he bestowed the race upon Foinavon in error.

Finding out what Gabriel has backed is difficult and invariably only apparent in running. I suggest there are two horses likely to be on his shortlist this year. The first will only run if fortune decrees and that is Maljimar, currently unlikely to make the cut. The other is a definite runner unless a huge hand descends from a purple sky and strikes him down. That is State Of Play, who looks the sort to lob, hunt, and step over the fences. He tried his luck over the Mildmay track two years’ ago but, having been prominent for a long way, found the searching pace and his weight too much. It should be a different story over the Aintree fences where he can settle into a gazelle-type lope.

A fresh horse that has only run twice this season, State Of Play, a former Hennessy winner that handles firm ground, has the look of having been laid out for Saturday.

All that remains is to convince the Archangel Gabriel that he is worth an investment. After that, it is a foregone conclusion…


APRIL FOOLS’ DAY – WHAT IS NEW?

I HAD THOUGHT ABOUT writing something appropriately absurd for April 1st or as it is known April Fools’ Day. You know how it goes, the, I Was Abducted By Aliens type piece. In racing’s case, thestories could be, ‘Miniature Racecourse Scheduled for Hyde Park to Accommodate Thoroughbred Pony Racing: Trained Monkeys to Replace Jockeys: Frankie Dettori to Ride for Godolphin in Australia.

On reflection, based on the news stories in circulation at present there is no need – the old adages that truth is stranger than fiction, or that the lunatics are taking over the asylum, seem applicable.

On the racing front, they are building the sixty-first racecourse at a time when the sixtieth has gone bust. The BHA continue on a kamikaze course with the law courts. Dubai million-dollar earner, jockey Ahmed Ajtebi, was frogmarched out of this country by immigration officials on a technicality. Meanwhile people that have eaten or flushed their passports down aircraft toilets arrive at our borders claiming asylum. Presumably, they hold up pre-written cards as a great many do not speak English. Perhaps they should claim they have ideal qualifications to live IN an asylum. These people, impersonating Bluebeard in his various forms, some with manuals on how to construct a bomb and with editions entitled Death to Infidels in their luggage, are welcomed; some given four-bedroom houses and Toyota Land cruisers.

Jacqui Smith, as Home Secretary, is partly responsible for this, but has other problems right now. The downloading of a couple of porno films by her husband is a personal matter between him and Ms Smith. What is shocking is the fact that as a duo they thought it acceptable to download anything at the taxpayers’ expense. Clearly, the state is funding their service provider use. Why? Is she saying that if she were not a government minister she would not have a computer? I am self-employed and need a TV and a computer for my work but claim for neither. As I do not live in a cave and have access to electricity, I assume the taxman would expect me to have such items whatever my business. I am not a government minister and do not earn a government minister’s salary. Ms Smith’s argument that she was unaware of her claim or her possible assertion that, because she needs more than one home, she should have more than one computer is irrelevant. This expenditure comes with the job. She should pay out of her salary and the other benefits that go with her privileged position.

More craziness looms with the G20 Summit and these planned demonstrations. Why do we put up with them? At the last such march – mostly full of loonies – some nutcase dressed in green and apparently in a world of his own, gyrating or spacing out to music was questioned by a television interviewer. Interrupted in the middle of some weird St Vitas’ dance whilst whatever substance pinged around in what was left of his brain, he spouted expressions last aired in the sixties. Old Marxist/ Lenin phrases such as redistribution of wealth, proletariat and evil capitalists resurfaced. This Summit is actually rather important. We can do without a contribution by Swampy and his mates who take it as an excuse for a day out and the chance to be on television.

Another such group we tolerate is Plane Stupid. They managed to bring Stansted Airport to a standstill in January, sabotaging business and holiday travellers alike. I guess the airport security should be asked how, if they cannot protect the runway against spotty students drunk on their own self-importance, they can safeguard it against terrorists?

The list of foolishness grows. An ISA boasting it will return 3.5%. That is £3.50 in a £100 invested or £35 in a £1,000 or a massive £350 in £10,000. If that was the best I could offer someone in exchange for such a cash commitment, I would be too embarrassed to advertise it.

Recent surveys of schoolchildren reveals a good proportion of them have never heard of Sir Winston Churchill. It is a sad reminder of the mortality of generations. Same ‘yoof’ cannot add, cannot spell and cannot speak proper. They can operate I Players, mobile phones, WIIs and MPVGs or whatever they are; but does that equip them for life?

So April Fools’ day is upon us! I only wish I could be confident it would cease at midday. Somehow, I suggest one will not have to scour the newspapers too thoroughly to discover incredulous items. The problem is ongoing: sorting fact from fiction.


  AND ANOTHER THING…

SO IT’S NEW YEAR’S DAY THEN!

Actually, as you are aware, that is an exaggeration; but you know the feeling. It is the start of something new, the chance to atone for past misgivings and mistakes. In this case it is the start of the Flat – a new racing season instead of a new year. It is a great start: the usual Doncaster meeting, with the Lincoln kick-starting proceedings. Then there is Kempton with the Roseberry Stakes and the Listed Magnolia Stakes, and of course, three-thousand miles away in the Middle-East’s answer to Miami, it is the Dubai World Cup, supported by an excellent international card.

Whatever your persuasion, I suggest such a menu outstrips whatever jumping has to offer at Lingfield and Uttoxeter. Speaking as a Flat man, I only hope those cards do not get in the way of Doncaster on ATR. However, Channel 4 rides to the rescue with coverage from Kempton and Doncaster so it should be all right.

The start of the Flat is a definite article. Unlike National Hunt that trundles on all year round, a seam is broken with the commencement of the turf season. All-weather racing continues but for the most part it plays second fiddle, although that is not the case at Kempton on Saturday. But we know where we are now. This is the chance to make the year count – to rub out all those conveniently forgotten errors of seasons past. A dollop of fortune can make this the year that eclipses all others. Just like the resolutions made on January 1st that are usually broken one-by-one well before Easter, riding the wave of optimism can be a short-lived journey.

Start the season badly and to a degree there is no way back. Just like the ex-smoker breaking the seal on that packet of cigarettes, old habits will resurface and take command. Don’t let it; fight back! We all have failings, recognising them is our first step to cutting them out or at least keeping them under control. So herewith a few suggestions that might help:

We all fall victim to messages (there are more of them on the Flat as so much racing comprises of unknown quantities). Most message horses these days, especially those originating from the big training centres and certainly the big yards, are public property by the time the milkman is making his rounds. Chances are such messages have been embellished on route. That means you will not be the only person to know them. It also means invariably they will be short prices. Try to resist the various rumours this time of year that range from: will win the Craven/Guineas/ Derby to: is a Royal Ascot horse, unless such messages sit neatly with your own opinion.

There is an adage that goes as follows: when you select a horse, you bet a tenner. When the butcher that has been talking to the cousin of the feed man who knows the lad that has been riding work tells you it will win, you risk a hundred. Bad move!

Flat racing is obviously quicker than jump racing so races can unfold in an instant. As a result, it is easy to believe you have clocked an unlucky loser. Whatever misfortune appears to have befallen a racehorse in running, halve what you thought was its impact on the result and you will not be far adrift.

Don’t let morning market moves with the firms or on the exchanges put you off a horse you fancy if it appears weak in the betting. Most serious business is conducted late these days. Runners that had appeared friendless in the early morning market can suddenly assume the properties of hot potatoes when the right money surfaces. Even if it doesn’t, not every race is a foregone conclusion. It is possible to be right when the majority is wrong, particularly if you hold a view or have seen something that has gone relatively unnoticed.

Get all the help you can but remember yours is the opinion you have to live with. For that reason, rely on your intuition, remembering there may be those that know more than you do, but that your intuition has carried you this far in life, meaning it cannot be that bad!

You will make mistakes. Everyone in this business does! Don’t be too hard on yourself, allowing lapses of judgement to affect your confidence. Making a mistake does not make you a fool; failing to learn from it does that!

Take the ego out of betting if you can. In a weak maiden, 7/4 returns the same as 7/4 in a Classic. Although it is tempting to wish to back the winner of big races, you are often backing on the bookmakers’ terms. It is not football. We all have our favourite stables and jockeys; but they will forgive you if you don’t always support them. ‘Falling in love’ with horses can be similarly expensive – unless they are Zarkava!

If you are not in possession of an ante-post voucher at a fancy price for any of the Classics, resist the temptation to rush in when you see an impressive winner of one of the trials, or worse a winner of a maiden by clear daylight. It is too late for that now and the Classic jigsaw is full of pieces that fail to interlock in the next two or three months.

Don’t take the bull by the horns on Day One and punt as if the world is about to end. It is a long season and although we have a few clues as to the wellbeing of a couple of stables, there are plenty of other yards waiting in the wings to unleash useful types. Feel your way through the minefield that is the first few weeks unless you have reason to believe you are ready to hit the ground running.

Of course, in keeping with anyone dispensing advice, I am above it. It applies to everyone else, which is the paradox of counsel.

I am likely to be more active tomorrow than I have been since last October. As I write, I have the temerity to believe I have solved the day’s hardest handicaps. I consider Swop worth a punt in the Lincoln and that Slugger O’ Toole may be too good for Spectiat in the Spring Mile but that Fireside may beat them both. Then Whitcombe Minster can overcome a graveyard draw in the Roseberry. That is not all, as London Bridge will win the maiden at Doncaster.

I am not finished. Two Step Salsa looks banker material in the first at Nad Al Sheba. I am not convinced a return to six furlongs will be ideal for Indian Blessing in the Golden Shaheen and therefore nominate Big City Man as a solid alternative. On his best form and judging by the manner of his victory last time, Bankable is too big at 16’s in what I expect to be a tightly contested Dubai Duty Free. Youmzain is the form horse in the Sheema Classic and subject to a strong message but he is not entirely convincing. I cannot solve the World Cup at present, although there is no doubting the progressive nature of My Indy or the solidity of his form. He may not be good enough to beat Albertus Maximus and confirm earlier winning form with Asiatic Boy, but it may be worth paying to find out.

Easy this game isn’t it? If there is one thing I can impart with utmost confidence it is this: it is always easier the night before than on the day of the races. And as the race or races draw closer, so the harder it looks. Right now, buoyed by two cups of strong tea, I can see it all clearly.

That bodes badly! I hope you will be more circumspect.

Final thoughts will be posted on tomorrow’s Bush Telegraph.


AND ANOTHER THING

THIS IS A QUIET WEEK for those of us working in racing – at least the early part of it is. Monday offers Claiming and Selling day at Wolverhampton. For jump-racing fans I am told several short-price and apparent good things line up at Kempton in particular, and to a lesser extent at Plumpton. Tomorrow there is Flat racing at Lingfield, but the fields small, as are the chances of making any money. There is already the mention of the dreaded words – Gosden, maiden and fancied, although not necessarily in that order. Southwell dishes up a diet of jump racing that only warrants a second look from diehards, and there is another dollop of similar fare at Sludgefield [sic].

The week trundles along in similar but slightly better fashion until a jumping card at Ascot on Friday. It then explodes on Saturday with the start of the Flat turf season, condensed this year to a two-day weekend meeting from Doncaster. Kempton Park stages a premature part-Easter card, and from Dubai, it is World Cup night.

It would appear the early part of the week is a good time to paint the fence, cut the grass and tidy the garden. This is the time to make your peace with God or a pact with the Devil if you feel either is relevant.

If you are married or with partner, it is also a good idea to be nice to them now because they won’t be seeing much of you for eight months. It is Aintree next week, then another relatively quiet and, unusually, a five-day racing week – Good Friday interrupting the fixtures much to the annoyance of the major bookmakers.

After that, it is Craven week and there is no chance of much more than the odd day’s respite until November. You may never see your partner again. She could be packed and long gone by the time you next use the kitchen. You may notice one night, before you turn in with the sound of Nick Luck’s voice still ringing in your ears, you have a lot more room in your wardrobe and on the bathroom shelves and the bed appears wider.

It is a bit like being in jail and your sentence is about to start. If your partner is still with you by May, or even June, they might as well just leave your food – that is if they are still cooking on your behalf – outside your office door. From their point of view, your continued existence is apparent by the replacement of food for an empty tray left for collection. The occupant in that room akin to something from a Hammer Horror movie – ‘The master decried it never be opened,’ – presumably remains alive. You – that is the occupant – become the mysterious master only seen after dark. You lurk within an office equipped with a computer, a television, a desk, filing cabinets and some personal items such as bottled water, Hula Hoops, a can of corned beef, only for consumption in the case of siege or nuclear war. Maybe one of Dracula’s coffins would be handy after all.

Those knowing little of this room no one without an appointment ever enters can be confused. They believe some sort of half-man-half-beast resides within. He may be a tagged criminal, confined to this room as part of his communal punishment.

An occasional whoop of what appears to be delight emanates from this fortress of an office. This is odd as the man is alone, so such delight can only be self-induced. But more often it is the groan of frustration, or the clunking heavy sound associated with defeat. This room hosts a good deal of defeat. Perhaps, borrowing the title from the Bob Dylan song, it should be christened Desolation Row.

The man on the racing channel tells you the horse you backed was unlucky and presses knobs in his cubicle. He has an odd haircut. Like you he does not get out much, so perhaps when he visits the barbershop he has to make the cut last. He does not look over-concerned about your misfortune, so clearly has not backed the horse himself. He is earning a guaranteed wage so it would be a surprise if he backed anything for more than a fiver. He smiles as he checks one of his screens and infers bad luck is all part of racing; but there is a chance to recoup winnings in the following handicap that contains twenty runners. Before that, there is just time to take a quick break. Is there? Yes, the next race on the other channel is not due for twenty minutes.

The break consists of at least two advertisements for insurance. Sometimes the same insurance company advertises twice in one break. Every insurance company you can think of is advertising just now, so there must be more money in insurance than there is in trying to find winners of twenty-runner handicaps.

One of the insurance sites is, according to its geeky users, very friendly. That’s nice. It’s nice to have a friendly website to visit before you give them your credit card details don’t you think? One person strums a guitar, another looks as if finding this particular website has been her salvation. There is another who looks as if he is more accustomed to typing Hot Babes Dot Com into Google than Confused Dot Com. Perhaps he is confused after all, having expected Paris Hilton to pop up on his screen. All agree they have saved hundreds of pounds on their insurance. One says he has saved £200. £200! I only pay just over £200 for an annual car premium, let alone save it! Then I don’t get out much and have a restricted mileage clause.

Along comes Michael Parkinson reminding us that he has met lots of interesting people. He suggests if we are over-fifty we should consider financing our funerals. So we are back to coffins again. Perhaps this is appropriate for people watching a racing channel, but for a man that has met lots of interesting people, surely this is a bit of a comedown for Mr Parkinson. However, it is when you hear Stephen Fry and Paul Merton doing the voiceovers for Direct Line that you know there has to be more money in insurance than there is in gambling. These performers don’t come cheaply.

Why though do these insurance companies target people that watch racing? If they are watching racing, chances are they are gamblers. If they are gamblers, they do not give a fig for insurance. The only insurance they are concerned with is the type that keeps Mr Luigi from visiting them in the dead of night asking where his money is. There is no mention from Messrs Parkinson, Fry and Merton that their employers underwrite that. They cover our water pipes bursting, our cars getting crunched by articulated lorries; they want us to have a courtesy car if we crash because we lose our no-claims bonus and will have to pay even more for the next premium, but they don’t insure against concrete overcoats.

There used to be a popular saying that countries get the television programmes they deserve. Obviously, those that advertise on At The Races think we deserve insurance against stupid and elementary accidents – such as falling over on a shop floor or using the wrong ladder to climb a roof. Alternatively, they think we may be so uninsurable that we will snap up any policy thrown our way. They also think we need to stop smoking or are about to kick the bucket.

As I write, the first odds-on shot of the day, You’re The Top, has obliged at Kempton. Back on At The Races, two car insurance adverts have figured in between a squirrel trying to persuade us to invest in an ISA. Then there is an advert for cheese for those of us likely to be wasting away in our offices whilst we watch racing. Then it’s Accident Insurance, followed by another sort of insurance and ‘Everybody has an opinion, what’s yours worf?’

A 66/1 shot won the Claimer from the even-money favourite with a one-time Group-placed horse finishing last. Two dubious propositions in First Avenue and Dreamy Sweeney obliged as I was told they would; but I knew better and did not back them

Normal service is resumed: I know what my opinion is worf.


And Another Thing…

I CANNOT CLAIM TO KNOW VERY MUCH ABOUT THE IRISH. Unlike most of the residents of Chicago or New York, I do not have Irish blood in my veins, although my mother was from Liverpool so I can’t be sure. I do know U2 come from Ireland. That the country has won the European Song Contest more than once, which sends out a mixed musical message. By reputation, their potato chips are supposed to be the best in the world, and they are responsible for Guinness, Bailey’s and the resurgence of cider by the manufacture of Magners, something that has elevated the apple-based drink to a new level. I made the mistake of buying a cheaper case of cider recently; by contrast, the drink tasted sweet. You get what you pay for!

Ireland has great racing roots and friends regularly advise me to visit. Perhaps I shall combine a race meeting with just that this summer.

In the meantime, the Irish remain something of a mystery to me. This may be partly because I have difficulty in understanding what some of them say, especially the owners of Forpadydeplasterer, just as I do the Scots or people from diverse parts of the country. I know this sounds awfully toffee-nosed and typical of a southerner who rarely ventures further north than Oxford. I spent some time in Yorkshire back in the nineties, but fled, when at a market a man about to be served demanded, ‘Two pounds of tatties luv.’ This lack of common culture was the last in a long list of difficulties I as a southerner faced. It is no exaggeration to say that within a fortnight I had left my house, loaded a small saloon that became even smaller when crammed with too many cassettes, the odd item of furniture, and an adopted Doberman called Zulu. Together we made a dash south on the M1. Zulu spent most of the journey sleeping and listening to Pink Floyd. He liked our new home, which we bought without seeing and where we spent ten years before his sad demise.

A female eventually replaced Zulu – a woman I mean, not a bitch, officially that is – but it was not the same. I suppose I should have realised it would not be. Zulu was his own dog, better known, and I suggest better liked in the village than his owner. I am afraid he slept in the bed alongside me, rather like his substitute. Unlike her, we never went to bed after a bitter exchange of words. He made little in the way of demands and was not subject to mood swings. His replacement stayed for three weeks before she tired of doing what Zulu could not and the fun dissipated. Zulu was great fun for twelve years and only left when nature took over.

Most of our home planet is a mystery. There is little point in wrestling with its complexities. I would like to see serious changes in parts of the world but I daresay those places I could cite would like to see changes in our society. Some things remain inherently wrong: bear baiting in Pakistan, abject and unnecessary poverty along with big game hunting in Africa, Japanese whaling, Asian sweatshops; we all know the things we would wish to change. Yet a formula that could bring the world together so that we follow a common agenda has proved elusive.

So Ireland, although not an alien culture, is still one that criss-crosses our own. One thing we have in common though is a love of the horse. Put three people on top of a racehorse; an Englishman, a Scotsman and an Irishman, and I suggest the Irishman will quickly become identifiable. He is the one that sits still, with hands looking as if they regularly wield a shovel (like all jockeys’ mitts) holding the reins with a feather touch.

Watching Richard Hughes on Scintillo at Kempton on Wednesday night, I was reminded just how good Irish jockeys are. Had Hughes been the victim of misfortune on his way to the Sunbury track, getting caught in traffic or suffering a prang of some sort, Richard Hannon could always have contacted me. In which case, even allowing for overweight and inadvertently launching my run up the stands’ rails because I could not negotiate the turn tightly enough, I probably would have won on Scintillo. I dread to think what James Willoughby or our generous friends from Kentucky would have made of such an exhibition. Richard Hughes on the other hand was pure style, impressing some of the American visitors with his composed, unruffled ride. There was a point when his nonchalance suggested he was about to extract his Nokia from his breeches and ask the wife what was for dinner. Like most Irish jockeys, he is poetry on a horse. He is part of the animal he rides; it is difficult to see the join. He and his mount look as if Philip Blacker has sculpted them from one piece of bronze. This is not just a eulogy to Richard Hughes, although admittedly I am a fully paid up member of his fan club. The same applies to Messrs Ahern, Kelly, Murtagh, Spencer, Murphy, Walsh, McCoy, Geraghty and Carberry. Any exclusions in this list are not deliberate. There is something about Irish jockeys that places them apart from other horsemen. Admittedly they cannot stand up on a horse’s back and light a cigarette as Cossacks can, nor can they do a forward somersault in mid-race, but then there is not much call for that at Kempton Park.

Perhaps it is because Irish horsemen are born and not made. Most of them return from their birth at hospital on the back of a cob. They start riding in earnest before they can walk, often before they can talk; definitely before they learn to conjugate a verb. Rather than drift into racing, they do so because, like the Colonel’s son that attends Sandhurst, it seems the logical move.

Many British jockeys only follow such a career path because of their size and weight. That and the fact it seems preferable to the options. As a result, Irish jockeys have something of a head start on lads sitting on a horse for the first time when attending the excellent British School of Racing.

It is not my intention to draw a line between the riding standards of the two nations. There are many fine British riders, some of them from racing dynasties. There is the legend that is Lester Piggott; from the same era the Smith brothers, Willie Carson and the bobbing Australians that were Bill Williamson, Ron Hutchinson and Scobie Breasley. There was perhaps the most stylish of them all, Joe Mercer. Of the present crop, The Hills brothers are tidy; George Baker and Alan Munro canny. Ryan Moore and Seb Sanders are outstanding. Other countries are responsible for great riders. Frankie Dettori is one of the best of all time. Plenty of Brazilian, Mexican and American jockeys have brilliant records.

But there is something about watching the likes of Hughes or Spencer when they are at their best, that results in a sharp intake of breath. As with Frankie, they make the difficult look easy – everything they do looks natural. And watching Richard Hughes in action yesterday, merely reminded me that over the coming months, we will be witnessing similar Horse of the Year type displays from those who eat a Mars a day, a pick of chicken or fish, and drink a thimble of wine once a week in order to keep the show on the road.

Thanks lads…


AND ANOTHER THING…

RACING’S IMAGE HAS COME under scrutiny recently. What with Panorama claiming foul and the BHA dithering about whom they should persecute, or prosecute, I am not sure which, and then the BBC throttling back on its coverage; the Sport of Kings is in danger of becoming a Ship of Fools. Then along came last week’s meeting at Cheltenham, elevating the sport to the front pages of newspapers. Kauto Star and his team were responsible – that and the fact that the Queen had a runner in the Gold Cup, adding up to one of the best Festivals in recent years. I am not talking betting here as we all did our pieces apart from the Irish, and even they did not all latch on to the right horses.

Gambling aside, it has not been a bad week. I did think that the comment made by David Williams of Ladbrokes told its own story when he stated on television he didn’t care if Kasbah Bliss or Voy Por Ustedes got beaten, so long as one of them did. How sporting of him!

Of course, what we need more than anything in racing is continued sponsorship. All five Classics, plus the King George VI and Queen Elizabeth II Stakes and the Juddmonte International, are reliant on it. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but means we have to entice money into the game. The problem for racing with this concept is that, unlike other sports, outside bookmakers, there is no natural sponsor. Contrast that with motor racing that has a host of potential supporters. Apart from the teams of cars, there is the alliance forged between Seiko watches and Honda. No doubt, other such partnerships exist. Omega is synonymous with James Bond, Slazenger and Robinson’s Barley Water with Wimbledon, footballers endorse various products, the list goes on.

So do companies investing in racing get a good deal for their money? Clearly, sponsorship works best for big companies that can wheel all marketing tools at their disposal onto the racecourse. Quite apart from having their prize-giving ceremony televised, splashing the name of their company and latest product on television screens, there are hoardings strategically placed along the track. Then there are the girls with sashes – those strips of company-embossed ribbon that start at their shoulders and end at their thighs – for those that have looked at other attributes, and the various advertisements for the firm on the racecard. For a big company it is a fair deal, providing they are selling something that race-goers and watchers on TV like.

Therein lies part of racing’s problem. Just whom does the sport appeal to? Obviously, those that like a flutter or the fun of going racing, or those watching Tommo as they fill in the Saturday Lucky Fifteen. Whereas we all know that James Bond is suave, that some footballers are cool, and that Formula 1 symbolizes speed, what is the image conjured by horseracing?

To those not involved, owners and trainers in strange clothing, speaking as if they have plums in their mouths that have replaced the silver spoons they were born with, and jockeys who, if they ride jumpers, have teeth missing and scars on their faces. If they are Flat jockeys, with the exception of Frankie Dettori, they are not sex symbols. They are small, circumspect with what they say if they ride for a big yard, and use words not always understood by the listening public. Sayings like: ‘I had to call a cab at the ditch,’ ‘He put down on me,’ ‘I didn’t want to disappoint him,’ and ‘He dropped the lot’ sound as if they belong to another language. Unless you are a teenage member of a pony club, they are unlikely to be people you aspire to be. No free Omega for Michael Hills or Jimmy Fortune I am afraid.

Horseracing is a bit like boxing. The only people that are interested in what the players in both sports wear, both professionally and privately, are already converted. Amir Khan represents Reebok, but unless you are in the minority who follows boxing, or wears sporting gear, that fact is irrelevant. Yet we all see the connection between Seiko and Honda, we all know David Beckham wears a Police watch. We don’t have to hero-worship David Beckham to know that if he is prepared to give his name to the Police brand, it is an endorsement.

Horseracing can be difficult to sell. However, sponsorship does work because there will be constant reference to a race that turns out to be important or relevant enough. The Stan James 2,000 Guineas is something of a mouthful, but commentators know how the game is played and add the epithet whenever discussing the race. Sponsorship of the Derby for Vodafone worked, so did diamond merchants De Beers sponsorship of the King George at Ascot as at the time potential customers with a spare £100,000 existed.

Apart from advertising a desirable product, the best sponsorship as a title for a race is the one using a single name. There are still racegoers that refer to the Dante Stakes as The Mecca Dante, and the Tote Gold Trophy as The Schweppes; although they are a vanishing breed. The Coral Eclipse has stuck, probably because two short names work well together. The Ladbroke St Leger is something of a struggle, but The Ladbroke (the handicap hurdle) has now surpassed in the memory whatever it was it replaced.

Horseracing is primarily a male pursuit; as such, possibly Gillette, Wilkinson Sword, King of Shaves, Ben Sherman, Diesel and Citizen could consider the advantages. So could Toyota, although fellow Japanese car manufacturer Mitsubishi dabbled; but to be effective you need to have a race that can be called The Toyota, The Diesel, The Gillette etc. and to be of sufficient merit for it warrant a one word title. The John Smith’s Magnet Cup is a mouthful but one tends to put the two together without any difficulty. And of course the same firm has worked wonders with the Grand National meeting, backed up by their excellent, ‘You’re Barred!’ advertising campaign.

And there is always room for the Tommy Wirret Marries Sandra Sprocket Handicap (Class 6) at Southwell, which is good fun for all concerned and often cheaper than a stag do.

Perhaps we could have the Armitage Bog Standard Handicap. What about the Specsavers – See Where Your Money Goes Stakes? For smaller races, such titles are fine. They are infinitely better than the, Buy Your DIY with Homeworthy on WWW Dot Com Handicap. However, once you have a race merely referred to by the name of the sponsor, it is a case of mission well and truly accomplished.

Big companies are out there with a marketing budget. These are hard times to prise cash from them, but for racing, it is vital to provide every encouragement.


 AND ANOTHER THING…

ONE DAY TO GO and if the past three are anything to go by I am in trouble. Cheltenham is a wild town – a bit like Jackson in that old country and western song, you know the one where Lee Hazlewood, or is it Johnny Cash, says, ‘We got married in a fever, hotter than a pepper sprout; we been talking about Jackson ever since the fire went out. I am going to Jackson; teach them women what they don’t know how.’

‘Go ahead,’ says his wife, ‘They will laugh at you in Jackson.’

            Substitute Cheltenham for Jackson and you have it about right. They would be laughing if they knew what I had done.

Horses first. I knew it would be tricky but I did not think it would turn out to be quite so bad. One winner, the first of the meeting. I ask: what could be better – except I didn’t do it on its own and had nothing with it. But it demonstrated that I had not lost the touch, or so I thought. Wrong! Go Native was a fluke.

Wednesday was a disaster. Thursday not too bad if they awarded points for endeavour, but they don’t do that and I lost all the same. Nominating Powerstation as a value bet at 33/1, but backing it to win and not each-way does not make either sense or money. Backing Tidal Bay in an each-way double with Punchestowns was on the right lines but my cash stayed in the bookmaker’s hod.

The Cheltenham Festival is a race meeting devised by the Devil. His red airship even hovers over the course as he scans the place for lost souls. Business must be good. There are plenty of us about and the Devil knows where to look.

Deceptively, everywhere people are screaming with delight, chucking newspapers in the air as winning selections pass the post; cheering in the winner’s enclosure, drunkenly clapping their fellow conspirators on the back in the bars – that is everyone except you. You are sitting on the grandstand steps, thumbing through the Racing Post to see where you went wrong. The print comes off on your hands and you transfer it to your shirt. That expensive tie has a mustard stain on it, making it look like something from Primark. They ought to have a place where people that have backed losers can go and receive counselling. It could be a tent at the back of the Guinness Village, but well away from all the celebrations.

My name is Peter and I backed Pierrot Lunaire in the Coral Cup. Ruby Walsh rode three winners on the day. He rode Pierrot Lunaire and the combination beat three of the twenty-seven runners. The only positive thing I can say about my wager was that I took 20/1 and the horse started at 14’s.

My name is Peter and I backed Mad Max even though I was told he wouldn’t win from someone who knows these things. There was a point when I thought I was right and those that spend all their time in the Malt and Shovel or Luke Harvey’s pub at the top of Lambourn were wrong. Two out I knew differently.

My name is Peter and I backed What A Friend even though Ruby Walsh had shunned him to ride something else – the winner as it so happens.

My name is Peter and I backed Tidal Bay even though the trainer said he had not been able to get enough work into him and he would be pleased if he finished fourth. I backed Tidal Bay each way in a ten horse race, where even the most generous of bookmakers stop paying at third place. Tidal Bay finished fourth just as the trainer said he might. At one point, the horse was so detached I thought he was on the way to the station to make his own way back to Cumbria.

Cheltenham puts Jackson in the shade at night. To be honest, I suspect that on non-race days, Cheltenham is just an ordinary town with WI meetings and theatrical evenings and halls half-full of people listening to lectures about mating badgers. On race days, it is somewhat different. The circus is in town.

The bars are crowded. There are a lot of people wearing green and drinking Guinness. There are long-legged girls who seem to have lost their boyfriends. They are able to differentiate between those that have won a lot of money and those that have not. They have a sixth sense that allows them to tell winners from losers. It seems a pity they cannot do this before racing starts, but I suppose they don’t have to. None of them make a beeline for me. Suddenly bald men with paunches seem to be making a comeback as they attract these ladies into their raucous circles and before long are buying them champagne.

During a quiet five minutes by her standards, I have the chance to talk to a girl called Brooke. Her real name, or so she says, is Amanda. I try not to stare at her cleavage or at the way her skirt finishes where it starts. She comes from Birmingham and is not at Cheltenham for the racing. I tell her I am a journalist.

I figure if she can lie about her name, I can lie about my occupation. She is not impressed. I tell her I am thinking of becoming a gigolo. The hours seem reasonable and the perks attractive. I ask if she has any tips. She says she has heard that Kauto Star will win the Gold Cup. I ask her if she knew Denman was an Australian wine. Even before I finish the question, I sense as a chat-up line that it is the equivalent of Mad Max. I am losing her but persevere. I tell her I am wearing a Jaguar suit and that I have just bought a new Police watch. I ask if that will help in my new proposed profession. She doubts it and suggests I start up my Jaguar and head for another table. I tell her this is my table and she nods before tottering off in Prada shoes as she chews gum, leaving me to wonder how Wrigleys and Moet taste together.

Like the racetrack, it seems the bars are reserved for everyone except me. I wait half-an-hour for a beer. I must have LOSER etched on my forehead. Eventually a barman takes pity and serves me a pint poured in a glass just dipped in dishwater. I take a swig of the beer but need to go to the lavatory and I know once I have left my drink it will either be downed by someone, or have a Tote ticket floating in it when I return.

Cheltenham is not for me. I should never have come. I could have watched the racing at home and gone to see Slumdog Millionaire and saved a fortune. Instead, because I cannot drive home after having had a drink or five, I am marooned. That means in a few hours I shall be incarcerated in a top floor room, sharing a bathroom with four other people.

I have looked at Friday’s cards and fancy Walkon, Mamlook and, most of all, Tourist at Wolverhampton. I know neither Walkon nor Mamlook will win as they are too obvious and the obvious is reserved for everyone else. So, I might as well get an early night, drive home at first light and then back Tourist in the evening.

Or I could mingle in the bar and see if there are any, shall we say, more mature and unattached ladies looking for a good time and waiting for someone in a Jaguar suit, sporting a brand new Police watch to provide it. Trouble is, I haven’t a clue who to introduce them to.


AND ANOTHER THING…

JUST IN CASE it has escaped anyone’s notice, we are in the midst of Cheltenham 2009. We are one day down with three cherished days of racing left. Yet even now, we have the trickle of quotes for next year’s event. Go Native has been quoted for the 2010 Champion Hurdle, as if anyone would be mad enough to back anything for an event that is 364 days away as we speak, when we have yet to settle the 2009 championships.

To cap it all, Matt Williams advises in today’s Racing Post that Celestial Halo is a standout bet at 16/1 for next year’s Champion Hurdle. Is he bonkers? Perhaps he is psychic. Perhaps he is both – a mad psychic in fact. Would that make him a psycho? In that case, he is trying to send us a coded message for Tony Martin’s eight-year-old in today’s Coral Cup?

Does he have a pack of tarot cards and a crystal ball by his desk? Should we call him Matt The Mystic? Dare we ask how far he can see into the future? I wonder if his powers extend to beyond March 2010. Perhaps he can predict when the world will end. Is he a reincarnation of Nostradamus?

I am sorry Matt. I am taking unfair advantage. But when you write drivel, you must expect a reaction. I daresay I write plenty of it and anyone is welcome to tell me so without me seeking editorial refuge. When you stick your head above the parapet, you run the risk of it being chopped off. That goes with the territory in this business and I mean Matt no harm.

But, actually, what we would really like Matt, is a standout for today, or maybe for tomorrow or something in the Gold Cup. If necessary, you can take your time and come up with a standout for Uttoxeter on Saturday, or even something for next week. But leave the fortune-telling to those astrologers in the newspapers.

Some of us may not even make it to next year’s Festival, let alone be in a position to cash in chips held on Celestial Halo in the Champion Hurdle. Celestial Halo may not even make it to Cheltenham himself. No, there are no standout bets for next year’s Festival. Let us try one trick at a time and concentrate on what is on the table this year.

And if this piece somehow comes round to haunt me this time next year and I am still around, I shall be the first to write an apology and officially christen Mr Williams with the moniker of Matt The Magnificent, or Mystic, or Miracle-worker, which ever seems the most appropriate. If necessary, I shall even write it into my will so that in the event of my premature demise, a letter from my solicitors will reach him informing him of his new status, attained in that place that is supposed to exist high above the clouds.

 

AND ANOTHER THING…

SO THAT IS IT THEN: no days to go: Cheltenham is upon us. No more levity, no more jokes; this is serious. It is the meeting to end all meetings for jumping fans. It comes after the vagaries of winter (and there have been plenty of those this year), signals the onset of spring and the promise of better to come. But for the Die Hard, John McClane enthusiast, this is it what National Hunt racing is all about. And because it is the oasis in a four-month desert, it is all the more eagerly awaited.

That is its magnetism; however, Cheltenham places serious demands on horses and punters alike. I consider it the hardest meeting of the year as far as winner finding is concerned. I suspect bookmakers agree as they market the Festival furiously in a manner akin to a football World Cup.

They claim this is it! Let battle commence. It is a time to support your own would-be champion, to settle old scores, to prove who is the greatest of them all! No, it is not. It is a race meeting – a damned good one – but a race meeting nonetheless. It is not the Somme – Argentina V England, Italy V France or Rangers V Celtic. Forget all this guff about it being some sort of partisan competition. The only battle out there for punters is one of financial survival.

As a spectacle, Cheltenham has it all: beautiful scenery, great racing, and a pleasant enough town to entertain those staying over. As a punting medium, it is a proverbial minefield. The problem with this meeting above all others is that it places a premium on qualities many of the participants have not proved they possess. Therein lies a problem.

For a start, the track is undulating and extremely tricky, with fences strategically placed to present horses with maximum difficulty, particularly when approached at speed. To negotiate the circuit successfully, horses need to be athletic and agile. It is also essential they obtain a rhythm early, as there is invariably a frantic pace. Horses fluffing an early fence find before they know it the next one is upon them, then the next, and as they expend energy just to hold their position, all chance seeps away. Even if travelling well, there are the cunning downhill fences and hurdles to overcome. Here, the landing side runs away from horses swooping toward turf in full-flight, and struggling to organise an undercarriage not in the lock position. That is Cheltenham and to the sort of horse that has been lobbing along a park course on the bridle before quickening away over the last two obstacles, it can come as a major shock.

I do not mean to sound pessimistic but this place finds horses out.

Favourites are invariably too short and often the results fail to stack up. Much as I prefer Cheltenham as a venue, Aintree’s Mildmay track offers the punter a much better chance of winning.

My strong advice this week to punters is to make enjoyment of the racing a priority. Pick your bets carefully. Look for the sort of horse that has form at Prestbury Park or that you feel, for whatever reason, will cope with the demands it faces. Bookmakers, who have had long enough to consider such contenders as Binocular, Kauto Star, Cousin Vinny, et al are unlikely to have incorrectly assessed their chances. If anything, the prices are too short. You don’t know anything about these animals that they don’t. Although it is tempting to be swept away with the hysteria of the whole shebang, because backing a 7/4 winner of the Gold Cup or Champion Hurdle will give you a buzz and is something you will remember and crow about, think long and hard. This place takes no prisoners. Therefore, unless you have a strong opinion about one or more of this sort of horse, throttle back on the betting a little and enjoy the racing more.

To that end, I have devised an alternative way of betting that can be fun and at the same time cost a lot less. It also offers the chance of a handsome win. At meetings such as this, I often back multiple bets and use what I refer to as the two-by two method. Because the prices of fanciable horses are often attractive, and because only a few races can be named in one, this is my alternative suggestion. It is one not open to most punters simply because they do not understand how to work out the staking. It is possible to back more than one horse in a race in, for example, doubles and trebles, so long as you know how to work out the staking. The most obvious example is the straightforward accumulator – not recommended at Cheltenham – but it is a good starting point and serves the purpose of this argument.

Pick three horses in one race, two in another two, and three in the last and the total number of wagers is 3x2x2x3, equalling 36. In this instance, at least thirty-five of these bets will lose. But if one line wins at the sort of prices Cheltenham throws up, you will recoup your stake many times over. Even with a couple of 2/1 shots slung in, mix those up with a 10/1 and an 8/1 winner and you are looking at a return of £891 for an outlay of £36. Now, as I stated, the chances of pulling an accumulator out of the hat is remote. But in multiple bets, just one fat-priced winner boosts the winnings enormously. And it is not unlikely that a 25/1 or 33/1 shot could be on your short list. Most days contain a race that is eminently solvable – the favourite looks strong – the second or perhaps third favourite the only reasonable danger. Make that your starting point. Your two selections are 2/1 and 3/1.

Two selections in one race means two bets. Now look at the next race of interest. It may be tough but you feel you have a chance of naming it in three. Your fancies hover around the 8/1 mark. So you have three selections in race two. Race three is of a similar nature. You fancy one at 12/1 – not unreasonable as it could be third or fourth favourite if the field is large enough. You consider there are two other horses in the field with major chances. Of course, something unconsidered at 50/1 can punch a hole in the best thought out logic, but that is unavoidable. What we are attempting is feasible, and we only need to pull off a bet like this once during the four days.

In the example given we have two horses in the first of our races and three in the other two. Combining them in doubles and trebles, gives you a total of 21 doubles and 18 trebles, or 39 bets. Using a pound as our unit, your outlay is £39 but at the start of play, you have 39 chances to win.

Now let us look at what you can win. I have been somewhat conservative in the prices of the chosen selections. One double at the lowest prices – 2/1 and 8/1 returns £27. You have lost a round of drinks. One double at 12/1 and 8/1 returns £117. Not bad, a profit that exceeds three times your stake. Three winners, at 2/1, 8/1 and 12/1, not as far-fetched as it sounds at a meeting where they often bet 6/1 the field, nets £534 for £1 units. Multiply that by a stake of ten, you win £5,340! Substitute the 12/1 winner for one at 33/1 (as stated 33/1 shots here can be fancied, even if second, third or even fourth choices) and the total returns to a £1 stake rockets to £1,371. As stated, it is one way of regulating your stake throughout the week and you only need to pull off the jackpot once. Whilst waiting for it, hopefully, you will get a return or two.

There are various ways you can alternate this type of bet. A Binocular-type banker – if that is what you think he is – is handy as one selection in a race cuts the number of bets down to size.

A Lucky 15 with two selections in each race, requiring any selection to win and therefore to be permed with any other or others that are successful, requires a stake of eighty units, or £80 in our example. That may sound a lot, but if you fail to select even one winner in eight selections in four races, then it is not going to be a profitable day in any case. And remember, only one winner means it figures in four bets, with its price doubled in each instance.

A Yankee containing two lots of two horses in their respective races, a banker in the next, and three in last, means a stake of £63.

This sort of ‘wasteful’ staking works at places like Cheltenham and Royal Ascot simply because prices for horses with half-a-chance are so much bigger than they are at Wolverhampton on a wet Wednesday.

There is a formula for working out the staking but I don’t want to cloud the issue any further. If in doubt ask your bookmaker; but take my advice, insufficiently clued up staff in betting shops are unlikely to be able to assist. So bets of this nature are best placed over the phone where skilled operators are on hand.

Suffice to say this has worked for me on some occasions and kept me out of trouble on others. It is something to consider and maybe a way of betting that is distinct from the hard-hitting single approach that tends to flourish at places like Cheltenham. The two systems can be played side-by side if preferred.

To my mind, perm betting in multiple bets makes far more sense than attempting the Lottery-style practice of trying to win the infernal Scoop Six.

Okay, the returns from my proposed form of betting are not as big. No millions will be won my way, but then, be honest, unless you are going to shell out a fortune in perms in some of those impossible hand-picked handicaps, you didn’t really expect to win the Scoop Six did you?

However you play it this week, play it cool!

AND ANOTHER THING…

BOOKMAKERS AND BANKS are somewhat similar in that they get their hands on our money, if only for a while; but when you are a big conglomerate you can turn very short-term money transfers into big profits. As a bonus, when we die, or have so much, or so little, dormant accounts containing deposits are often overlooked. Therefore, bookmakers and banks find they get to keep our money, which is even better for them. All those little accounts that had twelve pounds and eleven shillings in them growing like fertile eggs by the day; all those Lucky Fifteens that almost but not quite recouped their stake. It is all about volume; little fish tasting sweet and all that, especially if you have a net full of them. Little wonder then that bookmakers in particular like to encourage us to avail ourselves of their services.

Ladbrokes reckon everybody has an opinion and they want to know what ours are worth. I suspect they know, but it is a good come-on – bit like the ‘Do ya feel lucky punk?’ adage so famously spoken by Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry.

Judging by the websites, the micro sites, the circuses that are the Cheltenham preview nights, there are plenty of opinions in circulation just now. It remains to be seen quite what they are worth, or ‘worf’, as the Ladbrokes spokesman says on the advertisement.

Depending upon whom you listen to, Cheltenham seems easy this year. Simon Clare of Corals (nice man) gives the impression he is quaking with fear at the prospect of betting carnage for bookmakers. The prospect of JP McManus (very nice man) mopping up several of the major handicaps has allegedly caused bookmakers to hyperventilate with worry. I think not!

Winning races at the Festival is notoriously difficult. Plenty of people seem to think Voy Por Ustedes is a good thing in the Ryanair Chase, which seems appropriate enough, as the literal translation from the Spanish is I Go For You. We know he goes for Robert Thornton. Let us hope he goes for all his followers. We are told that in the Champion Chase, Master Minded is as unbeatable as is possible. Oh, and then either Binocular or Celestial Halo will win the Champion Hurdle. And we might as well just send the prize to Mr Doumen and save Kasbah Bliss the trouble of flying over; Diamond Harry will win the Ballymore Properties Hurdle and Cousin Vinny will kick-start the meeting by romping away with the Supreme Novices’.

Yeess, as Jeremy Paxman would say, but when are you going to tell me something that I don’t know.

Who cares? This is Big. No, it is Huge. It is so big they should rename it the Big, Big, Big Festival. Whatever it is called officially, it is The Big One; the one jumping fans have waited all year for. Why, after the final day, they were counting down to this year’s Festival – just 361 days to go they said. Now we are down to four days, coincidentally the same time it takes to run the Festival, unless the weather intervenes and they squeeze four days racing into two, in which case it saves on expenses but addles the brain. Then Cheltenham addles the brain anyway.

At a time when racing is desperate to market itself, it strikes me that there is something elitist about the presentation of the greatest jumping dates in the calendar. Presumably tomorrow there will be just three days to go, and on Sunday it will be two, and then on Monday it will be a case of – Don’t forget to pack an extra pair of brogues Jeeves, as there is only one day to go.

To go to what? you can hear non-racing people ask.

What is this big, big thing that is happening? I know we are having a new kitchen delivered on Tuesday, but surely that doesn’t warrant all this fuss.

Are we going to invade somebody again?

Is it the French?

Has Iran upset us by taking more service personnel hostage and dressing them in bespoke Iranian suits?

Is Beyonce about to take part in a concert in the nude?

No, there is a race meeting at a place called Cheltenham.

Really, I didn’t know we had a Formula One track at Cheltenham. Is Lewis Hamilton taking part?

No, it is horses.

They are pulling racing cars with horses?

No, the horses are racing.

Oh! Well they have plenty of race meetings every day don’t they; what is so special about this one. It’s not as if it is the Grand National or anything is it?

No, it is kind of the equine equivalent of the Olympic Games.

Horses don’t throw the javelin do they?

No, they race and jump over fences and hurdles, and the winners of the races in question get crowned the best in each discipline.

How many disciplines are there?

Two. Hurdles and fences. Oh, and they have one Flat race.

So they have three races then.

No. They run over different distances.

Well, how many races are there.

About twenty-six I think.

That’s twenty-six disciplines then. That’s a lot of discipline. Is Miss Whiplash going to be there?

Look, just piss off will you. Isn’t EastEnders about to start?

You see the problem for the uninitiated. Perhaps we have to work out a better way of marketing the meeting as an experience, incorporating four days in the country rather than copying NASA with a countdown and calling it incredibly big.

There is fine dining, along with the best of British and Irish culture. Everyone attends in fancy dress that has to include one article of tweed, or trousers of cavalry twill – hacking jackets for the gentlemen, along with shooting sticks – and a Hermes scarf for the ladies.

The reality is somewhat different. Unless you are in a private box, the only dining you will experience is likely to come out of a polystyrene container. That Hermes scarf will go unnoticed in the Centaur Bar, unless an inebriated racegoer adds a splash of colour to its pattern by one means or another. And it does help if you have a strong bladder, or preferably one attached to a catheter. There is also the small question of finances. This big event is likely to set you back as much as a week in the Maldives.

No one has asked for my opinion about the good things at the Cheltenham. I have received no invitation to sit behind a long table and nod sagely alongside John Francome and Mike Cattermole. This is probably just as well as my record at the meeting is questionable. But if you want to know, I can nominate Master Minded, Voy Por Ustedes, Cousin Vinny (although I had never heard of him before last week), Kauto Star and Binocular along with the best of them.

Yeess!

Actually, I have a nomination. I think Walkon will win the Triumph Hurdle. I, me, that is myself, believe that he will be even better on a slighter sounder surface and has the profile of an improver and looks a most willing competitor. Contrast that against Zaynar (nasty piece of work), described by those close to him as the biggest bastard at Seven Barrows. I know he is not putting himself up for election or entering the X Factor, but this is not the Heavyweight Boxing Championship of the World either. And Zaynar should know prizes are not dished out for storming up that hill snarling and asking the crowd if they want some! No, nice, eager to please Walkon fits the bill. He could be one of several winners for the Alan King stable, a yard that has managed to maintain its form throughout the season, which is no mean feat.

So bring it on!

How many days is it now?

Still four, but tomorrow it will be three.

Anyone know how many days it is to Royal Ascot?


AND ANOTHER THING…

THE PLAN AFTER LAST WEEK’S COLUMN was to make a couple of belated New Year’s resolutions and become a better person. I should have known it was asking too much. The signs were there in that very article when I had to take a swipe at Red Nose Day or whatever it is called. Decent people don’t do that, even if they think it is a stage-managed piece of self-indulgence. They keep such thoughts to themselves and say how nice it is that we are depleting the national economy further by giving chunks of it to Africa so that their military can buy more automatic-weapons.

Obviously, I am not cut out to be a nice guy. I try: I don’t deliberately run over cats, although privately I feel we are overrun with the damn things and that they are a bloody nuisance, whose sole purpose is to fool human beings into believing they are cuddly and nice. In reality, all they wish to do is to kill wildlife and urinate in our gardens. The only cats that count as far as I am concerned have spots, manes or stripes and live in the wild.

They say the written word doesn’t lie. You can put on a front in person, on camera even if you are adapt enough, but the written word is rather like your handwriting; to an expert there is no hiding place. Grant a person word space and their true personality will emerge between the lines. No matter; better you know whom you are dealing with.

This has been a quiet week. To alleviate the boredom, I ordered a watch on Amazon that I did not need. I posted a response on a blog that I suspect was none too kind. I also shouted abuse at my television set, directed at Richard Kingscote for his ride on Sir Liam. If he heard me, he has decided to delay his reaction – pretty much as he did on Sir Liam. Apparently, he is some sort of martial arts whizz. Maybe I would have been better picking on Cathy Gannon, but she has not cost me money.

On the plus side, I have to say that for a man that could barely handle Question Time in the House, Gordon Brown is showing promise. His speech in Washington, in front of the world’s cameras and political pundits, went down reasonably well. He is beginning to look like an accomplished politician. He is no Tony of course, but then who is? I saw somewhere that Mr Brown, the Prime Minister as opposed to the Scotsman that covers Hexham for ATR, has joined in the great BBC-should-cover-more-horseracing debate. If I read it in the Daily Mail, one of us is probably wrong. Apparently, a pile of signatures is growing on this subject and one day someone from the BHA, or Lesley Graham, will hire a van and dump a pile of paper, that represents a small forest, on the doorstep of No 10. Fair enough I suppose, except that if the signatures are from people with a vested interest in racing, then it strikes me they don’t amount to much in real terms, however many of them there are. How about a spokesperson for prisoners organising a petition to install 42 inch Panasonic Tvs in all cells? They could fill sheaf after sheaf of paper with lags supporting the cause, but unless those such as Paris Hilton, Boris Johnson or Bono joined in, it would lack some depth.

As a matter of interest, I did visit Number Ten’s website tonight but could find no mention of Gordon Brown endorsing the campaign for the BBC to do a racing U-turn. Maybe he is thinking it over, or has one or two other pressing matters on his mind. Possibly the BBC are similarly pre-occupied, particularly after the disqualification of the winning team on University Challenge. To make matters worse, the culprit – a man no longer a student – is a dead ringer for ex-jockey Jason Weaver, who was a damn good jockey, is a damn good tipster, and another very likeable character. As far as I know though, he is not conversant with Darwin’s Theory of Evolution.

Just as I am plummeting in my self-esteem, I have to shop John McCririck. Sorry about this John, but as anyone that has met you can attest, you are a nice man. Of course, this goes against the public perception built up over years of ranting and raving about this and that, but he doesn’t write a column of any description so has got away with presenting a false persona all his life. He gives money to the Greatwood Centre for the rehabilitation of racehorses. His wife, Jennie, is charming with a dry sense of humour and not the sort of woman to saddle herself with the oaf John pretends to be.

So never mind me. Gordon Brown is heading for statesmanship status. John McCririck is nothing but an old softie, and Britney Spears has brought out a new perfume. All is well with the world wouldn’t you say?


And Another Thing – Feb Archive

AND ANOTHER THING…

A GHOST IS WRITING THIS. A man that is out of form is as much use as an apparition. That’s me; for I am what is referred to as out of form. Except, at least privately, I contest this. No one is about to sit down and listen to my problems unless I am willing to pay £100 an hour; and if you can afford to pay people £100 an hour, then any problems may recede, if only fleetingly, depending on whom you pay and for what service.

Actually, I don’t think there is such a thing as being out of form. What happens is that from time to time we fail to obtain optimum results. No, this is not some sort of political spin; it is recognising that things cannot go our way all the time. This happens in every walk of life. It happens to jockeys who lose three photo-finishes in a row. To cricketers bowled out early in a couple of matches, to footballers who keep hitting the bar – the list goes on. What these little reversals tend to do is make us lose confidence in our abilities; it is as if some wicked witch has visited us in our sleep, removing what powers we possess so that we can no longer do what we used to take for granted. Except we can. Good jockeys will ride winners, batsmen will hit sixes; strikers will score goals. Lack of confidence is a killer blow; once confidence is lost it is a case of abandoning all hope ye who enter here!

In my case, what has gone awry is that I have not acted correctly on what turned out to be lucrative information. Horses I struggled to justify backing won at big prices. The trouble with news for outsiders is that by design, such beasts are hard to fancy. Why else would they be so attractively priced? So a certain amount of blind faith is required. Had I acted, even in a small way, I would have set myself up nicely for a serious crack at the forthcoming Flat season. Instead, I am in a vicious circle, wary of backing messages of a similar improbable nature, because missing crucial winners at prices varying from 16’s to 6’s means such a little spell is unlikely to be repeated. My inaction is a reminder of the complexity of this difficult business. To win you have to do everything just right. You not only have to nominate the correct horses, you have to back them, whilst filtering out those most likely to lose. I shall whinge no more about my personal circumstances; betting stories featuring what went wrong being second only in the boring stakes to rambling acceptance speeches at award ceremonies.

The important thing is to keep a perspective. Nobody has died. I am not in Afghanistan with bullets whizzing above my head. I have not really lost any hard cash. I have missed backing winners because I failed to like the look of them. End of story – move on! It does not indicate I have lost my touch for finding winners – I have tipped plenty of them recently on Bush Telegraph. What you tip, as in what you say, is not necessarily what you do! Tipping provides a safety net for the tipster. It is liable to make him look very clever or very stupid – as can anything consigned to print – but in this case, only the bank manager and the bookmaker know the true story.

Reversals are Nature’s way of bringing us down to earth. Without them we would all think we were clever, and as we are mostly foolish that would never do. Although in public, most of us are able to create an impression of being sane and in control; mostly we are stupid, particularly when in private. I would go so far as to say we are all inherently stupid and that the only thing that distinguishes a buffoon from a wise man is that the wise man is the less stupid of the two.

Reversals are meant to be humbling. They make us re-evaluate certain aspects of our lives. Me, I am thinking it is about time I behaved less like a hostage in a South American jail and more of a human being. My life is sifting away in my little office as I gawp at horseracing; so two months too late I am making a couple of resolutions. I am resolving to keep in regular contact with my true friends who tolerate my stupidity and think non-the-less of me for it. We meet few enough real friends in a lifetime after all. I am going to be more tolerant of my fellow planet-sharers. This may exclude those partaking in Red Nose Day – an event it seems to me designed to allow people a licence to pursue their darkest fantasies. These usually involve men attired in stockings, suspenders and copious amounts of make-up in return for persuading acquaintances to part with cash for obscure charities. And you are supposed put a red nose on your car, expose yourself in public, or indulge in something you always wanted to do but for which you could never find the time.

Now for something more uplifting: Cheltenham fever is gripping racing folk early this year. It may have something to do with this having been such a miserable winter. I fear that, and the fact so many dark horses will turn up for the Festival, will make it more challenging than usual. There is the bandying of names unfamiliar to me; but that can be excused, as I am primarily a Flat man. I am okay with the runners in the Champion Hurdle (is Ashkazar a big price?) and the Gold Cup, although there is the small matter of nominating the winners of these most prestigious of events.

I assume the Supreme Novices’ Hurdle is the first race on the opening day. This is the race where the crowd, mostly mistakenly believing they will leave Cheltenham richer in all things material and spiritual, cheer heartily as the runners are sent on their way by the starter. They do this on the opening race every day, but the volume gets turned down as the meeting progresses. Anyway, the favourite for the opening race on the opening day is Cousin Vinny. I have never heard of him. Is he a horse or one of Edward Gillespie’s long lost relatives?

I believe the Arkle comes next. I have heard of him (or Himself), but fail to recognise Golden Silver, Original, Follow The Plan and Made in Taipan. Have they despatched a contingent from the Far East this year?

Still on the first day, judging by the participants, the Cross-Country Chase looks like it is a satellite race due to be conducted on the Isle of Man, a place, rather like Wales, where letters are plucked from a Scrabble bag to make nonsensical names. Dix Villez, Drombeag, Freneys Well, Banister Lane and Tawnies figure prominently. Who are these people?

Before he rendered me nearly senseless, I once shared a few drinks with David Nicholson, so know a little about him. I knew never to match him drink for drink and that he was charming and engaging company and a man who had no side or prejudice.  I don’t know anything about the third-favourite for the race named in his honour. She is Quevaga. I suspect that is Spanish for something to do with bullfighting, but apparently Willie Mullins is the trainer, so maybe it has some other form of connotation.

In the William Hill Trophy Handicap Chase, Can’t Buy Me Time (song by the Beatles?) is favourite. I hope it will not be more of a case of Help! by this stage of the proceedings.

The list illustrating my ignorance continues. On Wednesday, there is Niche Market, Komati Kid, Mikai D’Haguenet and Alexander Severus all quoted in the lists. They are animals or otherwise of which I have no knowledge. Surely for those contemplating an ambitious wager in the Coral Cup, a reverse forecast Psycho and Mr Thriller would seem appropriate and topical, considering Paul Merton’s impending series on BBC concerning Alfred Hitchcock.

Whatever the results I suspect there is an element of dancing on the Titanic about those making the pilgrimage this year. Win or lose, they are determined to have a good time, as they never know when they might get another chance. They will wish to splash their shoes with Guinness or Magners, to squirt Moet on Viyella shirts built to withstand such misuse, and to laugh in the face of adversity as the losing tickets pile up. At night, I suspect racegoers will cock a snook at bad results as if they are trophies they have shot. They will be partying and whooping like it is 1999 to quote Prince, painting that little town cradled in the Cotswold Hills not purple, but a bright shade of red.

I am above such behaviour. Quaffing champagne and laughing at my betting misfortune is the equivalent of Sir Alan Sugar guffawing at the demise of Amstrad. In addition, there is of course, no point in me turning up. Being a ghost, my presence in the evenings is likely to turn the colour a whiter shade of pale.


AND ANOTHER THING…

YOU KNOW SPRING IS ROUND THE CORNER when the Racing Post carries a page and a half of adverts for accommodation in Cheltenham. Only the Irish could claim they have premises located in Birmingham City Centre with direct trains one hour away from the track. Actually, I have a three-bedroom bungalow south of Newbury that is an hour-and-a half’s drive away, and can whisk any would-be racegoers in style to Gloucester in my Japanese equivalent of an Aston Martin. It is something I could be persuaded to consider just so long as they do not puke Moet and Chandon in what passes as my back seat.

I have a decent wine cellar, am a good enough cook at five dishes to fool anyone for a short space of time, and it is likely such a venture would net more income than fiddling around trying to back winners at a place where my record is average to bad.

That is the thing with these big meetings. How many winners can you expect to back in four days? Two? One? More like none! Because the short-priced horses, however much you fancy them, are not value. So you try your hand at the bigger priced ones and they lose. It is a vicious circle!

Cheltenham is unique. Races are run at breakneck pace so it is vital horses can establish an early rhythm. Some can, some can’t; but throwing such a wild card at punters can upset the best thought-out plans. Form at Sandown and Haydock can become irrelevant. No, there are easier, if less spectacular pickings to be had mid-week at Southwell. But I shall get caught up in the hysteria no doubt, joining the throng in a search for a winner or two. Cheltenham is infectious. After that initial roar as the tapes flick up for the opening race – after that first glass of Magners or Guinness, and the endless quest for a lavatory that is useable – all reason flutters away to hover above the hills of the Cotswolds.

There is half a page promoting Cheltenham preview nights, where racing personalities all sit at a big table – rather like knights at an old Court – in front of a packed audience in a little room, becoming progressively more pissed as they drink glass after glass of red wine, all tipping the same horses.

But never mind all that, we have three clear weeks to go yet and three weeks is a long time in horseracing. The adverts are an encouraging sign. Ahead lies Super Thursday at Nad Al Sheba, The Winter Derby at Lingfield (unless they ran it while I was on holiday), the start of the Flat, and World Cup Night. The nights are drawing out, the spotlights in my office have survived another winter and are getting less use; we have two months grace from paying the bloody council tax – we have made it!

The Daily Mail has a lot to answer for. Their crusade to spread gloom and despondency throughout this land may have much to do with the surly and resigned nature of its people. Even if this country were run by a government requiring its citizens to work for two hours a day, three days a week, and ensured they were fed, housed and looked after appropriately, you can be sure the Daily Mail would find something to complain about. Now, in case some of us may actually be interested in what happens in Hollywood on Sunday night, they have run a piece that declares the winners of all the award categories at the Oscars. Apparently, this information has been leaked by a website. In my naivety, I always thought that the votes were sealed, that only the highest echelon in the Academy saw them as a final entity and that the counting was recorded on the afternoon prior to the ceremonies. However, I suppose that could have all changed. What the Mail purports to have revealed is hardly a revelation. They claim that the 1/100 shot Heath Ledger has won the Best Supporting Actor – well there’s a surprise – and that Kate Winslet has won Best Actress and Slumdog Millionaire Best Picture. Wow! Who would have thought it! What a scoop! Why, a treble on all three at current odds pays 8/11!

I once quoted a well-known bookmaker who refused to bet on anything that could talk. You can see what he meant. Whether the Mail turns out to be right or barking up another tree without roots, it is likely betting will be suspended and some of the anticipation of the award ceremony removed.

As well as the adverts for accommodation at Cheltenham, today’s Post seems to be moving into fresh pastures. They carry an advert on page sixty-seven for Sky channel 900. Personally, I rarely get above 432, but apparently Channel 900 promises fun from Playboy TV. Other channels included are Spice (I presume that is nothing to do with cooking), Climax (yes, I think I remember that) and Adult (some might question whether I qualify).  All for only a £1 for 12 days.

Now that sounds like a decent offer! And if I am to be entertaining ‘sporting and discerning gentleman’ for the duration of the Cheltenham Festival, it could be the sort of thing that will keep them quiet at night while I am attempting to sleep prior to the morning Cheltenham dash. I think that in the interests of business, I might just give it a try – purely to see if it will be suitable for my overall hospitality package!

       AND ANOTHER THING…

SO THEY ARE AT IT AGAIN! The BHA, with all the perseverance of Inspector Clouseau and one suspects an equal amount of bumbling, try once more to nail their men. Or so they say! To a degree, it is difficult to know the likely outcome as the BHA formbook of miscreants nicked is such a slender volume. This time they are again charging Miles Rodgers, jockeys Fergal Lynch and Darren Williams, along with a new face in the frame, trainer Karl Burke.

This is a tricky one! The BHA alleges they have a portfolio that traces back to 2004, when Tony Blair was still Prime Minister and we were all four-and-a-half years younger. Their case has taken five years to compile and resurfaces fourteen months after the Old Bailey acquittal of Lynch and Williams, along with Kieren Fallon in that West End hit, Pink Panther Goes To Court. Lynch and Williams (which is the lyricist and which the musician is unclear) are to be charged with instructing Rodgers to lay certain horses they rode. The races in question – only a small selection apparently and such records usually fail to provide an accurate picture – are divided in two. A list of twelve horses that were supposed to be lays include a 9/1 winner but exclude Notnowcato. Those that figure provide a level stake profit of two points for an outlay of twelve units. I make that the equivalent of betting at 1/6. I would suggest that is not a sterling endorsement for this as an operation. If these horses were lays – which has far more serious implications for the sport – as the biggest price was 4/1, it has to be said they do not have the look of anything more sinister than one person’s opinion. True lays need to be short prices. This list of twelve does not contain anything of that nature, meaning Mr Rodgers et al could have been taking advice from Harry down the chip shop. Once again, as occurred with the Kieren Fallon case, one gets the feeling that the BHA do not seem to understand the rudiments of betting; therefore any case they submit is liable to be seriously flawed.

What is apparent is that there is a pattern to their list. Either Lynch or Williams rode all of the horses supposedly on the lay sheet; and Bryan Smart and Karl Burke trained all bar three. This should not come as any great surprise as Lynch and Williams were presumably close to horses from the Burke and Smart stable. Fergal Lynch is now close to Philadelphia Park as he is riding in America after the Panorama programme insinuated he was a crook. So the musical has turned full circle, as Lynch finds himself a train ride away from New Jersey and Damon Runyon territory. Ironically, Runyon wrote that major film and Broadway hit Guys And Dolls, which was based on a short story called Pick the Winner.

There is a second list from the alleged mastermind, Fergal Lynch. This time there is no discernable pattern. They have the look of a random catalogue of bets, the sort most of us receive in the post every fortnight from our bookmakers. It purports to comprise of fifteen Lynch-inspired bets. Six won, nine lost. Now if these were win bets, Lynch is not a bad tipster as they netted a profit of over fourteen units. Possibly Lynch could consider launching a premium rate tipping service when he returns from the States, even if it is based in Pentonville.

It is tempting to assume that in Rodgers, Lynch and Williams found someone prepared to indulge their inclination to bet.

Jockeys are not supposed to bet for obvious reasons. These days they are not supposed to express an opinion but do so on a daily basis both on television and in the press. Trainers are permitted to bet but most of them are too busy chasing their bills to find the time. Karl Burke trains a hundred horses in Middleham. He dresses and speaks well and gives the impression of being the epitome of an ambitious young trainer whose life revolves round his horses. Like many a trainer in his position, from time to time, he may find himself in the company of potential owners he would rather avoid. But chasing such characters is the nature of the beast he rides. He is an in-between trainer, operating outside the money belt of Newmarket and Lambourn, attempting to carve a slice of new money. Without knowing the man personally, I would be surprised if he was anything other than a hard-working trainer with a limited knowledge of betting.

The sins of the double act that is Lynch and Williams are that they appear to have been caught infringing the rules. They are in difficult positions. Sometimes, to stop the whispering and accusations it is as well to admit the supposed crime or misdemeanour. Admit and some. Embellish it even. Nothing shuts newshounds up quicker than an admission. Yes, I am as gay as a theatre full of drunken actors. Yes, I had sex with my au pair and she hasn’t been able to stand up straight since. Yes, I made money out of the deal; now can someone send me literature on a second home in Monaco? However, sometimes a denial is the only option. If you are suspected of breaking the law or impinging the rules of your place of business, there is only one course of action – denial – Richard Nixon-style and hope David Frost fails to show up.

The case against Lynch and Williams is that they assisted Rodgers in a fraudulent practice, specifically the laying of horses on Betfair. Lynch is singled out as failing to ensure Bond City ran on its merits at Ripon in August 2004. These are serious charges and if unproven, could result in several members of the BHA needing to brush up their CVs. Clearly, by its reluctance to join the cast, the CPS and the City of London Police are either unconvinced or, still smarting from the Fallon debacle, not keen to repeat that exercise in court, leaving the BHA to reach its own conclusions.

Seek and you shall find. Racing is a pond with deep and murky waters. It always has been. Any pursuit that involves betting is shady. Similarly, most businesses are about money, meaning those in a position to handle it often have sticky fingers. Government – both local and national – is probably the worst example of misappropriation of cash. Only during the past seven days, Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, has faced charges she has, if not actively broken the law, misused parliamentary privileges over her expenses in respect of dossing in her sister’s house in the capital whilst claiming the maximum for a second home. It would seem there are plenty of privileges within Westminster. What is disappointing over the Smith affair is that we, the taxpayers, the people that provide the privileges, have a right to expect better from a member of cabinet and one holding high office. However, she has not, to the best our knowledge, laid horses on Betfair that she knew would not win. Now had she done that, forget the £100,000 plus she has taken from the public purse, she really would be in trouble.

Meanwhile, the BHA are intent on some form of re-run of the Old Bailey trial that saw them so discredited. They contend they have a packet of incriminating evidence against the persons named. They face a tough task on two counts. Firstly, they have to construct a case on a subject that is beyond most barristers’ comprehension and make it stick. Secondly, they will be relying on circumstantial evidence. They may have their way with Lynch and Williams. They are soft targets after all. Rodgers is impregnable it seems to me, unless he is to be charged with entrapment. Karl Burke is now subject to innuendo and worry. Unless the BHA is to drop a bombshell, they are likely to drag horseracing through more bad publicity.

Paddy Power often open a book on the most unlikely of events. I wonder what price they are offering about this case being thrown out of court, or of Burke being acquitted.

AND ANOTHER THING

Holidays

IT IS GOOD TO BE BACK! Really! It is my conclusion that a fortnight is too long to be away, especially if you are merely lazing in the sun. Such a confession is good news for me. I make my living from backing horses, and once it becomes a chore, my performance becomes affected. As it is, after a week of temperatures close to a hundred in Goa, India, I was aware of sinking into a rut. It was a case of pool, sun bed, sundowner, Singapore Slings and Gimlets under the stars, then curry for dinner. Fourteen nights – twelve curries. I think I may give it a week or two before I try another Rogan Josh!

And I think I will restrict future holidays to no more than a week. There are no plans although, like last year, the long-term strategy is for a few days in Los Angeles in November for the Breeders’ Cup, so long as it can be financially justified.

India is a favourite winter destination of mine, but is becoming increasingly popular and more expensive. As a country, it thrives on a confusion that does not always sit well with visitors. For example, the airport in Goa – no bigger than, say Southampton or Stansted – contrives to ensure that the three major international flights all arrive and depart within ten minutes of each other – resulting in bedlam. There is no air-conditioning. To heighten the anguish of passengers, the fans either don’t work or are not switched on. Pale-faced, surly Russians mix in a sweaty stew with Brits from the Manchester and Gatwick flights. We don’t like the Russians and they don’t seem to like anybody. They are very white and scowl a lot. Unless you speak the language, rather like the Japanese and Chinese, no utterance from them is comprehensible. The women wear perfume that smells like sweet chocolate, the men aftershave that does not smell of anything much, although it does sometimes seem as if a horse has piddled in their midst.

Leaving India developed into a mad scramble. Three plane-loads of holidaymakers were all trying to burst through one exit gate as the Tannoy-announcer panicked the disorganised tangle further by warning flights were about to depart. There was a time when I would have accepted such lunacy as part of India’s eccentricity, presumably inherited to a degree by the British Raj. Now, I imagined officials behind the glass looking down on us struggling travellers with wicked smiles on their faces. Sorry India, but this is no way to treat tourists whose money you court.

As it turned out, although we were late jetting-off due to contrived chaos, it transpired we arrived at Gatwick with about an hour to spare on Sunday night before the weather closed in. So returning produced a close shave of dissimilar but equally dramatic proportions of departure.

Hard luck betting stories are old news. I nearly left on a high. The Saturday of January 17th – my leaving date – featured a Lucky Fifteen on Group Captain, Titan Triumph, Turkish Surprise and Sunset Boulevard. Not being on hand to play each leg, there was little else I could do but try my luck in one attempt at a miracle bet. It nearly came off. Sunset Boulevard won at 9/1, with the other three running well and going close at big prices. On a different day, it could have been a case of a major victory. Although only returning a small win, the bet reinforced my belief that I am capable of making my own luck. This is not an attempt to talk myself up; however, self-belief is so important in this tumbledown business. When we lose, it is important to justify the bets struck, not to worry the house is about to be huffed and puffed away. My brush with triumph left me eagerly awaiting the next attempt. Although not able to participate, the win of Silver Mist in Dubai last Thursday was gratifying. Again, this is not a piece of self-advertising, but I did give him a positive word last time when he won despite a poor draw and racing over an inadequate trip. He proved marginally too strong for Third Set in a better contest. Whatever happens on the domestic front, Dubai remains a favourite hunting ground of mine for a raft of reasons, and I look forward to the remainder of the Carnival.

Walkon upheld what looks like strong juvenile form when winning at Cheltenham. He seems progressive and as if he could be even better on a less exacting surface. By all accounts, the powerful Henderson team introduced a very useful novice at Kempton. Tidal Bay, a horse I regularly fail to call correctly, probably failed to handle atrocious conditions over three miles at Cheltenham. His trainer, Howard Johnston, seems affable enough but makes some hard to justify decisions.

On the flight home, copies of Saturday’s Daily Mail were distributed. There was a nasty little article about the increase in slaughter of failed racehorses. We live in a world full of injustice and cruelty. Nevertheless, this sort revelation – predictable though it may be with the increase of racehorse ownership in such hard financial times – is like a telegram concerning a serving soldier in the Somme. It is personal and concerns all of us that make any kind of income from this industry. Far from being encouraged to participate in a sport that is beyond most people’s means, potential owners should reconsider. Owning a racehorse is close to madness unless you are Robbie Williams or David Frost. Chances are you will end up with a horse that will never come close to winning a race and even if it does, will never recover anything other than a small portion of its cost. Buying the beast will possibly prove the cheapest transaction made. Anyone who owns or part-owns a racehorse will find that barely a day will pass without some form of affiliated bill dropping through the letterbox. A bad horse costs as much to train as a good one. Costs for services you had hitherto only heard of will manifest. Farriers, vets, Wetherby’s and box-drivers all need to make a living and you will discover you are it. Even a horse that is not injury-prone (which most of them are) will cost at least £12,000 a year to train without all the add-ons. Potential owners are lucky to get away with twenty grand a year. Balance that against payments for a high-powered sports car, sending a child to private school, taking four luxury holidays a year with change and paying a Cheryl Cole look-alike to read you the Racing Post in stockings and suspenders each morning, and it is little surprise owning a racehorse is not at the top of any list of desirable acquisitions.

So I returned home, driving through a snowstorm that was already building up and slowing the M25, spotting a snow leopard somewhere through the swarm of flakes. Heading west, conditions improved but by Monday morning, a blizzard had left our Hampshire village dangerously white – quite a change from the oven that I had left on the sub-continent. But we are at the right end of the winter and let February do its worst: It is a short month, one that does not even require a council tax payment.

There was the mail. Usual stuff, mostly offers for a parting of the ways between my money and myself. There was nothing from the Inland Revenue, no accounts from bookmakers but the winter energy bills were waiting, disguised in white envelopes. The demand for money is set out in computer-speak. There is something sinister about the way the companies use words to whisper menace. We all know we have to pay the money, but the claim comes in a supercilious, almost menacing and leering way. You read the bottom line for a service you must have but that you have no control over. Suppliers are the equivalent of Micky The Fish at the door asking where his bosses’ repayments for that extortionate loan are. Mr Luigi don’t like to be kept waiting! Only in this case the approach is less direct but equally effective. Pay up or you may find future supplies expensively metered or threatened. Now you can imagine the soft-spoken – possibly female voice of a computer – speaking the slightly stunted spliced together impersonal words: This is your gas/electric bill. Please pay us £303.03. Thank you.

Not at all. My pleasure!

Why doesn’t such an approach work for the rest of us who have to fight tooth and nail for every dollar?


And Another Thing – Jan Archive

AND ANOTHER THING…

Succeeding

IT HAS BEEN A TOUGH couple of weeks for most people, racing folk not excepted: too many brown envelopes and not enough of the other kind. To compound any hardship for those of us in racing, the weather has wreaked havoc with the fixture list. Even allowing for the dearth in turf racing, the all-weather – so often a source of winter fortune – has been mostly dire. This is not an excuse for a moan. The end of December and the early part of January is traditionally a lean time for punters. It is a good idea to let the Kempton Boxing Day fixture take place and then book a winter break. We say the same every year, but somehow fail to get round to it at the right time. My blast of winter sun is set to start this Saturday [January 17th], meaning I will miss a couple of Dubai fixtures and some better class all-weather racing. Timing holidays in this business is difficult. We have to accept that if we want to get away we will probably miss something (not as much as we suspect when we return and see the results); it is the nature of the beast and returning fresh from a holiday is to our advantage.

But there is a chink of light in the distance. Whatever I miss or do not miss, it occurs to me that those of us making a living from racing are largely untouched by the current recession. As we are self-employed, we are at no greater risk of losing our jobs, or living than at any time. Racing continues and the challenges remain the same. The onus is on us to find and back winners, the odds of which are unchanged. I suppose for those of us that have a small earner from another racing-based activity (something I recommend for any professional backer: although it will fail to match losses, a regular income on which you can rely is priceless) there is always the chance that may be affected. However, in a way we are fortunate. Whilst trainers may be chasing owners for fees, bookmakers owed sums that debtors cannot pay; we punters run no such risks. Back the right horses and we collect. It seems to me little has changed. What this credit crunch has made me do though is to examine my expenses. Where possible I am throttling back. Once you question outgoings, it is surprising how much is paid without much thought. Savings can be made in newspapers, unnecessary phone calls (particularly on a mobile), and most of all on those bets that fail to fall within a proper remit. You know, the horse that is overpriced but is not going to win. The horse that can win in the unlikely event it recovers form from two years ago. At a time when opportunities are limited, it is tempting to fall for bets that we would not strike if we could choose from a proper menu. It is no good frittering away money just to keep your eye in, or because you are bored or think you could use a few bob.

If you bet every day, you are playing the bookmakers’ game; that is what he wishes you to do. Getting punters on the treadmill of picking horses out every day is the equivalent of a direct debit, which are easy to set up but difficult to terminate. The object is to relieve you of money, which trickles from your bank account without you keeping track.

Some direct debits make consummate sense: the mortgage, council tax and so on, but not every day expenses like the telephone or gas bills. As I said, they are remarkably easy to initiate but darned tricky to discontinue if you wish to change supplier or your payment method. I found this to my cost recently when switching to a free-call deal with AOL, only to find I am still paying B.T. and for the life of me cannot stop my direct debit with them. However, that is another story and something I must sort out when I have time.

Bookmakers rely on punters acquiring a betting habit. Get up, wash, shave, have breakfast, sort out a bet. It is not enough to say, this is the best I can come up with on a poor day; therefore, it is my bet. You need to make cold, calculated decisions. Operate the following criterion: if there were better racing elsewhere, is this a horse I would wish to back? If the answer is no, then it is not a bet just because it has been identified as the only possible opportunity on a bad day. Selectivity is vital if you are looking for serious and potentially profitable bets. You are not in a casino, taking a chance on this or that, playing hunches, betting on the twinkle of the Budweiser girl’s smile. She is dispensing free beer to distract you and because she has legs that reach the ceiling. That smile is reserved for everyone; the real smile – the secret one – for someone other than you.

To be successful in a pursuit as volatile as betting, it is essential you keep emotions in check. You need to expend all your energy on the business before you without becoming sidetracked. Focus on what you are doing, as ultimately you are a trader playing with your own money. You have no financial parachute when the day is done. When you lose, you have lost your own money. Presumably, you do not have the equivalent of Fort Knox staking you. Bad decisions or losing bets mean a reduction in your assets – in this case cash. Your personal bank, which you draw upon to finance bets, does not have never-ending reserves so at times reverses are hard to take. However, they are a fact of life for any betting professional.

If you are a trader rather than a backer you will be taking the scattergun approach, making a plethora of decisions, some good, some bad; all that matters in this case is how you end up at the close of business.

A cool, detached approach is doubly important for the reasons listed earlier. It is a funny thing but, try too hard in anything and chances are you will fail. Think back to all the good decisions you have made in life and chances are, you made them calmly and without feeling pressurized. It is therefore important not to put yourself under pressure to unearth winners. If they are not there, they are not there. Accept it and wait until the situation alters. Similarly, do not be afraid to back a horse at a decent price that others seem to have disregarded. There is no automatic safety net built in to backing short-priced horses. Many 2/1 favourites are no more likely to win than well-thought out 6/1 chances. Once you start to try too hard, although you may not notice it, your methods will alter, which will be detrimental as, assuming you are still standing in this business, you have proved yourself. Take a quick look at actors, sportsmen, performers in the arts, and they all have the same quality in common: that is they make the difficult appear easy. There are stories of various singers or actors vomiting before taking to the stage, but once they are out there, they switch into another mode, blanking out everything except their performances. To a degree, as a professional punter the same attribute is required. You may feel I am advocating that, for example, students should not study in earnest for exams. That is not what I am saying at all. Study and work experience are two separate issues, as graduates very quickly learn once they have left the cosy world of university. Once you have transcended the study stage, you are playing for real. Business is not an exam; marks count for nothing when money is haemorrhaging from your bank account.

If you follow the right course, you will succeed – that is providing you protect your stock – in this case your stake money. To this end, I refer to an earlier article focusing on deciding a bank. This is particularly important, as you need some form of financial independence to ride out a losing or dry run, something we all experience from time to time. Although it can be difficult, it is fatal to allow losing runs to influence decisions. Providing you have the necessary stock of money behind you and have staked within your bank, you have to ease your way out of a bad patch hesitantly as if negotiating a dark tunnel. If you try to blast your way out of trouble, your difficulties are likely to increase.

So, despite a slow start, I am entering 2009 with a degree of optimism. We have had one notable success this month and I see no reason why plenty of others should not follow. Of course, there will be dark days, eclipsed by the successes so long as we keep our heads. Many people are losing theirs at present, relying on credit to buy their way out of trouble. Throwing money at a problem never solved anything. Despite long faces in all industries associated with finances, ironically, considering we are in one of the most speculative businesses of all, I feel we, in this particular branch of the racing sector, will be okay.

This may be one of my last articles for a couple of weeks for reasons stated. I fly out on Saturday. I am bound for somewhere that is somewhat isolated and internet connection will not be possible, so I shall not know what is happening back home until my return. For me, that is a holiday. I want to switch off, forget about all aspects of gambling and return like a bull pawing the ground before being let loose into the ring. Only in my case, once that gate opens, I trust the outcome will be somewhat different to the fate of the unfortunate bull.


And Another Thing

MAKING IT UNSCATHED THROUGH 2009

This is the time of year when if we are not careful we make ourselves dejected by examining all that is wrong with us and trying, unsuccessfully, to make corrections. The temptation to think we can make a fresh start, write that novel, win the Tote Scoop Six, buy a second home in Miami, lingers in the ghostly background. To save such anguish, herewith an alternative and hopefully more realistic guide to surviving the next twelve months without the necessity to do anything other than tinker with the disarray we call our lives.

Resolutions first: Frankly, they can be a pain as most are destined to be broken. The most common New Year resolution is the desire and apparent need to stop smoking. If this applies to you, as an ex-smoker, you have my sympathy. If you wish to give up, it may help to be aware of how non-smokers perceive you. Smokers don clothes that smell as if they have been stored in an opium den in some Asian dock for a number of years. Their breath smells so stale it appears they have not cleaned their teeth for three months. Filmed over with nicotine, smokers’ dwelling places are like third-class carriages on an African train. Smoking shortens lives. Spare us the argument about Uncle Tommy who smoked fifty unfiltered Capstan Full Strength a day and lived until he was a hundred. He is the exception not the rule. Ask a million blind men to cross Oxford Street unaided continuously. One will survive; that does not mean it is a sensible pursuit for blind men to follow. If you want to give up smoking there are three things you can do.

Firstly, book a holiday to Australia. With a stop at Singapore, the journey takes over twenty-four hours. That means an enforced day without a cigarette, which gives you a head start. It also means you have blown your tobacco money for the year on a holiday. Smoking twenty a day sets you back £2,000 annually. When considered, that’s pricey to smell like an ashtray.

Secondly, stop buying cigarettes on the basis that every time you do, you are contributing to the Government’s exchequer and merely giving them more money to squander.

Thirdly, give up immediately – right now. Keep a full packet in the house and each time you get the craving, tell yourself you can have a cigarette in an hour’s time if you still feel desperate to light up. That way, psychologically, you have not really given up as such; you have postponed the moment. Once you start to feel better for not having smoked (it does not take long) you will see it as a contest between you and Benson & Hedges and one you can actually win.

If all else fails and you just cannot give up: stop reading about the effects of smoking.

Next, drinking. Unless you have a habit of waking up in a gutter with no recollection of how you got there with blood on your face and an empty wallet, give up drinking at your peril. Drinking makes you feel better and less stressed. Statistics show you are more likely to die of stress than alcoholism. If you drink wine or better still champagne, it gives you an interest, makes you appreciate the finer things in life, and instantly puts your worries into perspective. For advanced drunks there seems to be only one choice: to drink or not to drink. For those who can control it (not easy as alcohol is sly and only needs one shot to remove willpower), it can be a pleasant way of spending time with friends. I have heard it said you should never trust a person who does not drink. My other half does not drink – therefore cutting the supermarket budget in half – but I am beginning to watch her closely. That well-known drunk, philanderer, abuser of all he encountered including himself, and brilliant writer, Ernest Hemingway, once said: Always do sober what you said you would do when drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut.

Exercise: Don’t join a health club or a gym, it’s a waste of time and money. Save the time it takes to get there by working out at home. Save the membership money by finding a gym that is a mile-and-a-half away from where you live. Run there, round its car park and then back home everyday.

Dieting: Take my advice – forget it. You will put yourself through a regime you cannot possibly maintain in order to lose six pounds at best. When you have a rich meal and a bottle of wine, that weight will return. In order to punish your body you collaborate with its desire to become podgy, ending up heavier than when you started. Avoid all package and junk food. Other than that eat what you like within reason, eat slowly and work the contents off. Either the thought of having to run three miles the following day will prevent you from stuffing your face, or the exercise will keep you trim.

Be aware that (for men) there are three components of the body that have to be kept in check and if possible outwitted. The brain is the cleverest. It will lie to you, delude you in all things in order to keep the rest of the body functioning. It is like a twenty-year-old blonde sweet-talking a forty-year-old man – it lies. In its own way, the beard is equally clever. Just when you think you have found the perfect razor that leaves your face as smooth as a pebble, the beard will adapt and grow in a different direction, rendering the wonder razor as ineffectual as the others you have in your bathroom. That is why makers of razors are constantly bringing out new ‘improved models.’  Given the chance, the penis will rule the entire body. It cannot be trusted as it has its own independent agenda. A number of devices increase sexual arousal in women. The penis does not figure at the top of the list. German manufacturers, Mercedes Benz, BMW and Audi mostly occupy that place.

Gambling. Never strike a bet that, because of its sheer stupidity, keeps you awake at night after it has lost. Most bets will lose but there is nothing worse than the bet that was poorly thought out, placed in the heat of the moment, or after a drink, that you knew when you made it was about as wise as a chicken walking into a fox’s lair. Do not bet on anything that you only think you understand. Do not play hunches, dabble in the stock market, or buy a restaurant unless you know more than the person doing the selling.

In the present economic climate, most of us will have to make sacrifices. It is probably prudent to wait for that new kitchen or bathroom and not to succumb to the ‘Have now, pay next year’ offers that have an amazing habit of making that year arrive at least four months early.

We are all idiots in our own way. Over the coming 365 days you will make mistakes, play the fool, let yourself down and make some diabolical decisions: You and everybody else!


And Another Thing – Dec Archive

AND ANOTHER THING…

 A UFO?

WELL THAT’S it, another Christmas gone, another year consigned to the wreckage that is history. Any hope that 2009 may surpass its predecessor is looking as shaky as a raft preparing to sink in a stormy sea. There is the economy, events in the Middle East, a pipeline that appears to be more hot air than gas leading from Russia, and Britain’s high streets threatening to become ghost towns. Nine days gone and it is not looking promising.

A propeller blade is mangled on one of those wind contraptions in Lincolnshire. Bright lights are spotted in the sky – it must be a UFO! Considering we know there is no life on the Moon, it is impossible for there to be any on bubbling hot Venus or Mercury, and the signs are there is none on Mars, the question has to be asked: Just where have these alien craft supposed to have come from: Alpha Centauri; somewhere from the constellation known as Seven Sisters? It is more likely to be a missile from Seven Sisters Road in East London. Any alien spacecraft that reaches Earth has transcended all known laws of physics within our grasp. It takes us three years to reach Mars; the journey to Alpha Centauri would take some 70,000 years. Any being arriving at this planet from somewhere deep in the void has intelligence beyond our comprehension. To suggest they would choose to visit Earth out of all the options available, then pick somewhere in remote Lincolnshire, only to become thwarted by a wind farm, having travelled so far, is surely a contradiction.

Some rugby player, engaged to Princess Zara, has earned a driving ban for climbing behind the wheel of his car the day after a binge at Cheltenham races when he downed the equivalent of twenty-four units of alcohol. I cannot condone or defend the indefensible. But whilst so much advice is dispensed, why are so many of us in the dark as to what these wretched units actually represent? Scrap the units and convert to a language we understand. One bottle of wine equals whatever it equals on a stupidity gauge. Let it range from over the edge, progress to too much, ending up at way too much. Two bottles, three, or four mean blackout and possible death. A single shot of liquor, a double, half a bottle, is a week’s, a month’s, a lifetime’s intake. Spell it out so that we know the damage we are doing to ourselves. And scrap any tolerance of drinking and driving. Prohibit driving after the participation of one drink. Let the same apply to those taking Prozac or Valium tablets. While we are about it, the ingestion of one Viagra tablet entitles the recipient to sit on his own on public transport.

No, it is not looking good; nine days in, 2009 threatens to be even worse than 2008. I am even starting to like Gordon Brown!

Further afield, pornographers in America claim they are entitled to financial aid on a par with banks. It could be argued there is little between the two professions, or that the intentions of both are distinguished only by one letter. Bankers, however, have an aura of respectability, possibly undeserved, although their collective activities influence global economies. Pornography, or its immoral bed-partners, have influenced political careers, but that seems a flimsy basis to bail out those making a living out of peddling smut. The description accorded to Larry Flynt is that of porn baron. He has the jowls to be a baron, the face to be a gargoyle. He publishes Hustler, a magazine I am assured has nothing to do with Paul Newman. Flynt and sidekick Joe Francis, publisher of Girls Gone Wild (not a rival band to Girls Aloud), have presented a plea to Congress to pump (their words – but everything in such an article is by design a double entendre) 5 billion dollars into their industry. It goes on…Mr Francis – tongue-in-cheek we presume (when he removes it from someone else’s mouth or other part of the body that is) – said a cash injection (you see they just keep coming – and again) was required, “to see the industry through hard times”. Now we know he is joking! Does anyone know how you become a porn baron?

Whilst on the subject, a newly married couple were sitting on the edge of their bed in the hotel after the ceremony. The groom asks his bride if she would allow him to try a new sexual position. She shrugs her agreement, aware this is not the first time she will hear such a request over the forthcoming years of marriage. The groom explains he would like to try the wheelbarrow position, which involves him grabbing her by the legs as she steadies herself on her hands. She nods in resigned fashion, adding, ‘Only if you promise not to pass my parents’ house’.

I know this is supposed to be a column with a racing slant. The thing is, there hasn’t been any to speak of. Recently the racing that has survived has taken place in a shroud of fog and mist, something a cynic could claim has always been the case. James Willoughby very sensibly advocates that racing has to revitalise itself in the coming year. I could not agree more. Neither he nor I know quite how we achieve that, although we both admit some sort of division within the sport – similar to that adopted by football – seems necessary. Although we may not know the remedy, we are not paid silly money not to know. That is the province of the BHA members. There are too many racecards for most newspapers to carry comfortably. There is too much racing full stop; but punters should take heart. If there is too much for us, there is too much for the odds-compilers. That means both parties are liable to make mistakes. Our mistakes don’t necessarily cost us money so long as we are careful, because we do not have to play in every race. Bookmakers on the other hand do… cue Spectiat on Wednesday!


 

AND ANOTHER THING…

And now the bookies can do their bit to help the credit crunch …

THESE ARE DARK DAYS: dark in more ways than one. We wake in darkness and drive home in gloom and there is worse to come. In a month’s time the last embers of light will streak the sky at 3.40pm, meaning the day is pretty much over before it has begun. Then of course, there is the credit crunch, about which the least said the better. We are told that sales normally held in January are poised to start this week in a frantic and desperate attempt to kick-start Christmas spending, and that the government is borrowing money so it can spend what it has not got and is preparing to shower the taxpayers with allowances it cannot afford.

The last part sounds like something out of a Whitehall farce, you know, for those unable to remember, they were the set pieces that contrived to allow Brian Rix to lose his trousers. These set pieces mean that Gordon Brown is likely to lose the country its crown jewels but he has narrowed the gap on the Conservative lead, so that is the main thing.

Through it all – wars we have no appetite for; the expenditure of money we cannot afford – racing goes on. And the racing community continues as if there is no world other than that taking place under its nose. Have you ever noticed that in those question and answer sessions so prevalent, featuring racing personalities – Robert Thornton being the latest to be grilled – there is always the question, Do you think there is too much racing? This gets asked so many times it is rather like an obligatory enquiry of a Zimbabwean: Is Robert Mugabe doing a good job?  Sadly, the answer is virtually always the same in both cases, but the mere posing of the question tells its own story.

No one asks me if I think there is too much racing but it is a strange question when you think about it. Forget the Zimbabwe example; it is more like, Are there too many reality shows on television? If you think the answer is yes, the remedy is in your hands. You reply with the remote control and switch the television off.

Today is Sunday and that is what I did. Racing came from Aintree, Plumpton, Towcester and Navan. I pretended there was no racing at all, opting to ignore the whole shebang. You know what? I feel liberated. I am the kid that played truant and got away with it. I could not care whether Officier De Reserve won the Irish race or what won at Aintree. I got on with my life. I probably should not be saying this on a racing website, and many of you may have had a financial interest in the day’s proceedings. You may have been able to make more sense of it than I and had an opinion. You may have wanted to back Officier De Reserve or Gold Reef, or whatever else you fancied. You may have been grateful there were three meetings in England and one in Ireland. But the time will come when I will want to back some hairy beast at Wolverhampton and you will want to bunk off somewhere else, so you will get your own back.

The point is, there is too much racing, of course there is. But unlike too much taxation or thuggery, or not enough money, there is something we can do. We can just pretend it is not taking place. That is to say, we ignore it. Now, I realise years of conditioning means this is not easy. We have been controlled to pace up and down in the mornings waiting for that reassuring clunk of the Racing Post making its way through the letterbox. We need it as a smoker needs a cigarette. We have to at least look at the runners in case something is lurking we have been waiting to back. However; fight back, it is the pantomime season so, Oh no we don’t! We think we do, believe we do, give it no thought and presume it is our duty, but actually, it isn’t. We do not have to indulge. We can say sod it! I am cancelling Towcester and Aintree in the pouring rain and I never liked bloody Plumpton anyway. And Navan? What do we know about Navan?

That is what I said today. There followed a couple of phone calls from contacts who asked what I knew, and when I said nothing and there was nothing I wanted to know, they replied they would see what they could find out. I repeated my case because clearly they failed to understand. I do not care, I said; whatever you find out you can keep to yourself, I am having the day off. I don’t want to know anything. I don’t want to be told some stupid story about a horse I have never heard of that is going to win a race I know nothing about. I don’t want to have a bet!

This was fighting talk and it took a while to sink in. But the joy of it was that after eleven o’ clock the phones were silent and no one told me a damn thing. For all I know the world and his wife had it off today whilst my back was turned; but, you know what, I don’t care! I have voted with my feet, or in this case, my fingers. And I feel so much better for it.

A cook once told me what I suspect is an old joke. He had worked in the Army and when asked what was for dinner by a soldier replied, ‘I have got good news and bad news. Which would you like first?’

‘Give me the bad news,’ said the soldier.

‘The bad news is there is shit for dinner.’

‘What is the good news?’

‘There is not enough to go round.’

That is how I feel about racing at the moment. There is enough to go round but most of it is shit!

So if Debenhams can start their January sales in November, how about the bookmakers, who after all are responsible for most of the slop we are being served, doing the same. Let’s make them work for their money. How about they try a BOGOF deal: Bet One Get One Free. Have one Lucky 15, get one on the house. Have £100 on some three-legged yak, get another £100 to put on another. Come on boys, try it. If we are stupid enough to bet on this nonsense, it stands to reason we have to lose in the long run.

For all my rebellion, I know a lapse is only a few days away. I am absurdly confident that if the weights do not rise Air Force One will win the Hennessy. Right now, I can’t get a 8/13 shot to oblige and I think I am going to crack the Hennessy! Like, right. So come on Lads and Hills, how about it? How about a bit of BOGOF? You know there will only be one winner!


Note from Bob…

Spy is so right! The bookies should give us some more money! I love that idea! … I’ve collected together all the bookies I can find who are offering free bets when you open an account and listed them under (not surprisingly!) the FREE BETS tab.

Some are excellent eg Bet365‘s £200 offer (very shortly to be chopped to £100! and may be £25 soon so get yoru skates on if you don’t have an account already!

Some are miserly, just £10 … maybe Spy could embarass them into opening the satchels a bit wider?


AND ANOTHER THING

Racing and The BBC

JOURNALISTS IN TODAY’S RACING POST are spluttering rather a lot. Spluttering and journalese go hand in hand. Journalists need to be incensed every now and then; it gets the juices and ink flowing. It awakes angst and results in them scurrying to PCs to bash their keyboards, rather like ‘Annoyed Beyond Belief From Tunbridge Wells’. In an industry such as racing that presents little in the way of controversy, especially since the sidelining of Kieren Fallon and Dean McKeown, anything provoking copy is a boon.

As one, the Racing Post has descended on the BBC, admonishing, advising, rebuking, reprimanding, castigating and criticising and finally in exasperation venting vehemence, in disbelief at the news the BBC is virtually to phase out its racing coverage, axing all but the most prestigious of meetings. From 2010, it is to show a mere fourteen days of racing a year. This is bad news for Clare Balding and Willie Carson (both of whom will not be short of alternative work) but may not be the disaster it is depicted as being for the viewer.

Racing will get no coverage whatsoever between the months of October and April. In an aggressive decision of Stalin-proportions, the BBC has concluded that horseracing is not worthy of flagship coverage, especially during the winter. The long-term aim of the programme planners appears to be that all bar Royal Ascot and other high profile meetings from the Royal course, the Aintree Grand National Meeting, the Derby and Arc day will disappear from our screens.

If we examine the BBC’s decisions, they are not so surprising. Committed coverage to National Hunt racing for a corporation that attempts to run a tight ship where scheduling is concerned is a pain. As we discovered this weekend, not for the first time, winter racing can fall foul of the weather. Channel Four found themselves with time on their hands after the abandonment of Cheltenham. I have no idea how they filled the slot, but to a degree that is the point. If they had advertised they were showing a film, a re-run of old Muhammad Ali fights, what shoes women with chunky legs should wear, potential viewers would know where they were and could activate or deactivate their remotes accordingly. Racing is a prima donna activity. It is the Beyonce or Britney Spears of sports. It wishes to appear on its own terms; strut its stuff and leave us awestruck. The trouble from its perspective is it cannot command such devotion from its fans, which it keeps in endless suspense. It waits in the wings before making an appearance. Races are invariably late off; the annual farce that is the Cesarewitch even tries Channel Four’s patience. The horses have to cover the two-and-a-quarter mile trip twice. With the exception of a dogleg, Newmarket is a straight course, meaning the participants have to cross from Suffolk to Cambridgeshire and back. Consequently, the event is late off year after year. Impervious to anything other than their own importance (or at least that is the impression created), Newmarket make no attempt to rectify this situation by either re-jigging the overall programme so more time is available, or placing a huntsman in the paddock with a long-tom beforehand to ensure the participants get to post on time.

Talking of time, I remember an occasion when the Hennessy Gold Cup was taken off air because a horse was galloping loose at its leisure before the start of the event. The BBC had a commitment to broadcast a rugby match at 2.30, by which time the wretched beast, trained by Josh Gifford I seem to recall, was romping around the Berkshire track. Now, short of shooting it with a tranquilizer dart, I don’t know what the solution to such a situation is but the BBC handled it by pulling the plug.

As animals form a large part of racing coverage and they are notoriously unreliable, a schedule that includes them has to be either flexible or understanding. In the case of racing, the BBC is neither. It has other fish to fry and they tend to be fish that perform on cue. Football matches, rugby games, motor cross, Formula 1, cycling, the tossing of the caber, all tend to start when advertised. Some of them may be as exciting as watching an egg boil but they do as advertised on the tin. Racing does not. And because races tend to be run in quick time, they are a nuisance. They catch the casual viewer out. They flash on and off the screen without warning: preliminaries conducted at an almost indolent pace before the sudden injection of speed of a race occurring whilst you are turning down the curry or popping out to the garage to replenish beer stocks. It is not a relaxing pursuit to televise. Settle down to watch a rugby, tennis or football match and it starts and finishes when you expect. You can budget for its coverage, which means the comfortable scheduling of bladder and drink breaks. Racing is haphazard to say the least. And it is not just the animals that are responsible. The attitude that racing can operate within some bubble is prevalent and until those responsible for its management realise they are against sports and pursuits that appear to be better regulated, so it will remain.

It is significant that the BBC is only interested in festivals. Entire meetings such as Royal Ascot make for a full and varied programme. Fashion and celebrity spotting can be included, allowing the coverage to embrace a complete syllabus. Much better than zigzagging to Haydock whilst a racing car is having its tyres changed.

I submit that the BBC’s approach to racing is its own business. The premise that horseracing is owed a living is false. It is a minority sport. It may be our sport but that is our problem. Right now, horseracing is available on Racing UK (who do an excellent job when allowed; that is to say when their schedule is not too clogged up with dross that gets in the way of Cheltenham or Newmarket), and the free to air ATR. Okay, the latter station is littered with annoying adverts, but you do get to see the races in a fashion and it is FREE to subscribers of Sky. Genuine racing fans are accommodated by these stations, their existence squeezing potential viewers from terrestrial stations but are preferable to the nail biting situation created by a cluttered BBC schedule.

It is too late for racing to muscle in on the coverage of other sports. The damage has been done. We cannot have it both ways. The racing channels contribute to racing’s finances. If the BBC chooses to show golf, fishing or The Sound of Music in preference to nag-racing, as I have heard it referred to by non-followers, it is their prerogative.

In the meantime, not the first time, racing must look within and try to modernise. It could start by looking at the television that appears on the front page of the Racing Post today. It looks like an Alba or a Bush – you know the old-fashioned television with a back as big as a small van now superseded by the slim line LCD model installed in most modern homes.


 AND ANOTHER THING…

What’s  happened to the Racing Post …

WE ARE WAKING UP TO various degrees of unpleasantness this morning. This depends upon where you live. Snow and ice in the north, wind and rain in the south; I should imagine it’s the sort of day that makes you think twice about setting off to work – that is if you have any work to set off to.

My commute consists of walking down the hall. Traffic is normally light at this time of day, allowing me to hanger right to my office. I listen to the traffic reports on the radio with bewilderment. Accident after accident; I wonder when the penny will drop for both motorists and police that we simply cannot have a country brought to a virtual standstill on major motorways every day between the hours of 6.30am and 10.00am.

Once I arrive at my destination I discover that for such a non-descript day, quite a lot is happening. Firstly, like many others, my username and password were apparently unrecognisable to the new Racing Post website yesterday. So I have not gained access as such, and am still unable to make much sense of its content even though the logging-on procedure has been temporarily dispensed with. I suspect this new site is a precursor to squeezing more money out of us – the long-suffering consumer. Facilities hitherto accessible are likely to be available at a ‘nominal charge’, meaning expenses will rise further.

The Racing Post may do well to rethink this suspected policy. For those of us that have the newspaper every day, our bill already nudges £60 a month. Frankly, I reckon that is enough for a newspaper. They should consider there are free sites out there: The Sporting Life and ATR websites may not be as comprehensive as the one operated by the Post, but they provide enough basic information to be going on with.

This next paragraph comes with a warning. Tidal Bay is one of those horses I rarely call correctly. I thought he was opposable in last year’s Arkle, before that in another event at Cheltenham and again first time out this season. But facts have to be faced, he is a pretty good racehorse. Doubts surround Kauto Star (I have always questioned his so-called supremacy); until Denman he had never met anything of any great merit and won a poor Cheltenham Gold Cup. Therefore, Tidal Bay looks like an ideal alternative King George winner to me. Now he is to run over two miles at Sandown on Saturday. He may well win, but it is close enough to Boxing Day, particularly if he has a hard race against Master Minded. But at a time when bets seemed to be rationed sparingly, Tidal Bay is on a short-list for Kempton at present.

It is a sign of the times that the Ascot executive are pleased and relieved that Betfair are to sponsor one of the major Flat races of the season in the King George VI & Queen Elizabeth II Stakes. At one time such a situation would have been unthinkable. I remember when the part sponsorship of the Royal Meeting was pooh-poohed for fear of an Ann Summers Ascot Stakes. Although Ann Summers would doubtless describe their business as uplifting, the raising of eyebrows is not, as I understand it, their intention. Now Ascot’s great showpiece, sponsorless since the De Beers pullout, is to be financed by the contentious betting firm, doubtless to the gnashing of immaculately maintained upper-class teeth. Epsom face a similar dilemma, having to rattle a begging bowl for next year’s Derby after the disconnection of the Vodafone alliance. Epsom appear confident of announcing a new sponsor before Christmas. I notice with interest that their managing director, Nick Blofeld, made this prediction. It is the surname that is a bother. I don’t suppose we face the Spectre Derby do we? Will Mr Blofeld welcome his new sponsor whilst stroking a white cat with the immortal greeting: ‘We have been expecting you …?’

And through all this, a new racecourse is being built in Wales. Not the most obvious venue one would have thought considering the state of the ground at Chepstow on many an occasion. And to anyone having to cross the border, the title of this racecourse is unpronounceable to all but Tom Jones and Charlotte Church: Ffos Las. It sounds like somewhere in Spain to me. Didn’t we have a lovely time the day we went to Ffos Las; it does not have the ring of Bangor does it?


AND ANOTHER THING…

What were Newcastle thinking …

IN CASE IT HAS ESCAPED the attention of those that manage racecourses, this is the winter. I should also state that the weather has taken an unseasonal turn for the worse. I am no clerk of the course. I do have a garden (well two actually – front and back – but I am not showing off it is not Highgrove) and I know when the ground has been so hardened by frost that it needs to thaw out before I lay hands on a spade. If it has rained for forty days and forty nights, I also know that my garden is waterlogged. I do not need to get up at 7.00am to ascertain this.

So what were Newcastle thinking when on Saturday, after degrees of minus seven overnight, they thought they could race? An inspection scheduled for 8.00am was put back to 9.00am, as if a warm current of air or a zephyr from the Gulfstream was likely to waft across Gosport Park in the extra hour, thus removing all the white stuff that seemingly clung to every blade of turf on the track. Even the two Channel Four presenters, shivering in the covered grandstand, could hardly contain their pessimism. It was obvious to an idiot that beyond the glass panelling of the grandstand, a terrain resembling Siberia offered no prospect of racing taking place. But we are back to that silly season again when racecourse executives believe in Father Christmas, waking to a frozen racetrack that will magically melt into a raceable one within three hours.

Unless they have erected a massive marquee under which a succession of gas burners have been pumping out heat all night, when temperatures dip to the extent they did at Newcastle in the early hours of Saturday, racing ain’t gonna happen. But year after year, we have this ridiculous situation of inspections (most of which are formalities anyway) being put back, until, come race-time the bleedin’ obvious dawns.

I had thought after the debacles of Huntingdon and Warwick, to name but two last season, that some effort would be made to ensure early decisions were reached. As we approach the shortest day of the year, racing starts earlier. Therefore, decisions ought to be made in good time for race goers; but more importantly for trainers, owners and jockeys. There is no point in horseboxes, each gulping copious amounts of diesel, or racing professionals, heading to various frozen destinations only to discover that racing is impossible halfway to the venue or on arrival.

I know it is disappointing for the brogue-wearing fraternity, but this is all part  of the craic that is National Hunt Racing. I have friends who are perfectly happy to arrive at a snowbound or frost-hardened venue so long as the bars are open, Guinness is served and racing shown from the surviving tracks. I cannot claim to understand this but then true jumping fans are a different breed to those of us that go racing in suits and ties and drink Pimms.

Newcastle’s extreme optimism was followed by Carlisle subjecting the racing public to a similar piece of incredulity when they suddenly decided their course was waterlogged on Sunday morning. I cannot claim to know too much about this particular episode as I has already mentally cancelled all racing on Sunday, and was long gone when the clerk of the course squelched his way to what I presume was an obvious decision. Racecourses do not waterlog in a matter of hours. Neither does the A339 to Newbury. What happens is that it starts to rain and it fails to stop. Gradually, a build up of water accrues and it becomes evident, as the rain is showing no sign of letting up, that those areas prone to flooding are filling with water. So if a racecourse looks like a rice field in the monsoon season, racing is not going to take place even if the rain stops immediately. As a layman, this seems elementary information.

I am not a doctor. Some of you may find this surprising considering I appear to have a remedy for most if not all things. But I don’t need to be one to know that if I bang my head on a brick wall, or hit myself on the foot with a hammer, it will hurt. The same logic applies to those that state I am not a groundsman.

So may I make a suggestion. To prevent this will-they-won’t-they-race scenario reoccurring over the coming months, why not adjust our present situation. Forget prolonged prevarication in the hope of one of nature’s miracles occurring before the opener. If a racecourse is not fit for racing by 8.30am and no independent weather forecast stating conditions will dramatically alter is available (and on the head of the forecaster be it), the meeting is automatically abandoned. No headless-chicken squawking, ‘It should be alright – fingers crossed.’ The racecourse is deemed unfit for purpose on that specific day and racing is off, cancelled, abandoned, finished.

In Monty Python terms the Norwegian Blue parrot with beautiful plumage is defunct; bereft of life; it has passed on: it is no more – it is dead!


And Another Thing

A tale of two christmases …

AT THIS TIME OF YEAR, everyone tells you what to do. It is not a good time to be a turkey or a woman as it seems both suffer in different ways.

I suspect a woman’s Christmas begins sometime in December, but according to Nigella Lawson it starts in earnest on Christmas Eve. For both species (turkey and woman), it is a season of sacrifice for what is in essence one meal. I have seen Nigella’s itinerary for Christmas Day, ready for implementation by millions of women, and her instructions resemble those the legendary Ryan Price used to hand out to jockeys. In fact, her approach is rather like a trainer dispensing orders in the parade ring prior to the Grand National.

There is a brief parade of utensils and condiments, an assembly of ingredients, culminating with the removal of the turkey from the fridge twenty-four hours in advance of the big day. That does not sound too demanding but one or two participants may start to get edgy. Then it is giblets in the pan, which will boil and simmer on a stove, steaming the kitchen windows and stinking out the house in the process. This lasts for two hours. Stuffing has to be prepared; cranberry sauce strained. You have to do something with panettone cheese and mix up Italian sausage to make stuffing. There is a warning for women that this is non-negotiable. This means no pulling-up, no refusing; no unseating – keep riding at all costs.

By now, the runners are approaching the tapes. The giblet water, destined for stock, needs attending to. And there is the equivalent of saddle, irons and girth-checking: there has to be sherry, carbonated water, champagne, the fridge organised and, remember, this is only Christmas Eve. Maybe the turkey, quietly defrosting to room temperature in the midst of madness has the better deal after all.

By Christmas Day, the Starter is fidgeting on his rostrum. Some of the runners are over-excited – too frisky, overawed in the knowledge they may have bitten off more than they (or worse case scenario, anyone else) can chew. Grim looks are exchanged. The shirt does not fit; she does not want a basque and stockings as a present – they were not bought for her benefit anyway! The cardigan is the wrong colour, the perfume not right – she knows it was on offer at Debenhams and has been for two months. Three copies of Mamma Mia is two too many.

Through such adversity, the woman of the house is ready for the off. The tapes twang upward, the starter shouts, there is no cheering but she embarks on the lonely journey. She is peeling and cutting potatoes by 10.00am in accordance with Nigella’s self-confessed brutal schedule. She has made that interminable crossing over the Melling Road and is approaching the first.

In the background there is the sound of people only on Wii, children pushing Chinese-made fire engines on a collision course with the skirting board. The phone rings; Dad has a Gordon’s; there is the pop of what sounds suspiciously like a champagne cork, leaving mother wondering whether he will last until early afternoon, as she also detects the clinking of bottles of red wine as they are transferred to the airing cupboard to warm. However, there is no time to concentrate on the opposition so early in the race. The priority right now is to get into a rhythm, maintain it and keep out of trouble. There is the cry from Mrs Simkin at No 42 as she hurtles to the ground at Beecher’s, but it is every woman for herself now. Survivors are preparing the turkey for its final journey, trimming sprouts and seeing to stuffing.

Dad slyly tops up his Gordon’s from the stands.

From hereon in, everything is set in irreversible motion. Potatoes have to be parboiled at 11.00 precisely. The turkey is oven-bound at 11.30. This relentless schedule continues. Ahead there is basting, more parboiling, dredging, draining, chopping, in fact anything ending in i-n-g is likely except the one thing dad might like. At mid-day, after completion of the first circuit, it is acceptable to have a glass of wine or a cup of tea. The table has to be laid, a Christmas pudding steamed, parsnips maple-roasted, sprouts boiled.  I cannot go on…

It is only 12.50 and goose fat needs heating for potatoes. The Chair looms; Dad has opened some Rioja. The kids are bored with I Pods, Nintendos, X Boxes and new Nokias, on which they have annoyed everyone in the house and all their friends.

The inferno continues in the kitchen. The pace increases. Those left standing are jostling for position. It is not merely a question of survival any longer. Chestnuts have to be warmed in butter; there are parcels of chipolatas to wrap, gravy to be made; people are ringing the doorbell. This is a nightmare! Yet the schedule demands everything must on the table by 2.30 for what Goddess Nigella terms as LUNCH!

Why do women have to embark on such dangerous activity alone? Men, be under no illusion, the making of the Christmas lunch or dinner – call it what you will – is a matter of utmost importance to any lady of the house. It is a massive undertaking and one for which they receive little thanks. It is stressful, it is lonely, leaping all those fences and avoiding so many pitfalls single-handed, but they do it despite the fact those eating what has been so precisely prepared are usually halfway out of their heads by serving time.

This is the one day when women claw back all credibility. Yes, they can multi-task; yes, they can organise; yes, they can stare an abyss of adversity in the face and succeed. From the Melling Road dash to that agonisingly long run-in with its cruel elbow that has changed the complexion of many a National, they negotiate the obstacles and storm to the line; exhausted, frazzled, half a stone lighter whilst everyone else is that amount heavier, they have lasted the course. Whilst those they have served lick greasy lips, splash down wine and pick up shredded turkey thighs, the female cook delicately forks a few choice cuts of white breast, drinks half a glass of wine and a full glass of water. The preparing of the Christmas dinner is the female equivalent of a man attempting to affix a pair of shelves that are straight. Only they can do it!

If the pair of shelves fail to line-up or are slanted, which they will be, a man will shrug it off. If anything, his failure is worth repeating in the pub or over subsequent meals. Yet should a woman produce a less than perfect Christmas meal Armageddon is nigh. It is not often I find myself siding with the female of the species but I sympathise in this instance. Wives, partners, girlfriends have not served an apprenticeship for this sort of cookathon. They are not Cunard-trained. Yet they get little if any help from the male members of the household, all of whom lounge around quaffing wine and waiting for the kitchen fairy to deliver the feast. If the woman is lucky she will get some assistance with the washing-up and put her feet up with a glass of something around five o’clock. No wonder they flick through travel brochures during December.

Men, on the other hand are marking time. Christmas for them is a diversion. If they like racing it is something of an intrusion. The 24th and 25th of December are the two days that come between Fontwell and Southwell on the 23rd, and Kempton Park on Boxing Day. During these two blank racing days, they have longer than usual to devote to studying the form. Whilst Mum is in the midst of bone-cracking kitchen action, Dad is drawing up plans to attack the enemy at Kempton Park.

And this is a two-day meeting, which allows them plenty of opportunity to pick their selections with care and, should things not go according to plan on the 26th, they get another chance the following day when the Coral Welsh National is also staged.

For men the two blank days therefore need treating with caution. The automatic assumption is that because there is no racing there is no excuse to sneak to the pub with one’s mates, or to lock oneself up in the spare room with the television. This means in exchange for the Grand National that is the Christmas dinner, men need to tread carefully. Under no circumstances, forget the Christmas card. The present of a new pair of wellie-boots for the garden may be crap, but God help you if the card is missing or the words inside wrong. It needs to express the right sentiment. You could present the woman in your life with a piece of Cartier jewellery but the card needs to contain certain words and phrases. It is not a greetings card, wishing her a Happy Christmas and a Prosperous New Year. This card has to extol love and, although written by some fresh-faced graduate in Delhi, it has to appear to have been composed specially. And never, ever, under peril of death, send a joke Christmas card: nothing to do with age or flatulence. That sort of thing is for Leroy down the pub.

Put the paper hat on; let the mother-in-law in without comment. Look at photos of grandchildren that all look the same, with enlarged heads that could belong to deep-sea groupers, and try not to confuse the sexes of the pictures on show. ‘Isn’t she lovely,’ is not so clever when its name is Henry.

It is most likely to be the drink that will let a man down. Start too early and you are doomed. You will sway in your seat at the dinner table, eat a meal you have no recollection of and snore loudly in a semi-conscious stupor once you leave the dining table and your bottom encounters a soft sofa or armchair. This is unavoidable if the intake of wine has exceeded a bottle, followed by an after dinner port or brandy. Treat alcohol like a horse that needs holding up – that is to say not holding up to your lips on a constant basis. No; restraint is the watchword.

The object for racing folk is to make it unscathed to Boxing Day. Avoid dredging up family grudges, arguing with the wife, killing the kids and you have survived.

As for the King George VI Chase, I suggest it is a race only to bet in if you have a strong opinion about Kauto Star. As far as I am concerned, he is the friend I never got to know. Is he one of the best chasers in recent times or has he got a soft centre and merely been lucky in that he has rarely been seriously tested? Certainly, the Gold Cup he won was sub-standard, but horses can only beat what opposes them. After Friday’s race, for which he is a backable 6/4 in places, he may be the equivalent of the last unopened present discovered under the tree. You could argue three miles against a hotchpotch of rivals of undetermined ability over such a trip presents an easy target; or you could conclude he faces a stronger field than he is used to. Stamina doubts aside, Voy Por Ustedes, and Imperial Commander have the potential to test Kauto Star. But there are doubts, as there are about the enigmatic Old Vic, another to add to the mix.

It is beginning to look a lot like Christmas, or a benefit for Kauto Star. The biggest danger would appear to be the likely principal player – Kauto Star. He will probably win, but we can surely do better over the festive period from a betting point of view.

And Another Thing

2009 AND ALL THAT…

With most punters denouncing 2008 as a bad year, hopes are high they will be hailing 2009 as a good one. It is that time of the year. Off with the old and on with the new…

Here goes – Spy’s Almanac for the coming year…

JANUARY: The Prophet – you know that man that dresses like a pantomime character from 1,001 Arabian Nights with a startled look on his face suggesting he has caught his wife in flagrante delicto with the leading man in his dressing room – realises that it is not a ball of the crystal variety he requires. Nicky Henderson has a blank first Saturday of the New Year causing his immediate placement on the trainers’ cold list. Binocular is floated to 10/3 for the Champion Hurdle, Punchestowns to 5/1 for the World Hurdle and Zaynar withdrawn from the Triumph Hurdle betting. Denman demonstrates his wellbeing by winning a point-to-point at Larkhill and is tips-on for the Gold Cup. The Dubai Carnival starts mid-month and, because of atrocious weather conditions in this country, Nicky Henderson sends a team to Nad Al Sheba, more to put work into them than anything else, resulting in a first-day treble. This prompts a major plunge on his main Cheltenham hopes, forcing Binocular to odds-on and the other two to regain their places at the head of the market for their respective races. Tony McCoy is spotted smiling in Lambourn. Nigel Twiston-Davies has a third at Sedgefield and declares there is nothing wrong with his horses.

FEBRUARY: The Racing Post website is finally comprehensible. Although nowhere near as easy to navigate as its forerunner, most services offered are now chargeable. Interest rates plummet to such an extent that those with a clean credit history are paid by banks to take out loans. This practise ceases with the discovery many recipients are using the money to invest in US dollars, as the city boys reckon before long it will be dollar for pound, cent for pence. Ironically, a dollar used to be slang for today’s equivalent of twenty-five pence sterling. The Government publishes a pamphlet entitled How To Avoid Going Bust. Tips include not borrowing more than individuals can afford, and sidestepping ventures that sound simple in theory, but those where costs are liable to escalate beyond control. Sound familiar? The Dickens-created Mr Micawber quote from David Copperfield opens the booklet: ‘Annual income twenty pounds, expenditure nineteen shillings and eleven pennies, result happiness: Annual income twenty pounds, expenditure twenty pounds sixpence, result misery.’ Wise words, but wasted on those not familiar with Dickens or under the age of sixty for whom pennies are an unknown quantity. This coincides with the pound reaching its lowest rate against the euro and dollar. Snow and ice threatens racing for the latter part of the month, leaving Cheltenham clues in limbo. Ladbrokes float the idea of manufacturing mechanical horses that can function on ice; but for now, they bring back Escalado in all their shops. The fact that the blue horse wins an uncommon amount of races in the last week of February results in a BHA inquiry.

MARCH: The weather relents in time for Cheltenham. Punters starved of racing go berserk on the first day. Binocular is backed down to 4/6 for the Champion Hurdle and wins pulling a cart. Ladbrokes, the only firm to offer evens in the morning, admit to taking a pasting and rumours are afoot that Gary Wiltshire, John McCririck and Barry Dennis are about to make a hostile bid for the betting arm of the company, to be renamed Fatblokes. Master Minded pulls off a similar trick to that of Binocular in the following day’s Champion Chase. The hostile bid gathers pace over several glasses of Guinness and a couple of bottles of champagne, in the case of McCririck, as the trio observe long Ladbrokes faces after racing. However, this is Cheltenham and rain of biblical proportions threatens the last two days of the meeting. Whilst we in this country consider the ground barely raceable, the Irish claim it is no worse than yielding, pleading for the meeting to go on; go on, go on – which it does. Punchestowns falls at the last when clear in the World Hurdle. Kauto Star ploughs through the fence in front of the stands on the first circuit of the Gold Cup, mistakenly assuming it is the last. This catches poor Ruby Walsh by surprise and he is unshipped. Exotic Dancer refuses at the top of the hill, leaving a horse with an unpronounceable German name to win at 100/1. Ladbrokes declare they have recovered losses with interest, resulting in the quashing of the hostile bid, forcing Messrs Wiltshire, McCririck and Dennis to resume gainful employment. Denman wins at Barbury Castle and is declared to be on course for a tilt at regaining his Gold Cup crown in 2010.

APRIL: Aidan O’Brien wins the Grand National with Galileo, whom he declares was getting bored with the same old routine at Coolmore and needed an outing to freshen him up. Paul Carberry rides. Such is Galileo’s superiority that he is half a furlong clear at the Chair, and is pulled up for a breather and to ensure he gets the trip before giving chase to the field for the second circuit. Despite a mistake at Valentines, he is back in front before the Melling Road. Godolphin responds by announcing they are to train the eight million dollar purchase, Pluvius, and the similarly expensive Jalil with next year’s Cheltenham Festival in mind. Frankie Dettori states he has other winter plans and suggests Kevin McEvoy might like to return from Australia for the assignment. McEvoy is not available for comment. The Craven meeting at Newmarket signals the return of Flat racing in earnest. The usual stables fire their big guns with the usual unexpected results. Horses that looked close to good things for major honours sink without trace, replaced by once-raced maidens who, unheard of a month ago, are promoted to single-figure prices for the upcoming Classics. This trend continues in the Classic Trial at Sandown on what will always be known as Whitbread Day. The race itself, which has changed hands several times since the brewery pullout, goes to Cloudy Bay.

MAY: The Aga Khan wins both Guineas, causing a shortfall in the national economy. To avoid embarrassment, Gordon Brown, buoyed up by watching a DVD of Casino Royale, suggests that the Aga Khan visits Downing Street to play a hand of poker – double or quits. Brown loses and ups the ante by throwing the keys to his car and those of Chequers on the table. He loses again. Only after intervention from Buckingham Palace are the crown jewels protected. Gordon Brown declares there is no problem and that he will merely borrow the necessary cash to pay our debts. As the card game was conducted on his turf, the cabinet is quick to point out to the Prime Minister that taking a leaf out of the cheating Goldfinger’s manner of card playing might have been preferable to using Casino Royale as his template. Gordon Brown responds by declaring he has a cunning plan. From now on, the cabinet will form a Saturday syndicate and, with funds that can rival the Findlays and Nevisons of the punting world, attempt the Tote Scoop Six. This coincides with the publication of Dave Nevison’s latest book entitled, A Right Rogering. It does not actually have anything to do with betting, concerning as it does the sex lives of the travelling Tote girls and the racecourse catering staff.

JUNE: The BBC attempts to fill our screens with their coverage of the two-day Derby meeting. Unfortunately, it is subject to constant interruptions from a little known show-jumping venue and a darts competition. We see a recording of the Oaks, won in a desperate finish by Leocorno from the short-priced favourite, Fantasia. Winning jockey Ryan Moore is noted smiling after the race for a second or two. The BBC manage to show the last two furlongs of the Derby, which is won by Aidan O’Brien’s sixth string, the unraced and unpronounceable EurystheusofTiryns. When asked how such a name came to be, Mrs Mangier, who is charged with the task of naming thoroughbreds for Ballydoyle, explained he was the king that set Hercules the twelve impossible labours. Pressed further, she reveals having been told the horse was not much and might win the Turkish St Leger one day. Michael Tabor avoids using the horse’s name in the post-race interview. The BBC has another stab at bringing racing to the nation two weeks later at Royal Ascot – that most English of all occasions, resplendent with fashion, popping champagne corks, the presence of royalty and, oh yes, a few horses. Such is the state of the nation’s finances that there is a renaming of many of the races. The Queen Anne Stakes opens the card but the inclusion of the Prince Faisal Stakes, the Emir Of Qatar Cup and the Sultan Of Saudi Arabia Palace Stakes leaves some racegoers confused. The Queen seems equally affected. Betting on the colour of her dress on the first day is suspended after a flood of cash for white is vindicated when she arrives resplendent in a dish-dash.

JULY: A prolonged dry spell and baking hot conditions mean rock hard ground, and doomists proclaiming Global Warming and the end of the world. For some it arrives immediately after the results of the first day at Newmarket’s July Meeting, where nothing under the price of 12/1 manages to oblige. Parts of Lingfield are used as an overflow for Gatwick airport. The King George VI and Queen Elizabeth II Stakes – now the Emirates Stakes – is run at Great Leighs as Ascot resembles a moonscape. Ladbrokes rethink the mechanical horse idea, stating that each horse could be fitted with a Yamaha motor of finite difference in strength, be named, trained and would resemble a normal horse in every way. The Government is concerned that these horses would not need feeding or working, making many stable staff redundant. The whole idea threatens to reduce the workforce and cause widespread unemployment. Such sentiment has conveniently overlooked the fact that unemployment is running at five million and rising. Ladbrokes agree to shelve the idea but are still keen on developing a prototype on the sly.

AUGUST: Betting offices join a general exodus of shops from the high street. No longer attracting a generation interested in betting on horses, they are used by those wishing to play fruit machines. In an obvious but clever ploy, in that those that play these machines are inherently missing a screw or two, comes the introduction of a new machine that only pays out 10% of the time. It is called The Belcher, as when it does pay out it appears to belch coins. Catch it right, you scoop a pot, but one that represents only half of what is fed into its grinning metallic mouth. The principle appears to match the Lottery and the Scoop Six. Some offices open late at night or early in the morning, when Australian racing is also beamed onto the screens to keep those occupied as they queue in front of The Belcher. Goodwood go ahead with their Glorious meeting despite the fact the ground is fast, verging on concrete. The fields are small, the prices of winners big. All bar the big three bookmakers are now operating abroad.

SEPTEMBER: Keiren Fallon returns to the saddle and promptly rides the winner of the St Leger for Michael Stoute – a trainer that waited until 2008 to break his duck in the last Classic, and now wins it back-to-back. Not everyone is pleased however, as Ryan Moore chooses the wrong one and scowls his way to the weighing room. It transpires that the trainer is not the only one to achieve consecutive success in the oldest Classic. The winner was not a three-year-old at all, but last year’s victor, Conduit, who becomes the only known four-year-old to win the St Leger. Of course, Conduit is disqualified, leaving his entourage perplexed. The BHA and members of the Metropolitan Police interview Keiren Fallon. After the driest summer on record since the last one, the rains arrive, inciting the doomists to change tack and assume Armageddon is nigh. With rain falling on top of baked turf, most racecourses are awash. So, despite the increased number of meetings for 2009, in fact, due to abandonments, the actual number proves to be less than in 2008. Great Leighs stages the Tote International from a washed-out Ascot during the day and an abandoned Chester card in the evening. Southwell is the venue for the Haydock Sprint.

OCTOBER: Gordon Brown calls a snap election and sensationally loses to the Liberal Democrats. They are elected because of radical proposals to cure the ills besieging this nation. The list is long and includes tackling the issues of the day: economy, transport, crime, health, education and world peace to name just six. When asked by Jeremy Paxman what he will tackle first, a bemused Nick Clegg mutters that it will take time. Challenged, he admits it is one thing to pontificate when out of power and quite another to implement policies when elected. From that moment it is clear he is in charge of a clueless government. No change there then! Racing trundles along as if little has changed since the turn of the century.

NOVEMBER: Highlight of the month is the Breeders’ Cup renewal at Santa Anita. European horses migrate to California, connections encouraged by the prospect of racing on the Pro-Ride surface that brought so much success in 2008. The reward is a haul of 40% of all prize-money on offer. This leaves Californian Governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, somewhat crestfallen when faced with the task of presenting trophies to lanky over-dressed Englishmen in European suits wearing ties.

Cheltenham fails to dry out in time for the Paddy Power Gold Cup meeting. Ladbrokes produce six of their prototype mechanical horses that are permitted to slosh through the sodden ground in what is billed as a race. The event is named; some sort of form produced and six top jockeys booked to sit astride these metal constructions. Things get off to a fair start until they plod downhill and hit a patch of particularly soft ground. They become bogged-down at this point, sinking into the mud up to their ball bearings. Tony McCoy is the last jockey to stop riding, whilst Messrs Murphy, Brennan, Johnson, Geraghty and Thornton pile into the waiting Land Rovers. The crowd retires to the Centaur stand and proceeds to drink the bar dry. The Paddy Power Gold Cup is run through a computer, but reminiscent of the famous malfunctioning HAL from 2001: A Space Odyssey, it spews out a 66/1 winner, much to the disgust of those foolish enough to bet on the outcome. At a dried-out Newbury, Denman wins the Hennessy and is installed as favourite for the 2010 Cheltenham Gold Cup.

DECEMBER: Unseasonably warm weather continues, allowing racing to resume as normal. Meanwhile the all-weather tracks are in need of an overhaul as their surfaces have been so overused they need re-laying. Therefore, after the Boylesports Cheltenham meeting, it is Plumpton, Huntingdon, Ludlow, Bangor and Fontwell all the way to Boxing Day and Kempton Park. Binocular wins the Christmas Hurdle and Kauto Star his fourth King George. But it is too little too late as far as punters are concerned. They denounce 2009 as a bad year and hope to be hailing 2010 as a good one. It is that time of year. Off with the old and on with the new…


And Another Thing – Nov Archive

AND ANOTHER THING

Worried about Jack

I AM WORRIED ABOUT JACK. In case you do not know (and why should you), Jack is described by Sporting Index as their, Bet on the Move manager. I am not sure why ‘bet’ and ‘move’ are capitalised here and manager is not, but I assume Sporting Index know what they are doing. Or do they?

Leaving aside the possibility of a grammatical faux pas, Jack’s function, according to today’s advert that appears in the back page of the Post, is to prevent punters from becoming frustrated. Stopping people from becoming frustrated seems like a neat trick and if Jack can pull it off – why stop at punters. He sounds like the sort of guy we should be electing to high office.

But hang on a minute; all is not quite as it seems. Jack is your bookmaker at the end of a mobile phone. According to the advert he is there so that workers that are ‘slaving at their desks’ can bet on sports even if the firm they work for has blocked internet access. Firstly, if you are actually slaving at a desk, it is a reasonable assumption that you are engaged in important work. Let us say you could be a bank employee, in a call centre, working in insurance or advertising. Slaving at your desk implies other people are relying on your judgement. Under these circumstances, the reason access to betting sites is denied is because employers would rather that judgement was not impaired.

Sorry to say this folks, but betting, rather like any other heady activity, does tend to take your eye off the metaphorical ball. Knowing you have money riding on something in the 2.30 at Cheltenham might just mean your priorities shift before, during and after the result is known. For that reason, gamblers are not particularly popular employees. Anyone faced with the interests and hobbies section of an application form is well advised to steer clear of a reply that includes the words ‘gambling,’ or ‘horseracing’ in the same way they would avoid, ‘visiting my local massage parlour.’

Sporting Index are offering to kindly circumnavigate the gambling issue with good old Jack. You can keep in touch with Jack when you should be working by downloading Bet on the Move, which, according to these jolly good sports, will ‘take the worry out of getting on.’

Now look here Jack, most of us are not worried about getting on, what really worries us is what happens after we have got on. Just to cover themselves, Sporting Index then go on to explain that we ought to understand the risks with sports spread betting as it involves a higher level of risk and we can lose more than our original stake. There follows a reminder to bet responsibly.

My definition of betting responsibly is not to bet when I am supposed to be working. Do you know something Jack; I think I will take the chance of being frustrated by the situation of not being able to get on and not being able to bet on the move. I hope any surgeon that is likely to take a scalpel to my torso feels the same. I hope Gordon Brown and Barak Obama agree; I know the Emirates Foreign Minister, Sheikh Mohammed, most certainly does.

Commercial times may be hard just now, but this hardship extends to us all. We do not want people encouraging us to bet when we should be working, drink a bottle of wine a night, take substances that make us sniff excessively or smoke cigarettes. For most punters, it does matter more when there is money on it, but for all the wrong reasons.

So let us cut out all this sporty, good fun nonsense that surrounds betting. For most people, who do not know what they are doing, it is okay to have a bet on a day off to watch their selections on the television, but to encourage them to make it part of their daily ritual is not responsible. Backing losers, which most of us do more often than backing winners, is not fun. It can result in the kids wearing shoes that are half a size too small and not joining the rest of the school on the Christmas outing. Or it can mean the parents wish in the new year deep in debt and in the wee rather than only on it!

The prototype for Jack’s attention is a well-dressed guy sitting at a desk in a white shirt and wearing a silver tie. He looks as if he could use losing a few pounds in weight rather than in cash. I suspect Jack or Sporting Index care little about his welfare and more about how much money he might lose whilst he forgets about his obligation to the company he is employed to represent.

Give it a rest lads! Betting is tough. It is not a pursuit for people squeezing it in between meetings, deadlines and making decisions that will effect others. Drinking the odd glass of wine or having a few pints is fine and something most of us look forward to after a hard day’s work. But, like drinking, serious betting, portrayed as a bit of fun or an obligation to support such-and-such a team, is for the few and certainly does not mix well with the working day. Under those circumstances, fun it ain’t!

Try getting a proper job Jack and, for the guy texting through his selections when he should be justifying his wage, try losing a few of those excess pounds round your middle rather than in your wallet. The pounds in your pocket are likely to be much needed, and if they are not at present, they will be before long. This is going to be a difficult winter. This advert represents all that is worst about our industry.


And Another thing

Horse of the year

IT WON’T MAKE ANY difference to her of course but I am pleased she got it. I am talking about the acclamation of Zarkava as Horse of the Year in the Cartier awards.

Everyone who knows me suggests I should get out more: this confirms it. I mean it is just another day at the stables for Zarkava. Her box will be raked over, she will be fed and watered and may have a groom and brush-up, be led out, do a bit of light exercise and get patted a lot. Not a bad life for her but then she has earned it. Unbeaten in seven spins (let’s face it she was so good she made them look like bits of work), winner of five Group 1s, versatile over trip, a filly with character and a beautiful physical presence to match, she transformed taking the proverbial out of her opposition into an art form. Oh; and she won the Prix de L’Arc de Triomphe, which is not easy for a three-year-old filly.

She was unable to attend the ceremony in London but sent a sheepskin noseband to represent her instead. It is a pity she was unable to a give a speech but I suppose pressing matters at home took precedent. I am not sure what she would have said. I suspect her acceptance would have trumped Gwyneth Paltrow’s famous Oscar acceptance, but Zarkava is nowhere near as emotional as Gwyneth although some would say she has better legs and of course, there are four of them to gaze at as opposed to two! And you get to see them all, right from the ankle to the very top… Sorry, am I in danger of transcending into the realm of fantasy now?

So Zarkava is Horse of the Year and Filly of the Year. New Approach is Three-Year-Old Colt and best older horse is Duke Of Marmalade. Top Sprinter is Marchand D’Or, Stayer goes to Yeats. No controversy there!

Racing owes a debt to companies like Cartier for their involvement. May I also make a small endorsement on their behalf. Their after-shave and EDT is expensive but is different class to all but two other main brands. Of which Lynx is not one!

As well as recognition of equines, Cartier bestowed an Award of Merit upon Sheikh Mohammed. If ever such an accolade was deserved, surely Sheikh Mohammed is the most apt recipient. British and global racing would be so much poorer (not just financially) without him as his contribution to our sport is incalculable. Here’s to you Your Highness and to a Godolphin revival next season.

One member of the illustrious gathering at London’s Grosvenor House was the ebullient and often controversial ATR presenter Matt Chapman. He appears to be in a spot of bother with the racing channel at present and there is talk of him being temporararily suspended for comments over a ride given to an Irish horse, beaten something approaching a hundred lengths. Matt has always been outspoken but is a beacon of energy and a bubble of fun in between the solemn Michael Parkinson funeral adverts and that prat saying he is Confused Dot Com. Frankly, looking at him, I am not surprised. Should he be let out unattended, let alone encouraged to make a public announcement? And what does his demeanour say about the people his firm are attempting to snare into their business net? Confused Dot Com…is that a sensible name for an insurance company? And who is confused here; the company or prospective customer? Does not the very advertisement tend to send a message that says: Can’t be bothered to get the best deal? Just leave it to us and we will come up with some sort of quote? I don’t know. I am confused – no dot – no com. Hurry back Matt, the channel is not the same without you!

Lastly, we have an advertisement on page 22 in today’s Post. Boylesports are offering an On-Line Tipster Competition. To promote it there are the usual pictures of horses streaking past the winning line. No problem there, but take a look at the man in the red polo shirt. He looks like Warren Mitchell, or Alf Garnett. And I know he is meant to be cheering one of his selections home, but a closer look does suggest he may be celebrating by indulging in something a little less savoury.

Maybe it’s me. I have been consigned to serious articles just lately as I believe our lawyers are on holiday. Time to return to my room…


AND ANOTHER THING…

A Love Affair with Newmarket

NEWMARKET TENDS TO BE cold this time of year. There is a north-easterly wind that originates from Siberia, Norway, or maybe even Neptune, that tears across the flatlands of the fens and, with nothing to stop it, decides to make the town of Newmarket one of its first stops.

Newmarket is the original Western town, except it is east. It is Clint Eastwood country, a one-horse town, except that it houses several thousand. It should be a ghost town this time of year, except it is not. It seems to be thriving.

Nowadays, with all-weather racing at least four times a week, the show goes on. It may not be the show of high summer but it is a show. The talk in the pubs is of what might have been; it is too early to talk of what might be. You can tell which of the various stables the lads belong to as they wear baseball caps embossed with the names of racehorses. They wear them like badges gained in battle. There is King’s Best, Pivotal, Raven’s Pass, Oasis Dream, the list goes on. They haven’t got round to making a cap with the name of Fantasia yet, but the Cumani team walk around as if it is only a question of time. Assessment of her varies from, ‘She’ll win the Oaks,’ to ‘She’ll win the Guineas as well as the Oaks’ or, ‘She is next year’s Zarkava.’

I smile sagely. I have heard this sort of thing a few times before; talk of horses destined to sink in the Limekilns or never to make it beyond Racecourse Side, but it stills excites. Perhaps it is the display of enthusiasm undiminished by previous disappointments, perhaps the time of year when if you do not have something to keep you awake at night, there is little point working in Flat racing.  Michael Bell’s staff mutter about Sariska but no one is suggesting they will be wearing a hat bearing her name just yet.

That’s the way of it in a ten-thousand horse town. There is plenty to talk about even in November. I get the feeling some of it is being kept from a stranger that has just rode in and looks vaguely out of place in a suit and tie. There will be more to talk about in January, more still in February and then March, by which time there will be at least ten Derby winners housed in Newmarket. But as the Classic season approaches its height, the talk will become less and open secrets become more closed.

Last year it was all Twice Over – this year the talk is about fillies. There are the two mentioned, surprisingly little about Rainbow View, a little about the Michael Stoute-trained Leocorno – but you get the feeling that at this stage it is merely a question of throwing a hat in the ring against the Cumani boys just to shut them up. It doesn’t work though as the rhetoric from the Italian-run yard is not fuelled by Bank’s bitter. They seem to truly believe they have a vey good filly on their hands with Fantasia.

At one time that would be all you needed to know. Go to Newmarket, buy a few drinks, talk to a few jocks, a few ex-jocks, see how the land lies, and chances are you have the names of next year’s stars, in no particular order, in your back pocket. The trick is to remember them after drinking copious quantities of Adnams or Bank’s bitter, both of which have a taste that screams, ‘And another of those’ at you which your mouth transfers to the barman. Nights in Newmarket tend to be expensive because there is no shortage of places to roll on to after the drinking has finished, only to start again.

There is a good Indian, a famous Chinese, a nightclub. By the time you hit them, you are past caring about your shrinking wallet and anyway you have enough names to satisfy MI5 let alone pay for the night. The walk to the hotel in a raw wind almost sobers you up and you are so cold when you pick up your room key that it seems a brandy will thaw you out. It doesn’t of course, but you put it on your tab without thinking and stagger up the stairs before flaking out half-dressed.

I like Newmarket. I used to live there but on the wrong side of the tracks. Anywhere north of the racecourse is a bad idea unless you have arrived in a horse-drawn wagon and sell pots and pans for a living. You are venturing close to American air bases and some camp sites where odd things happen in the middle of the night. The west is better. The south is okay so long as you keep close to Newmarket central.

Stetchworth, where Frankie Dettori lives, Dullingham, or Burrough Green, home of Julian Wilson, and a village with a typical English cricket green – are all fine. The village of Ashley is nice, as is Wickhambrook although it is dangerously close to a meat-processing factory so it can get whiffy.

The county line comes as you approach Haverhill, a blot on any landscape and certainly one here. Men in Haverhill will still be wearing shorts in November. There are no baseball caps with the names of horses to be seen. Any caps you do see will likely have NYC written on them at best, something rude at worst. The upside is you are unlikely to understand the message. T-shirts are worn over heavily tattooed bodies up until Christmas. They are splodged with indecipherable lettering and pictures that are either great works of art or unspeakable sexual acts. In Haverhill, making that distinction is not always easy but it is usually safer to assume the latter. After Haverhill you are heading for deepest darkest Essex, where even to get your grass mowed means you have to pay cash as cheques are not trusted.

With the exception of the little havens mentioned, east of Newmarket is the most sought after. Tie your horse up to a saloon in Moulton and you will be fine, as you should be in parts of Kentford. But Newmarket takes some knowing; walk into the wrong pub and you could find yourself in a ditch an hour later minus your shoes and socks.

But to get back to my point about an excursion there once being a pilgrimage in search of all knowledge. The Holy Grail path now extends to Lambourn, Ballydoyle, Dubai and France, so knowing what horses are on the lips of townsfolk in this sprawly Suffolk town is only to be privy to a fifth of the overall picture.

Next year’s Flat season seems an age away. There is to be triumph and tragedy on the battlefield of Cheltenham, Aintree and Wetherby to name a few before then. The jumping boys are preparing to dig in. They are talking the talk and walking the walk. Jumping horses have their names abbreviated so that Kauto Star becomes, Kauto and Master Minded, I imagine, gets called Master, but I don’t really know. I know they used to call Cab On Target, merely ‘Cab.’

It’s a long time since I actually went jumping so I have no idea what they get up to. I imagine they get cold, have a drink, splash their shoes in the lavatory (which is why brogues are so popular) sing Irish songs and hail Ruby Walsh and Paul Nicholls a lot. I know the last time I went, Trabolgan – or should that be ‘Trab’ – won the Hennessy.

It appears, that judging by the title of his autobiography, Mick Fitgerald seems to think jump racing is better than sex. As I appear to be losing track of both, I shall have to take his word for it – which makes me think that by swerving this year’s Newbury spectacular, I may not be missing too much!


AND ANOTHER THING

Take a chance

HAVING STAYED UP late last night studying form (yes really), I have made my final decisions as far as today is concerned this morning to the accompaniment of the Scouting For Girls Cd. For those of you not on the cutting edge, they are the band that had hits with She’s So Lovely, It’s Not About You, Heartbeat and Elvis Ain’t Dead. These are unabashed pop songs with upbeat tempos and downbeat lyrics mainly about unrequited love. That is kind of the story of my life and I am not sure such a background is conducive to making the tricky bull or bear judgements required for a successful afternoon. Probably not but, after all the dissecting, all the consideration of what the form book says to you in those dark uninterrupted moments in the middle of the night, basically you have to act or sit on the fence.

Maybe it is because it is the last day at Newmarket; maybe I have been swept away by the cheerful trivia of the band and think I am a resurrected Elvis, or James Bond (another of their songs), causing me to throw caution to the winds.

It makes me think though: Does this game have to be so hard? When you consider it, backing a winner depends on many things failing into place. Your thought processes have to be correctly, even incorrectly tuned if that is what it takes, in order to make that all-important phone call or computer transaction.

I don’t know whether I am doing the right thing but I am backing Gold Sovereign and Virtual. And that’s it. Someone has to make a decision on occasions like this and I am leaving it to the band and me. After all, It’s Not About Me, my Heartbeat is steady, I Ain’t Dead and could have been James Bond if I had applied myself.

The difference between a successful and unsuccessful day often rests on an impulse decision. After all the careful and considered analysis, what eventually happens frequently comes down to a split second decision made somewhere in the recesses of the brain. Of course, you know when you really should bet because you are straining at the leash to do so, but you cannot always wait for the perfect wager, growing a beard in the process, sometimes you just have to take a chance.

So that is today sorted. A nice early finish means I can have a glass or two before dinner whatever happens then watch X Factor like a sad git – it is Saturday night after all – but no matter.

I owe it to the Flat season to see it out in style, one way or another. Yes, I know there is a meeting at Doncaster to come and that they will be circling around Kempton, Great Leighs, Lingfield and Wolverhampton throughout the winter but this is the last chance saloon as far as turf racing is concerned. If this weather persists, the chances are they will stage Doncaster in a shroud of mist, fog, or on the brink of a hurricane. Might as well go for broke now and get it over with.


And Another Thing – Oct Archive

And Another Thing

Back From Holiday …

DESPITE misgivings about leaving my office and formbook for seven days, a week in Corfu turned out to be a most relaxing and pleasant experience. The weather was unseasonably kind and I have returned with a deep suntan. But having been staked out on a sun-lounger may not achieve much except make me feel better. I have a lot of work to catch up on so apart from the postman, if he is delivering a parcel or a registered letter, it is likely to go unnoticed. And as with every positive there is a negative; my trousers seem to be having an argument with my waistline. Either that or they have shrunk whilst in Greece. But I know that cannot be correct as the rest of my wardrobe seems to have suffered a similar fate, meaning the common denominator is my stomach. I don’t need to stand on scales. I have put on weight; it is just a question of how much and that I would rather not know. All that time in the gym, honing a body that has hit freefall, has left me having to start from scratch. For now, I will wear all my shirts outside my trousers, which can look trendy or downright stupid depending on the shirt, and the trouser – not to mention the wearer.

I ought to mention I went all-inclusive. I am not Michael Winner so I do not holiday at Sandy Lane; instead, I have to mix with the rest of humanity. An all-inclusive holiday is great, particularly when, allowing for commission, the Euro is almost worth a Pound. There is nothing to pay once you have hauled yourself to the airport and they have dumped you at your resort. Within three minutes of wheeling your case to your room, you can be sampling a cold glass of Lowenbrau. You might think that the downside to this is that the hotel will be full of raving drunks. Not so!

Surprisingly those that avail themselves of this sort of package deal are either so well pickled in alcohol before they start that they are capable of soaking it up from eleven in the morning to eleven at night, or, realising the stupidity of spending a holiday in a drunken stupor, tend to treat the demon drink with utmost respect. A semblance of temperance is also helped if the white wine is served tepid and the red cold. Drink is not the problem – it is the food – lots of it, served buffet style, meaning you can pile plate after plate. And people do. I watched them heap plates with chicken curry, fish, a bit of turkey for good measure, anything they can find, and then chips, leaving a telltale trail on the floor, slithering from overloaded plates. Then the desserts, the sort of thing you never get at home unless someone has been to Marks & Spencers.

Eveningwear can often consist of grown-men wearing an England football shirt. No other nation does this. Partners of these men, often looking as if they are John Lewis account holders, sit stoically in a specially chosen outfit opposite a man in a football shirt who may erupt at any minute, leaping from his chair, upsetting the soup and  chanting, ‘Rooney, Rooney!’ Why don’t these women tell them?

In daylight, there is no hiding place. We have the swimming pool strut to overcome in our skimpy trunks, bodies looking like the buffet creation that the first fork has ruined; put out of shape and made into an unrecognisable item. The body is gaining its revenge. It delights in splaying outward and downward and suddenly the realisation: You can do what you like on that rowing machine or the treadmill; get a Scandinavian cleaner that is really from Albania and has no papers but what do you care. She lets you chase her round the kitchen while she shrieks, ‘You English are so naughty,’ but it all comes undone after a week’s all-inclusive holiday.

Worse will follow: that knob of baldness that appears like the first snowflake of winter. Only snowflakes melt. Bald patches, like holes in the roof, get bigger. That is when you know it is all over.

People seem to confuse the purpose of swimming pools. The clue is in the title. They have not been designed for Lilos the size of battleships. They are not there for splashing and dive-bombing. Notices always proclaims such but they are no more effective than signs that say, ‘Now wash your hands’ in lavatories. If you don’t know that is what you do after contact with those parts of you best concealed from the light of day, a notice will not suddenly put the idea in your head.

I am not exempt from dubious behaviour. I confess to having spent most of my days in the sun rather like a dog: sleeping, only stirring for a brief period of activity such as, in my case, a swim or another half of cold-filtered lager. Then it was back to the sun bed, making ridiculous nasal and guttural noises that often woke me up. Heaven knows what they did to those around me – that became fewer by the day I seem to recall. And I have a serious question to pose here. Are we so exhausted by modern living that given the chance of a break our bodies will shutdown to recharge and recharge ad infinitum? Are we all running ourselves so far into the ground that we will sit down in a high-winged chair on the first day of our retirement (assuming we reach that far), snore, belch, drink brown ale and never get up again? Are we all existing on adrenalin – the only thing that prevents us from turning into Rip Van Winkle.

Did you see what I did there? Yes, it is the Dewhurst this Saturday – the last golden day of the season with the Cesarewitch and the Champion Stakes on the same card. Rip Van Winkle looks like a very good horse. He may be a very good horse but has to prove it. Bushranger has already proved it and may be one of those Giant’s Causeway types that you always think will get beat by the new kid on the block but never does. We shall see.

So I am back in England. Electric and gas prices continue to go up, earnings come down. A winter threatens to bankrupt us. But punters should take heart as the credit crunch could be good news as we all have less to lose. They used to call it boom and bust but we are not supposed to use that expression anymore. Perhaps we should call it Bloody Incompetence with Taxpayers’ Money. But of course it is always someone else’s fault: the Middle Eastern oilmen, the bankers, the fact that consumers cannot be trusted to budget and cannot handle credit. That’s a laugh from a government that has sold the family silver and borrowed to the hilt!

Don’t let me get started! It’s not fair on those of you that have read this far and it is not good for my blood pressure.

England play tonight. They should win and reignite the belief that we will win the World Cup; something that we will only achieve if at least six other countries are prevented from taking part. But we should beat Belarus and if we don’t; well it will not be our fault. It will be the referee, the manager, or the fact that nobody could actually find Belarus on the map until a few minutes before the match.

Adverts are already in evidence for Christmas and the Flat season is winding down. I cannot afford to go to Santa Anita for the Breeders’ Cup and somehow I cannot bring myself to get stuck back into that form book that is supposed to provide my living. Suddenly, after all that sleeping, I am too tired.

AND ANOTHER THING…

Another Winter Holiday paid for

RIGHT, that is it, the flight is booked, so is the hotel and I shall be leaving for Los Angeles on Wednesday. The hotel is in the shade of the Blue Mountains and just a short ride on the Orange Highway from Santa Anita. It should be a great week. The bars of Hollywood by night, the racetrack during the day after I have checked local properties in Beverley Hills to see if there is anything for sale I like and can afford.

Wake up! Time to get back to work! That was the plan back in March when I was in possession of an ante post voucher for Twice Over in the Guineas at 33/1. 2008 was obviously going to be a big year and the plan was to reward all that hard work in October with a trip to the Breeders’ Cup at Santa Anita. Instead, I sneaked a week in Corfu and am currently scanning the local paper to see if Tesco need any workers on the night shift.

I am not alone. Most professional backers I know have struggled this year, despite having everything at their disposal: all those films of past races; form for even the most obscure of animals, enhanced prices on the exchanges and the chance to lay a short one.

From a betting point of view, the season was slow to gather pace and somehow it stayed that way. As a pastime, backing horses is rather like going to the gym. Start to get out of the habit and it is difficult to pick up again. And as the months drifted by it seemed that form lines remained in freefall. With betting opportunities apparently limited, it is hard to be confident about having a bet when, should it go wrong, there is no obvious way of recovering losses. I think most of us have sleepwalked through this year in a partial state of paralysis. Somehow, we have managed; sometimes, that is what this game is all about – surviving and getting by.

It is too late now to expect some sort of renaissance in the shape of a miracle bet. My chance came at Ascot a couple of weeks ago. The wins of Furnace, Jukebox Jury, Liberation and Soul City over two days represented my best winning period of the year. But it was still a case of that age-old cry after they had won. I should have had more on! If only I had been braver with my staking! We are never satisfied! In case you had not noticed, it is easy when we know the results. My reply to myself was, just be grateful you backed them at all!

So what do we do after the winding back of the clocks and the Breeders’ Cup signifies the virtual end of the season this weekend? Well, there are still Newbury and Doncaster meetings to come but I am not sure I hold out too much hope for anything dramatic.

National Hunt racing is all right but I contend you cannot make a living backing jumpers. They are too prone to injury and winter racing is weather dependent. Some horses handle left-handed tracks but not right-handed and often bizarre things occur, sabotaging the best thought out plans.

But there is hope on the horizon. Actually, because there is significantly less Flat racing during the winter, it is easier to monitor. Yes, we are dealing with a sub-standard type of horse that can often disappoint for no apparent reason, but by sticking to the tried and tested, and with all facts regarding draw and going an open secret, it is possible to make money on the all-weather. Assuming we can tick over until Christmas, there is always a chance of a brief break in the sun during January before the carnival that is Dubai. Now you can win money in Dubai providing you follow the form closely, as so many horses are out there making up the numbers or giving their trainers a free holiday.

The biggest problem I find is maintaining one’s enthusiasm during the dark winter days. It is so much easier to declare the cards as being of no use rather than to dig around in an attempt to root out something that is a backable prospect. Not all is lost. We remain, cracking our way through the credit crunch, on the lookout for the next winner.

I always say the meter starts running as soon as you touchdown in America where nothing is free. They do not even give you a breakfast at most hotels. To take a trip to California one needs to have had a good year. So the target has not been met and I shall watch the racing from the familiar confines of my little office. I am not looking upon this as a failure. After all, I am still in the game! And I believe they are holding the Breeders’ Cup at Santa Anita again next year.

That is the thing about this business. You are only a race away from pulling the rabbit from out of the hat. It is just that, right now, the rabbit has flattened his ears and it is damned difficult to grab hold of the little blighter!


AND ANOTHER THING…

Mad as Hell!

THERE WAS A FILM in the seventies that developed into a cult movie as it became very popular. Network was its name. You know the sort of thing; it was one of those ‘now’ films. It starred Peter Finch as a slightly deranged anchor man for a news programme, who eventually suggested that all his fellow New Yorkers should stick their heads out of their high-rise windows and shout: ‘I am as mad as hell and I am not going to take it anymore!’

One by one, cries started to percolate through the city, as first a few responded and then, in a united cacophony of sound, citizens responded en masse.

Now I am no Peter Finch and this is not a movie. Nevertheless, I am starting to get as mad as hell. Unquestionably we are facing a depression, we do not need the supremo from the Bank of England to tell us all that. What vexes me is that having people shrieking such a message to us is rather like having the incompetent captain of the Titanic telling us we are about to hit an iceberg. You may recall the captain of this ship unwisely allowed himself to be cajoled into trying to make a name for the engineers and designers of the ship in an attempt to break the record for a transatlantic crossing. Therefore, in his haste, he ignored warnings of the danger of ice, resulting in the ship travelling too fast to stop when the lookout spotted the fatal glacier protruding from the ocean.

So I don’t want to hear about politicians and bankers telling me they have got it wrong with my money and that we are about to be holed below the waterline. WE are not being holed; their policy, their incompetence, their ivory-tower attitude, means THEY are guilty of negligence. The hole is their responsibility. I am sorry, but if you receive massive amounts of money to pursue your so-called vocation whilst the rest of us peck around in the dirt, it is not then reasonable to expect us surfs to bail you out!

If we are running short of money – sort it! Unless I have it wrong, we spend a million a day in Iraq and Afghanistan achieving nothing. That just so happens to be taxpayers’ money. I do not wish to see my money dribbling away in the sand in two countries that have nothing whatsoever to do with me. I certainly do not then expect be told I must tighten my belt – that I should go to Primark and buy extra jumpers so that I can cut back on the central heating, or that I should go to bed an hour earlier to keep warm. Is there a war on? Are they going to bring back rationing cards? And no, I do not want to hear about politicians living it up on yachts in Corfu at my expense. I am mad as hell!

This week I received a note from my newsagent informing me my paper bill was overdue. It was the first I had heard of it (I pay on a monthly basis). It was the note that got right up my back passage. We have all received them. They start off as if penned by Uriah Heap, Dear valued customer, it has come to our attention… then that stupid hedging of bets at the end…if you have paid this account, kindly accept our thanks and apologies. When you query this with the shop, of course, they tell you a computer sent the letter.

No it did not! Someone had to address it and put it in an envelope. Did it not occur that I have been a customer for ten years, never missed a payment and that I had been on holiday? And did it not occur that for that reason no local bill had been sent to me? Then to add insult to injury, at the bottom of the letter is a codicil informing me it will be necessary to raise the delivery charges. Now I am mad as hell again. The bloody paper is late as it is. Why should I subsidise a service I am not getting? Eh? Eh? Go on punk tell me that!

So I have devised a plan to stop all this squeezing of my finances to fund holidays for executives. From now on, every time some bastard tells me I have to pay more for less; I am going to consume less of his product to offset the charge. In the case of the paper shop, I am stopping the local paper and the Weekender. That means I will save £3 a week at a stroke! Perhaps using the last word whilst in such a vociferous mood is tempting fate. But to press on: I am going to cancel all unnecessary bits of insurance, such as boiler cover and all this stupid stuff I am insured against like falling into a river and ruining my best suit. I am just going to ensure I do not fall into any rivers. It has not happened yet, why should it now?

I am going to fight back. Why should I carry the can for the fat cats that have so far denied me a lick of the cream that has turned sour in their oversized troughs?

I am not leaving a pound coin in anyone else’s fund when it could be in mine.

I am about to overhaul my situation with the bank. I have savaged the funds I have in Betfair and, whilst I am about it, I am sick of being talked to by the presenters on At The Races as if I have an IQ in single figures. So unless they stop telling me nonsense and keep bombarding me with those stupid adverts, I am going to turn the sound down when they are on – Matt Chapman excepted – which should save a smidgen of electricity. I shall only turn it up when they actually show a race. And no, I am not going to wait for the Sp’s afterwards so that Michael Parkinson can ask to me to check if my funeral arrangements are in order. No Parkinson, they are not. But you see, I don’t intend dying just yet; and if I do, presumably because I have bust a blood vessel from all this ranting, they can stick my body in an orange box and drop it in the sea for all I care.

You see, I am as mad as hell and I am not going to take it anymore! You can join me if you like!


And Another Thing

Supermarkets. A Testing Challenge!

SO THE RACING was rubbish today. I went to Tesco to stock up the cranking old freezers with enough food to withstand a nuclear war. Well, in this incessant business you have to take advantage of any chance you get. By tonight, this looked a prudent move on my part. Even in the comparative mild climate known as the South of England, the weather is bad. We could be in for a hard time. But nah, surely it is just an unseasonal weather blip, the sort that often follows the resetting of the clocks. Funny that, as soon as the clocks go back, winter takes it as its signal to get nasty.

Fleeced by the Supermarket

Anyway, like any other major supermarket, the object of the design of Tesco is to flummox innocents like myself. I arrived armed with a list of items I felt I needed, but once inside the giant warehouse found my brain had deserted me and even the list was of little use. I was drawn to televisions I did not need, bought the Scouting For Girls CD, added more wine to my collection, failed to distinguish the difference between butter and Clover, fought to comprehend what I had gone for, bought a case of Magners, face tissues instead of the other kind; in short was overwhelmed by the whole experience.

In the end, I settled for filling the trolley and I guess the contents will suffice until spring when I surface from enforced hibernation. But they really have got it right at Tesco. Entering is like crossing the threshold of some enchanted castle where you are star struck by what is ahead of you. Instead of sticking to the agenda written on the note you are clutching that should have accounted for no more than  sixty pounds, you can easily triple that amount in the belief you are bagging a bargain or six. The two for one, the buy one get one free offers, are no such thing. They induce us to misuse our credit cards. What Tesco gives with one hand it takes with its other three. Fair play to them, it is a clever trick. They are laying 2/1 the favourite whilst everyone else is going 7/4 and we bite. But we don’t just back the favourite, we try the forecast, the tri-cast, a Lucky 15, and by the time we leave there is only one winner. Forget that bottle of wine at half price, that knockdown offer on cheese, when it is all added up Tesco has achieved what every retailer dreams of: they have suckered the consumer in to parting with more than bargained for. And it is a clever trick. We have not been fleeced; as consumers, we walk away with goods, but we have spent more than we intended.

Women take 3 times as long to shop as men

It is also a test of human relationships. Women, men and supermarkets do not mix. Women are particular about what they buy. They check the expiry date on goods. Men, on the other hand, just pick up the item at the front of the stack and chuck it their trolley. Expiry dates are for wimps. The closer they sail to the wind on that score, the more of a challenge it is to their guts. Men are capable of eating a can of corned beef packaged in 1943 without any ill-effects; give such a thing to a woman and the ambulance will be at the door.

Women take three times as long to shop as men; this is apparent by the time the middle-aisle has been reached. By then, men are getting twitchy. They wish to return home to watch the racing, the movie or have a lunchtime drink with their mates. But the other half is still deciding whether to buy a cereal with raisins or apricots. This results in mini domestics flaring up throughout the store. By the time they reach the cheese counter, most men are ready to commit murder as they watch their partners hover, dally, squeeze, feel, and rattle every object before it is consigned to the trolley. What difference does it make? They are all the same for goodness sake. A bag of potatoes is a bag of potatoes, a chicken is a chicken; all that alters is the weight and the price.

Supermarkets are a test of a relationship

Judging by today’s exhibition, I am of the opinion that marriage counsellors are redundant. The only criterion for a happy marriage is whether a couple can navigate a supermarket without grabbing each other by the throat or worse. If they can stand each other for in excess of three hours in Tesco, Sainsburys, Waitrose or Morrisons, then they should weather the Venus-Mars union that awaits. This is the ultimate test. If your partner drives you crazy in a supermarket but you can still exit smiling, pack the car, and not utter a cross word on the way home, you are in a partnership made in heaven. If not, you are just another normal bloke: Rex Harrison in My Fair Lady, wishing why a woman could not be more like a man.

The answer is they never will be. They just don’t understand. They have no comprehension of real life. You tell them you like stockings and suspenders so, just to spite you, after a suitable interval, they never wear them again. Admit you have a peccadillo of any sort and prepare for it to be withdrawn at the earliest opportunity. Tell them you are a leg man, they will wear trousers, state you like breasts, they will button themselves up to the neck, admit you like high heels they will wear flat shoes.

To hell with them! Take them to the supermarket in your car, excuse yourself on the pretence of wishing to use the lavatory and leave them wandering up and down the aisles as you drive home to watch a James Bond or a Monty Python CD. That way everyone will be happy. It will take hours for them to realise you have disappeared as they compare the various types of toilet ducks whilst you find something to laugh at on the television screen. Yes, Monty Python and James Bond, another of the things they fail to appreciate or understand…

And Another Thing – Sept Archive

And Another Thing

When Successful gamblers win BIG money

I HAVE HEARD THE theory that gamblers have an inherent wish to lose. I know this appears strange, a sort of boffin equivalent to spending millions on creating a think-tank to tell us something we already know, don’t need to know, or that is just plain stupid. You know the sort of thing: After two years of intensive study, an erstwhile body informs us that people who do not smoke live longer, or that single mothers find life harder than those in a stable relationship. Well, it keeps people fit for little else but to pontificate in work I suppose. At this point, I feel obliged to deviate slightly and point out that although pontificate sounds like something your mother told you would impair your eyesight, whole government departments have made a healthy living out of its pursuit.

To get back to the central point: The train of thought that all gamblers wish to lose is neither a new nor a singular one. The idea behind this thinking is that gamblers are in fact financial masochists wishing to wreck their lives sooner rather than later. That they reached a subliminal decision that climbing on the rollercoaster that was betting seemed more fun than becoming a drunk and sleeping in their own urine. Tough choice that one! So gambling became their chosen path, leading them down a road that would ultimately lead to disaster. After all, what with all its pitfalls what other outcome could possibly ensue? Backing horses, going to casinos, gave them a licence to become a failure that would not be their fault. They even have the Inland Revenue on their side, as so-called professional backers do not need to pay tax on winnings from betting as HM Revenue & Customs state that in the end there won’t be any! So for those intent on failure, betting was the easy way: the head in the gas oven as opposed to the knife in a hot bath, the sleeping pill rather than the leap over the cliff, because success in life was never an option anyway!

This is the theory, doubtless first dreamed up by someone with a German-sounding name who lives in a house dusted with an endless row of battered books.

Most of you will find all this odd, but for those of us who bet, losing is something we have to learn to live with. It is the equivalent of getting dressed in your best Saturday suit and going to the disco `a la John Trivolta and dealing with constant rebuffs from members of the opposite sex (or in these times the same I suppose) in return for the occasional sweet night of success. In short, at times it is not much of a way to spend a life. All that preparation resulting in failure, very often through no fault of your own: It rains two hours before the race and your horse needs it firm. The draw bias has suddenly changed, you, of course, are on the wrong side.

Why do we persist? It’s hopeless! Even when you are right, you are wrong! We get used to discussing our failures, we live with them, and they become our companions over a pint of Fullers. Winners never talk about it, only losers mull over the events of the day. Talking about winning is tantamount to counting your chips at the table. It is not done! After all, this game is not about winning, it was designed for losers.

So when we do win, and win big, we have some adjustment to make. We know how to lose, but winning, that is a different matter entirely. After all, we did not join to win, remember we joined this club so that we could squander away our lives and blame someone else – jockeys, trainers, the system, too much racing. And I am not exempt. Many of my columns have concentrated on the wrongs of racing, homed in on the idiots; highlighted the inconsistencies. That is the prerogative of someone writing from behind the armoured shield of anonymity. It is the privilege of the critic, the bravery of being out of range.

This weekend, totally against the run of play I had one of the best weekends I can remember. It came without warning. In short, I backed four winners: Furnace, Jukebox Jury, Soul City and Liberation. They were chunky prices, I tipped them on Bush Telegraph for anyone who reads that and I made a lot of money. There, now I have said it, broken the taboo, ruined the day of anyone reading this that has had a bad weekend punting or one that was only so-so.

I am not attempting to rub salt in the wound. I have experienced what a bookmaker acquaintance once referred to as a golden run. And after such a run, one has to be ultra-carful because a golden run has a beginning and most certainly an end. It is there just to give you enough incentive to continue in the belief that you are the exception to the Inland Revenue rule. That you are the chosen one, the one who can break the mould when in fact all you can do in this business is to swing the percentages in your favour. That means patience, hard work and plenty of days when your chin is on the ground. This golden run has the life of a firefly. It lasts between the last race of the successful day to the first of the next day when you become another potential loser. Savour it, but recognise it for what it is! The reinstatement of the status quo is round the corner, meaning as your golden run ends, someone else’s begins.

Those are the rules. All the successful gambler can do is to bend them; he cannot alter them. But the bending, the shifting of the percentages, can make the difference at the end of the year between selecting a suitable bridge to sleep under and finding another mortgage payment.

And Another Thing

Horse Racing V’s Football

SO after the 6.50 at Kempton, it strikes me that I can watch the football: England against Croatia. I am no football expert; there are those who doubtless say I am no expert on any thing – fair play (to use the vernacular) if that is their view.

But aside from watching the England matches and the World Cup games, I don’t watch football that much. That said, internationals are always thrilling and not for the first time, I can see why as a spectator sport it has so much appeal. Compared with the high dive into the pool that is horseracing, football is white-water rafting. Horseracing is a sudden injection of adrenalin – even the Grand National only lasts ten minutes – whereas football supplies ninety minutes of action on the pitch and a third of that amount in replays and discussion afterwards. Even though horseracing has been a large part of my life for longer than I care to remember, replays of races are cold salads in comparison to the curry of football.

I do not know why that should be, particularly as I am no great fan of what is dubbed (more vernacular but unintended) the Beautiful Game. Football is infectious. It builds to a crescendo, encourages the onlooker to take a stance, a position, become involved in the drama as it unfolds. Even its replays allow the spectator to relive a glorious moment they are hungry to see. Perhaps it is because the action is faster than a horserace, less expected and there is more to view. Other players are all contributing to the goal or the free kick and the apprehension mounts in a way that is unachievable in a horserace. And because we are dealing with human beings out there, we feel their anguish, their triumphs, their emotions, possibly more than in the heat of the moment they do themselves. Who can forget David Beckham’s avenging penalty against Argentina? Surely the poignancy of the moment, the way he composed himself for one of the mightiest kicks of his life was not lost on any one watching. He we all held our breath and felt the sweat on our palms as, alone, he ran toward the spot and kicked the ball.

Horseracing never really reaches that level of tension. If you have had a bet and your horse is travelling well, perhaps looking likely to win, there is an instant of joy as he moves closer, and then a second or two of delayed doubt followed by the dash to the line when you either cheer or curse. In comparison, it is a minor moment set against the drawn out drama of a football match. It is also true that however much we might like to take the gambling element out of a horserace; it is not quite the same to cheer on a dumb animal than it is to cheer on a human being. In no way I am degrading racehorses here, as I love them although they do not always seem to reciprocate my feelings. We all have our favourite equines. Of course, as a professional punter, such trivia is supposed to be beneath me but it is not. Off hand, I would say I admire Duke of Marmalade for his professional no-nonsense uncomplicated attitude, Darjina because she is beautiful and Zarkava for the same reason. But none of them can actually speak to me so I have no idea what goes through their heads.

If I were to listen to an interview with Duke of Marmalade, what would he say? I suspect he would be somewhat like Frank Bruno: ‘Yeah, well, I was always goin’ well, you know what I mean, and when that Papal Bull headed me at Ascot, well you know, I was always goin’ to get ‘im.’ Darjina on the other hand may just shake her head and say, ‘I cannot possibly make any comment until I have had a drink of water darling.’ Through an interpreter of course!

An unkind observer may be tempted to suggest Duke of Marmalade or Darjina could give a better interview than Wayne Rooney. But no, with footballers we know how they are feeling. Take Joe Cole last night. Battered and cut from an awful tackle from some Bolshevik beast, stitched and with a head zigzagged with blood, back on the bench, he was talking, joshing, being, well, Joe Cole.

Whereas horses can only shake their heads, gulp water and kick innocent bystanders who get in their flight path. You even have to hold their head in place to get a reasonable photograph. Trainers, owners and jockeys sometimes try to attribute human characteristics to a horse but if he is defecating as they speak, it does dilute such comments to a degree. And when a race is over, it’s all change and bring on the next one.

Somehow, even a half-decent game of football is not over when the final whistle has gone. There is the dissection, the goals in slow motion and they do have a quality that a horserace, once we know the result, cannot match.

Maybe it is something we should be aware of when we try to promote our sport. Even the heady rush of gambling, which can be very short-lived if your horse is plainly going nowhere from some way out, fails to ignite the passion in the same way that other sports can. Perhaps it is because it is over so quickly.

And we all know the downfall of activities that are over quickly. Somehow, the anticipation is always better than the act. Or is that me again?

And Another Thing

September 2008

Ayr Gold Cup: Is there a draw advantage

CONFUCIUS he say: ‘If you have to back two winners to be paid once – do not bet.’ Actually the Chinese philosopher said no such thing. He was too busy in 550 BC saying such things as, ‘An oppressive government is more to be feared than a tiger’ and, ‘Better a diamond with a flaw than a pebble without.’

But I suspect if he were asked to apply his crafty mind to the complex puzzle that is today’s Ayr Gold Cup he would probably dismiss it with something similar as the sentence I falsely attributed to him. Not that I am comparing myself in any shape or form (particularly shape) to the great thinker, but without the distraction of tigers or typhoons to worry about, if he were in circulation today and turned his attention to today’s conundrum, I suspect he would take a similar approach. As if the big sprint is not hard enough to start with, we are faced with a situation that suggests if you are not drawn low you are unlikely to win. This is based on analysis gleaned from one race: The Ayr Silver Cup, run yesterday where if you raced on the stands’ side you might as well have been trying to circumnavigate the globe backwards.

This is a preamble leading to the chances of Confuchias, the horse, who has been in many a notebook after such a promising run in the Great St Wilfred from a draw that gave him little or no chance. Backed earlier this week, as those that had not seen the merits of that run began to cotton on to it, and then handed by fate what seemed at the time a good draw, he touched favouritism before sliding after events yesterday. A formerly good horse with Group pretensions, he likes this ground and everything looked in place for a big run in such a minefield – or rice field – of a race.

All that changed a little after 4.43 yesterday when the repercussions of the Silver Cup draw sunk in. So now not only does Confuchias have to be the best horse, he has to defy Newton’s theory – or something that approximates it – to win.

However, Confucius the man may have the last laugh. He was allegedly born on September 28th – a date that is only eight days off the running of this year’s race. He also once said,’ It does not matter how slowly you go, so long as you do not stop.’ Is it possible he is trying to tell us something here and that all his deep-rooted and mind-influencing philosophy of so long ago was in fact leading to this one golden moment?

It is also possible that I am acting like a fifth member of the Monty Python team, who so cleverly alluded to the pitfalls and blind stupidity of taking everything as an omen in The Life of Brian.

Apparently, Confucius once asked after some stables had burnt down: ‘Was anyone hurt?’ He did not ask about the horses. The lesson, according to a Confucius sage, is that the great man was demonstrating the superior value human beings have over property. Piffle!

But if, as reported, he paid such scant heed for the poor unfortunate beasts then, perhaps now, some 2,500 years later, they are about to get their own back.

And Another Thing

All weather horse racing please

FRIDAY: They are squelching through heavy ground at Ayr, where frankly we ought to have our heads tested for even contemplating having a bet. I had mine tested some time ago and the results came back negative. Newmarket stage an all two-year-old card, meaning there will be messages and counter-messages aplenty. Doubtless we will be subject to such phrases as: ‘Group horse in the making – working the house down’ and the one that sends chills down the spine of the wrong kind, ‘Help yourself.’

Newbury’s card is of a high standard but, as is often the case, although long on quality, it is short on betting opportunities. Maybe Royal Vintage; can see Multidimensional but would not back him and Palavinci will be all the rage after a promising second to the very useful Delegator who, for my money, won with a ton in hand. The balance of Invincible Heart’s form means he wins the 4.30 with daylight to spare but I am not convinced he is as good as his form makes him look.

But take heart, Girl of Pangaea should win the 8.20 at Wolverhampton, a full eight hours after racing has started and on a Friday night. Like, yeah, I really want to wait all day to back that at 11/10!

And if all else fails I have a message for Earned Income in the trotting race at 9.20. Get me outta’ here!

Incredibly, this Flat season is drawing to a swift conclusion. And after such a promising start – what, only three months ago, or so it seems – when we all backed Twice Over in the Craven and held vouchers for him for the 2,000 Guineas, somehow it has dribbled away, closely followed by our bank balances.

And we read in the paper today that Denman is likely to miss the Hennessy, has lost weight and may be suffering from an irregular heart beat. This is devastating news for his connections and for all jump fans. Such glum news is a reminder of the line of tissue that separates joy from misery in this game. It also demonstrates how it only takes one horse to light up those short mid-winter days and that without him, the 2008/ 2009 National Hunt season could become just another season, taking place in the fog and gloom until Cheltenham in March. Let us hope not.

Clearly, all-weather racing is at last being taken seriously and the news of pre-Breeders’ Cup cards at Great Leighs and Kempton is nothing but positive. Now all we have to do is sort out this infernal credit crunch, stop pouring money down the bottomless pits that are Iraq and Afghanistan, get Paris Hilton off the front pages and boycott Big Brother and we might actually be on the road to recovery.

And Another Thing

Quotes, Words what do they mean?

RAY COCHRANE is responsible for this piece. I like Ray but why will he insist on calling all female horses mares? He must know that a female horse is a filly and only becomes a mare when she reaches the age of five. I guess it is some sort of Irishism – akin to the statement made by all Irish trainers or jockeys that their horse won IN Ascot rather than AT.

Whilst I am about it my quibble with the current trend to savage the English language does not stop there. Why do we call children kids – surely a kid is something spawned by a goat – why cops for police – cops pound the New York streets – why totally useless expressions that mean nothing like chrimbo for Christmas, why taters for potatoes. Have we become incapable of referring to anything correctly?

This prompted me to consider how other sports tend to cope with misquotes and inevitably led to some hilarious examples. In comparison, memorial quotes do not tend to surface from horseracing as such, but there is a clutch of amusing statements from gamblers. So in the spirit of that compilation programme of bloopers hosted by Dennis Norden – herewith the first batch…

‘One way to stop a runaway horse is to bet on him.’ Jeffrey Bernard.

‘One of the healthiest ways to gamble is with a spade and a packet of garden seeds.’ Dan Bennett.

‘Dear Lord, help me to break even. I need the money.’ Anon.

‘Depend on the rabbit’s foot if you will, but remember it didn’t work for the rabbit.’ R.E. Shay.

‘I met with an accident on the way to the track: I arrived safely.’ Joe E Lewis.

‘The only way to make a small fortune out of betting on horses is to start with a large one.’ Sir Peter O’ Sullevan.

‘Someone once asked me why women don’t gamble as much as men do, and I gave the common-sense reply that we don’t have as much money. That was a true but incomplete answer. In fact, women’s total instinct for gambling is satisfied by marriage.’ Gloria Steinem.

‘The safest way to double your money is to fold it over once and put it in your pocket.’ Kin Hubbard.

‘This is the only place where the windows clean the people.’ Joe E Lewis, standing by a Tote window.

‘Horse sense is the thing a horse has that keeps it from betting on people.’ W C Fields.

‘Horses and jockeys mature quicker than people – which is why horses are admitted to race tracks at the age of two and jockeys before they are old enough to shave.’ Dick Deddoes.

Because football commentators tend to be ex-footballers, they are capable of making the biggest howlers of all.

‘Living in Italy was like being in a foreign country.’ Ian Rush.

‘We actually got the winner three minutes from the end but then they equalized.’ Ian Mc Nail.

‘If history repeats itself, I should think we can expect the same again.’ ‘That would have been a goal if the keeper hadn’t saved it.’ Both quotes attributable to Terry Venables.

‘He dribbles a lot and the opposition don’t like it; you can see it all over their faces.’ Ron Atkinson.

‘I wouldn’t be surprised if this game went all the way to the finish.’ ‘Batistuta gets most of his goals with the ball.’ Ian St John.

‘It’s now 1-1, an exact reversal of the score on Saturday.’ Radio 5.

‘What I said at half-time would be unprintable on radio.’ Gerry Francis.

‘He’s one of those footballers whose brains are in his head.’ Derek Johnstone, BBC Scotland.

‘I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel.’ Stuart Pearce.

‘Hodge scored for Forest after 22 seconds – totally against the run of play.’ Peter Lorenzo.

‘A brain scan revealed that Andrew Caddick is not suffering from a stress fracture of the shin.’ Jo Sheldon.

On a witty note: After being told a concussed striker did not know who he was, the Partick Thistle manager quipped: ‘That’s great, tell him he’s Pele and get him back on!’

‘The only way we will be going to Europe is if the club splash out and take us to Eurodisney.’ Dean Holdsworth, Wimbledon FC.

In his excitement, Murray Walker could be relied upon to supply a host of gaffs that in some cases surpassed the events he covered. A few gems are below…

‘And now excuse me while I interrupt myself.’

‘The leader is absolutely unique, except for the one behind it which is identical.’

‘There is nothing wrong with the car except it’s on fire.’

‘Tambay’s hopes, which were previously nil, are now absolutely zero.’

How about this for a mixed metaphor or two from ITV’s Bruce Roach: ‘We threw our dice into the ring and turned up trumps.’

‘In life he was a living legend; in death nothing has changed.’ Live TV.

‘I owe a lot to my parents, especially my father and mother.’ Greg Norman.

‘Ballesteros felt much better today after a 69 yesterday.’ Steve Ryder.

In a similar vein, broadcast on Metro Radio: ‘Julian Dicks is everywhere. It’s like they’ve got eleven Dicks on the field.’

Even worse, from Harry Carpenter: ‘Isn’t that nice; the wife of the Cambridge president is kissing the cox of the Oxford crew.

Ken Brown, on golfer Nick Faldo and his caddie Fanny Sunneson lining-up shots at the Scottish open: ‘Some times Nick likes to use Fanny, other times he prefers to do it himself.’

‘It’s a great advantage to hurdle with both legs.’ David Coleman.

‘Sure there have been injuries and deaths in boxing – but none of them serious.’ Alan Minter.

‘I’ll fight Lloyd Honeyghan for nothing if the price is right.’ Marlon Starling.

No quotes on boxing would be complete without a snapshot sample from the Greatest, Muhammad Ali. Here is a smorgasbord of quotes that demonstrate Ali’s wit, wisdom and showmanship, starting with…

‘Why chump, I bet you scare yourself to death just starin’ in the mirror. You ugly bear! You ain’t never fought nobody but tramps and has-beens. You call yourself a world champion? You’re too old and slow to be champion.’ To Sonny Liston – the Mike Tyson of his day – February 1964.

‘There’s not a man alive who can whup me. I’m too fast. I am too smart. I am too pretty. I should be a postage stamp. That’s the only way I’ll ever get licked.’

‘To be a great champion you must believe you are the best. If you’re not, pretend you are.’

‘Superman don’t need no seat belt.’ (To flight attendant, who replied, ‘Superman don’t need no airplane either.’) One of the few occasions Muhammad Ali was outdone, in or out of the ring.

‘I’m so fast that last night I turned off the light switch in my hotel room and got into bed before the room was dark.’

‘Frazier is so ugly he should donate his face to the US Bureau of Wildlife.’

Later, in a more reflective mood, Ali retracts his personal statements that cut Joe Frazier deeply. ‘I said a lot of things in the heat of the moment that I shouldn’t have said. Called him names I shouldn’t have called him. I apologise for that. I’m sorry. It was all meant to promote the fight.’

‘I’ve seen George Foreman shadow boxing and the shadow won.’ Before the legendary fight that became the Rumble in the Jungle.

Finally, towards the end of the rollercoaster that was the man who lived up to his own billing and was perhaps one of the greatest men to have lived, ‘A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.’

And Another Thing

Going Conundrums

ANOTHER day, I wish I could say another dollar but I fear any exchange of cash is likely to be exiting my pocket rather than entering it. Prospects of winning anything at the races today seem about as likely as a rebate from the taxman landing on my doormat.

And each morning we wake to more greyness, more rain, more gloom, another portent that the end of the world is nigh. Perhaps it is the sheer despondency of life at present that makes the thought of betting so unattractive. After all, a semblance of optimism is required to have a bet. You have to believe that something good is heading your way in order to ignite the belief you might win. But when waking to a scene from the film The Day After Tomorrow each morning, harbouring any ideas other than those of a negative variety is tough.

Moreover, I find it incredulous that we have a perfectly good all-weather track at Lingfield and that someone has decided to split the card between racing on Polytrack and turf today. Why? More confusion of the Goingstick variety I spoke of last week where hard is registered as 1 and heavy 15. Surely anyone with a spare grey cell would have decided for the sake of simplicity, it should be the other way round. So today we are faced with the first three races being run on turf – if they are run at all considering the surface is already heavy – or Goingstick1 (and why is Goingstick spelt thus?), and the remainder of the card taking place on Polytrack? Who dreamed this up? Consider then the gauntlet prospective punters have to run should they decide to attempt a bet there today.

In the first race, run over turf, Goingstick 1, the favourite, Definightly, is drawn two. Using all known information at our disposal, this is a bad draw, but if, as used to happen once upon a time when there was no such thing as Sunday racing and Godolphin won all the major races, the runners decide to race down the far side, it could conceivably be a good draw. But at 7/4, does it matter? Just leave the bloody thing – Roger Charlton will probably decide the horse has not eaten up and withdraw it in any case just to save us all wasting our time!

A mark of 74 for My Sweet Georgia looks reasonable in the nursery considering she finished second to the highly promising Gallagher. But she is a Royal Applause on soft ground and is another who, on the face of it, from a draw of five, has a lot of running to do. They have been banging on about Sericus for some time but on all known evidence, he looks average at best. But if he is any good, being by Verglass, this easy ground will play to his strengths – that is if he has any.

Then we come to the 4.10 where, on her promising fifth to Snoqualmie Girl at Newmarket, Purple Sage would look like a reasonable betting prospect in the maiden. However, she behaved like a right madam next time, looks as if she wants cut in the ground and as if she is an out and out galloper. Presented with a sharp track like Lingfield, on a fast surface and from a draw of ten – yeah she could win – but would you want to risk it and pay to find out?

Then there is Collateral Damage at Beverley who likes soft ground (just as well), but has two ways of running. That is to say he will lose when you back him and win when you don’t.

And apparently turnover is down, bookmakers cannot pay their bills, Betfair are struggling to sustain betting levels and spectators are tending to spend their leisure time elsewhere.

No – surely not!

And Another Thing

Saturday’s Horse Racing sinks into the mud

SO THAT’S IT, another Saturday has bitten the dust, or should that be sunk into the abyss. The Haydock Sprint washed out along with the Leopardstown card that was to have included the Champion Stakes and the Coolmore Fusaichi Pegasus Stakes – three Group 1 races sunk in the mud. Plans are afoot to stage the Leopardstown card on Sunday and to run the Haydock Sprint at Doncaster next week, but neither is guaranteed. Doncaster has to survive a weather forecast that is far from favourable for the sprint to take place. And Group 1’s or not, races that take place on a bog or during a monsoon have limited appeal; moreover, there is something about cobbled together cards that tarnishes the original concept.

Thinking back to the Royal Ascot card held at York, or the Ebor meeting held at Newmarket, it has to be said they were not the same – something was missing. Races are rather like geriatric passengers on ocean liners; they fail to travel well. But we are making the best of a bad situation and under pressure from bookmakers bleating on about the Levy and the racing authorities clamouring to prove they are adaptable to everything the elements can throw their way, some sort of re-scheduling looks like taking place.

So I suppose we have to join the band of applauders and say well done. Well done it is then!

Of course, what has happened is no one’s fault. By all accounts Haydock did all it could to ensure racing took place. What it could not do was to produce a cloud-busting machine that would disperse the hovering watery menace that washed its fixture away. And for reasons that are murky, they were unable to cancel a fixture overnight even though everyone within a hundred miles of the venue knew racing was impossible. Apparently, it is something to do with insurance and ticket sales and vendors and bookmakers’ licences and the price of fish at the local market. That is what we have come to in this watch-your-back, more-than-my-job-is-worth rain-soaked Great Britain of 2008. Pity really; but there is always Big Brother and the X Factor so that is all right then!

Haydock is not a track I have ever visited, so I cannot claim to know much about it except that there are trees in the paddock. But it is noticeable that when watching coverage from there the crowd seems noisy. Normally they are at their most vocal before and during the first race. A kind of football roar goes up as the horses start and you can just imagine the pints being slugged down as they set off. Should any of the runners fail to start, or break loose, the crowd is in its element, booing and cheering with equal venom as horse and rider pass the post in embarrassed isolation. Obviously, this behaviour is drink-fuelled and I could not help but wonder where these so-called racing fans would be on a blank Saturday. Would they be raising tattooed arms and hamburger-sized fists to betting office staff in Haydock High Street; urinating in waste bins in shopping centres, or mooning from the back of Ford Escorts on motorways as they drive from service station to service station before finding a publican too greedy or frightened to turn them away?

Kempton did of course stage a good meeting. Even to those whose idea of studying form is to peruse the Daily Mirror or the Sun, there were two obvious things they could get stuck in to on the card. Premio Loco, selected by Pricewise, and Ethaara and both, although poor value for those of us who purported to know better, started at cramped odds but obliged. And a winner never starts at poor odds, right? So Jack The Lad and Sid The Snake could free up Oxford Street and Kingston High Street and end up at the Sunbury track. They gulped down the ridiculously expensive drinks and by the time of the two-mile event, those who fail to recognise the difference between a horse and a zebra were cheering home the leader as if he had won on the first circuit. By the time of their next swig they realised there was more to a two-mile race than six furlongs and it was a case of all change in the finishing order as they passed the post on the occasion that counted.

All this is largely prompted by the advert placed by Chateau Racing that appeared in the Racing Post today. Its strap line was ‘Fed Up With Loutish Behaviour And Being Ripped Off?’ and invited race-goers to sample the more genteel delight that is French racing. Personally, yes, I am fed-up with both those descriptions of life in general in this country at present. At a time when we are promoting this country in advance of the 2012 Olympics, feeling smug about the fix America appears to be in, and poking fun at our cousins on the continent, I wonder what they make of us.

While our version of Rome burns; while the Titanic that used to be GREAT Britain slips beneath the waves, we continue to believe we are somehow superior. Fine, but has any one checked how the pound is faring against the euro and the dollar recently?

But, hey, what’s that got to do with anything? Keep drinking that American and Belgian lager; that French and Spanish wine lads, keep shouting for the wrong horse…

And Another Thing

Only 4 Gambling free days

BEING GIVEN YOUR OWN column in a newspaper or a website is tantamount to a licence to appear on Grumpy Old Men/Women on television. You are given carte blanche to snort and rant about matters that vex. Conscious that most of us only have such an opportunity when incoherent after a flagon of ale in the local, or when the other half is in the kitchen and not listening, I have to be aware of the need to rein myself in. I am in danger of becoming a fledging Victor Meldrew or akin to a Daily Mail columnist – who only ever seem to grumble – perhaps they should recruit the doomed Fraser from Dad’s Army to their ranks.

Aware of the direction into which I am lurching, I have concentrated my efforts recently on being sensible. Perfectly sane articles about betting and how best to harness individual areas of competence have replaced flippancy and clever dick sarcasm. Reading some of the comments, most of them relevant and I hope helpful, I have to say I fail to recognise the writer. Yes, it is me; but like most people who perform a role – in this case one of punter – I just do it rather than subject it to analysis. You know what I am saying: it is rather like driving a car, being a magician or pleasing a woman. You know the theory but find it impossible to explain the no-how to someone else. Of course, as far as the latter category is concerned we are talking about the impossible so it is not quantifiable.

All this is a preamble to announcing I am reverting to type. I realise this is bad news for those of you who thought I might have been replaced, incarcerated or run over by any number of aggrieved members from the ranks of racing. Those having some difficulty in adjusting to my Hyde as opposed to the philanthropic Dr Jekyll, may care to look away now.

Off with the everyday M&S shirt and tie, it comes off in one Paddy Power movement and reveals underneath, not a bookmaker wishing to demonstrate generosity, not Superman, but a grisly, hairy being full of bile, unmitigated annoyance and downright unpleasantness requiring removal on a regular basis.

My last missive that deviated from the notion that I was properly hinged attacked Goingstick readings as absurdly constructed and the equal irrationality of the colour coding of horses that move in and out of the betting. Nothing too controversial there I would have thought. But they have forced me out of temporary retirement, reopening the wound of a subject earlier tackled: the four blank Sundays in the 2009 fixture list.

Oh great joy and bliss; those four renegade Sundays are no more! They are to be filled – by trotting racing – possibly held at Wolverhampton. Apparently, there are a number of curry houses in Wolverhampton so the trots is not a new concept to the city. Trotting though is something all together different. It is a bit like Santa Clause’s reindeer pulling a single carriage except that the horses doing the pulling don’t fly over snowy rooftops and presents are not dispensed. On the contrary, their antics, harnessed as they are, not to break out of a trot and disqualified if they do, are likely to take from the poor and give to the rich. So possibly this silly pastime should take place down the road from Wolverhampton at the home of Robin Hood – namely Nottingham. Those tempted to bet should pay special attention to a configuration of names containing any combination of B. Hur, A O’Brien or I. Carus. The first cart is likely to have an unfair advantage, the second means there will presumably be no betting, and the last is liable to catch fire if the sun makes an appearance.

The possibilities of the four rogue days containing a programme of trotting will not alter my social arrangements for the year. The prospect of four blank days of racing makes a framework for my social calendar. At the point of writing, there are four days when I can plan to go to Sunday lunch with my partner, that is if she is still my partner, after what is sure to be a rocky few winter months when the ringing of the phone will dictate my life. No matter how desperate the content of racing, how confident you are that there is nothing to be concerned with, have you noticed how some bastard, with nothing else to do with his sad little life, will phone and tell you he has one? Even if you forewarn all your contacts and tell them you don’t want to be phoned or harassed with next year’s Guineas winner appearing at Catterick, the silly sods still phone. The call will be prefixed with, ‘I know we agreed to have a quiet day but you cannot afford to miss this one…’

Actually, yes, I can. Let me put it this way. If I allow my day to revolve round this bloody certainty that originates from the shopkeeper in Newmarket High Street and it loses, can we agree to all or any of the following? Can I have your car? Do I have your permission to burn your house down, preferably with you in it? Can I share a shower with your missus and rub her all over with shower creme?

I thought not. Well, okay I know I have already done the last one but it would not do any harm to repeat it, particularly if she was sober this time.

But back to the four blank days. What were the authorities thinking? Four blank days of horseracing in one year! Add that to Good Friday, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day and, shock horror, there are seven days during 2009 when there is no horseracing. It is enough to make Scrooge reduce Tiny Tim’s pension plan.

So apart from trotting, fruit machines and virtual racing, what about the human rights of compulsive gamblers and what can they bet on?

Herewith a few suggestions if you feel affected: On Christmas Eve, try driving to your local town and drawing up a spread on how long it takes you to park in the multi-storey. The spread should start at ten minutes and run right through to not at all, to run out of petrol, frozen in vehicle for entire Christmas period with only a new shirt for Uncle Jim, some socks for Uncle Martin, a jumper for Janice and a six-pack of Stella Artois.

Christmas Day: Who, if any one, will be drunk before lunch is served; who is the first to fall asleep after lunch; how many times the Queen has to refer to her cue-card on which her speech is written, and whether Steve McQueen will make it on that infernal motorbike.

Good Friday: Whether the special offer at Homebase will be on barbeques or sun-loungers; neither of which, on the evidence of the last two years, will be in much demand.

As for the four days of non-proposed racing, I suggest that the trotting, if it goes ahead, can do so without the need to buy the Racing Post. I only hope the ground staff can get rid of the ruts made by the wheels of those carriages before the resumption of proper racing.

And Another Thing

September 2008

Professional and Novice Gamblers all want quality racing to bet on

THEY HAVE been showing re-runs of Dad’s Army on BBC recently and I have managed to catch a few of them. Not deliberately, but I have been drawn to the clips I have seen. The problem for me is I can see my character in the cast. It is the: ‘Doomed, we’re all doomed’ Fraser. I don’t wish to become Fraser, or any of those other characters on Grumpy Old Men but, if you are involved in racing just now, what is the alternative?

Yesterday, in desperation, I penned a piece about why certain races should be boycotted and I find myself in the same situation today. And bit by insidious bit I am beginning to resent those making up the spectators in the arena. By that I mean the presenters on the racing channels who try to pretend that each day is bulging with betting opportunities and that they are dipping in and out of the exchanges at every opportunity in between races. Whereas we know this is piffle because if they have any sense (which they must have to be in such jobs) they are pressing buttons, preparing their next part of the script and keeping their fake tans topped up before smiling to camera. No guys, it won’t wash. I know the tan will, but the whole grinning, ‘what a jolly game this is act’ is beginning to play to emptier houses.

Such presenters, on satellite and terrestrial channels, bookmakers, the Tote and anyone making a living out of this racing game, want us – the mugs – to bet. We are an integral part of keeping the show on the road. We take the risks, we bet, often with money we can’t afford to lose, so that the fat cats can continue to draw monthly wage packets and top up their pensions. A pension is only a word to a professional punter. He is his pension and unless he can back winners, his fund is nil – mafish as our friends in the desert would say. So I want to bet. I don’t want to be faced with the sort of nonsense I saw yesterday and am faced with again today. Yes, it is nonsense. Today’s cards are pants and dirty ones at that! Take Pontefract. Imaam should win the first but who in their right mind would back a horse that has three seconds to its name; been a hot favourite twice – 2/5 last time – and will be odds-on again today? No thanks! But you can’t lay it because its form entitles it to win.

Ascot Lime will be short in the 4.30. The race is weak and you would think he would oblige. He is a good-looking son of Pivotal who had a bad start to his racing career when some wild beast from the jungle ran across him at the start. He is getting his act together but his solitary win was from a mark of 77 and now he races from 89. I ask you, how has this happened? How can a horse that has one victory to his name, and then by the narrow margin of a head, be rated twelve pounds higher two runs later without winning? So it looks like another blank day. At least I shan’t lose, but expenses won’t be suspended either.

Elsewhere, after a scare, we are told Denman is now all right. I think it was Martin Pipe who once said there is no such thing as a bit of a leg; saying a horse has a bit of a leg is like saying a woman is a little bit pregnant. Well said Martin! I wish Denman and all connected nothing but good fortune; but fear that we have not heard the last of this saga. Sick one day – well the next. No, that doesn’t sound right to me.

If I am all Fraser and gloom, at least events in the wider world do present a lighter side. A pig in Australia is apparently preventing its owner, a woman, from leaving her house to use the outside toilet, or dunny. The pig is by all accounts big as far as pigs go – an undesirable shape to be in I would have thought if you are a pig – and his sheer bulk and bad temper has made this woman a prisoner in her own house. Quite what she is doing without the services of a toilet is unclear. Drinking very little and crossing her legs a lot one would imagine. Oh and the pig is called Bruce. Now I knew that everyone in Australia is called either John or Bruce, unless of course they are female in which case their name is Sheila, but calling a pig Bruce does lack some imagination in a nation full of men all answering to the same name.

Ruth Kelly has stolen some of Gordon Brown’s thunder by announcing her retirement from politics a few hours after his speech to Conference. Tricky times for the Labour Party at present. If they wish to replace Gordon Brown, they do have a name problem to overcome with regard to his successor. Just as Classics are not won by horses called Jack’s Dream, political parties shouldn’t be headed by people called Darling, Miliband or Straw (as in the last). So those wishing to replace Gordon Brown have a limited choice. Assuming they don’t want to be labelled the Black Adder party, we have to dismiss Alistair Darling if only because we don’t want the Home Secretary saying in public, ‘Sorry, Darling what was that you said?’ There are two Milibands, one in particularly looking as if he belongs on the end of someone’s arm, and another Browne; yes his spelling is slightly different, but he is still Brown in essence. No, that won’t do. Unless they can come across a Bruce, this only leaves Hazel Blears, who sounds more and more like a stateswoman each time we see her. Perhaps aware of this, the powers-that-be only allotted her three minutes speaking time at Conference but she made it count. Hazel Blears it is then! Unless that is J K Rowling can stump up another million quid for the Party, in which case perhaps that will be enough to buy it lock, stock and barrel and she and Harry Potter can run the show.

Lindsay Lohan has come out of her pink closet and broken a thousand male hearts with the announcement she has a female lover in the shape of Samantha Ronson. I can’t claim to be familiar with either, which is probably just as well. The last thing I want is a broken heart as well as an empty wallet.

And Another Thing – Aug Archive

And Another Thing

So that’s Glorious Goodwood over for another year – one festival nearer to the darkness of autumn.

Well, how was it for you? Did you lay Infallible reckoning a three-year-old filly had it to do against colts? Or Henrythenavigator because you felt lucky, Yeats because two miles was a minimum and Lush Lashes because the ground had turned against her? I pose such questions because, with the exception of feeling lucky over ‘Henry’, the other three propositions were all credible reasons for taking a chance. But when it comes down to it, it is what you actually do: whether or not you press that button, pick up the phone or write out the slip that counts. There is a fine line between winning and losing. If you back every horse you fancy, you will lose. If you lay every favourite that you can make half a case against, the same applies.

Somehow, you have to invoke a selective system. And very often it is not a system at all but more an almost random slice of fortune, sprinkled with a sliver of logic or even a sixth sense. What it boils down to is – some transactions are made and others are not. Thereby is the difference between winning and losing. It is as simple as that.

As it turned out, I hit the ground running with Paco Boy and followed up with Gravitation. Two good-priced winners from which only a congenital idiot, a compulsive or someone who had given his Ladbroke details to a sadist could then turn into a losing week.

I mention this, not to crow about my good fortune but to illustrate the point. Without the winning bet on Paco Boy (which followed a losing one on Monte Alto), I may not have gone down the same road with Gravitation. And without such a safety net I may not have backed Visit. There were some losers along the way: Muthabara and Prime Defender on Saturday to name but two, but by then I was comfortably in front, or Comfortably Numb depending on your perception and whether you are a Pink Floyd fan.

So what is the difference between a horse we fancy but let run and the one we actually back? Some bets are obvious but they probably only account for fifteen or twenty bets a season at best. Would we be better just concentrating on those, or are we right to back horses we think might win or are good value?

To be fair, spreading the number of bets we strike does give us a better chance of winning in the long run – or so you would think – but I am coming to the conclusion that there are bets where the odds are stacked in our favour and bets where they are against or only about right at best. This may sound obvious but it is worth dwelling on. Gravitation at 7/1 with only Folk Opera to beat has got to be a better bet than Prime Defender at a shorter price in the Stewards’ Cup. So why play the bookmaker’s game and back Prime Defender at all?

The truth is, however confident we are before the race, afterwards, it is blindingly obvious what we should or should not have done. I have struck some bets in my time on horses that I was convinced would win only to see them blend into the mountainous backdrop that is Ayr or the rolling turf of Newmarket. Then, after it is all over, something has come to mind. Wrong trip – never won left-handed, wins in the summer months – badly drawn (idiot! You need to be drawn low on the round course at Thirsk not Ripon). Come clean – I can’t be the only one that has made stupid mistakes such as these. Can I?

When it all comes together, we are so clever. But this game only teases us into thinking we have cracked its code. No sooner do we think we are on top than we find ourselves right back where we belong!

And Another Thing

What’s gone wrong this year?

IS IT ME or has it taken until the first week of August to get to grips with Flat racing form? Normally we feel our way through the murk of March and April as form lines gradually slot into place, and by the time of the Guineas Meeting have a fair idea where we stand.

Not so this time round. Aided by one or two clues from the winter all-weather fixtures and from the excellent Dubai Carnival, then by the first two Classics, most years one can bumble along backing the odd winner in amongst all the fat losers until mid-summer when, for those who have persevered with the formbook, all the hard work starts to pay dividends.

Bug strikes Lambourn and Newmarket

So what has gone wrong this year? Well a couple of things: firstly, a bug has plagued half of Lambourn and Newmarket. Horses appear fine in their work but those affected return from the races lifeless and listless having failed to run up to form. Very few yards have escaped this malaise yet not one, with the exception of Jeremy Noseda, has admitted to being a victim. Sensibly, he shut up shop and now looks to be on the way back. The rest of those struggling through this particularly unpleasant equine strain seem to be in some sort of denial. Not one trainer seems to be prepared to admit there is a problem. What they tell their owners is their own business but it does not take a detective to work out something is wrong. Just look at the results. Even yards struggling through have patchy form.

It is no coincidence that those yards that have enjoyed the most success this season have all been isolated. Richard Hannon and Andrew Balding are two that spring to mind. Neither yard is housed in a main training centre. The only other horses their strings see are either pulling carts or delivering milk. Then there is of course the current domination of the Aidan O’ Brien stable, another yard with plenty of fresh air between itself and other training establishments. Doubtless those connected would say Ballydoyle’s success has been down to the fact they have consistently produced the best horses on the day – and that may well be true – but surely their path to success has been smoothed somewhat.

The problem may not go away with the disappearance of this bug because the danger is that when the big yards return to normal, the formbook is likely to be about as much use as Gordon Brown at a fashion convention – or indeed any convention at all!

All one can do at present is stick to horses with solid recent form and avoid those from yards whose last winner was ridden by Scobie Breasley!

 

Panorama lifts the lid

The recent Panorama expose that promised to lift the lid on the seamier side of racing was boring viewing for most of us connected with the sport, as it highlighted nothing new. However, what was interesting was how the media tackled a subject we knew more about than it did. To an extent its coverage told us how reliable its reportage on other subjects, those we have to take their word on, is likely to be. In that respect, we have to conclude that Panorama produced an accurate account of what it had uncovered.

There was no sensationalism; on the contrary, it seemed tame, although the stupidity of a few jockeys beggars belief! It did also tell us that there are some very undesirable characters within racing. Not exactly shock horror for most of us. The characters unearthed were hardly the likeable Damon Runyan rogues of his excellent accounts of racing’s lowlife. They were typical of today’s get-rich-quick can’t talk proper culture. The sooner they can all be placed in a home for those deluded into believing they belong in a civilised society the better!

Godolphin wobbling?

Lastly, I like Sheikh Mohammed and all he stands for. But I do think he is in danger of wobbling from the rails. Apparently Dubai has degenerated into a playground for those with ‘loads of money’ and who pay scant regard for Arabian culture. In search of the rouble and the pound, Dubai is no longer quite the desirable destination it once was. Similarly, Godolphin is in danger of being an expensive failure for all who fly its flag. The concept that money can be chucked at, and thus rectify, a problem has long been exposed as false. The main difficulty Godolphin has stems from its purchasing policy.

Unlike Coolmore, they do not have the quality of stallion to breed top class middle-distance horses. In search of elusive Group 1 winners, they pursue a policy of buying American-breds that invariably fail to stay further than ten furlongs at best or of buying from others horses at inflated prices that have won half-decent races.

Sometimes the truth hurts. It is time for Godolphin to take a long look at itself. We all want it to be a success again but, like those trainers in denial over what is happening under their noses at Newmarket and Lambourn at present, they have to wake up and smell the mint tea.


And Another Thing

 Bookmakers are the enemy now!

A FEW YEARS ago I was in a betting shop. At the counter, a customer was engaged in an argument with a member of staff. Apparently, there was some sort of altercation in progress concerning a price that he thought he had taken about a selection in a multiple bet. It appeared that because a member of staff had not initialled the price, company policy dictated they were not bound to pay at such odds. Having exhausted all his lines of argument, the exasperated punter finally threatened the manageress with what he considered the threat to end all threats. ‘I lose at least a £100 a week in here,’ he spluttered, ‘and if you refuse to pay me at 6/1 I shall take my business elsewhere and you will be that amount worse off!’ Some line of argument! Needless to say she paid him.

But what a sad, sad statement for the punter to make. Even allowing for a variation in his arithmetic, he was claiming he lost somewhere in the region of £5,000 a year to a firm of bookmakers and yet he continued to bet undeterred by such knowledge. That sort of sum would allow him to go on holiday three times a year, buy a new car, hire a room in Mayfair twice a year for a weekend and have a young blonde in thigh boots beat his buttocks with the Racing Post – the possibilities are endless. Yet he preferred to give his cash to bookmakers. He might as well have cut out the middle-man and made a standing order to the firm in question, in which case he would not have needed to leave the comfort of his sofa.

I am afraid betting shops are full of such characters. Or at least they used to be; now they are virtually empty. It is little wonder. Apparently, and I am largely relying on information received here as I live in a country village, betting shops depend on anything other than horseracing for the lion’s share of their profit. Friends in London – where there is a betting shop every few hundred yards – tell me such establishments are now little more than arcades. Bells ring, announcers announce, there are constant lottery games, fruit machines pump out coins and flash, whilst on the bank of screens, dogs whizz out of traps and horses, real and otherwise, race.

Tellingly, Ladbrokes have released their half-year profits, revealing they have made only £126.7m as opposed to £154.4m last year. Lots of belt-tightening will be required at Harrow then! No more best claret at the Ladbroke lunches, just Rioja. Actually, I was once treated to lunch by one of the top men at Ladbrokes that consisted of a beef sandwich and a glass of fresh orange in a club off Portman Square. Once I had expressed no interest in drinking the alcohol (never a good idea to imbibe when consorting with the enemy in my view), interest in me waned. That is another story for another day. To return to the Ladbroke report: Chris Bell, their chief executive, stated betting office profits were up by 6.5 per cent. Chris Bell wears expensive suits and looks like he could stand-in for David Cameron. Following the line taken by William Hill earlier in the week, he bemoans the fact that there will be four blank Sundays in 2009 and the cut in evening racing fixtures during the winter. Then he reveals that the principle reason for his company’s enhanced performance in the shops is mainly down to fruit machines.

T              herefore, it has nothing at all to do with horseracing and profits from fruit machines do not constitute an increase in Horseracing Levy. Rather like the man in the earlier scenario, Bell has showed his hand. By declaring fruit machines have mainly generated increased profits, he is in effect issuing a warning to those tempted to play them that they represent the worst value for money within the confines of a betting shop.

That is obvious when you think about it. They are programmed to take out a pre-determined profit. They are rather like the Tote Pool, only worse because they do not declare a dividend. They can insidiously take 30% – even 40% profit without any risk to the proprietor. But only whilst those with coins in their hands keep feeding the ever-hungry mouths of the machines in the belief they will be the exception to the rule. One other slightly more worrying development about the Ladbroke situation is their apparent keenness to move into countries like China and India, which Bell seemed to announce with relish. These are two countries struggling with poverty despite the richness of their showpiece cities. Because they have such large populations that will always be the case, and is not a reflection on the way they are governed. The last thing they need is betting shops, owned by the world’s biggest bookmakers or anyone else.

There was a time when bookmakers were a respected adversary, the sort you would play football against in no man’s land at Christmas. That time has passed. Now they have revealed themselves as the enemy. One last point about them: How is that now, with so much competition from all quarters, including Betfair and squeezed margins, they can afford to match new customers on a free bet for bet basis?

Mr Bell and his kind know what they can do with their free orange juice and beef sandwiches!


And Another Thing

How Many Racecourses do we really need?

THERE ARE sixty racecourses in this country. Those that bemoan the standard of racing at some of them may, like me, consider we have at least twenty too many. To have sixty racecourses that are standing idle for the most of the time, requiring ground maintenance and security arrangements, seems like a dubious business proposition. Someone has to finance this idle situation. Some of the money comes from the revenue generated by the courses, some of it from the Levy Board or the BHA. Far better, I would have thought, to have less racecourses staging more racing.

Pound for pound, we derive most value from the all-weather racecourses, of which there are only four. They may not provide the highest standard of racing but they do give punters a fair chance. The ground and the draw is not an issue. We can rely on the ground invariably being standard, whilst the draw bias is an open secret. If anything, we could do with a few more Polytrack-based racecourses and few less turf-based, something so amply demonstrated by the unfortunate non-fixture that was York this week. Polytrack is the future. Its surface can withstand endless pounding. It would be possible to stage two meetings a day at, say Wolverhampton or Great Leighs – any combination of morning, afternoon and evening – and the surface is not subject to a last minute change due to unexpected weather.

Turf racecourses are liable to become quagmires, or airport runways. Because they are watered, the draw bias can alter without rhyme or reason. Some places like Folkestone, Salisbury, Doncaster, York and Newcastle have an advantageous draw one day that can turn into the kiss of death the next. This situation benefits no one – except of course bookmakers.

Reluctantly, we have to accept the isolated world of horseracing is not so isolated when global weather change can effect its continuance in its present form. Our winters are warmer but our summers (at least if the last two are anything to go by) are wetter.  America has tackled this problem by installing dirt racecourses (soon to be replaced by a similar surface to Polytrack) on all their courses so there is a choice of surface. We all saw the disgraceful slop that was Monmore in New Jersey at last year’s Breeders’ Cup; but that is a scene never to be repeated as Santa Anita (this and next year’s host to the Breeders’ Cup) to be followed by all US racecourses, has dug up and shovelled away its dirt.

In this country, it seems a similar overhaul of some of our racecourses is in order. If we are to trim the number of racing venues, such a move has to be fair and without prejudice. So initially we could start by short listing all non dual-coded racecourses as potentially redundant.

Yes, that means Cheltenham, Aintree, York, Wetherby and Newmarket have to be included. It should not take too long and too many brains to decide they are exempt from closure.

But what of Huntingdon, Taunton, Stratford, Salisbury, Brighton (ridiculously popular with Londoners considering its vagaries) Nottingham and Sedgefield? How about Carlisle, Catterick, Folkestone, the cluster of racecourses in Yorkshire, those encroaching the Midlands: Ludlow, Towcester, Warwick, Worcester – are they all essential? Locals to places like those mentioned in addition to Fakenham and Market Rasen will no doubt put up a fight, and I do accept there is a problem with the closure of National Hunt racecourses.

However, where racecourses are close to each other, surely a distribution of racing throughout the surviving racecourses would mean one less in that area would not spell a reduction in actual racing. Is it sensible to continue to prop up sixty racecourses when forty, maybe even thirty-five, would do the same job at a lesser cost and allow more investment in prize-money and a lowering in entrance fees (currently too high) for race-goers?

Once upon a time, they used to race at Hurst Park, Alexandra Park and Manchester. Their fixtures transferred, no one laments the passing of these places now – only those of us old enough or nostalgic enough are even aware of their closure, much less are in mourning.

Time and circumstances change. Racing has to bend with the wind. We need at least three more all-weather racecourses: one in the Midlands to supply an overflow for Wolverhampton: one in the North so that some of the mentioned Yorkshire racecourses, once defunct, would not create a black hole, and another somewhere in the South, possibly the eagle’s eerie that is Bath.

I know such radical thinking will not make me popular with many; but needs must! A cull of racecourses is required. We need to trim the fixture list but consider utilising the all-weather racecourses on a wider scale to accommodate the shortfall, at least in terms of Flat racing. National Hunt racing is a special case. Virtually useless from a betting point of view after April, to an extent they will have to paddle their respective canoes (in some cases literally) during the summer months. Those that can survive during the winter (places like Plumpton and Fontwell must struggle) are welcome to soldier on; those that cannot will have to accept they are not viable concerns and hand their fixtures over to courses that are.

Sixty racecourses are too many when a lesser number could achieve the same job at a smaller cost


And Another Thing

Changes will throw the form book our of the window

IF THE WEATHER men are anywhere near correct we are in for a rough time over the next few days. By all accounts, biblical proportions of rain are due, meaning if your neighbour is a carpenter and you hear banging and hammering noises coming from his garage it could be time to check your insurance.

Weather forecasters have a poor betting history. They are quite good at stating the obvious but less good when it comes to predicting the unexpected. Once the weather turns in one direction or the other they are quick to state that it will be a long hot summer or the wettest in living memory or, at the first sign of a dusting of ground frost in December that we are in for a desperate winter.

Right now, they seem united. The next three days are likely to present us with monsoon conditions: for Sunderland read Singapore, Reading becomes Rangoon and Birmingham Bombay. We are in for a rainy season, which means that for the second year running the summer has been a virtual washout.

So far, at least in the south of the country, the sky looks menacing, purple in places; there is a grumble of thunder but other than a brief downpour or two, rather like the man that predicts the end of the world is nigh, we have not progressed beyond threats. Perhaps it is different with you but taking the weathermen at their word, we are all likely to be awash at some stage over the next few days.

As far as racing is concerned that means we are in for yet another seismic change in terms of form and ground. Such a situation only exacerbates a year when form is already in turmoil. If you are struggling, then if it is any consolation, professionals that I know are at best breaking even on their betting but losing when considering expenses, at worst, they are doing their brains.

It has been that sort of year. Black clouds have been amassing ever since the start of the Flat season and now they are literally threatening to rain on our parade. Therefore, we should expect the remainder of this week’s meetings to appeal to runners with webbed feet.

Tomorrow, Beverley and Hamilton could be quagmires. Chepstow, already (and always it seems) soft, must be in doubt after the predicted deluges, whilst Sandown and Salisbury should survive but look guaranteed to be soft. Only Great Leighs on Thursday can be relied upon to provide decent ground. The weekend is likely to be anyone’s guess and we can only hope York can provide a raceable surface for its Ebor meeting next week.

All very depressing I know. Apart from the fact that racing has failed to lift off from a punting point of view, it has also been a downbeat year in other ways for followers of the sport. So much so, that, under pressure from the other half, I have just booked a late summer holiday in Greece starting on the Tuesday after the Arc de Triomphe. That is a sure sign that all my yards will simultaneously have it off during that period and horses like Moonquake that I have waited for all season, will chose that week to come good. But you cannot continue to sit and hope. Better to spend money on something you are guaranteed to enjoy rather than contribute to the holiday funds of others.

In the meantime, on the assumption our friends from the Met Office are on the right lines, it looks like a case of backing Black Rain in the 8.10 Sandown tomorrow and laying Bright Sun in the 2.10 at Beverley on Thursday.

And Another Thing

OLYMPICS

I REALISE I must be in the minority when I say that I have not watched a single event from China. Nothing personal, it is just that I am not particularly interested in archery, swimming (especially when the events same to be won by the same competitor), sailing or whatever else it is that they are up to at present. My loss no doubt; and to be fair racing takes a large chunk of the day, so for me, watching television as a pastime is rather like Gordon Ramsey having to endure a dinner party in my conservatory.

By all accounts, the Chinese have made a good job of staging the Olympics. Their opening ceremony was spectacular – anything that involves fireworks does give them an advantage – but they appear to have set a standard that will be hard for Great Britain to emulate in 2012 when the quest for athletic excellence shifts to London.

Oh Lord! London. Great city for shopping: Oxford Street for the big chains, Bond Street for designers and Marleybone High Street for women who like the unusual reasonably priced, as found in Shoon.

Shaftesbury Avenue is good for theatres – although not up to Broadway – and there are countless other attractions like the London Eye, the Imax, museums and events like tea at the Ritz.

But London to host the Olympics. Now that is something of a challenge for a city geared up to commerce, shopping, entertainment and turning visitors over. However, we appear to be on the starting blocks already. No sooner do the current Games conclude than, to coincide with the handover on August 24th, London will stage a party with Will Young, James Morrison and Scouting for Girls headlining a host of artists along The Mall. Whether any miming will be involved is not known.

The Olympic Flag will be handed to Boris Johnson, so no danger of him doing much damage there, and to be on the safe side Jade Goody will be in India.

As for the Games themselves – well women’s boxing makes it debut in 2012. This discipline will be moved from its unofficial traditional location of the Robin Hood pub in Nottingham to London’s Royal Victoria Dock, itself no stranger to the sight of blood on a Saturday night.

As a nation, we have four years to prepare the world for what they may encounter after their touchdown at London Airport. Well, there will be the usual shady-looking cab drivers prowling the terminals in the hope of picking up a fare. Strangers to the UK who agree to the cheaper alternative to the traditional black cab, will have the temporary impression that the Vauxhall Cavalier is a cutting edge vehicle here.

Those unfamiliar with our monetary system will also be perplexed when persuaded the larger note that says it is a twenty is worth less than the smaller one that says it is a five. They may also think a game known as Find the Lady is incredibly easy to play until they actually put any money down. As yet this particular event has not been included in the Games, although its addition would surely increase the host nation’s medal chance. The same applies to the MacDonalds Hamburger Eating competition, principally because, as a condition, this discipline should include the downing of a pint of bitter in between burgers. A deal is rumoured to be pending between Fuller’s Cockney Pride, Tetley’s and the surprisingly excellent Chinese beer, Tsingtao. The most suitable location for this would appear to be The Queen Vic, which could also hold fledging events such as darts, dominos and spitting into a pint mug from a distance of ten yards.

Visitors must also learn to distinguish between the venue of Stratford in East London and Stratford-Upon-Avon. The former is to be revitalised in preparation for several events, the latter, whilst suitable for rowing, cream tea shovelling and starting sentences with ‘Methinks’ and ‘Foresooth’, is not as yet a location for the Games.

Those who find themselves here in four years time should be aware that we have some stringent immigration rules. Only if you cannot speak English, or have a billion pounds are you likely to be eligible to apply for British citizenship when the competition concludes. However, if you tick neither of the above boxes, all is not lost as you may still be given a Toyota Cruiser and a large house in Finsbury Park.

As for us residents, before the shindig, travel agents should prepare for a flood of enquiries from residents in the capital looking for holidays between late July and early August. At its completion, there is the promise of a better transport system, new state-of-the-art stadiums, and the rebirth of the east end of London.

Today, on ground that should have made us all think twice, there were some disappointing runs from some very well-fancied favourites. The word disappointing is overused in racing. Trainers often shove it under our noses when discussing the chances of horses that appear to only have to go down and come back. ‘I shall be very disappointed if he-or she doesn’t win’ is an often-heard claim. It makes me wonder how we should cope with so much disappointment swimming around after the races.

I have seen some of the trainers in question after this unforeseen disappointment has manifested itself. They look surprisingly unruffled, in contrast to those that have backed the horses concerned. Amongst those presumably suffering from a bout of depression and disappointment tonight are connections of  odds-on failures William Blake and Miss Rochester. Included must be I Am The Best  having demonstrated whomsoever named him was somewhat optimistic.


And Another Thing

French Horseracing Invasion …

THE FRENCH ARE at it again. Not content with invading Ascot and stealing the show a la Gerald Mosse, they stage the day’s major race-meeting on Sunday at Deauville. Two races are shown from there on the racing channels and the prize-money totals the equivalent of three days domestic racing in this country. The Group 2 for fillies and mares was worth £54,000, the Group 1 Prix Maurice de Gheest over £100,000. Not bad for a wet Sunday in August and certainly better than anything we will manage this week! Oh sure, we have York round the corner but, like so many things associated with our nearest neighbours across the channel, you cannot help but think they have a better formula than we have..

French racing is very different to our equivalent. They have nowhere near the amount of racing but when they do stage a meeting, it is with typical Gallic panache. Horses have a chance to graduate from the provinces [where claiming races can be worth up to £10,000] and race for proper prize-money. The major tracks of Longchamp, Deauville, Maisons-Laffitte, Chantilly and Saint-Cloud all regularly host meetings where fat purses are offered to winning connections. Entrance fees are low and an experience at a French racecourse is a much more refined affair than it is in Britain. No chanting from hordes of race goers just off the coach who have polished off crates of Carling and John Smiths and are now starting on the racecourse draught. No heaving betting ring full of men in football shirts swilling beer from plastic containers and gurning at the television cameras behind John McCririck. It is more a case of Yves St Lauren, Hermes ties and the equivalent of what used to be the British stiff upper-lip.

Of course the French only have customers to please and no bookmakers, so which is preferable? Betting in France is strictly regulated and controlled by the PMU, with all profits returned to racing. Betting in this country is still regulated but is an industry in freefall. Of course, this means punters have far greater choice here and are not saddled with swingeing SPs or their equivalent. And there is none of this coupling nonsense to put up with. The French definitely have that one wrong. Their system, which is a dubious concept to start with, means coupling horses in the same ownership, rather than the logical step of lumping together horses that represent the same trainer. A case can be made for the latter system but horses in the same, or in part-ownership being coupled means that very often, with something like the Ballydoyle consortium, or on occasions when Prince Khalid Abdullah has more than one runner in a race, prices are compressed to a ghastly level.

The French do not have everything right but they are a good way toward making racing a pastime enjoyed by the public, rather than an industry catering for people with little interest in the sport.

Visitors to our racecourses do gracefully declare that English racing is wonderful. It can be; but those voicing such opinions are invariably speaking from an experience in a private box or Members’ terraces at the very least, as opposed to having to spend an afternoon next to Billy six-bellies in Tatts with beer drizzling on their shoes.

It would be nice if we could combine the best of both worlds to these shores but such a move would require a major cultural rethink that shifts way beyond our little equine world.

As a nation, we would have to revise our behaviour in all sorts of areas. Our attitude to alcohol and the way we spend our leisure time for a start.

For the time being, although it grieves me to admit it, rather like their food and their way of life, the Europeans, although far from perfect, do seem to have the edge over us in the culture stakes. Which is rather a shame as there was a time when Britain led the way in that particular field. Alas, along with so much more of our national heritage, those days are gone. Many will state about time too! They may have a point. Those that administrated this country for so long eventually fell on their own swords, leaving the way open for a dilution of power, away from authority and to its people.

Perhaps they only have themselves to blame for the kind of society we now find ourselves living in. Had they made a better and more convincing job of that rule, perhaps the yob, knife and drink culture, for which we are increasing becoming synonymous, would never had reared its grotesque head.

And Another Thing

Is French Horseracing better than UK racing: The French Horseracing Invasion …

THE FRENCH ARE at it again. Not content with invading Ascot and stealing the show a la Gerald Mosse, they stage the day’s major race-meeting on Sunday at Deauville. Two races are shown from there on the racing channels and the prize-money totals the equivalent of three days domestic racing in this country. The Group 2 for fillies and mares was worth £54,000, the Group 1 Prix Maurice de Gheest over £100,000. Not bad for a wet Sunday in August and certainly better than anything we will manage this week! Oh sure, we have York round the corner but, like so many things associated with our nearest neighbours across the channel, you cannot help but think they have a better formula than we have..

French racing is very different to our equivalent. They have nowhere near the amount of racing but when they do stage a meeting, it is with typical Gallic panache. Horses have a chance to graduate from the provinces [where claiming races can be worth up to £10,000] and race for proper prize-money. The major tracks of Longchamp, Deauville, Maisons-Laffitte, Chantilly and Saint-Cloud all regularly host meetings where fat purses are offered to winning connections. Entrance fees are low and an experience at a French racecourse is a much more refined affair than it is in Britain. No chanting from hordes of race goers just off the coach who have polished off crates of Carling and John Smiths and are now starting on the racecourse draught. No heaving betting ring full of men in football shirts swilling beer from plastic containers and gurning at the television cameras behind John McCririck. It is more a case of Yves St Lauren, Hermes ties and the equivalent of what used to be the British stiff upper-lip.

Of course the French only have customers to please and no bookmakers, so which is preferable? Betting in France is strictly regulated and controlled by the PMU, with all profits returned to racing. Betting in this country is still regulated but is an industry in freefall. Of course, this means punters have far greater choice here and are not saddled with swingeing SPs or their equivalent. And there is none of this coupling nonsense to put up with. The French definitely have that one wrong. Their system, which is a dubious concept to start with, means coupling horses in the same ownership, rather than the logical step of lumping together horses that represent the same trainer. A case can be made for the latter system but horses in the same, or in part-ownership being coupled means that very often, with something like the Ballydoyle consortium, or on occasions when Prince Khalid Abdullah has more than one runner in a race, prices are compressed to a ghastly level.

The French do not have everything right but they are a good way toward making racing a pastime enjoyed by the public, rather than an industry catering for people with little interest in the sport.

Visitors to our racecourses do gracefully declare that English racing is wonderful. It can be; but those voicing such opinions are invariably speaking from an experience in a private box or Members’ terraces at the very least, as opposed to having to spend an afternoon next to Billy six-bellies in Tatts with beer drizzling on their shoes.

It would be nice if we could combine the best of both worlds to these shores but such a move would require a major cultural rethink that shifts way beyond our little equine world.

As a nation, we would have to revise our behaviour in all sorts of areas. Our attitude to alcohol and the way we spend our leisure time for a start.

For the time being, although it grieves me to admit it, rather like their food and their way of life, the Europeans, although far from perfect, do seem to have the edge over us in the culture stakes. Which is rather a shame as there was a time when Britain led the way in that particular field. Alas, along with so much more of our national heritage, those days are gone. Many will state about time too! They may have a point. Those that administrated this country for so long eventually fell on their own swords, leaving the way open for a dilution of power, away from authority and to its people.

Perhaps they only have themselves to blame for the kind of society we now find ourselves living in. Had they made a better and more convincing job of that rule, perhaps the yob, knife and drink culture, for which we are increasing becoming synonymous, would never had reared its grotesque head.

 

And Another Thing

Beat the bookies! What  a Day!

THEY SAY HUMBLE PIE, a bit like quiche, is best eaten cold. Saturday was supposed to be a day for curmudgeons, a day when all racing’s ills manifested themselves in one awful day that could be bemoaned for months to come. It started in typical curmudgeonly style. It rained. It rained very hard at Haydock, making the ground akin to Towcester in December. It also rained pretty hard at Newmarket and steadily at Ascot – where they held the Shergar Cup.

Oh so much to complain about! The form would be out the window, the Shergar Cup would provide the bookmakers with the sort of benefit they could not have staged better if they had been in control. The races were all handicaps; we were largely unfamiliar with half the jockeys riding, and the captain of the British team was a girl. And we all know that girls cannot ride because they are not strong enough or wily enough and the proper jockeys, that is to say the men, shuffle and buffet them around during races.

So there was not point in having a bet at all. At Haydock, where it had rained very hard, in the opener, Zero Tolerance was punted into the ground and bolted up. Then, in the Coral Handicap, especially designed to fox the punter, the obvious and topical horse in view of events in China, Valery Borzov, sprinted away to land another gamble. The good thing, Multidimensional, obliged in the Group 3 at generous odds of 2/1 and then Pricewise dealt another blow to the layers when Perks won the Class 2 Handicap. Not a bad start to a card that looked about as logical as Portman Park beforehand.

Newmarket trundled along reasonably well. Despite being his Bismarck, a very well-backed Rainbow View upset only Barry Dennis when winning the Group 3 Sweet Solera in the style of a useful filly. Kalahari Gold wrapped up Channel Four’s coverage when winning his third race after only four starts and Rainbow View’s form was further upheld in the maiden, when another market-mover in Snoqualmie Girl landed the money.

At the grumpy old man’s last stand, Ascot, Strike Up the Band won the first for the excellent Yutaka Take and was backed to do so. Jamie Spencer had the sort of day we all had coming. He failed to persuade Bentong to exit the stalls in this and later, his mount, Vanderlin, burst from the stalls prematurely in the last and had to be withdrawn. Now that’s more like it!

The Japanese rider followed up in he second when Nans Joy, who could not win, did. Then they smashed into Shifting Star and he obliged. Then, horror of horrors, the girl jockey, Hayley Turner, rode a peach in anyone’s language to pounce late and grab the staying race. What makes it worse, this is not the first time she has done this sort of thing. The little strumpet can ride and she looks cute, particularly with mud splattered across her pretty face and her earrings twinkling in the rain. If she is going to be a proper jockey, at least she could look like one of the dwarfs out of Snow White. But no, not content with captaining her team and having the gall to be the only British jockey to ride a winner, she makes you want to ask her out for a drink! Lord, it was turning into the sort of day that could raise a smile on the most cantankerous old sod’s face.

But there was still hope! The day’s one bet on the card, Perfect Star, was sure to lose the last. Okay, she liked a bit of give, but the rain had really got in by this time, she pulled to the start and her rider, Gerald Mosse, had already booted two winners home so had used up all his good fortune. What was worse, those of us on the filly had taken on the might of Ladbrokes, knocking off her best odds of 13/2 with them in the morning, so were guaranteed to have plenty to complain about as we all know Ladbrokes always get it right. It was a recipe for disaster. Time to open the red wine. Something French seemed appropriate, as Mosse was sure to make a mess of things. Worse, he had probably phoned Ladbrokes in the morning and told them they could lay the filly for all they were worth!

Off a slow pace, he rode a shocker, lying too far out of his ground and giving the filly far too much to do. After a glass of claret, it was obvious Perfect Star was not going to win. But the rain slowed those in front, who stopped quickly and Mosse was able to extricate the filly and produce her with the perfect run to get up close home. See, I told you he was a good jockey!

And rumour has it that the Ascot crowd were entertained after racing by Paul Young, Bananarama and other popular musicians and that people, most of them improperly dressed by Ascot standards, were reported having had a good time. Damn it! What is happening with this racing game? It’s not supposed to be enjoyable!

So now it’s Saturday night and there is nothing to complain about except that there is nothing on the television.

Bloody Saturdays – Bloody Shergar Cup!


And Another Thing

 

Punters’ Russian Roulette

WE ALL KNOW that English racing is the best in the world. We have the best jockeys, the best horses, the most diverse courses: Ascot, Cheltenham, Newmarket and York to name a few. Oh, and we have the biggest number of racecourses of any country considering our size. That is a great recipe is it not.

So how come I have not watched a single horserace the last two days and possibly will not bother again today. Put bluntly, racing has been abysmal, dire, shocking, boring in the extreme. Writing this on Tuesday night, if somebody offered me that dream scenario of being able to have a bet today with the results already known, I would be unable to cash in. That is to say, I am unaware of a single result from this afternoon’s fixtures. I am no wiser than I was this morning.

I have Racing UK, I have ATR – a horserace is only a flick of the remote control away. Yet I have not been in the slightest bit interested. I have spent this afternoon listening to Steve Wright on Radio 2 whilst catching up on some work. For that to happen something is wrong. You bet – or in my case you don’t!

I do not expect Goodwood every week. I know poor horses need a chance to compete. But do they have to do it in my office for race after race, day after day? No, they do not. Not if I chose for them not to, and for the past two days I have chosen them to run round the likes of Catterick, Windsor, Carlisle and Chepstow without me. That is my choice – it is yours too. If, as the bookmakers would have us believe, racing revolves around the turnover they generate, allowing them to put money into the sport, how is it that the level of prize-money today was so paltry?

At Catterick, there were seven races where the total prize-money on offer was around £20,000. At Chepstow, it was even worse. They staged eight races where the amount on offer was less, around £19,000. Contrast that with Rosscommon tonight with a total in Sterling of £35,000 for just six races, or Gowran Park where they staged seven events and stumped up a total of £40,000.

Something is radically wrong somewhere. This is not an isolated incident, this is happening every day of the week. And when the prize-money on offer is less than the amount that can be won by laying or backing a horse for even a modest sum, then it does not take an egghead to work out our priorities are askew. All it takes is a bit of common sense and the will to improve the situation. Put on a £10,000 race at Chepstow today and a £7,000 event at Catterick. If trainers fail to support such an initiative and it does not give punters at least something of interest on the day, close the tracks, stop the funding, tell the courses in question they have to make their own way without the help of the Levy Board.

Bookmakers would soon start screaming if blank days appeared, or on certain days, only one meeting was staged. If they are the benevolent saviours that they claim, let them step in and plug the gap in the fixture list, which at present infers only those without any appreciation of the noble sport are dim-witted enough to watch what is served up regardless of quality. If, as they assert, racing is not the focal point of their business, let us put it to the test and see how long their betting shops, their off-shore credit offices and their mansions of commerce in London, Manchester and Leeds, last without the staple diet they have taken for granted for so long.

As punters – never forget you have a choice. You can turn off the remote; you can go to the cinema or the gym instead of the betting office. You can check out the latest holiday details on your computer instead of gawping at Betfair.

Racing is great when it is good. But it is dross when it is bad. Let us vote with our biros, our fingers on the remote and our telephones. Let us see what the authorities do then!

Last week I wrote about the fine line between winning and losing. The invisible decision-making process that defines when a horse is a bet and when it is not. Sometimes, such uncertain decisions are based on luck, the mood we find ourselves in or on a sixth sense.

Consider this for a set of decisions: Let me set the scene. You are in a private carriage of a train crashing through the night somewhere in Europe. It is dark outside; your fellow passengers are reflected in the black window. There are six of you all from different walks of life. There is a soldier, a priest, a widow, a card sharp, a failed gambler and an ordinary-looking citizen. You may look unique but you are the same. You all have a chequered history and are not what you seem. You are one of this set of people. Outside, little lighted villages flash by. You are hurtling through the night to an appointment that means nothing to you. Should you fail to arrive it will not matter. You have reached a point in your life when the speeding train has more purpose than you do.

Now, in the midst of such inner turmoil, comes an invitation from an eccentric billionaire to take part in a game of Russian roulette for a million pounds. This is not the ordinary game but one concerning six players, meaning five will survive and one will not.

There is one revolver and one bullet. This bullet is inserted in the chamber, which is then spun and the gun placed in the middle of a table. Players have to then pick up the gun in turn, place it to their temple and squeeze the trigger. Obviously, if the bullet is in the chamber when they do so, he or she will be sitting at the table minus a vital part of their anatomy.

So two questions for you regarding probability and odds: Firstly, would you take part in this game for the money on offer? We all know the odds are 5/1 in your favour and possibly a million pounds could change your life. Then again, so could blowing your brains out. Secondly, as the chamber is only spun once before the game commences, it is certain that after a maximum of six shots one of the party will be dead. Therefore, if you had the choice, at which point in the process would you care to fire. Would you prefer to fire first – the only time when the odds are an irrefutable 5/1, or last – in which case you may not have to fire at all but if you do then you face certain death? Alternatively, perhaps you would opt for somewhere in-between. The choice is yours.

Mathematicians will tell you it makes no difference and that all have the same 5/1 chance irrespective of the firing order. However, mathematicians are unlikely to take part in such a desperate drama. Those who would may invoke the theory of probability, which is an entirely different proposition altogether. They will claim that to fire first [5/1 absolute odds] or last (unlikely to get that far) is preferable.

This is an intriguing theme for one such as myself and one I shall return to. In the meantime, any comments would be welcome.

AND ANOTHER THING

Zarkava will win the Arc

3 AM AND I AM AWAKE – not a good start to the week. This has been happening a lot lately; I have been waking at strange hours like some git with a guilty conscience. It normally happens when I am in the middle of a long losing run but I actually won a few bob last week so now I am waking up to worry about winning as well as losing!

Perhaps I am awake because of my wife – or to be more exact my partner. I hate referring to her as my partner because the word suggests that I don’t wish to reveal with whom I share my life. I could be living with a Yeti, or worse, someone of the same sex. No, it is a woman. I know that because she was away for a few days the week before last and I slept perfectly well and thought I had gone deaf. Anyway, she would insist on inflicting me with this late night television programme on Sunday about members of the Women’s Institute investigating the possibility of legalising brothels. Therefore, the last thing I see before going to bed is one middle-aged woman and one rather older one visiting Amsterdam, Nevada and New Zealand in search of the perfect brothel. I mean, why can’t I ever get a commission like that? And what is the point of legalising brothels when they will still do it in the back of cars, in old metal containers that used to transport bananas and in King’s Cross, and the so-called sex industry will still be run by crime in one form or another? If you ask me, the presenter of this little gem on Channel 4 seemed to be enjoying her role – which included posing in leather boots and not much else in a window in Winchester of all places, and helping a man relieve himself over the telephone whilst she read from a script all for 70pence – a little bit too much!

I have backed a loser before the week has even started, as I am due at the dentist at 9.30, providing I can keep awake after such a sleepless night. It is ostensibly a check-up but I have no doubt they will find something that will mean I will have to back a winner to pay them. But you cannot upset your dentist anymore. If you do, they will strike you off their list and unless you take a holiday in South Africa, your gums will eventually rot and your teeth fall out. So I shall go and get prodded, cleaned, try to speak with a thingy stuck in my mouth, spit and pay whatever they ask.

It strikes me that there is enough going on right now to keep anyone awake. I am thinking of all the injustices being perpetrated. For a start, what is the point of a legal system that keeps contradicting itself? One set of jurors finds Barry George guilty of murder, another sets him free. His defence? He could not have killed Jill Dando because he was stalking another woman – unnamed and presumably in grave danger if his stalking skills ever lead him to her. Well that’s all right then isn’t it!

And I know I am going back in time, but why did the prosecution in the Fallon case have to bring over a race reader from Australia to analyse all those bloopers Fallon was supposed to have made on purpose but, unless there is a retrial of course, didn’t? Was Timeform’s Jim McGrath otherwise engaged?

Then there is Gordon Brown! A prime minister no one voted for who bites his nails, cannot match his tie and shirt and has a glass eye. He keeps telling us he is the right man for the job, although it is plain to everyone without a glass eye that he is not – unless he is referring to a different job – maybe the president of Haiti. He has had his year in Number 10 – can we have Tony back now?

Next, they tell us power suppliers have made record profits and are putting up energy prices by something like 70%. They also say that inflation is running at 4% when even my paperboy knows it is running in double figures. And his knowledge of world economics is based on the price of Red Bull, Mars bars and Dizzie Rascal’s latest CD. His only ambition in life seems to be to wear away that little strip of lawn between my path and the pavement that he will insist on cutting across to shove the Racing Post through my letterbox. There was a time when I used to run down to the shop to pick up the paper, when coincidentally I weighed half a stone less than I do now, but after falling over a hedgehog and cutting my chin one pitch black morning I decided to give that up.

This weekend, two fillies that have been comprehensively beaten by Zarkava win Group 1 races, which seems to suggest Zarkava will win the Arc – only she has not done the trip and is not sure to get it. Duke Of Marmalade had not done the King George trip, nor had Halfway To Heaven gone ten furlongs before the Nassau. Neither was bred to stay but of course they did and they won.

Today we hit the ground with a bump with racing from Windsor, Ripon and Carlisle. There is something happening at Newton Abbot but no sane person can take that seriously in August! Someone has told me he has a good thing lined up for Tuesday. Of course, I don’t know what it is and will probably only get to find out when its price has been halved in the morning betting. And I shall have twice as much on it than I should to compensate and it will be ridden by Jamie Spencer and get baulked in its run. Maybe it will not be that bad. Maybe I will not make it to Tuesday.

Other than that, I cannot imagine why I am having difficulty in sleeping.

And Another thing..

AND ANOTHER THING…

WE ALL KNOW you should not attempt certain ventures under the influence of drink. Driving is top of the list – trying to chat up the opposite sex features highly, as does betting and attempting to write a column. Not guilty on the first two; unfortunately, woefully culpable in the last two cases.

I am in Paris: Longchamp to be precise. They run the first – a Listed event – as lunch is served. Everything in France stops for food so we don’t really notice the victory of Never Forget which, given its name, seems inappropriate. Instead, there are discussions concerning the merits of the claret and the beef. I have a glass of wine. It is typically French, that is to say too nice and too cheap by our standards. One glass becomes two, becomes three and thereafter four. I am drowning in grape – sunk, all willpower drained.

Over a trip that is barely five furlongs, Marchand D’or cannot win the Prix de Saint-Georges. Paradoxically, he does. The seven-year-old defies the claret, meaning it is time for another glass to clear the head.

Today is all about international racing. There is the Group 1 Singapore Airlines International at Kranji and the 1,000 and 2,000 French Guineas at Longchamp. The British contribution consists of Flat racing at Ripon. There is also jump racing at Market Rasen and Stratford, featuring horses I have not heard of. Some jump – others don’t. It is run-of-the-mill stuff. There is a tip for Florentine Ruler at Ripon. Some tips win – others don’t. This one does. Needless to say, no-one in our party backs it.

On a topsy-turvy day, despite floppy weather forecasts, it is raining in England but dry in France. Conditions are steamy in Singapore where it is kinda hot (to quote Paul Theroux), humid and wet. On rain-softened ground, Lizard’s Desire slithers by ever-consistent and gallant Gloria De Cameao to reverse Dubai World Cup form. At the time, those of us that know it all stated the World Cup was sub-standard. That form traversed a quarter of the globe here. Lizard’s Desire is a strange name for a Group 1 winner. What do you suppose would head such a reptile’s list: an insect on its tongue, a rock, a hard place, a member of the opposite sex? The claret is taking over again…

Back to Longchamp: quoting and translating Sophie Ellis-Bextor, it was not quite Meutre a la Discoteque, more a question of Murder on the Racecourse in the next. In a scrum of a race, having grabbed the English 1,000 Guineas in the Stewards’ room, Special Duty, possibly deciding this is an easier option to Group 1 success, repeated the feat in the French equivalent. In truth, given a poor and over-confident ride today, she looked the best filly but benefitted from carnage up front. They disqualified whatever was first past the post for hampering another runner, thus allowing Special Duty to win back-to-back Classics. I am turning into Rory Bremner now; a brown horse leads with a brown horse in second place, followed by a darker brown horse etc… Ce la vie!

Lope De Vega – named after a famous Spanish playwright – beat Dick Turpin, named after a famous British highwayman, in the French 2,000 Guineas. Siyouni got no run but did not look good enough in any case according to the claret.

AND ANOTHER THING…

MONDAY; bright but windy; deceptively colder outside than it looks from inside. The first day of the working week is invariably a strange one. Those in racing could argue theirs is a seamless occupation; those of us not constrained by official employment have to make time for ourselves when we can.

We enter a new week with a couple of last chances on the horizon. We witness the dying days of a Labour Government. As it becomes increasingly clear that the Conservatives and the Liberals are to reach agreement, Saturday’s Mail poured scorn on such a process. Nevertheless, their constant sniping at everything means, as a newspaper, they have become the equivalent of the boy that cried wolf. According to the Mail, nothing is right; the world is on the brink of all that is unsavoury. However, they did carry a picture of Samantha’s greeting to David Cameron on his return home. Cameras penetrated the glass panes of the front door as Samantha planted a kiss loaded with a combination of passion, pride and affection on the cheek of what is likely to be our next prime minister. With eyes closed, one hand round his neck, the other outstretched with fingers delicately about to snap the lock on the door, it could have been a painting by Jack Vettriano. A touching snapshot before the couple retreated to the privacy of their home with Samantha gently alleviating the weight carried by her tired husband. Some pictures do indeed say a thousand words; this was one of them. David Cameron is looking more like a statesman with each passing day – his wife more like a statesman’s wife. Suddenly, after so many years as a Socialist, I find myself wishing them well.

If the politics of this country have reached a temporary cul de sac, so has the path to Epsom. The Derby print is fuzzy. After the victory of Midas Touch yesterday in the Beresford Stakes, more a piece of work than a race, some are redirecting the spotlight towards stablemate St Nicholas Abbey.
looking very fit, he was a stone below any form shown last year. Even if making the kind of improvement necessary, this did not look a strong renewal of the season’s first Classic, leaving him vulnerable. Lastly, I am always sceptical about Montjeus as he fails to sire robust offspring. Prejudice in racing can be costly, but those of us with an opinion need to tell it as we see it, risking being lynched when wrong
There are several reasons why I doubt St Nicholas Abbey will win the Derby. Firstly, he does not look to have flourished physically since last year. Lean, lightly framed and on the small side, I will be surprised if he can regain his juvenile dominance over Classic rivals. Secondly, he was never moving like a winner at Newmarket in the Guineas where, . The noose hovers but St Nicholas Abbey will not do for me whatever rhetoric I hear from Ballydoyle over the next couple of weeks.

We are entering the final phase of the Derby build-up. This week all eyes will focus on the Dante at York. The O’Brien team will know better where they stand after the race. I think it entirely possible they lack their usual firepower. It could be work by St Nicholas Abbey – against sub-standard rivals – has misled. I understand there is at least one major word for a horse likely to make the Dante line-up – a horse that could shake the market up if he performs as expected.

For now, as with politics, although developments may be nearby in terms of time, resolution stretches into the distance.

It seems a week is a long time in politics. It is also a long time in racing.

Watch this space…

AND ANOTHER THING…

THE EMAIL ARRIVED JUST BEFORE David Cameron said a few words. Given a free hand, I can imagine the few words he might have chosen. Much the same as mine in fact as RUK informed me that tomorrow offered a betting bonanza with the screening of twenty-seven races.

We get these weekend emails from RUK and ATR, treating us like kids about to embark on a school outing.

Oh good goody gumdrops! Why, I can hardly wait! Maybe I will call their bluff and turn Saturday into a betting bonanza day. I had planned to cut the grass and tidy up the garage in the morning but now am not so sure.

ATR will presumably be inviting me to guess the draw at Ascot and reminding me that Lingfield stages its Classic Trial card. From a betting point of view, Ascot looks awful with its big fields and tricky handicaps.

Lingfield looks as if it might contain a few nuggets. Nothing too clever, but then a winner is a winner and, bogged down by work, I have watched several of those go unbacked this week.

Golden Stream looks to be of interest in the first at Lingfield. Despite a middle-distance pedigree, this seven-furlong trip should suit after running well enough behind subsequent winner Equiano at the Craven meeting.

Henry Cecil looks to have the two trials wrapped up. Timepiece and Bullet Train will both appreciate the step up in trip and should prove capable of providing Warren Place with a double. Those assuming Tranqil Tiger can make it a treble may find the weight concession of a stone to Alianmaar thwarting their plans.
Mia’s Boy could be the answer to Haydock’s 2.00, particularly if there is further rain.

So maybe it will turn out to be a bonanza after all.

AND ANOTHER THING…

SO BRITAIN has made its mind up. Well, not exactly; it isn’t sure. Reluctant to unconditionally hand the reins of power to the Conservatives, voters not caught up in rainy queues (did they think someone was dishing out freebies or Harrod’s were conducting a sale?) sent a negative message to the Labour Government.

This morning we have an awkward situation for all concerned. The losers have to be Labour. Whatever they say, this Government is dead in the water. It seems likely Gordon Brown will attempt to cling to power by his chewed fingertips but there is no way back for him after this defeat. He is the boxer knocked to the canvas three times. To rise for a fourth is inviting further punishment. The longer he lounges in No.10, the more desperate he looks. Of the three party leaders, Brown is in the worst position. Even an alliance with the Lib Dems will not guarantee Labour power in the House. If Labour wish to slug it out, they need to replace Brown. If the Lib Dems want to hitch their wagon to a winning team, they need to link with the Tories. If they prop up a flailing Labour Government thrashing in bubbling waters, the electorate will not forget and possibly not forgive. However, this is the chance for electoral reform, something the Liberals – quite rightly from their perspective – have always hungered after.

For their part, Conservatives need to hold their nerve and say as little as possible. I know such action is an anathema for politicians but nothing is likely to blow up in their faces in the short term. Neither Labour nor the Lib Dems have sufficient firepower. An uneasy alliance with Nick Clegg appears to be their best bet.

As for plugging the financial black hole, I have a few suggestions to whosoever is at the helm of this holed ship we sail. Herewith my budget:

Firstly, drastically cut our expenditure on failed foreign ventures. Afghanistan must be at the top of the list. We must either insist our European partners share the burden of policing the place or withdraw. That should save a chunk.

Help to fund the NHS by siphoning money from the Lottery and from Lucky Dips and other stupid scratch cards. You know those things at the newsagents, bought by those making you late for work.

Stop issuing British passports to asylum seekers or other would-be residents in this country. Instead, hand out temporary passports, renewable on a yearly basis at a fixed cost that exceeds the current one. That will raise further revenue and makes immigrants traceable. Those failing to renew such a document would be here illegally.

Raise taxes indirectly. Increase road tax on all vehicles over 2,000cc and put ten pence on a bottle of wine and spirits. Smokers will have to bear a similar brunt. Broadband is ridiculously cheap. Tax it! Sorry, but it is better to give the electorate a choice how they contribute to the Exchequer than rob them at source, often resulting in hardship.

Phew! That’s a load off my mind – world politics solved in about three-hundred words.

I am wasted on racing!

Is that the sound of a lottery-funded ambulance I hear?

AND ANOTHER THING…

YESTERDAY, BEING SATURDAY, I bought the Racing Post. Big deal I can hear you say. Well, since the Post increased its price and produced its “new and improved website” I haven’t bothered with them too much. I am glad they are clinging on to their “new and improved” price of £1.90 for the Saturday edition, but suspect it will reach £2 before Royal Ascot. For that sort of money I feel we should have a balsa-wood model of Sea The Stars included. Then we can collect parts of his anatomy – a leg here, an ear there – before assembling him piece-by-piece in his glorious entirety at the end of the season. That way, after the clocks have gone back, we will have something to look forward to during the long dark evenings.

I resent paying so much for a newspaper, particularly when much of its content is superfluous – at least to me. Yesterday’s paper contained twenty-seven pages of sport. Most of it was football. Sporting Index inserted a whole page advert, featuring two men at a game eating hamburgers. Wide-eyed with surprise and incredulity, they looked as if they had witnessed a UFO-landing or even Ashley Cole ‘in flagrante delicto’ mid-match. Actually they were ostensibly at the Emirates Stadium, sampling the sort of adrenalin rush only experienced after betting with said firm. Such a feeling has nothing to do with Arsenal actually playing then.

There were bits about snooker, tennis, speedway, cricket, boxing, rugby, darts, athletics and the election. I suppose that is fair, even though the paper is the RACING Post.

Some of the racing content was dull. It is not the paper’s fault; there were seven meetings, four of which we could have done without in my view. However, you know what they say about pleasing all of the people all of the time. The front-page headline was flat; but just what do you say faced with the same scenario on a daily basis and the feature race is the uninspiringly named Bet365 Gold Cup? All the same, racing is grateful for such sponsorship. I suppose the clue is in 365. Therefore, it’s Bell To Hit The Right Note at Leicester, Laheeb To Maintain Progress At Sandown, Tamirinbleu Catches The Eye. I suppose there is not much else you can do with such knotty names. Tom Segal’s other Pricewise tip could have contained the strap line: Nostringsattached to untie tricky Bet365. But it didn’t so what does it matter. It was more a case of Church Island delighting the Sandown congregation – at least those that backed it. I am making light of a serious subject. After all, backing winners, according to Sporting Index, is a matter of great import. It is more crucial than life itself. That is why those two characters at the Emirates Stadium had paid good money to eat dried-up, shrivelled hamburgers and were agog. That is why Blue Square encouraged us to ‘Grab a piece of the action’, why 888sport listed the runners and their prices before posing the ubiquitous question: Who will win the last big staying handicap chase of the season? Stan James employed journalise with: Is Air Force One Mann enough? Betfred must have made some kind of history, their ad failing to feature a picture of Fred. Does any one know if he is ill?

The other major group of advertisers are the tipsters. Henry Rix continues to remind us we could all be living in Bermuda if we had subscribed and listened to his advice. It is about time David Nevison ditched his slogan: A Bloody Good Tipping Service. I am not hinting that it isn’t – I have no idea what it is – but is not the chosen name for such a product somewhat coarse? I wonder if the UKIP banner: Sod The Lot was Nevison-inspired. Nick Mordin warns us not to bet until we have heard what he has to say. There is Tommo in a tired suit. There is a very serious-looking man giving the impression a court judgement has gone against him, advocating the prowess of his computer-based selections. The list goes on…

I am vaguely intrigued to know how these clever men fared on Saturday. Were Saturday’s tips tomorrow’s losers? Did they advise Church Island, Paco Boy or Glass Harmonium? Perhaps they went for I’m So Lucky or Exemplary at Leicester. I wonder if their predictions were more accurate than those spouted by weathermen telling us to expect temperatures of 72 degrees on Sunday, suggesting we could fire up our barbeques.

At least there were the Classifieds.

Panbet were advertising for Live Traders. I can see how they would prefer their traders to be live as opposed to dead. They did not specify that too much else was required of candidates. There was no mention they should be capable flute-players, live in a forest or be conversant with the value of unicorn tokens.

A Farm Manager was required in Doha. I have passed through Doha airport a few times en route to Abu Dhabi or Dubai. I believe it to be a dry state. That is something of a handicap for most of us – a blessing for some. We are all told to drink responsibly these days, which can be tricky. My tip is to make a colourless spirit your chosen tipple. That way it looks as if you are topping-up your gin or vodka with a mixer, when in truth you are topping-up your mixer with spirit. Having a beer fridge in the garage is equally responsible. You can just pop out with a glass for a can, wolf one down, refill the glass and no one is any the wiser. Two for the price of one, surely that is responsible!

There was a job advert for an apprentice in Scotland. Now there is a novel contrast: The frozen plains of Scotland or the dry but warm dunes of Doha. Okay, you get copious amounts of drink in Scotland but at what cost. There is that nonsensical language that features wee and aye a lot and plates of suspicious-looking food. No wonder they drink too much. Then there is the SNP. Alex Salmond is fine, but isn’t he taking his party’s exclusion from the debates a little too much to heart? After all, what does the SNP have to do with the majority of the country?

Michael Dods needs an assistant to work alongside his yard manager. That sounds interesting, something confirmed by Mr Dods in his advert. There is also the benefit of a 2 bed cottage. In these days of repossessions, that is interesting. Unfortunately, the killer blow is that first-class references are required. The only such references I can provide come from a booking clerk somewhere in Bombay that once secured me a seat on an overnight train bound for Mapsa. I doubt that will do.

Somebody in the West Midlands wants a Head Lad – presumably, that is a racing job. Don Cantillon needs stable staff whose weight fails to exceed ten stone – not much chance there then. James Moffatt in Cumbria also requires stable staff although does not stipulate weight. A Yard Person is required in Newmarket and that would seem the best bet. Newmarket is a decent enough town so long as you are on its right side. That is to say not on the wrong side – which can be near Mildenhall, Fordham or Haverhill. You get to drink Banks and Adnams beer in Newmarket, and if you fall over on the way home, it largely goes unnoticed. Add to that the incentive that I suspect the position of Yard Person is attainable and we may have a winner here.

There is no sign of any one scouting for a bashed up and washed-up writer I suppose. Next week, if I can cobble the money together and galvanise my legs into sprinting to the paper shop, as it is Guineas weekend, the job opportunities may conceivably be more promising.

That just about sums this game up – we live in hope.

AND ANOTHER THING…

UNLIKELY THOUGH IT MAY HAVE SEEMED a fortnight ago, the two televised political events leading up to the general election have drawn fourteen million viewers. Ten million tuned in to the ITV event last week, the figures were understandably down yesterday with the debate screened on Sky. A figure of four million still outstrips a re-run of Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) and Ice Cold In Alex.

That is two ninety-minute debates – the equivalent of two football matches in terms of screen time – attracting a sizeable slab of the viewing public. The format is a feast to make programmers salivate. They provide a venue, three podiums, an audience, a presenter and three politicians turn up and discuss the issues of the day. There are no expensive locations, no overpaid and temperamental actors involved, no stunt men and no directors and their assistants or editors to pay.

Television viewers have demonstrated the unwatchable can become watchable if correctly marketed. In truth, not much marketing has been necessary. Both debates, whilst not riveting, have provided excellent television. To a degree, they have driven a coach and horses through tradition. What they do is to allow the electorate access to the party leaders in a different setting from the scrum that is the House of Commons. Now the three men that aspire to the highest office in British politics have to work for a living in the real world. Their only prop is a lectern. The camera searches and scans their features for any weaknesses, as candidates are required to struggle for public approval rather like contenders in The Dragon’s Den, all desperate to promote the big idea. There is the cut and thrust of live debate; the drama uncertainty contains, as three men discuss policies in unknown territory without the smokescreen Westminster affords. There is no hiding place: questions have to be answered or fudged.

If the sight of three men representing one of the most unpopular groups in the country pinging and ponging questions and answers can attract such viewing figures, what can racing learn? Even the excellent Sky presenter Kay Burley referred to the Grand National as part of her election link, stating that the horse that was sweating the most won the race. This comment was in response to a remark that HD picked up flecks of perspiration on Nick Clegg’s face at some point during the debate.

Horseracing has its work cut out to compete with the big events that crop up in other spheres on a regular basis. The Grand National, Derby and Royal Ascot aside, racing’s problem for the uncommitted is that daily it looks pretty much the same. Granted the names change. Horses spring out of the paper as guaranteed winners in the morning, often confirmed by messages containing superlatives, only to disappoint in the afternoon. For every Alainmaar – the 11/8 winner of Wednesday’s City And Suburban – there are two equivalents of the never-going-to-win Dizziness today. Bookmakers are alert to these messages to such an extent you feel sometimes they have tapped your phone. They slash prices about horses that are expected to win until, whatever the message might indicate, such horses become unattractive betting propositions. Knit one, purl two; win one, lose two, and even a novice at maths can work out that at an average 11/8, you lose.

Without betting, racing has little to offer. The better meetings always captivate the aficionado; however, to quote Patrick Veitch, either in his book or in a conversation I once had with him – I cannot remember which: Racing is merely horses running across a field. Once unleashed on a racecourse, horses can rewrite the formbook; they are not always what that list of form figures leading up to the moment of their next race states. They can boil over, they can fail to stride out on the ground, a loose stag can join in – you name it, horses, with a perverse magnetism to trouble and mayhem can attract it in all its various forms. Those that cannot afford to spend time on following the form as closely as it requires inevitably find themselves disappointed by their appraisals. Back too many losers; be taken to the cleaners on the prices too many times by the layers and punters will find more attractive ways of spending their money.

So can racing ever stand hoof to toe with the slow build up of test cricket, a ninety minute football match, indeed what has been the case over the last two Thursdays – the political equivalent of Meydan in the first three months of the year – the political debate? Present evidence suggests not. The fact racing viewing figures are eclipsed by politics is something of a blow to our sport.

Possibly those ghastly Racing For Change people could take a look at the present phenomenon that is the political carnival. People are eager to watch because it contains so many ingredients. Firstly, there is the opportunity to see politicians stripped bare. There is the chance to assess answers to questions without the usual prevarication. And many are determined to vote in the May election and welcome an opportunity to be enlightened. Of course, such a recipe would wilt in time and there is only one debate remaining. It would be unrealistic to expect sustenance of interest beyond the General Election, but after the first week in May we have the World Cup build-up and racing will find itself reverting to shadows it seldom steps from.

The point about the unexpected interest in the debates is that people were eager to see how they played out. Racing struggles because it is all talk and very little action. There is too much predictably inaccurate pre-race speculation from racing pundits about what might or might not win an event that is over in a flash of time. Even the Grand National only takes ten minutes to run – considerably less from a punter’s point of view if his selection exits early.

To use an appropriate analogy, you can take a horse to water but you can’t make it drink. Those that see racing as a sport peppered with propping up the bar and leering at the ladies will not be educated or convinced there is more to it. Some of the crackpot ideas unearthed by RFC do little to encourage a different mindset. Racing is what it is. Tinkering with its composition, staging so-called bullet races, staggering times, publishing the full names of jockeys on racecards, trialling bigger number cloths, are an irrelevance. They are only components presented to an audience already present.

At the risk of repeating myself, there is too much racing, the sport suffers from overkill and the tail – in the shape of bookmakers – is wagging the dog.

I am not paid to rack my brains in order to think about such matters in depth, but am certain a prescription for ailing coverage and interest in our sport exists. It is just that without firing up and capturing potential racegoers and followers of the sport, the likes of Lesley Graham, Derek Thompson and even John Francome will not generate much excitement by giggling and talking endlessly about matters that largely fly over the average viewer’s head.

AND ANOTHER THING…

IT WAS A LONG TIME AGO: Thirty-nine years to be precise. The ink has long since dried, newspapers turned to yellowed parchment.

There were two moon landings, strife in Vietnam, Northern Ireland, Bangladesh and Pakistan. The UK went decimal causing prices to double overnight. Joe Frazier beat Muhammad Ali at Madison Square Garden in the first of three titanic struggles between the two legendary boxers. Walt Disney opened a theme park in Orlando. There was the forming of the United Arab Emirates.

We listened to Led Zeppelin’s iconic Stairway to Heaven and Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young, Bob Dylan and Leonard Cohen, thinking velvet words could slice through the thorny paths of corruption and lies. Carole King released Tapestry, Joni Mitchell Blue, Rod Stewart Every Picture Tells A Story. There was Imagine from John Lennon, My Sweet Lord from George Harrison and Brown Sugar from the Rolling Stones. There was Jackson Browne and the Eagles, Yes, James Taylor and Tom Rush.

We watched Love Story at the cinema, along with Dirty Harry, The French Connection and A Clockwork Orange. This was a new age – a real time for change. Forget the sixties – froth – a precursor for the serious stuff that the early seventies brought.

Petrol was 33 pence a gallon, the price of an average house £5,600. This was 1971, the year Gary Barlow was born, as, coincidentally, was Clare Balding.

There was a three-year-old horse that year called Mill Reef, trained in Kingsclere, a sleepy, leafy avenue of a village with a church, three pubs and two main streets. If you drove your Ford Cortina out of the village heading west, you climbed a steep hill that overlooked Watership Down, something it still does. On a summer’s day there were only two colours then, as now: a cobalt-blue sky and the rolling green of the hills.

Mill Reef took leathery morning strolls up the banks and hills to the gallops from where he breezed amongst the Ian Balding string like a ghost in the morning mists. He gulped the Hampshire air deep into his lungs. It fired and fuelled an engine within a small frame that was powerful enough to carry him to victory in the Derby, The Eclipse, The King George and the Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe in one glorious season. He gave his owner and breeder, the American Paul Mellon, the ‘best day of his life’ on the first Wednesday in June when he won the Derby. All that is history now, folklore almost, but some still remember.

Ian Balding remembered today in the winners’ enclosure at Epsom and the memory moved him to tears when interviewed by Nick Luck on RUK. In truth, I doubt there is a day that goes by without Mr Balding thinking about that little son of Never Bend. There he was, turning back the clock, exposed to the camera and standing in the very spot that had meant so much to connections of Mill Reef and all Derby winners – the haloed winning circle. The occasion got the better of him in the nicest possible way, and those that shared the memory along with him gulped back the tears. It was a very long time ago and not all of us have made it. Those that have stopped for a moment to remember. Mill Reef was just a horse, doing what he knew – in truth that was all. He won four races in a golden season whilst all around him the world was changing and turning: rivers were running red with blood, skies scrawled with the vapour of bombers as the architects of change plotted an alternative. All this meant nothing to Mill Reef and those that sought refuge in the joy he brought. It is a joy that horses – correction, some horses, bring long after they have departed and are represented by grainy ancient film.

In the middle of April 2010, Epsom staged its first meeting of the season. There are no fences at Epsom. There are ever likely to be. When you see a card there at this time of year, you are aware of spring – of the swallow and cuckoo – the promise of summer. The Epsom camber is the same: a sloping plain of Pisa, inviting horses to run across the course toward the rail. It is a slippery switchback of a course that climbs and plunges before sliding away from the legs of horses. That was how it was today: as it has always been. The Esso signs are gone along with those belonging to Ever Ready and Vodafone. It is all about Investec now. But the winning roll of honour continues. The names swell with each passing year. Some names stand out – the greatest of the great. There is Sea Bird, there is Nijinsky, Sir Ivor and Sea The Stars. For an instant, for those that recalled that day in June, there was Mill Reef. Small in stature but big enough to invoke tears from those that were there, that shared a hair of his mane, that cashed the winning slip, that returned home on the coach, in the car or on foot to the train that in those days departed from Epsom and took them to Victoria.

He was just a horse. Mill Reef was his name.

NEWBURY – SATURDAY APRIL 17th

LIKE A MONSTER WITH INDIGESTION, a piece of angry rock is apparently spewing a black mass of ash into the atmosphere. There is no evidence of this three-mile high cloud. The sky is blue. The sun is bright. Beneath this canopy it was business as usual at Newbury. The message in the maiden that opened the card was for Tenessee. Like the spelling of this son of Nayef, the message was probably almost but not quite right. Having apparently been working with Dansili Dancer, Tenessee turned to jelly quickly, but not before he had attracted significant market support. Sometimes you wonder how authentic these messages are. Is someone making them up? If they are, I trust they are well paid. Ritual, a fine example of Cape Cross, was another to make a rapid retreat, leaving Colonel Carter to pounce inside the last furlong. Significant Move made a highly satisfactory debut for Roger Charlton, whose yard appears to be finding its stride. Latansaa was an encouraging third for Marcus tregoning – another stable that is in form.

Two of last year’s leftovers, in Harbinger and Manifest, dominated the Dubai Duty Free John Porter. Regarded as Classic contenders at various stages of their three-year-old campaigns, neither actually made it. Harbinger seemed to suffer some sort of setback, whilst Manifest, considered a St Leger candidate until beaten on his third start, was possibly too big and immature. Both looked different propositions today. Harbinger had the finishing kick to settle the issue but Manifest showed a great deal of promise. Both should figure in this sort of company throughout the season, although Harbinger could be a Coronation type. Claremont ran with promise in third, just ahead of Polly’s Mark and the lightly raced Blizzard Blues who, as stable mate of better-fancied Manifest was unconsidered, should make his mark soon. Purple Moon appeared to blow up in the closing stages and this run should have put an edge on him. Despite excellent form at home and away, he is not an easy horse to win with.

Cityscape ran very well from top weight in the Spring Cup. His mark is presently 108. It may be raised to 110 after today but a big handicap could well be on the agenda.

Puff did a magic dragon when blowing away Habaayib in the Dubai Fred Darling. Lady Of The Desert looked all set to collect when taking it up a furlong out, but one has to conclude she failed to stay and that her dam, Queen’s Logic, has more influence on her genes than her sire, Rahy.

It was again a case of stamina – or lack of it – being responsible for the result of the trial for colts, the Bathwick Tyres Greenham. Despite pulling away two out, Canford Cliffs ran out of petrol quickly. He lugged badly left, but was on empty in the last half furlong as Dick Turpin robbed him of the prize. Presumably, Canford Cliffs will revert to sprinting now. Arcano failed to replicate his form from the Prix Morny in third, never threatening to play a part. It is difficult to construe a Guineas case for him after this.

They changed the ground to Good to Firm before the following maiden which, showing a high knee action, Tactician did extremely well to win. A son of Motivator, he possibly outstayed the opposition to an extent; even so, he had every chance to down tools. He may not have beaten too much but has plenty of scope and providing this run has not taken its toll, looks to have a future.

Fair Trade justified the decision to come here in preference to Newmarket but the ground was no better for him. Once in front it was clear he would be better with some cut but he held the fast finishing Colour Scheme. Well entered and already having shown signs of ability as a juvenile, it remains to be seen what route he now takes. There is certainly more to come so long as his sights are not set too high. Colour Scheme should have no trouble in winning before long.

NEWBURY – GREENHAM MEETING Day One

One of the better early two-year-old events of the year opened the card, dominated by the February foals, the speedily bred duo, Klammer and Royal Exchange. Klammer collared Royal Exchange from off the pace to shade it close home. The winner is by Exceed And Excel, the runner-up by Royal Applause. Royal Exchange was expected to open his account in this, which looked likely until the winner’s late rattle. He should soon gain compensation. Third was the once-raced Shafgaan who is the benchmark to this, Novabridge having failed to advertise that Folkestone form at Thirsk ten minutes later.

Meezaan landed something of a gamble in the following Class 3 handicap. A winner of a Lingfield maiden, there is plenty to like about this son of Medicean who has plenty of presence and a good turn of foot. He won this comfortably from what in hindsight was a generous mark of 87, and should be capable of progressing further. A quote of 20/1 for the Guineas, however, looks optimistic – something confirmed by Richard Hills in his post race comment that the immediate target is the Jersey. This looked a proper handicap. Runner-up, the fancied High Constable, looks decent enough, with Gramercy emphasising the current wellbeing of inmates from the in-form Michael Bell stable. It is hard to know what to make of the favourite, Rebel Soldier. Admittedly, he lost the race at the start, but he should have made some headway if his advance billing was accurate. On this showing, it was not. Once again, Planet Red went out like a light. It could be six is his trip, but on his two efforts so far this season, he has given little cause for optimism.

Blue Jack provided the perfect start to his new trainer in the Class 2 handicap, producing a finishing burst that split the opposition apart. Elnawin was travelling like the winner approaching the final furlong but it looks as if this five – a trip he has never won over – was too sharp. A return to six should do the trick.

Several lined up for the Class 3 Conditions Stakes armed with stable confidence. Yarmouth winner Admission, locally trained Rasmy and recently Derby-supplemented Bullet Train were the colts in question. Bullet Train is a fine physical specimen that appears mentally immature. He travelled strongly on the outside for much of the way, taking a long time to master the leaders. Nice type though he undoubtedly is, he does not appeal as Group 1 material as he lacks a turn of foot. No sooner had he headed a weakening Rasmy, who probably failed to stay, than Myplacelater swept by to steal the honours. After High Heeled last year, this was another success for a filly in this event. So far confined an all-weather campaign, this was a massive step up on anything so far shown by Myplacelater. Two weeks ago, she had finished behind Pipette at Kempton. Bullet Train should win a race or two, possibly a decent handicap at Royal Ascot, whilst Admission has confirmed his Yarmouth win was no fluke.

All of a sudden, the mood of the day changed. There was the discovery of subsidence on the track at Ayr. At Newbury, Ayam Zainah ran amok in the paddock before the Bridget Maiden Fillies’ Stakes, causing what looked like a serious injury to Kieren Fallon. What with ragged starts at Thirsk, this is a timely reminder to the likes of Racing For Change that this sport concerns highly-strung animals that have not read any script. Whatever way RFC feel they can tinker with this, that and the other (not much sign they are doing anything at present except spending racing’s cash) they should bear this in mind. Today was the perfect example of there being too much racing. Kieren Fallon was stretchered away from Newbury whilst RUK could barely keep up with the action, carrying on regardless, keeping racegoers in the dark as to the jockey’s plight. If he is injured, Fate has played a cruel trick on Fallon that he does not deserve. The race – for unraced fillies – went to the well-grown Funky Lady who knuckled down well to finish nicely on top of Qudwah and Titivation once she got the message.

It was fillies again in the Robert Sangster Maiden. The form horse, Pink Symphony, put her experience to good use. Mujdeya threw away her chance by hanging at a crucial stage and giving her rider little in the way of help in the last furlong. She finished well but there has to be a question about her attitude. Bakongo made eye-catching headway in the last quarter of a mile.

There was not much to be gleaned from the Class 4 handicap over two miles won by Satwa Gold. Devil To Pay looked the winner down the straight but, not for the first time, produced only a limited response when it mattered.

Not for the first time, those that tried to outwit the formbook ended up with egg on their faces after the last. Gertrude Bell had finished in front of Nouriya when they were both behind Timepiece last season. Of course, Nouriya was entitled to reverse as she was having her first run at the time. However, it was not to be as Gertrude Bell strode right away to win the second division of the Robert Sangster Maiden with Nouriya unable to deliver a serious blow.

NEWMARKET CRAVEN MEETING – DAY 2

IN THE CLASS 4 MAIDEN FOR FILLIES, Richard Hannon bagged yet another two-year-old event with what looked a smart filly by Royal Applause, Penny’s Pearl. Although the well fancied Golden Shine was undoubtedly unfortunate, the way Penny’s Pearl stretched when asked suggests she may well have won anyway. Credit is due to the stoutly bred Yarooh in second, whilst clearly Golden Shine (green and buffeted around in running) should win next time. Apparently, she is Mick Channon’s best juvenile at this early stage of the season. The first three look useful in a race that was above average.

As always, the Wood Ditton took punters into unknown territory. There were three messages – for Soviet Secret, Diescentric and Chiefdom Prince. The last-named had been keeping yesterday’s winner Desert Myth company, giving him what appeared to be the best claims. Looking sharp enough to do himself justice, he pulled too hard early, only moving well in the middle part of the contest and therefore failed to finish. A drop in trip may be required. Diescentric is a good-sized colt that will improve for this having won with something in hand. Soviet Secret is on the small side and may not be much better than this run indicates. The third, Squall, was just about the paddock pick. A strapping son of Dubawi, he looked as if he badly needed the outing. He stuck on and looks like one to bear in mind next time when he should strip a lot fitter.

It has been a long time between drinks for Equiano who returned to winning ways in the Listed Abernant Stakes. On first viewing, in a desperate head-bobber, it appeared Mullionmileanhour had claimed him; however, the replay showed otherwise. Headed a few strides short of the post, Equiano fought back under a strong Michael Hills drive to snatch victory out of defeat. On his day, Equiano is a decent sort although nominating his day is not always a straightforward task. Lightly raced Mullionmileanhour would seem the obvious horse to take from this after what was only his fourth run. Providing he stands up to training, he should gain compensation. Golden Stream belied her breeding [Sadler’s Wells – Phantom Gold] in finishing a close up sixth. Six is probably too sharp but this will have blown away the winter cobwebs and she could be a different proposition next time.

RACING POST CRAVEN STAKES (Group 3): The meeting revolves around this race and this year’s renewal did not disappoint. Elusive Pimpernel, beaten only by St Nicholas Abbey in last year’s Racing Post at Doncaster, made the perfect start to his second season. As was the pattern last year, he hit a flat spot at halfway but once shaken up found his stride to power clear. Looking to be carrying condition, he has the size and temperament to improve for this run. The time was good, the opposition second-division. By Elusive Quality out of a Sadler’s Wells mare, Elusive Pimpernel has the pedigree to stay a mile-and-a-quarter at least. He may lack the killer kick to win a Guineas but is a solid prospect. Dancing David replicated Doncaster form with the winner in second and Critical Moment confirmed this is his ground rather than the soft he encountered when disappointing at Newbury last backend. He also indicated that the Barry Hills stable has turned a corner.

Sri Putra upset a couple of better-fancied rivals in the Group 3 Earl of Sefton Stakes. First Palavicini then Tranquil Tiger seemed to throw away the opportunity, both becoming overwhelmed in the closing stages. Apparently cruising, Tranquil Tiger lugged to his right, whilst Palavicini hung in behind. Tranquil Tiger has a make-up well known to us. Newmarket, with its wide-open spaces, is not ideal; tighter tracks bring out the best in him. For that reason, he could be appealing at the Chester May meeting.

Eldalil justified market support in the Class 4 maiden, a race often responsible for fillies destined for better things. A most attractive daughter of Singspiel, seven furlongs looked a minimum both before and after. She travelled smoothly throughout, eased to the front with two to race but in the end had to find extra to hold Dance East. Although the margin was narrow, Eldalil was always going to win and will come in to her own over further. She looks like a filly to follow.
A handicap that has featured some illustrious names of the past closed this two-day meeting. Wigmore Hall won in a slow time without being asked a serious question. On the face of it, this looked impressive but caution is advised. The field may not have been as strong as in recent years and his winning mark of 88 means he needs to improve if he is to make the leap from handicap company. Right Step and Tamaathul occupied the places with Official Style showing promise in fourth.

NEWMARKET CRAVEN MEETING

SO DESPITE THE GRUMBLINGS of RFC, the Craven Meeting went ahead. If they have their way, Racing For Change will dispense with this fixture. Let us hope someone has a word. The Alex Scott Maiden instigated proceedings. As usual, there were messages; as is often the case they did not win. Won by twice-raced Balducci – his two runs had been on the all-weather – the race did not look out of the ordinary but should contain a winner or two. Harvest Dancer came there but, as feared by those from the yard that backed him, blew up. It is premature to write off Esaar who travels well in his races but has so far failed to finish off to maximum effect. Making excuses can be costly, but after a wet and desperate winter, the Barry Hills stable has yet to strike form. The way Esaar kept on I am not convinced he failed to stay, which would make him an interesting proposition in a handicap. Of the rest, the desperately green Safwaan is highly regarded and we should expect improvement.

Two-year-olds held court in the next, an event won by Monsieur Chevalier last year. The market pointed to Retainer and this time was spot on. Although only officially two tomorrow, this well grown son of Acclamation knew his job. Speedy, he quickened when shaken up, drawing away in the final furlong. This was another success for the Hannon stable that are currently farming juvenile events. A bold show was expected from runner-up Sikeeb who stayed on in the manner of one that will appreciate a sixth furlong in time. The rest may struggle to make an impact just now. The oldest in the field, the Royal Applause colt, Early Applause, is on the small side and looked hopelessly at sea from the outset.

They raced for serious money in the Tattersalls Timeform 3-Y-O Trophy where the first of plenty of Michael Stoute gambles over the forthcoming months surfaced in Longliner. It is worth stating that if you follow messages from this yard you are often destined to take short prices about unproven horses. Longliner was a 16/1 chance on the book, but when the Stoute team make a move it can be folly to ignore it. Beaten in two minor events last season, Longliner, a son of Dalakhani, is a fine physical specimen that has thrived over the winter. With a dubious head carriage, he looked fazed by events today. According him the benefit of the doubt, his turn should come. Despite looking the winner when shooting clear, Ameer was inched out in the closing stages by the ex-Peter Chapple-Hyam-trained Coordinated Cut. A rare white-faced Montjeu, it could be Coordinated Cut has not inherited any of the negative qualities sometimes associated with his sire. He stuck on strongly for Jamie Spencer as Ameer reached the end of his tether. Hot Prospect was a distant third, just ahead of High Twelve who looked fit but has not grown much since last year and looks unlikely to better this effort.

There was a time when The Free Handicap could throw up a Classic contender but it seems to have lost some of its glitter in recent years. Red Jazz seemed an unlikely winner beforehand but, small enough to be produced fit after an absence, he broke the losing run of the Barry Hills yard. Bounced out, he made all to hold Quadrille, winning from a mark of 107. A quote of 20/1 for the Guineas seems ludicrously short about a colt not certain to stay. Although effectively finishing third of the four with pretensions to scoring, the maiden, Mata Keranjang, should open his account before long. He will improve for a step up in trip (slow early pace did not suit), has developed nicely since we last saw him, and will improve on today’s third.

For the benefit of those associated with Racing For Change, perhaps I might explain what the Nell Gwyn, amongst other events at this meeting, is all about. Such races are designed to pinpoint possible highflyers of the future: those that can progress to Listed of even Group company later in the season. What you do lads, is to watch the race before coming to a conclusion based on what you have seen. It is rather like going to a movie and deciding if you like it. However, if you don’t watch the film you will never be able to form an opinion. Got the idea? So did we see a Guineas winner in Music Show today? That is a tough call to make, but what we did see was a pretty good filly defying two obstacles. Firstly, she had to concede 3lbs to the entire field; secondly, on a day that favoured those up with the pace, she passed the complete field to win. Blue Maiden pressed her on the run to the line but Music Show, whose only blemish was at Ayr in September, was too good despite reportedly being in the need of the outing. This looked a strong renewal with Principal Role (dismounted after the race) an unexposed third, highly thought of Safina a most promising fourth and the strong-travelling Hafawa fifth.

From 1,000 Guineas clues, it was time to turn attention to the Oaks. Taking on the colts in the Feilden Stakes and saddled with a 3lbs penalty, Timepiece had to show plenty in order to justify her position in the second fillies’ Classic. Not out of place against the colts on looks, in a race where nothing went right for her she showed enough to keep the dream alive. Although only fourth, we can expect improvement from Timepiece particularly over further. Rumoush continued the current excellent run of the Marcus Tregoning yard, sweeping past Timepiece two out before lugging right. She has come a long way since winning a Lingfield all-weather event in November. We have seen stronger Feildens than this so improvement from the principals will be required if they are to take on better company.

If we needed any reminding that this meeting can be a graveyard for the message horses, it came directly with the eclipse of widely touted Lunar Victory in the Class 4 maiden. Desert Myth, described as a decent sort by his stable that would improve for the run, won nicely from solid yardstick Deauville Post. Winner excepted, it is a struggle to take too much out of this. There are possibilities for Awsaal and maybe Out Of Eden, whilst Lunar Victory ran poorly and is presumably worth another chance.

Pastoral Player went within inches of restoring the status quo in the last, a race often farmed by trainer Hughie Morrison. With the field split in two, it was the stands’ side that held sway in a photo as Mister Hughie (an appropriate winner) caused an upset at the expense of the well backed Pastoral Player, Sunraider and Racy, who looks the sort to be placed to advantage shortly.

AND ANOTHER THING…

SO NOW WE KNOW THE SECRET! Prolific Pricewise selector, Tom Segal does not just rely on the formbook according to today’s Daily Mail. No, apparently Tom is something of a roué that finds solace and inspiration in the company of ladies. It appears Mr Segal, subject of a current lawsuit, is accused of keeping sex slaves – two young female Russian “attendants” being on call twenty-four hours a day to satisfy his desires.

One Kayden Nguyen, 23, measurements unknown, claims she was treated as a ‘sex toy’ after applying to be Mr Segal’s personal assistant. It’s a wonder Tom has any time to rifle through the formbook; but then maybe that is a task entrusted to one of his “attendants”.

But, wait a moment, this is not about the Racing Post’s Tom Segal after all as these allegations concern an actor, star of Under Siege, The Patriot and A Dangerous Man, amongst many other movies. Therefore, I am wrong on two counts here. This article refers to Steven Seagal [different Christian name and different spelling of surname]. Any vision of Tom Segal boning and boning up simultaneously is of course pure fiction. Sorry Tom.

As for Steven Seagal, although doubtless he enjoys the company of the opposite sex, he looks like an unlikely ‘sex slave baron’. Over the years, he has endeavoured to put his fame to good use. He has lobbied vigorously on behalf of PETA, an organisation concerned with animal welfare. He has devoted energy to drawing attention to the cruelty of the fur trade, the plight of baby elephants in Thailand and in India. A deputy Chief Sherriff in Louisiana, Steven Seagal, an advisor on the James Bond film Never Say Never Again and a tough guy with a black belt in karate, seems an unlikely loser in what looks like a series of trumped-up charges.

Talking of matters legal; what on earth is going on with this former female soldier, Tilern DeBique or Sexy T as she calls herself? It beggars belief that she may receive half-a-million of taxpayers’ cash in compensation for transgressing Army rules. She has trotted out the usual claptrap associated with the supposed put-upon in this compensation culture we find ourselves living in. Like most that pursue huge sums at our expense, she seems an expert in bending the truth. She could start by rebranding her ‘Sexy T’ MySpace image. If the picture of her in today’s paper is anything to go by, plain ‘T’ would seem more appropriate.

I know this is not a political column. However, I do like the UKIP poster, featuring Messrs Brown, Cameron and Clegg, proclaiming ‘Sod The Lot’. Whatever the polls may say, I sense most of middle-England have yet to make up their minds which way to vote. This election may turn into the Mon Mome Grand National in terms of result. In the belief that when push comes to shove many will conclude the present government cannot hide behind the façade open to the Tories that, “The Economy Is in Such a Mess We Have No Alternative but to squeeze the Country like a Lemon”, I have backed Labour to win this forthcoming election. After all, many electors, faced with an unknown alternative and propped up by the current government, may opt for the known over the unknown.

2010 was heralded as a new beginning. One way or another, this seems likely. On the racing front, Racing For Change continue to batter all that is sacred, claiming we should do away with the Craven meeting, allowing the Flat Season to kick off with the 1,000 Guineas. Are they mad? Don’t bother to answer, I think we all know what they are: overgrown public schoolboys on a collective massive earner, attempting to tinker with a sport they appear to have a limited knowledge of. I have a remedy: get rid of RFC and remember where the money to appoint such a quango comes from – The Punter.

Those that advocate Tony McCoy should win the BBC Sports Personality may be missing a crucial ingredient. Normally, the politically correct machine that is the Cooperation leads the public into voting for someone perceived to have achieved success for the UK. Winning a horserace is unlikely to break into this mould.

Those that know Tony McCoy are understandably delighted. He is a great ambassador for the sport and one that contributes considerably to charity. After the famous victory of Don’t Push It on Saturday and Tony McCoy breaking his National hoodoo, comes the welcome racing news that Zenyatta has extended her run to sixteen, equalling Cigar and Citation. The daughter of Street Cry, who has a bigger world-wide fan club than any so-called “Sexy Soldier” or politician, recorded this monumental feat at Arkansas in The Apple Blossom Handicap at Oaklawn Park. A six-year-old mare by Street Cry, named after a Police album, Zenyatta is likely to run once more, but thoughts are turning to her impending stud career. It is possible she will be mated with Sea The Stars, in which case surely favourite for the name of her first offspring has to be taken from a Carpenters song: Interstellar Policeman.

GRAND NATIONAL DAY 2010.

I WATCHED THE FIRST IN THE NUDE. No, I have not become a naturist, or a streaker. With the sun out, I frittered away the morning – cleaning the car, pottering in the garden, fully clothed I might add, and then, all of a sudden, realised racing was imminent. A quick shower later and they were off for the John Smith’s Mersey Novices’ Hurdle. Dripping on the carpet, I watched Peddlers Cross and Jason Maquire ride into a tunnel of noise approaching the last two flights. As the well-backed favourite eased his way to the front, you could sense the packed stands collectively gulp on the run to the last. Peddlers Cross met it untidily but maintained his gallop, extending his winning sequence for the season to five. His win bloodied the bookmakers’ noses on this most important of all days for them, and gladdened the hearts of spectators. After his Cheltenham win, taking a short price about Peddlers Cross may not have been the smartest move but it paid off. This has been a tremendous season for Donald McCain Jnr, consolidated by this prestigious win.

It’s okay, you can remove that vision from your minds now. Appropriately dressed this time, I maintained a hundred percent record for the Flat season when throwing a few quid at Celtic Sultan at Lingfield. In fifth, he ran better than his price suggested he would – maybe I am getting there in time for Newmarket next week. Maybe not! One swallow does not make a summer and all that…

On his Arkle form, Osana should have won the Grade 1 novice chase that came up next at Aintree. A winner of two chases at Navan, it seems fair to say he often places rather than wins on the big day. And any hypothesis had to disregard Tataniano who had been beaten last time at long odds-on at Newbury. It is always dangerous to write off the Nicholls-Walsh combination, as it proved here. Well suited by this quickening ground, Tataniano popped the fences to scoot clear of Osana. This was another favourable result – the best two backed horses occupying the first two places. Bookmakers, sachels swelled by earlier success during the week, had taken another blow but were still standing.

The quality keeps coming. Time flashes by on days like this. Now it is the Grade 1 Aintree Hurdle – won last year by Solwit. The extra half mile can make this a tricky contest as it invariably contains major Champion Hurdle contenders. This year was no exception with only the winner missing. The second, third and fourth re-oppose each other. Zaynar looks to have the call over Celestial Halo and Khyber Kim. Forget the thesis about Khyber Kim being best fresh, forget the slide rule, the formbook is vindicated once again. Champion Hurdle runner-up Khyber Kim gains Cheltenham compensation big time. Celestial Halo takes a crashing fall two out. He defies fate, struggling up on wobbly legs and cantering clear. Ruby Walsh does not look so fortunate. Zaynar was always under the hammer and, not for the first time, Muirhead failed to find what he promised. So it was a case of three well-backed horses obliging in a row.

Part of the dark art of bookmaking is to wait in the shadows. Bookmakers know that all it takes is for one good result in a high profile race to swing things in their favour: they pay; they wait. Bottles of lifeblood arrive for the next three events: tough handicaps – including the Grand National. White teeth glint in the sunlight.

After such an analogy, how fitting that a horse named after a Tarrentino movie about zombies takes the listed handicap chase. From Dawn To Dusk quickened on the run to the last to beat three better fancied rivals in Dom D’ Orgeval, Rare Bob and Wogan. Although 12/1, the winner was not unfancied and will have drawn blood. Bookmakers are not haemorrhaging the stuff but drops are visible. Punters are rocking and rolling. In a city made famous by The Beatles, there are no cries for Help or Please, Please Me.

With everything in their favour, it is little wonder bookmakers battle for business on a day such as this. A Mon Mome or Foinavon-style result can re-balance audit sheets for a complete season. In the Grand National, they have the runners, changing ground, a wide-open contest with no obvious handicap blot, no Red Rum, so, after a day tilted in the favour of punters, layers step from the shadows, sensing and smelling their quarry is ripe.

As an event it is spectacular. It can be cruel. Winners need luck, to race on a golden strip of turf: courage, agility, dourness, inexhaustible reserves: luck, luck and a bit more luck.

Considering we are supposed to be in the worst recession since the last one fifteen years ago, Liverpool is packed. Racegoers are vocal; there looks to be a party atmosphere amongst the designer clothes and the foaming bottles of champagne.

King Johns Castle outwits us all. He takes one look at the scene, deciding it is not for him. They go off too fast, hurtling toward the first. Remarkably, there are limited fallers on the first circuit. After The Chair they start to flag, it is as if riflemen are taking pot shots. You get to spot the principals from Becher’s. Turning for home only Hello Bud is there boxing for the bookies. He is the first of the four that are clear to wilt. Now it is pay, pay time whatever wins. It is the horse that ran Denman to half-a-length as a novice – Don’t Push It. Awash with sweat beforehand, like many a quirky character, Aintree brings out the best in him. He takes to the fences, carrying Tony McCoy to the front at the last. He has a raw battle with Black Apalachi but once in front, McCoy rides as if life depends upon it. Backed from 20/1 to 10/1 favourite, Don’t Push It, at last realises his potential. Now a ten-year-old, it has been a while. Punters should not assume this trick that will work again next year. However, this is a famous victory for AP and JP. It rights wrongs for Jonjo.

Their chance gone, bookmakers wince. The winner is bad, so are the places. Black Apalachi, State Of Play and Big Fella Thanks were all popular. After two days of profits, bookmakers have pushed their luck too far. With the welcome news that all horses have returned safely, bookmakers are the real casualties. Whatever happens in the last two races, they are on the canvas. Possibly, I am relishing their misfortune but they dominate racing, or at least try to, without any thought or concern for the sport itself. There was a time when, to a degree, I would have stood in their corner and defended them. After their constant manipulation of all racing matters, those days are gone.

Dee EE Williams failed to alleviate misery for layers with his victory in the next. The success of Megastar in the bumper delivered the knock-out punch.

AINTREE 2010

THE FIRST RACE WAS PIVOTAL FOR MANY. Favourite backers latched on to Cheltenham winner Menorah, who posted the best figures after that win in the Supreme but faced a different test here. As a result, he drifted from a skinny morning price to odds that were more realistic. The profile horse was La Sarrazine, a mare on the upgrade that had by-passed Cheltenham. The formbook described her two wins as a mixture of ‘clever, easy’ and ‘smooth’. These are not attributes always essential for Aintree winners; often they are more likely to come in handy for writers, tennis players or makers of luxury chocolates. Perhaps La Sarrazine will undergo a career change. She ran okay in the John Smith’s Grade 2 Novice Hurdle but lacked the strength to land a blow against the geldings. A casualty at the first hurdle in the Supreme at Cheltenham, the nibbled at General Miller got up on the run-in to deprive Menorah in the closing stages. A faster pace would have suited Menorah, for whom it has been a long and hard season. He and La Sarrazine attracted serious money, so once again the bookmakers had the punters on the ropes early.

Many in the huge crowd seemed impervious to the intricacies of the horses; some momentarily of the opinion Captive Audience had won the opener as he passed the post first with a circuit left to run. The turf was beautifully striped in two shades of green, making me wonder if those responsible have weekend jobs, and if not if they would like ones. It was Ladies’ Day, making legs a major distraction. Horses have four to look at. Their front ones are different to the ones at the back, but most sets look pretty much the same. Ladies only sport two. No two are the same; most on a day like this are stunning. It would come as no surprise to learn bookmakers have planted hundreds of leggy fillies on the track to distract punters. It seemed there were plenty to distract – most of Liverpool, Manchester, and Cheshire had taken time off to attend.

This made Ogee (derivation of ogle he said in desperation – actually, it is an arch) the topical tip. Some of us thought we knew better than Nicky Henderson and opposed Sun Alliance runner-up Burton Port in very different conditions in the Mildmay. After all, Cheltenham and Aintree are chalk and cheese, but Burton Port has the right name to accompany cheese. Despite sweating beforehand and pulling fiercely on the way to post then taking a long time to find his stride in the race, he won comfortably, completing a first season over fences that has seen him bag five and finish second on his remaining two outings. This is an enviable record. Burton Port has the right kind of attitude to take him to high office.

I am watching this at home as I can’t be trusted at Liverpool. Although I have edged my way to the soft suburbs, I am a Londoner at heart. Even so, I have never heard the expression ‘bangers’ – as in bangers and mash – rhyming slang for cash. Gary Wiltshire certainly has. He earned his gravy, tripping it out to great effect before the Melling Chase, reporting someone had placed 20,000 Bangers on Forpadydeplasterer. That looked money well invested two out, but the son of Moscow Society wavered, running on empty before plugging on from the last. Albertas Run is at his best on this sort of ground. He stayed the trip well and kept on strongly to win a thrilling race.

A tough day was set to get tougher. The omens for those behind with their betting were not good with the onset of the John Smith’s Topham Chase, the first of two double-hard handicaps, a tough looking Sefton and a bumper. Colleen Rooney was unfazed. She revealed the secret of backing winners: it is to go for horses ridden by jockeys in matching tops and bottoms. I am not sure what constitutes a matching top and bottom. I know jockeys can talk out of their backsides sometimes, but surely, all bottoms look the same in breeches. However, no doubt Mrs Rooney knew what she meant. Whatever it was, it apparently stands her in good stead year as she backed Mon Mome in last year’s National and Albertas Run today. I wonder if Tony McCoy is aware his bottom matches his top. Come to think of it…

They thundered round the Grand National fences in the Topham, led for most of the way by Frankie Figg who looked tired when ejecting his jockey two out. The winner, Always Waining, had form figures akin to a coded message received by cipher clerks at Bletchley Park. Two Fs and a P figured, there was an 8, a 5 and a 7. Available at 40/1 with Ladbrokes in the morning, an SP of 22/1 inferred not many, but possibly some, made much sense of his claims. Scotsirish was a brave second from top weight, conceding 2lbs short of two stone to the winner. With carnage on and off the track, BBC cameras tried not to dwell on fallers. Some of them looked, and indeed proved to be, as bad as possible. Cash Point machines were doing brisk business according to Gary Wiltshire. Day Two was swinging in the favour of bookmakers.

Whatever the jockeys said, the ground was encouraging horses to travel a stride too quickly. They motored round the Mildmay course at a kamikaze pace for the three mile Sefton Novices’ Hurdle. It was a very long last furlong for trailblazer Western Leader who, after blasting from flag-fall, fizzled desperately from the final flight. Winning jockey Dougie Costello prematurely dismounting from Wayward Prince, action that is commendable, demonstrating quick thinking in the thick of triumph. He reported he felt the horse to be at the end of its tether.

Adjusting to a schedule that fell behind, BBC allowed their coverage to overrun. Cynics might conclude those looking for clues for tomorrow should take a lead from the programme that was to follow – namely Pointless. However, Gary Wiltshire told us that The Package is an almost certain steamer after lumpy and informed money – or possibly bangers – for the Grand National.

A lucrative day was capped for Jonjo O’ Neill (great tie) and Tony McCoy (average bottom) when Ringaroses won the handicap hurdle. By now, what with all the distractions, I suspect most punters were acting on autopilot – if at all.

Aintree seemed to be buzzing for the last. No doubt alcohol had some influence. It was a mares’ bumper, won by Big Time Billy. Had someone been alcohol fuelled when naming a filly with such a masculine name. No matter, Aintree specialises in fairytales. She provided a double for Peter Bowen, who had won the Topham earlier. Her price suggests this was not a golden end to the day for punters but, hey, pass the bottle this way…

AINTREE 2010

IF IT’S EARLY APRIL, snowdrops are peeping; lawns are squaring up to their first brushes with lawnmowers: it must be Aintree. It can be a funny old place, especially after dark, but from a racing point of view, coming on the back of Cheltenham it presents punters with a perennial problem: will Cheltenham form stand up? That can be tricky. As a rule, horses having had hard races at the Festival should be treated with caution.

Aintree can be as shocking as an electric storm. In the opener, Big Buck’s faced six opponents trying to ensure lightning struck early. It didn’t. I am not sure who backs horses at 30/100; those that did collected; not without some consternation though as Big Buck’s appears to have a sense of humour. Always travelling powerfully, he needed rousting from the turn to pick up the bit, but it was eventually plain sailing.

Orsippus, a Musselburgh winner that had only a slender chance in the Grade 1 on Cheltenham form, defied the formbook when winning the Matalan Anniversary Novice Hurdle, returning to a stunned silence. Sanctuaire, who had beaten Orsippus comprehensively at Cheltenham, loomed at the last but emptied surprisingly quickly. He had won so easily at Prestbury Park that it seemed unlikely anything that had finished behind him there would be capable of overturning the form. Racing thrives on the unlikely and the unlikely turned up in a major way as Orsippus beat the Triumph Hurdle runner-up in Barizan and the Fred Winter winner in Sanctuaire.

If there were to be a surprise, most people’s idea of it was in the Totesport Bowl Chase, a race with a chequered betting history. Results indicated that Imperial Commander was an unlikely winner. Desert Orchid, Denman and Kauto Star were amongst past failures after Cheltenham. Imperial Commander added his name to an exclusive list with a lack-lustre display. With the heavy-hitters staying clear, the Gold Cup winner drifted to what threatened to look a generous 6/4 in places. The owners of the Gold Cup winner were reportedly reluctant to push their luck. Nigel Twiston-Davies insisted they should run. Whatever transpired, the ‘told-you-so’ brigade was armed and dangerous for the post mortem. Results make us all clever in life; however, circumspection appeared lacking in the trainer’s decision to run-and-be-hanged. Although embarrassingly clear on all known ratings, Imperial Commander was never travelling, knocking lumps out of the fences on the far side until eventually depositing Paddy Brennan. As Grade 1s go, this was questionable. What A Friend, 22lbs and three lengths behind Denman in the Hennessy, drew clear of Carruthers who had finished thirty lengths adrift of Imperial Commander at Cheltenham. What A Friend has improved since Newbury, winning a Lexus since and now this after what has been a light season. Whether he has improved 22lbs is dubious, but he is on the upgrade. He still has ten pounds to find to develop into a Gold Cup prospect, but only seven; it would be unwise to assume he cannot progress further.

Baby Run consolidated a miserable day for the Twiston-Davies team when falling in the Fox Hunters’ Chase. In fact, most of the runners fell or departed from their riders one way or another, leaving twelve Misters and one Miss to return with green breeches. Twenty-one went to post, nine returned, headed by 50/1 chance Silver Adonis. Tally Ho!

After a 40/1 and a 50/1 winner, it was the turn of a 20/1 chance in round five as first-time visored Chaninbar bolted away with the Red Rum Handicap.

Faced with a handicap to end the day, punters attempted to fire their way out of trouble in the Grade 2 Manifesto Chase. Stepped up to two-and-a-half miles, a trip likely to be more suitable than that of the Arkle, all Somersby had to do was to replicate Cheltenham form to win. Enough said! Sweating at the start, jig-jogged before the vets; on quicker ground, on a faster track, Somersby clouted fence after fence, failing to lasso the giant Mad Max.

Ainama and Wishfull Thinking were the two expected to win the concluding handicap. Neither obliged, nor did they look likely to do so. Ainama appears to be a bridle horse. I was forewarned that Sir Harry Ormesher was fancied but, in typically shrewd style, decided to ignore such advice. The rest as they say…
Who needs 16/1 winners anyway?

Just in case you were not aware of it, there was Flat racing. Slugger O’Toole will be entered into plenty of notebooks after a highly promising effort from a generous mark at Leicester.

At Maisons-Laffitte, the ground was squelchy. No such description exists but it looked extremely testing. It was not surprising that the short-priced favourite for the Group 3 Prix Djebel, the Elusive City colt Bolcity, floundered in the conditions. In complete contrast, as a son of Dubawi, Makfi handled heavy ground without any problem. Dubawi was possibly Dubai Millenium’s best son – certainly at stud. Dubai Millenium was a son of dirt performer Seeking The Gold so the omens were good for the winner and poor for the favourite.
Sensing an imminent bloodbath, punters shied away from the clear form pick, Special Duty, allowing her to start at only marginal odds-on in the Prix Imprudence. Such caution was repaid. The Cheveley Park winner looked well, moved well, but the finish was missing. She was far from disgraced in defeat and will be a different proposition on better ground. It would be premature for those with ante-post vouchers for this year’s 1,000 Guineas to fret.

AND ANOTHER THING…

APPARENTLY, IT’S A BANK HOLIDAY BONANZA. I am afraid you will have to excuse me for not joining in with the fervour. I agree it is a Bank Holiday; I am questioning the bonanza bit: bonanza for whom I wonder. Ask not for whom the bell tolls – it tolls for thee etc.

At the time of writing (such a cosy phrase as it gets any writer off the hook), there are nine scheduled meetings in Britain and Ireland. Paramount amongst these is the Grand National card at Fairyhouse. Here again I am found wanting. Thirty horses will attempt to plod round and plough across heavy ground on a course hardly tailor-made for such a cut-and-thrust long-distance race. Past results suggest this is not a punter-friendly event, nor is it particularly horse-friendly. Unlike Aintree, which has a course specifically designed to accommodate thirty horses charging in all directions, Fairyhouse is just another track. Cube-shaped, it is hilly in places, has tight turns and is often the scene of carnage – at least on Easter Monday, which brings us full circle.

To give it its proper name, the Powers Whiskey Irish Grand National Chase is run over the same trip as the Whitbread, or Betfred, or whatever it is currently called, at Sandown. It is worth a hundred and forty thousand Euros, which is pretty much the same a being worth a hundred and forty thousand pounds these days I suppose. Competition is varied and fierce. To use an oft-tripped out phrase, it is an eclectic mix. Proven contenders with established form face those ascending the ranks. Nevertheless, it is not for me. I admit I like the first part of the title. I have never tried Irish whiskey, mainly because I do not drink whiskey, or indeed whisky; unless it is bourbon, but I am told the Irish variety should be sampled. Perhaps on another day – possibly at the Curragh for the Irish 2,000 Guineas. As for today, I think I will give it a miss. I cannot solve the race, I admit to having no conception of understanding its complexity, let alone a chance of selecting its winner. I suspect it will look like something from a scene taken out of How The West Was Won, with horses careering all over the place and riders taking spectacular tumbles. Tom Segal and Mark Winstanley have had a stab at it, but then are paid to do just that. Good luck to them and all who sail with them.

We mortals have to confine our attentions to matters of less import. Here, possibly, I find myself influenced by Professor Brian Cox’s excellent program Wonders of the Solar System, which concluded yesterday. Actually, it ended without coming to a finite conclusion, but presented the viewer with some thought-provoking pointers about the possibility of the origin of life and the possibility of its extension beyond this planet. It looks as if the Irish National provides punters with a similar puzzle as that set by the pattern of that swirly starry life above the upper atmosphere, and all that Messrs Winstanley and Segal can do is make educated guesses. Some questions are just too baffling so best left unanswered. However, the paradox is that whilst I am tempted to think Ladbrokes have been too generous about their offered 11/10 for Donnas Palm in the preceding race – a Grade 3 hurdle – I am in such appalling form that even this assumption is likely to be wrong. This opens the way for either Segal or Winstanley to produce a veritable rabbit from the Jameson hat whilst I gaze on in stupefied admiration.

Such is life – at least on an Easter Monday bank holiday with nine meetings and not a winner in sight.

AND ANOTHER THING…

AFTER THE JOLLY JAPES of April Fool’s Day, I am having difficulty shuffling fact from fiction. The disarming point was that a proportion of the ‘silly’ stories appearing in most areas of the media yesterday did not look out of place. We live in mad times. Anything, no matter how ludicrous, seems possible – indeed likely. The more ludicrous, the stronger the chance it will surface.

The Daily Mail reported that AA men were to be fitted with jetpacks that could fly them above gridlocked Britain in order to repair broken-down vehicles.

The Sun invited readers to lick (presumably as opposed to drool over) a page of its newspaper as they had perfected a process of impregnating the paper with flavours.

The Mirror and Express (an unlikely combination) carried an identical story: That the Queen booked herself onto an easyJet flight in order to cut travel costs.

The broadsheets were only slightly more credible. The Telegraph claimed Virgin Media had recruited ferrets to help install broadband to rural areas. The Independent ran a story that a second Hadron Collider was being considered for use in the tunnel of London Underground’s Circle Line. The Guardian weighed in with the best effort: that in an attempt to cash in on Gordon Brown’s tough guy image, the Labour Party was set to introduce billboards bearing slogans including: ‘Vote Labour – Or Else’, and ‘Step Outside Posh Boy.’

On the sporting front, there were stories revealing an aerodynamic jacket for greyhounds; of the supply of a pink West Ham strip by Ann Summers, and that the European Union was insisting the 2,000 and 1,000 Guineas should be renamed the 2,331 and 1,165 Euros respectively to comply with current EU Law.

After the craziness of the past and present, some of these reports needed a second read before spotting the flaw. Right now, we have RMT leader Bob Crow seemingly intent on calling a strike to the run-up to an election, hoping to thwart the socialist government with whom he and his membership are closely affiliated. That does seem odd. Also odd is the fact that in his likening of this action to pugilism, Crow, using a boxing analogy, seems to think heavyweight championship bouts are still decided over fifteen rounds.

Tony Blair returns to the political arena in a half-hearted way to endorse his old adversary Gordon Brown. As he speaks, Blair sounds like an American on a whistle stop holiday. The content is vintage Blair. Hearing the old master, the architect of a Brave New World that turned out to be new but not particularly brave, was refreshing, but right now, the country is not in the mood for politics or politicians. And there is a ripple of thought that Blair, as the man presiding over the country at the time, was largely responsible for the mess we now find ourselves in. That is a problem because, in general, we, the electorate, are clueless. All we do know is that most politicians have taken us for fools and continue to do so.

And this morning – and this is not a political point – we awake to the news that on the eve of Good Friday of all days, Israeli jets strafed suspected Hamas targets in the Gaza Strip.

You may have noticed there is no racing today. A quick glance through the card at Kempton tomorrow offers no obvious reason for optimism, however, in a business that changes in an inkling it may be a different story twenty-four hours from now.

A brace of Grand Nationals wait next week: The Irish version at Fairyhouse and the ‘real thing’ at Aintree next Saturday.

After that it is the Craven meeting at Newmarket and then it is a case of heads down for the foreseeable future with night racing, Classic trials, the races themselves hitting us before we know it and hopefully a brightening of the weather. The long-term prediction that we are in for a hot summer would be nice but, rather like those April Fool articles, no one is counting on it. Just a summer devoid of endless rain, flooding and misery would do. Oh, and perhaps some results we can forecast.

In short, a little more fact and a little less fiction would do.

AND ANOTHER THING…

SATURDAY MARCH 27th: They have taken away the obstacles – well the ones they have to jump anyway – this is the first day of the 2010 Flat Racing Season. It is the first of 210 such days according to me as I hobble across my desk to consult my William Hill diary. I suppose I better qualify the hobbling: I have somehow managed to ‘do my back in’. I believe that is the near-medical phrase; at least it is as close as I am likely to come. Pained retrieval of the diary is retribution for unkind comments made about David Hood of William Hill in one of my Cheltenham pieces I suppose.

210 days, or thereabouts, of preponderance about draws, ground and third run for a handicap mark and whether Richard Hills is aboard the right Sheikh Hamdan horse amongst other impeding puzzles. If only it were as simple as that. It won’t be, but right now, Flat racing provides the besieged punter with fresh hope: the beginning of a new dawn, hopefully, not a false one by mid-May. Thoughts of grey foggy autumn – of the St Leger, Dewhurst, the Racing Post, the Cesarewitch et al are as far away as icebergs on the North Pole.

We open this new beginning beneath the greenish glass of the Meydan stands, which are bigger than a brace of Royal Caribbean ocean liners. Then comes the Lincoln meeting from Doncaster and the Roseberry from Kempton.

Meydan draws first blood on World Cup night. One suspects it is blood drained from punters. A seven-year-old from Hong Kong wins the Group 3 Sprint at 12/1 from a 33/1 shot. Calming Influence – at 14/1 – upsets better-fancied Godolphin representatives in the Mile, providing Mahmoud Al Zarooni with his first winner. Better and more predictable results surely await – perhaps in the shape of Spanish Moon and Twice Over at the other end of the card. Musir strikes in the UAE Derby to provide a famous one-two on behalf of Mike de Kock; his UAE Oaks winner, Raihana, boosts the form of that race in second with Mendip losing his unbeaten record in honourable fashion back in third.

Irish Heartbreak strikes back for punters when landing a gamble in the nineteen-runner Spring Mile at faraway Doncaster. He is punted down to 4/1, wobbling past the line on weary legs, fuelling the draw debate for the big race – something that apparently engenders more opinion than the race itself. The first three here are all drawn high. Possibly the drawn high/drawn low deliberation is a form of diversion by punters. Trying to call the side from which the Lincoln winner emerges is akin to ramifications about the weather in the butcher’s shop. Second-guessing the significance of the draw provides the perfect cop-out for actually indulging in the serious business of trying to nominate its winner – something most of us will achieve no more than four times in a racing lifetime.

Hitherto largely shunned Kempton kicked off their staggered Easter card with the Class 3 Conditions event. Overnight there is a different standard of racing and, as a result, runners. Indian Skipper had a prior engagement, reducing the field to five in the opener. The ex-John Gosden-trained Prohibit outstays Elnawin to win at odds of 6/1.

By now, to quote the racing presenters, the action is ‘fast and furious’. We forget how rapidly races come round on the Flat. Runners go behind, mess about, are off; there is a split screen, an advert for Go Compare, who must be making a fortune to screen so many commercials; it is all happening…How soon we forget a change of gear is required for the next thirty weeks. It takes a little over a minute for Redford to supply me with my first loser of the new season. He has earned a living and a reputation as a flatterer-to-deceive. Actually, he does neither in the Listed Race. Six furlongs may have been on the short side but, after a reasonable effort a fortnight ago, this showing was abysmal. No wonder Michael Bell let him go!

A horse with chequered form figures – two Ps and a slash – ridden by an amateur that dons orange colours with black stars (perhaps he is on his way to a party tonight) wins at Newbury at 25/1.

Perverse is the name of this game. Something comparatively unconsidered wins a five-runner race at Kempton. A horse that is supposedly drawn on the wrong side of the course and is apparently ridiculously short in the betting wins the Lincoln. Penitent’s work companion, South Easter, takes the Magnolia at Kempton. It is not exactly the Derby – one of his targets last year before a setback – but it is testament to the training technique of Willie Haggis.

I abandon Newbury and Stratford, not to mention Naas or should that be Navan? The fast and the furious is beginning to get faster and more furious, the pain in my back more acute and my brain slower. An advert for Gordon’s gin makes me wonder if a good slug of that would have more effect than Ibuprofen.

The first of the juvenile events, The Brocklesby, goes to an Elusive City foaled on Feb 10th, making him one of the oldest in the field. The first three are all February foals – a system that still performs even though you end up with a shortlist of ten in two-year-old races at this time of year. Twenty minutes later at Kempton, an April foal, Takeway, who is not even two yet, beats a May foal in Beach Patrol. So that’s another well-thought out system down the plug hole!

Al Shemali wins the Dubai Duty Free at a massive price. It was bigger than 33/1, smaller than 50/1. It may have been 227/1 for all the chance the average punter had of finding it, unless of course they had a dog named Al Shemali, which is equally unlikely. The argument rotates full circle. Let’s have another Lincoln Handicap!

Just as racing in this country starts to taper, it is time for the first of the two big events in Dubai. It is Sheema Classic time, the aperitif before the World Cup. Ryan Moore has to be any punter’s buddy as he does so little wrong. He gives Spanish Moon a great ride from a bad draw. William Buick defies Newton’s Law in similar fashion when pouncing on Dar Re Mi from an even wider box. Her win is a compliment to last year’s Arc form. Produced at the right time, Spanish Moon cannot contain the mare. Winning jockeys always give horses good rides but this is a major triumph for young Buick who keeps his head to cement a blossoming association with John Gosden.

The World Cup is a first. It is a first for Meydan as a racecourse, Nad Al Sheema now ploughed into the desert, and it is a first for the surface known as Tapeta, that contains a magic ingredient – wax. At least the track will look shiny.

The sun has gone down. The moon, sometimes bone-white, sometimes a deceptive orange as it reflects the burning sand, is hidden. There are fireworks, a giant imitation falcon hovers, there are Emma Ramsden’s legs.

Equine legs take over. There are fifty-six in a field of fourteen. None of the legs matches Emma’s but one set will earn over £3million. That set belongs to last year’s runner-up Gloria De Capeao, narrowly beaten by Red Desire over this track last time. It is something of a turn up. Most viewers feel Lizard’s Dream snatched it in the last stride. Allybar makes it a three-way affair. The prices reflect the result. Twice Over is disappointing, so is Gio Ponti.

That’s almost it from Meydan. Santana and Elton John are about to rock this particular part of the Emirates. The dream that began with Cigar is still smoking. Fifteen years later it continues…

AND ANOTHER THING…

THESE DAYS MUCH IS MADE of our vulnerability to pleasures of the flesh. There is nothing wrong with that – we all need a safety net at times and temptation is making a robust living out there. The truth is most of us, excluding those in monasteries, but sadly not all ordained into the church, have a problem with something. It could be one of the big four: smoking, drug-addiction, alcohol or gambling. Pornography along with eating and shopping to access are less precarious habits, but are still potential life-wreckers.

The trouble is everything is now on tap and at large. Today’s hobby or bit of fun becomes tomorrow’s obsession. We walk a fine line between being users and abusers.

With that in mind, I thought I would have a go at Gamcare’s Fact or Fiction Quiz, designed to highlight a potential problem that could be about to affect, or is affecting, those that gamble.

There are twelve questions, each requiring a Fact or Fiction answer. Herewith the questions, GamCare’s answers – most of which are predictable – then mine along with my final score. You might like to join in:

1: Gambling is an easy way to make money.
GamCare: Fiction: Gambling is a form of entertainment where you pay to play. It is not a reliable way to make money.

Me: Fiction: There is no easy way to make money unless you are an MP, Paris Hilton or Davina McCall. Attempting to make money at gambling – assuming you choose a field where some degree of expertise is required – means spending half a lifetime honing and maintaining that expertise. If I had spent the same amount of time on studies that I have on horseracing, I would be married to Antonia Fraser and be living in Knightsbridge with a winter retreat in Florida. Easy it most certainly is not!

SCORE: 1
2: If a gaming machine in a casino or betting shop hasn’t paid out for a while, it will soon.

GamCare: Fiction: In games of chance there is no such thing as a win being overdue. The outcome on a gaming machine in a casino or betting shop is entirely random.

Me: True: There is no black and white answer, but I have to address the posed question. Calculating odds on games of chance are based on past results and mathematical probability. For example, in a pack of fifty-two cards the chances of flipping over the King of Hearts, or any other named card, are 51/1 so long as the pack is shuffled before each turn. After, let us say, eighty random turns, resulting in the absence of any named card, it stands to reason that unless the unequivocal odds are wrong from the outset (which they are not), the chances of restoring the status quo with the appearance of the red king improves with each negative turn. The mathematician will contend the odds never vary irrespective of results. In that case, what odds will he lay on a reversed proposition? That is to say, is he prepared to lay 51/1 on the king after a hundred negative turns?

SCORE: 1
3: Some people are luckier than others.
GamCare: Fiction: It may seem that you, or someone you know, is luckier than other people. But chance-based gambling is completely random, and everyone is equally likely to lose, or win.

Me: Fact: Again, the answer is framed to suit an incomplete question – no mention having been made in the posing of the question to chance-based gambling. To answer the exact question: for sure, some people are infinitely luckier than others are. This extends to financial transactions and affairs of the heart. Much of life is based on chance and being in the right place at the right time. However, the adage that we all make our own luck is, to a degree, true. The harder we work, the more we put into a venture, the more we believe in ourselves, the luckier we will become. Equally, some people walk on water at times while the rest of us drown.

SCORE: 1
4: The House always wins.
Gamcare: True: Gambling operators have a ‘house edge’, or advantage on every bet you make. The longer you play, the more likely you’ll end up losing overall.

Me: True: In this case it is assumed the House is a casino or Tote-based operation. Here, in the case of a casino, the equivalent of the Zero on the roulette wheel ensures an edge once in every thirty-seven spins. With pool-based layers, a similar but more obvious advantage exists as they extract their profit before announcing a dividend.

SCORE: 2
5: ‘I’ll win the money back.’
GamCare: Fiction: Continuing to gamble after losing will not help you win back your money – in fact, it may lead to even bigger losses.
Me: Fiction: Expressing such a belligerent view suggests you are already desperate. There is nothing wrong with optimism and confidence in your ability to recover a losing situation. However, in gambling, losses are part and parcel of the deal. If they have made such an impact, you have bet either too heavily, or beyond your means. It augers badly to make such a statement.

SCORE: 3
6: My lucky numbers increase my chance of winning the Lottery.
GamCare: Fiction: Using lucky numbers or wearing a lucky shirt will not increase your chance of winning. The truth is that the numbers you choose have exactly the same chance of winning as any others.
Me: Fiction: For reasons expressed. Cut out the rhetoric and assume you will not win the Lottery whatever you wear, do, or think, and get on with your life.

SCORE: 4
7: A number which hasn’t appeared for a while must be due to come up soon.
GamCare: Fiction: The chance of a number coming up in each game is the same as any other, regardless of how many times you play. The result is completely outside your control.

Me: True: Referring back to question two, although largely random, a pattern exists in every spin of the wheel or turn of the card. Just as odds can become warped and out of kilter, a moon titled from its axis will inevitably right itself. This is a mathematical pattern as constant as the proposal that each spin of the wheel means identical odds for every possibility. The mathematician will tell you the odds against dying in a game of Russian roulette are 5/1. But logic along with probability strongly points to these odds failing to apply if you play the game long enough. However, the serious gambler should not be playing such games because little or no skill is required. They merely provide the participant with a blast of adrenalin – in which case they are already in need of help.

SCORE: 4
8: I’ve got a system – this horse is unbeatable.
Gamcare: Fiction: For some people the thrill of gambling is beating the system, but there is always a chance of losing no matter how closely you study the form guide. A lot can happen in a race – for example, a horse can get injured, or weather conditions can change.

Me: True: This is another badly worded statement. Systems do not work so as a proposition this is nonsense. Those that employ systems are wasting their time and passing the buck for inspiration. But in the second part of their answer GamCare introduce the possibility that the selection is the result of form study. The only system that works is to follow the form as diligently as possible, in which case there are times when it is feasible to believe a said selection will prevail. The name of the game is gambling and most punters are aware of the risks they run. They also know that despite fighting talk before a race, plenty can go wrong. Saying a horse is a certainty and believing it are two separate issues; however, those without faith and consumed by all that can thwart them would never bet.

SCORE: 4
9: You are just as likely to win the Lottery using numbers: 1,2,3,4,5 & 6 as, 4, 11, 23, 31, 37 & 41.
GamCare: Fact: Many people think that the first set of numbers would be impossible to get. But because the Lottery is a game of chance, one set of numbers is just as likely as any other.
Me: Fiction: We are back to the old chestnut of the stalwart mathematical solution, turning the highly improbable into the impossible. Just look back at the results of the Lottery. Has a spread of consecutive numbers ever come up? I reiterate – playing the impossible is for fools. But if you must indulge, at least give yourself a chance.

SCORE: 4
10: If I win my problems will be solved.
GamCare: Fiction: Winning is unlikely to solve your problems and continuing to gamble and expecting to win will probably add to them.
Me: True: These are the words of a gambler rather than informed or shrewd punter but, undoubtedly, just as a windfall from the will of an unknown aunt in Australia will change your life, so will a major win. Unfortunately, it would appear the person depicted here will find them self back in an identical situation before too long though, so in part, GamCare are right; although, as winning is the principal objective of betting, I cannot concur with their overall judgement.

SCORE: 4
11: I almost got the jackpot.
Gamcare: Fiction: Some people view a loss as a ‘near miss’, that is when a gambling outcome falls just short of a win (e.g one number missing from a lottery ticket, or the reels on a gaming machine almost matching up). This is an illusion. A ‘near miss’ is a loss – nothing more. It does not mean you will win next time.
Me: Fact: Most of what Gamcare say here is true if applied to stupid lottery games and Lucky Dips. But if related to horseracing and, for example, the punter has successfully named five out of six in a Placepot or a accumulator, it shows they are in form, on the mark and if they continue in the same vein but set their winning sights a tad lower, success should not be far away.

SCORE: 4
12: A person can have a problem with their gambling even if they don’t gamble every day, or seemingly can’t afford it.

GamCare: True: People don’t have to gamble every day to develop a problem. If the time you spend on gambling affects other aspects of your life, like your health or relationships with family and friends, then you have a problem.
Me: True: Gambling is a heady concoction. It needs to be taken with a great deal of water, particularly if you are playing pure games of chance or are unable to devote the necessary time to events requiring skill.

SCORE: 5
The conclusion from GamCare based on my answers is:
ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT: ‘You got more answers wrong than right. It is important that you find out more about how gambling really works so that you can make an informed decision about taking part. This website has lots of helpful information on gambling responsibly.

Thanks, but do you know anything for tomorrow?

Seriously, GamCare is there to help. If you think you have a problem, give them a call.

AND ANOTHER THING CHELTENHAM DIARY…

WE WAKE TO GREY SKIES, cash haemorrhaging from our bank accounts while we slept. If you listen carefully, you can hear the drip, drip, drip during the still of the night. Expenses are like a bank statement in reverse. Just as there is always less in your bank than you figure, expenses are always higher than you thought.

There is the hotel with its drinks and meals – not to mention the breakfasts. Those chits carelessly signed at all hours – the forgotten bottles of wine, the plundering of the mini-bar, entrance fees to the races. This is day four at Cheltenham. I am here in the Cotswold drizzle. I could have gone to Florida, returned with change, a topped-up suntan and a photo taken with a giant Mickey Mouse.

On the plus side there was a night with a lady in a midnight blue dress; there were laughs with The Goose, DJ and The Tinman; but, now, approaching the final day and that solemn printout at the hotel reception desk, there seems no chance of recovering any of the money spent without effecting my credit rating.

We knew it would be tough, but it has been Mike Tyson-tough – fifteen rounds with Muhammad Ali tough. It is a case of last man standing in Crazytown. I suspect that man might be DJ after he blasted Menorah in the opener, knowing that if required, what with all the offers, it could turn out to be a free bet. It was not required and set him up for the week.

Breakfast is a quiet affair. Leather luggage sits at our feet like obedient Labradors; laptops in bags drape over chairs. The cards in the morning look no better than they did last night. There is no way anyone is likely to come out on the right side today unless an angel sits on their shoulders.

DJ advances claims for Dee Ee Williams in the 2.05 but grumbles that it is Pricewise, meaning an automatic shortening in odds. Shrugging off the horse’s early exit on Wednesday, he claims Quel Espirit is contesting the race that should have been his target all week in the 2.40. DJ appears to be the man we should listen to. Unlike the rest of us, he has approached this meeting with a lack of levity, devoting time to the formbook late at night whilst we have been acting the fool. He goes on to declare he has taken the 20/1 about Pause And Clause in the 4.40 and had a saver on Balthazar King. This is fighting talk: a strong shot of vodka from DJ, demonstrating he is off the ropes in a battle most of us have conceded. We listen with reverence. We all admit to being clueless about the Triumph. The Gold Cup promises to provide a stirring showpiece but offers no betting opportunities. There are a couple of seven-year-olds in the Foxhunter and one eight-year-old but the rest are as old as fourteen. The handicaps are potential death traps. It looks like a day to watch.

A little after Burlington Bertie, we load the cars and trudge leisurely to the course to watch. Alice Plunkett approaches. She is dressed in black and white with a cap that has a slashed peak. She looks like a member of the Russian Secret Police or the old Stasi. For a moment I fear I am about to be arrested for loitering without intent, or worse. She breezes by in search of bigger fish.

There is a spirited cheer as they start the Triumph Hurdle. Barizan sets off, chasing a typhoon, and is clear for much of the way. It must be heartbreaking for connections to see him finish in slow motion. Soldatino cuts him down from the last with inevitable ruthlessness, supplementing Zaynar’s win for the Henderson stable last year.

Marodima scatters the seagulls as he sets off with his customary gusto in the County Hurdle. The only fish here are plated in exotic sauces, or wrapped in yesterday’s newspaper. As there is no nearby ocean, you wonder what seagulls are doing at Prestbury Park. A lady in purple tells me their arrival inland is a sign of bad weather. A couple of hurdles later it starts to rain. I contemplate asking her what she fancies for the rest of the card. The crowd shuffles her away and a man in a squiggly suit is stroking the arm of her coat, so I think better of it. Katie Walsh completes a double at the meeting on Thousand Stars and is greeted by wild scenes in the winners’ enclosure. DJ and Pricewise almost pull one out of the fire as Dee Ee Williams crosses the last in front and hangs on for third. Such a run confirms there is nothing like a team in form. Confidence begets confidence, just as doubt and hesitance forebodes failure. I fear I belong in the second category at present.

They are in the rain for the Grade 1 Hurdle. It is driving down hard and all of a sudden the ground looks loose and testing. Watching without vested interest, my heart goes out to connections of Restless Harry who, having clung on in front with evaporating strength, is squeezed out by his two main rivals and takes what looks like a bad fall at the last. Screens are erected – the worst feared. No one needs this right in front of the stands. To a huge cheer, Restless Harry gets to his feet and walks away in a cloud of steam.

All of a sudden, the Gold Cup is upon us. This is potentially a big moment for racing. There are no Kicking King blue skies; more appropriately, it is War Of Attrition grey. There has been hype, the race billed as a boxing match between Kauto Star and Denman. Each has its supporters, whether matched by cash only time will tell; nevertheless, for this snapshot in time, racing has moved from the back page. It is the sort of occasion to make true followers of the sport hold their collective breaths. However, unless related to Houdini, such action is ill-advised as it takes a little over six minutes to run the event.

Umbrellas are up; eyes trained, there is a crescendo of noise as the runners break. On a day loaded with emotion, a day when fortune balances on a razor blade, Denman takes chances, standing off too far at several fences. AP holds him together. Kauto Star breasts the fence at the top of the hill first time and it becomes clear the script is out the window. It is hard to know what effect a jolting mistake like that made by Kauto Star has. Is it like a knockdown in the ring? Probably. Ruby Walsh tries to creep back into contention, but Kauto Star is already beaten and cannot regain his equilibrium when falling four out. Denman is in front but the danger wears black and white and is not Alice Plunkett. Imperial Commander stalks Denman before running him down in the straight. This is a great day for Paddy Brennan and trainer Nigel Twiston-Davies who demonstrate their glee. There are long but brave faces too. It may not have been the dream result racing wanted but the race was loaded with tension and excitement.

Breath back and it is the Foxhunter Chase. This is one for the specialists. I gather Baby Run provides a famous double for the Twiston-Davies team. Horses walk up the hill; I suspect the stewards may have a word with the winning rider.

With two races left, we are almost at the touching gloves stage. There are too many tips in the following handicap hurdle, named in honour of Martin Pipe, to take any notice. The changing ground encourages me to have a very small bet on DJ’s saver, the King’s Theatre six-year-old, Balthazar King. Another lesson has to be learned here: if you are to ride someone’s luck, do so completely. Balthazar King falls – Pause And Clause wins. I am pleased for DJ, he did the work and it paid off; but disconsolate for myself.

It is a dark and rainy end to the meeting. Just the nineteen line up for the Grand Annual Handicap. There is no point in me attempting a bet. I have reached the stage when I couldn’t back a winner armed with tomorrow’s paper. My luck is so bad I am expecting my windscreen wipers to pack up on the way home. Pigeon Island wins the last. It goes without saying that DJ put it up to me half-an-hour before the race! Anyone like his number?

So that is it: one of a multitude of Cheltenham 2010 views. The circus is about to leave town, much to the relief of most locals who can have their roads and hostelries back. Only those with a vacant room or a dry shed will be sorry to see us go; the rest will rejoice to see the back of us. For some, the countdown starts all over again. What is it now…361 days until Cheltenham 2011?

AND ANOTHER THING CHELTENHAM DIARY…

IT MUST BE THURSDAY. I wake in a different place. At first, with last night’s memory of Irish revelry uppermost in the mind, it could be Limerick or Sligo – it seems a long time since I heard an English accent. With the sun streaming through the windows it could be Monaco. I cannot hear the throaty roar of Lamborghinis or Ferraris; there is no whiff of the sea or the idle tick of passing yachts; so perhaps not.

If this is Cheltenham, and at this stage it may not be, the Met Office has backed another loser. There is no sign of the predicted rain. I could be on another planet – on a galaxy far, far away – the planet Inebriate to be exact. Toward the end of yesterday’s festivities, I introduced a new factor into the proceedings – a pacifier known as gin. Still grappling with my whereabouts, gin is in my thoughts. At a little after six in the morning, that can’t be healthy can it? I am thinking that of all the gins in the world (no, I am not going to launch into a line from Casablanca) none can match the taste of Gordon’s.

Other than that, I cannot recall too much about Wednesday night; however, I fear what could be shady events will return piecemeal to haunt me as I gain awareness. I know I started on the gin at the racecourse. The great thing about the juniper-based drink is that it is sociable with mixers and can be staggered. You can intersperse gin and tonic with just tonic. And it doesn’t leave you wrecked in the morning. I daresay your vital organs know they have had a night on the town, but you can bounce back from its intake. I had to bounce back from a night in the Queen’s Hotel. The hotel looks like a presidential building from the outside. Inside it gives the impression of hosting a moveable function. Visitors come and go. Glasses clink, perfectly manicured ladies in high heels glide in and out of the bar in rustling dresses and crackling stockings.

The gin was meant to be my secret weapon for today’s betting. I felt a transfusion would bolster my diminishing confidence. I think it did something else, which, recalling a lady in a midnight blue dress that concealed matching underwear, I ought not to elaborate on.

You don’t want to hear about the first part of the morning, any more than you want to know about the last part of the previous night.

I reconvene with The Tinman, The Goose and DJ. No one says too much at first. It is as if we all possess DVDs of each behaving appallingly, revealing dark secrets. There is an air of embarrassment until DJ breaks the spell by drawing our attention to the fact that there is a horse appropriately called Reckless Venture running in the 4.15 Hexham.

We gingerly eat breakfast then get down to business. We conduct our own version of The Morning Line. Bookmakers are crowing, but the meeting is a long haul and such jubilation could be premature. Winning and losing is often a case of timing. Imagine Queveca won the first on Tuesday rather than the last, and Sanctuaire the third yesterday, in which case layers would have struggled with much higher liabilities as punters would have been playing with their money. That’s the kind of spirit we need. Now we are gently sizzling like the bacon on our plates. William Hill spokesman, David Hood, a medical marvel in that his foot is where his mouth should be, condescendingly states his firm is warming to the idea of a five-day festival. That is big of them! Since when does William Hill have the deciding votes on such matters?

I put up Barbers Shop and Karabak as the bets of the day. The boys agree. They are good judges when sober and not too bad when drunk. Although DJ did once buy a racehorse after demolishing a caramel-coloured bottle of what looked like whisky, despite the vendor attempting to dissuade him. Needless to say the horse was no good and without it DJ could have been driving a Mercedes for a while.

We have a strong message for Ainama and an okay one for Barbers Shop. Opinion is divided about Ainama, but in our wisdom we feel Barbers Shop has an easier and more unambiguous chance. Reading some of these Cheltenham handicaps is akin to tackling a hieroglyphic parchment.

The gin has worn off by the first. I have a coffee from the Expresso Bar and feel clear of head and sound of mind – illusions both. I have two small bets in the Jewson: Lenabane (Weapon’s Amnesty form times two) and the once-useful hurdler Nicanor. The roar is louder today as the field is despatched – punters seem to be dusting themselves down and squaring up to the bookmakers. Nicanor is horribly hampered at the first and soon tails off. Lenabane falls a few fences later. There is incident aplenty; fallers, hampering, unseating It is a case of déjà vu for Messrs Johnson and Hobbs as, having opened the meeting with Menorah, they add to their tally with Copper Bleu. It is Ladies’ Day. Mrs Sarah Hobbs is perfectly turned out for the occasion in a grey coat cuffed with pink and wearing striking black pointed boots. As it is not gentleman’s day, husband Philip hasn’t made much of a sartorial effort; for him it is a pullover beneath his usual tweed jacket.

I decide to leave the next. DJ likes messages and backs Ainama, taking The Goose with him. Two out they must be counting their money and I am rueing my timidity. In a cruel twist, Ainama fails to stay, turning to jelly in Tony McCoy’s hands on the run to the last. Triumph goes to the David Pipe-trained Buena Vista who makes all to win at the not outrageous price of 16/1 for such a complex contest. Chester Barnes looks well – David Pipe as if he has grown an inch or two overnight.

Punters are still waiting. Their chance could be in the offing with the next, the Ryanair Chase – a race that seems to concern three runners. This excludes the winner, Albertas Run, who repeats course wins to punch a hole in the best thought out plans. Tony McCoy looks in some pain after his first race spill (has an event ever been so minimised by such a phrase) as he dismounts. We cannot say Jonjo didn’t tell us about Albertas Run, but how many listened? Poquelin runs best of the main contenders in second. Soft ground mare J’Y Vole is third ahead of Deep Purple. Tranquil Sea underperforms, as does Barbers Shop who never looks happy. This trip was supposed to be ideal but he faded as usual. Something is wrong. Perhaps he is looking for the missing apostrophe. His sire, Saddlers’ Hall had one although not where you would expect to find it. Like Barbers Shop, Albertas Run is minus the punctuation mark but it doesn’t seem to offend him. Betting carnage continues…

Now it is the World Hurdle and time is running out. If we cannot solve relatively easy puzzles like the Ryanair and this, we have no chance in the last two, which are knotty handicaps designed to perplex.

It takes Paul Nicholls and Ruby Walsh, ably assisted by Big Buck’s, to pull one back for the heavy-hitters. There is no semblance of the talked about flat spot, no sign of the ground being too fast. Big Buck’s – another struggling with an apostrophe in a strange place – may not have been on my shopping list, but lights up Cheltenham and vindicates those brave enough to dig deep in shrinking wallets. Cast-iron each-way selection Karabak finishes a laboured fourth as Big Buck’s get the Chicane treatment for the third time.

The wind is up. Flecks of rain are in the air for the twenty-four-runner Grade 3 Handicap. Assuming they have capacity on their side, bookmakers have a cocky look about them as they lay, lay and lay. They just get away with it, the tips – and there are plenty of them – are all beaten. Great Endeavour clings on to foil a major gamble on J.P’s Sunnyhillboy.

Out of interest, I watch Reckless Venture run at Hexham. Despite his rivals doing their best to hand him the race on a plate by either unseating, falling or blundering, he cannot pass the one that puts it all together – Simply Smashing.

I hang around for the last for reasons unknown. A brown horse wearing a noseband wins it. He is called Ballabriggs, is trained by the McCain yard that had a winner yesterday and owned by Trevor Hemmings who was responsible for Albertas Run. That’s Cheltenham: highs for the privileged few – lows for many.

The weather, already closing in, is supposed to change tomorrow according to the Met Office. However, they are hedging bets sprinkling their forecast with words like ‘could’ and ‘might’, making you think they know about as much about precipitation as I do about Cheltenham. I leave the course with the words of a song ringing in my ears. It is one of many containing clever lyrics by Randy Newman: I Think It Is Going To Rain Today.

AND ANOTHER THING CHELTENHAM DIARY…

YESTERDAY I could have been standing in the wrong place, but Cheltenham seemed more subdued than usual. Possibly the Irish were shell-shocked after the defeats of Dunguib and Captain Cee Bee, or most of us were still trying to get to grips with racing starting at an unprecedented 1.30pm, shaking off the cobwebs from the night before. Somehow, things were not quite the same. The ground looked firmer than described; there was that early start and the shifting of the final flight of hurdles by seventy yards. Racing folk like to rely on similitude. This was a festival containing unwarranted change. There were mutterings from supporters of Get Me Out Of Here that he would have won the Supreme had the final flight been in its original position.

There was an almost clinical inevitability about proceedings after the first. Cash was peeled from wallets as results swung the wrong way, getting worse until the last race when no one had any money left. At least Zenyatta won at Santa Anita over the weekend; although Rachel Alexandra gave further proof that this game has a conspiratorial look to it at times when beaten at odds of 1/20 at Fair Grounds.

Even the town seemed quiet last night, except for at apparently around five o’ clock when, already a potential bottleneck, Cheltenham became clogged with slow-moving cars.

To quote Scarlett O’ Hara: Tomorrow is another day. Today we start another day with an air of resignation. A cloud of impeding doom hovers. There are three very tricky handicaps loaded with possible winners, three Grade 1’s that might not be as straightforward as they look, and an infernal bumper.

The town wakes slowly. The cash machines and banks are soon busy. Money travels in one direction – that is to say, out of accounts rather than in. It seems that normally focused punters are clutching at straws. Some are declaring an intention to blast out of trouble with Master Minded. Others are pouring over prices for the 2011 Champion Hurdle, Champion Chase and Gold Cup either with incredulity or to prevent getting ensnared into the day’s activities.

Some of us meet in a café, stirring the foam on top of our coffees too much as if extras in an old David Lean black and white movie. We flick through the Racing Post, all agreeing that Tom Segal’s tips are the ones to ignore. After 12/1 and 40/1 winners yesterday, he is next likely to be in the Cheltenham winning enclosure around 2015. We mull over one or two reasons why horses will or won’t. There are no girls present so no one advances an argument that they like a name. The Tinman says he really likes Rite Of Passage as a horse. The Goose cynically suggests if that is the case he should buy a picture of him and have it framed, or ask Rite Of Passage if he fancies a pint after racing. Liking a horse is not a reason to back it.

We kind of agree Master Minded might be a lay, that Long Run does not jump well enough to win the RSA and, in any event as we all discovered to our cost yesterday, this is not a course where inexperienced riders can be expected to shine. This sparks an argument. I say Barry O’Connell gave Dunguib the only ride he could under the circumstances; that those backing Dunguib knew an amateur was the pilot and the horse did not jump quickly enough when it mattered. This livens up the café but our heated discussion means we are in danger of being thrown out.

The Tinman is intent of making the most of the offers made by bookmakers. One firm is refunding money on any hurdler that falls. Paddy Power are doubling a £50 bet to a £100. They have also somehow planted a Hollywood-type sign on Cleeve Hill. Of course, the firm in question knows all about The Tinman who, unable to bet with them directly, wishes to enlist the services of his wife back at home. I turn on my phone and immediately see I have a message for Lucky Redback in the 7.20 at Kempton and Air Force One at Down Royal. I turn it off again.

The betting ring is understandably quiet before the first: an eighteen-runner four-mile chase for amateur riders. The action begins to a muted cheer. I have to say I still have the taste of breakfast in my mouth – I cannot seem to adjust to this early start. I miss the first circuit, catching up with the action as they turn away from the stands. At least the ground looks okay. Considering hardly a bet has been struck in anger, there is plenty of noise from spectators as the field turns into the straight. At 14/1, Poker De Sivola foils a couple of well-supported rivals. Tom Segal nearly pulls off another coup when Becauseicouldntsee looks all over the winner until the last hundred yards. Perhaps the man has befriended an angel. Possibly, I should check his tip in the next. There is a gamble of sorts on Mobaasher. I think he finishes fifth. Doubtless, some bookmaker or another will be paying out.

I make the next between Rite Of Passage, Quel Spirit and Manyriverstocross (Gold Trophy form boosted yesterday) but Tom Segal tips Summit Meeting. Quel Spirit falls at the second, badly hampering Manyriverstocross. There is further drama at the second last when Sleepy Hollow ducks out. The Irish begin to herald what looks like victory as Rite Of Passage, going strongly, creeps closer. A win for a heavily backed Irish favourite on St Patrick’s Day might ignite the place, but Rite Of Passage cannot sustain his effort although keeps on to snatch third. Staying wins the day and it is Peddlers Cross – backed by some – that finds the most up the run-in to maintain an unbeaten record at the expense of Reve De Sivola. Summit Meeting is an honourable fourth, continuing Tom Segal’s excellent run. Tom Segal is a nice, unassuming man that it is hard to dislike. But no one likes a man in form, especially when they are out of it.

Now we are approaching the third race. In bygone years, we would be ordering a gin and tonic, having watched one race. Now the third – the RSA Chase is almost upon us. I have been with Burton Port all season, having backed him at ante-post odds of 25/1. With the ground nowhere near as fast as feared, I feel obliged to stick with him. This is the wonky piece of logic attributable to a man on the skids. The Henderson camp are adamant Long Run is their best with Punchestowns a close second in the pecking order. That means Burton Port is the least likely winner from Seven Barrows. Mr Sam Waley-Cohen partners Long Run. Plenty of others and I are worried about the word ‘Mister’. As well as looking as if he could use a haircut, Mr Waley-Cohen is pitched against top jockeys in a Grade 1 on a horse that can dive at a fence or two. This means he should be fine at the water, but that does not make him betting material. His round is peppered by awkward jumping but he is cantering on the turn, only to empty like a barrel of Guinness in a Dublin pub. Burton Port is always struggling with the pace but keeps finding for Tony McCoy to finish an excellent second. I am astounded. I sample the unusual flavour of a winning wager. For those in a similar boat, after that initial euphoric flood, it tastes yeasty and sweet with a hint of bitterness. The feeling that whatever has been won could have been increased causes such bitterness. Weapon’s Amnesty sprints away up the hill to provide another result for the bookmakers. This has often been a race for the slogger rather than the show boater. Its changing complexion flattens both Long Run (didn’t appear to stay) and Punchestowns (far from ideal preparation), whilst Diamond Harry makes a succession of errors.

It is just after 3.15 and we have reached the fourth event – the last of the Graded races – the Queen Mother Chase. I am tempted to lay Master Minded, who I feel is facing tougher opposition this year and is too short in the betting. However, I am not in the mood to play the hero – a role best left to Russell Crowe, Mel Gibson or George Clooney. They are not in town.

There is more joy for the layers. Big Zeb outguns Forpadydeplasterer with Kalahari King third. Master Minded struggles to cross the line a weary fourth.
To give Coral their due they do sponsor the Eclipse; but largely bookmakers tend to concentrate their sponsorship on impossible handicaps. Little surprise then that the Coral Cup turned out to be harder than it looked. Several gambles went astray. I was tempted by Quantitativeasing; although, fearful there would be at least two or three lurkers in the field, resisted. He travels well throughout but the honours go to stable companion, Spirit River with something at 80/1 placed. I see 33/1 and 50/1 figure so reckon I have made a good decision.
By now, grateful to be clinging to the edge of the cliff by my fingernails; I decide discretion is the better part of valour. Two races remain. Despite feeling the Fred Winter is between Hunterview and Sanctuaire, I cannot believe solving this handicap can be so simple. Therefore, I let them take their places without my involvement.

Off the hook, I try a gin and tonic. It costs too much but I can recommend it. Nothing refreshes like a G&T, even if you are paying over the odds. I have another as Sanctuaire scythes through the field to absolutely bolt up. How perverse can this game be? One of the hardest races of the meeting supplies its first winning favourite.

There are no obstacles for the last. For a moment I imagine I am at Newmarket’s July course. I fear an unreported gin and tonic – or two – may have been taken. This is the race won by Dunguib last year. This year it was won by the Tizzard-trained Cue Card, a four-year-old by King’s Theatre that restored the betting status quo by winning at 40/1.

I shall attempt to regain my nerve before tomorrow, a day I thought contained some promise. All is not lost.

 

AND ANOTHER THING CHELTENHAM SPECIAL…

So here we are: no days to go! It’s here! Let’s be having you, etc, etc. After 361 days, the Cheltenham Festival is back.

It starts with the arrival of the Racing Post, secreted within is what appears to be a personal and possibly intimate message from someone called Ruby. It comes in the form of a letter that promises to provide me with a hot tip. The piece of paper hoodwinks me for a second – own up – I can’t be the only one to think Ruby was angling for a date or better! Of course, it is a mass-produced piece of merchandising on behalf of Racing UK. The Ruby is Ruby Walsh. At first glance, it looks authentic – which it is – but it is no handwritten note. There is a ring of what appears to be coffee in the bottom right-hand corner, but it could easily be Caffery’s.

The Racing Post also features offer after offer by bookmakers that we have been told are experiencing a lean patch. Ladbrokes promise to double your stake if you are a new customer by providing you with a free bet equivalent to the amount wagered. This does seem a bit harsh on customers that regularly bet with the firm and only have a dog-eared diary to show for such loyalty. I get the best price offers, the pay out on the fifth home, but Betfred are boldly prepared to refund losing bets in the opener in the form of a free bet. Paddy Power offer to refund all losing bets if Dunguib wins. Dunguib fails to win, finishing third to well-backed rivals. Does this mean Paddy Power have won or lost on the race? I guess, as potential backers of Dunguib would have backed the horse with Betfred, it means they have lost. But then, they would have had stakes refunded, so, maybe it was clever ploy after all. I am struggling with the concept to be frank as, if a layer takes out the favourite without the parachute effect of a Rule 4, how is it possible for them to win?

The sun shines and they start the Festival forty-five minutes earlier than usual at 1.30pm, meaning less time in the morning to battle to the course or to peruse the form. The true professional should have negotiated both obstacles in advance; however, time is a big enemy for the serious punter.

Shades of an earlier article come back to haunt me as Menorah, the selection of my fictitious trainer’s wife, clings on to win the Supreme Novice Hurdle from Get Me Out Of Here. Dunguib fails to jump quickly enough in third.

Captain Cee Bee becomes the second hotpot to disappoint. Unlike Dunguib he gives supporters little in the way of hope, never looking happy in the Arkle, beaten after only two fences. The all-important rhythm is missing; he struggles over the obstacles and on the ground. Those including myself that thought he could break the hoodoo of the formbook, once again had to suffer the lesson that one day we might learn. That damn book does not lie! Whether Captain Cee Bee would have beaten Sizing Europe at Leopardstown is only opinion – he could not get anywhere near him today. A later statement announced Captain Cee Bee had broken a blood-vessel – something he had also done when strongly fancied at Aintree two years ago. However you unravel it, Sizing Europe, again the pick of that trainer’s wife, vindicates the Leopardstown form and wins from a game and relatively inexperienced Somersby. With Osana in third and Mad Max fourth, this year’s Arkle reads like a Champion Hurdle of yesteryear.

Some of us are in a corner now. Beforehand, the first two races looked solvable – which they were – but somehow, it was a case of there being none so blind as those that refuse to see.

There is a strong word for Excellent Vision in the 2.30 at Southwell – as if we have come all this way to back a horse on sand! In all the excitement, Excellent Vision is fortuitously forgotten. That is just as well as he goes off at 8/11 and beats two home.

The William Hill Handicap illustrates just why bookmakers are prepared to make Dirty Harry – come-on-punk-make-my-day offers. Chief Dan George wins at 33/1 from some heavily backed rivals. The Package tries but cannot quite close, Ogee is third, a full of running Bensalem falls two out.

There is muttering in the stands. Rules have changed. Dust is flying, the ground is quick, the final hurdle seventy yards closer to the line, prejudicing strong closers – something demonstrated in the tight finishes so far seen – favouring the likes of Go Native and Starluck in the imminent Champion Hurdle. Best-laid plans flounder; considered opinion is in freefall.

Two out it looked as if whatever won the Champion would strut into the winner’s enclosure making most of us eat our words. First, it looked as if Celestial Halo would lead throughout, then that Punjabi would pick up, or Starluck or Go Native would slice through the pack to play the speed card. Then you see the green-and-gold colours worn by Binocular, a horse that has for so long failed to deliver what he has promised, cruising and pouncing. He has come from being a nowhere man – a virtual non-runner only a fortnight ago – to blitz his rivals. Those that claimed Cheltenham would not suit Go Native were right; Solwit looked unsuited by the ground, but his preparation meant he stared defeat in the face from the minute he left the plane from Ireland. So it was Binocular, the horse described by A P McCoy as the best never to win a Champion Hurdle, that righted that wrong. What made the difference: The ground, the easing of a back that had apparently plagued him for much of his career? Whatever it was, Binocular stepped from the shadows to win his big race after all.

The Cross Country Chase is run at a fast pace. It supplies another big priced winner, this time in the shape of A New Story. Fred, William and Paddy are rubbing their hands. I must be hearing things as well as seeing them. I think there is an announcement that the ground has been changed to Good to Soft all over. This is mystifying. The ground was Good to Soft (good in places) at the start of racing. There has been no rain, the times are fast, dust is flying, yet Cheltenham claim the ground has eased. Unless a group of Magnier-soaked Irish racegoers have relieved themselves on the track, I am cracking up completely. Heads are shaking; in fact some of them are on the ground after the last race.

There is one contest remaining. It is for mares. There are tips for Queveca, Sway and Voler La Vedette. Queveca wins, as she did last year and Voler La Vedette finishes third. Easy this racing game is it not.

So Day One has vanished. Over before it started. This would seem like a good day to have dreamed through but it is real enough.

Maybe Miss Ruby is waiting in a bar somewhere in the heart of Cheltenham after all. I hope she doesn’t mind going Dutch!

AND ANOTHER THING…

IT WOULD APPEAR THERE ARE NOW TWO DAYS TO GO… If you were a visitor from outer space seeing that headline, you would assume something on a momentous scale was imminent. Possibly a solution to global-warming, a giant leap in scientific terms meaning the launch of a rocket to Ursa Minor, the finals of X-factor. As we racing folk know it is of course more important than any of those aforementioned possibilities. They can wait for another occasion. It is, as I write, two days to Cheltenham. Tomorrow there will be one day to Cheltenham, and then on Tuesday no days at all because it will be upon us. But for those that delight in countdowns, they can start all over on Saturday as there will be 361 days to Cheltenham 2011.

The Festival – as it is known – is many things to many men. To true National Hunt aficionados it is the Olympics of jump racing. To certain celebrities it is the chance to wear a hacking jacket. To others it is the opportunity to reaffirm they have survived the winter, are still alive, and warming up for bigger and more winnable battles.

This time last week – when there were, what, nine days to go – the possibility of winkling out a Cheltenham banker looked somewhat simpler. That lynch pin: the Cheltenham banker – arguably two words that should not appear in the same sentence – appeared to be Solwit in the Champion Hurdle. However, if a week is a long time in politics, it is an eternity in horseracing. Horses delight in throwing a sicky when it matters most. Snug in a warm stall, fed and exercised on a regular basis, Solwit has had an easy winter, possibly easier than most of us. How does he repay this kindness? He waits until the week before Cheltenham to start feeling under the weather. He scopes dirty and runs a temperature. Solwit – I always knew no good would come to a horse with such an easily transposable name into something so much more unkindly – chooses this moment to let his supporters down. These racehorses all seem to be playing the same game of confusion: It is a case of will-he-won’t-he for Binocular: Weird Al has exited entirely. According to current downbeat bulletins, Solwit may turn up but cannot be supported with any confidence. Punchestowns is playing cat-and-mouse with the vet. What’s next? Is Edward Gillespie about to succumb to a bout of mumps? At least the weather appears settled so there is little chance of the tented village blowing away or wind reaching such speeds to deem racing as dangerous.

So we are all set then. Well Alastair Down certainly is. He lives in Cheltenham so we see quite a lot of his windswept face at this time of year. I think he wears a wax jacket with the famous hill in the background. Alastair is a very nice bloke that will talk to anyone between cigarettes – that even includes me – and he likes jump racing rather a lot. This is his week and I doubt he would pay much attention to extra-terrestrial visitors over the next few days. Indeed, should Gordon Brown have been so unwise as to call that election for this week, I doubt whether Alastair and most of the spectators at Prestbury Park would know its result. Try them on the first six home in the Supreme Novices’ Hurdle though and it would be a different kettle of horse.

Talking of the opening race, featuring that Irish banker Dunguib, there has to be a doubt about his price being correct for such a frantic contest. Firstly there is his dodgy jumping – a doubt that has been extensively documented. And there is his name; it does sound rather like a squib of a firework don’t you think? I guess his connections would respond to a piece of such apparent irrationality with the statement: We will let him do the talking. I am not sure whether he speaks fluently or not, but it has to be said that is not how he jumps. Maybe he is a horse to lay or back in running.

The second favourite for the Arkle, Somersby, is unbeaten over fences, accounting for three rivals last time and four the time before that. Defeating a total of seven opponents is not exactly what one is looking for before a test like the Arkle. Captain Cee Bee should be unbeaten over the bigger obstacles but for a last fence capitulation at Leopardstown when looking all set to beat Sizing Europe on Boxing Day. Earlier in the month, he made a good impression when beating seventeen rivals at Naas, a course he then successfully revisited to make his tally two from three. He has always been very highly regarded, is a Festival winner over hurdles, and despite a shortish price, could be the real deal.

The Champion Hurdle is probably best left alone as far as betting is concerned, although if there is an emerging new star on the block it is surely Go Native.

Maybe Thursday is the day to provide the meeting’s best bets. Barbers Shop, a horse whom Her Majesty decided to lighten in terms of digits by losing the apostrophe, surely runs over his optimum trip in the Ryanair Chase. He was not disgraced in last year’s Gold Cup before stamina ran out and this looks an ideal event for him.

Then in the Ladbrokes World Hurdle, surely on this quicker ground, Karabak has a chance of reversing form with Big Buck’s, but will at least place even if failing to beat the odds-on favourite.

Those are my thoughts with; let me see, two days almost to the minute to go. My wellbeing, those of the intended participants, and of course crashing spaceships permitting, that is how it looks prior to my last Sunday lunch before Cheltenham. Come to think about it, allowing for my current form, it could even be the last Sunday lunch I have the pleasure of. I would like to say it is roast beef, pork or even chicken. Things are tight. It is sausage and mash and a glass of red wine from the remnants of a bottle I opened last time I backed a winner. I am afraid it is a little cobwebby…

AND ANOTHER THING…

GIVE ME A MINUTE…It’s all a little hazy but is becoming clearer. This has been a long day, being as it was the first of the Cheltenham Festival. You know how it is, that last minute packing, the turning back two miles up the road because I had left my lucky suit behind along with an extra tie. Stupid really, I put them on a hanger overnight – you would think I would remember…must be my age. I have reached that time of life when everything needs to be checked and rechecked. I am breaking out of the village and I have this dread that I may have left my wallet in my desk drawer. So I fumble in my overnight bag until I feel the wallet’s comforting bulk – which I knew I would – but this is the thing, once an idea is implanted you have to follow it through before you can relax. Having pulled off the road, I look at the vacant strap above the rear seat, realising the suit and tie are missing and return home.

It all takes time and on the re-run I am mixing it with the morning traffic. People going to work – don’t they know there is an important racing meeting on? I get through the snarl that is Newbury with ten minutes to spare and am on the M4 heading west with the build up behind me. Now I am motoring. These days I have a Volvo. It is a temporary measure. The sports car was too expensive and impractical for the winter, as well as being too big to fit into the garage. So is the Volvo but it stands impassively outside the house like a piece of hardware from The Hurt Locker, impervious to the weather. The Mazda used to shrink in the frost and snow, spluttering when I turned the key. The big chrome grill of the Volvo sniggers and the car springs into life without my foot hitting a pedal.

There is the usual tailback at Swindon but I am already on the A419, heading for the A417. There is that bloody tricky roundabout after Birdlip leading to Crickley Hill. It’s easy going into Cheltenham on that route but it catches you out when you are leaving – the amount of times I have taken the wrong turning and ended up on that dark winding road that is the A436 heading for Oxford! However, that is a worry for later – much later. And when I can’t trust my own befuddled judgement, I have learned to follow a horsebox – preferably one of Alan King’s.

So I make it nice and early. I have missed the hordes, been spared the toxic jams, the slow-motion scenic route through Cheltenham. I stop for coffee and some sort of pastry concoction that will have to sustain me for the rest of the day: no point paying Cheltenham prices and then busting my bladder while I search for a lavatory with a vacant stall. That’s it – I am ready.

Yes, I know it is March 9th to you, but you see it is the 16th to me. They open the gates as I arrive. I park the trusty Volvo and stroll toward the turnstiles. I buy a racecard and look knowingly at the turf. I haven’t a clue how it is riding but the description is good. That will do me. It looks good; well, to be more precise, lush, green and good.

There is a chance for a premature dribble in a lavatory. I will be so glad later. Apart from the early blip with the suit, things are shaping well. I climb the stands and watch the racecourse fill up. It happens at a pace. Perhaps there is word that a tidal wave is about to engulf the rest of the country, so this is the only safe place left. The devil’s airship, masquerading as belonging to Ladbrokes, floats blood red above us.

The hacking jacket and Harris Tweed brigade are rubbing shoulders in the stands in their checks and flecks of heather. Some of them look like extras from Braveheart.

I engage a Flat racing trainer’s wife in conversation. She is in a black coat with fake fur trim. I am glad it is fake fur although I know she could afford the real thing. She is here because her husband asked her to come. She doesn’t like the cold too much, preferring Newmarket in July. We have something in common and I ask her about a couple of her husband’s horses without coming on too strong. She says she would like a brandy and I volunteer to buy one. She accepts. Now the day is taking a dangerous turn, but going racing is always dangerous. What the hell; we adjourn to the Members Bar. We are not badged-up but slip the man in the blazer a score. He lets us in as he recognises the lady, although gives me a dodgy look. I am used to that by now. She has two brandies in as many minutes and I have one.

We decide Danguib does not jump well enough to justify support in the Spinal Research Supreme Novices’ Hurdle. Before the off I am thinking that maybe it should be called the Brain Research Supreme Novices’ Hurdle as everyone else regards Danguib as a banker. Danguib falls at the top of the hill when cantering. There is a unanimous groan emitted from the stands, followed by the slippery gulp of Guinness from the bars, signifying the metaphoric tidal wave has extended to Cleeve Hill. Menorah wins as we thought and we are off to a flying start. Now remember that – Menorah wins the opener. There is no sign of the trainer’s wife’s husband. She gives me a peck on the cheek, leaving a ring of lipstick on my face. We have a brandy to celebrate, although I prefer the cherry taste of her lipstick, which I can just reach by using my tongue like a gurner from the West Country that has drunk a flagon of cider.

Despite reservations on my part, we play up some of our winnings on Sizing Europe in the Arkle. He is in with a chance two out but Captain Cee Bee is too quick and storms away up the hill. Disconsolate Irish are back in good cheer as Captain Cee Bee was another banker for them. They forget vanquished Danguib as they cheer in the victor. So now you have the first two winners at this year’s Festival. There is more to come…

There are only five runners in the Champion Hurdle. Don’t ask me why. Khyber Kim had a headache, Zaynar stepped on a frog the day before and Celestial Halo grazed his knees when tripping up on a road. In a last minute decision, they re-routed Starluck to the Winter Derby. That left Punjabi to follow up last year’s win in another close finish, this time with Go Native.

Now things get a little blurred. You see, we had another brandy and I had a beer, which was admittedly stupid but, Jenny – I shall call her Jenny – was so jovial I felt obliged to match her mood. I think they ran a handicap next – the William Hill Trophy I believe – won by Exmoor Ranger, who is, I think, supposed to like soft ground. Perhaps it had been raining whilst we were in the bar.

Then they ran some sort of cross-country event. I have a feeling Monkerhostin won it but things were definitely a little blurred by then. It was either Monkerhostin or Sizing Australia – I know that either Philip Hobbs had a double or Sizing Australia made up for Sizing Europe’s earlier failure. But just do the pair of them, by now you should be so far in front it will hardly matter.

Quevega easily won the David Nicholson Mares Hurdle but she was favourite to do so and you don’t need that.

Jenny and I had a portion of fish and chips from that van outside the course and went back to my Volvo, succeeding in making it stink like Billingsgate. It mattered little as by now we were steaming up the windows with passion. I have never been kissed like it. It’s a wonder her husband can get up in the morning, let alone train a string of racehorses. As her tongue slithers in and out of my mouth, Jenny says Nicky Henderson has told her Quantitativeasing will win the Neptune Novice Hurdle the next day. I say I can’t even spell the damn thing or say it, but am past caring. At least she laughs.

Then she throws back her head, removes a wig and begins to look like Johnny Depp. Water laps at the sides of my impregnable Volvo and starts to gush in through the doors and sills. Suddenly it is evident we are alone – the car park has emptied and is awash. The car floats down Cheltenham High Street until it reaches something approaching Iguasu Falls, also known in Argentina as the Devil’s Throat. I don’t know why I mention that. We tumble in a surge of white water but not before I have time to see Alan King’s horsebox sail safely on its way toward the A417.

It is Wednesday March 10th – six days to go. The red squares on my alarm tell me it is 6.40 am. There is racing at Wolverhampton, Lingfield and somewhere else. There is an inspection at another place. The Volvo is grinning on the drive. The heating has yet to kick in. I am no nearer to solving anything that might or might not happen next week.

But that first part, before it all turned incoherent, when Menorah and Captain Cee Bee won their respective races, that seemed real enough.

Maybe, just maybe…

AND ANOTHER THING…

I KNOW IT IS NOT FOR EVERYONE – Meydan that is. Even Flat fans blanch, claiming it is a waste of time. It is difficult, tell me something connected with this game that isn’t, but it is far from impossible. And it is precisely because so many people shun betting there that value can be found. That said, like any other type of betting you have keep your wits about you, always remembering it is a moveable feast.

It shifted slightly today. What ought to be borne in mind is that the carnival that is Dubai packs its racing into a concentrated period. Many horses peak and slide backwards; some less than others, but just enough to prevent them from holding their form long enough to reproduce their best.

Today was Super Thursday. It started with Mendip continuing his ascent. Looking more like Rocky in training each time you see him, he is getting stronger, lasting longer, it is The Eye of the Tiger all over again. He was a powerhouse today in the Listed event. He still has a way to go before we can acclaim him as a Kentucky Derby winner, but he sure looks like a contender. Vale Of York on the other hand failed to settle and therefore to stay. His win in the Breeders’ Cup Juvenile looked slightly suspect at the time in that the draw played a massive part in the outcome. His seven-pound penalty here was the final nail in a coffin already closing fast.

War Artist had posted a mighty speed figure three weeks earlier but could not repeat it. He travelled but failed to pick up, leaving Desert Party and Mutheeb to fight out the spoils in the Group 3 over six furlongs. War Artist is now seven and by Orpen, a stallion who regularly throws up hit-and-miss progeny.

Skysurfers bounced to the Moon and back. There was talk of him contesting the World Cup but there was also that niggling suspicion that his latest blitzing success appeared to have taken his stable by surprise despite its apparent solidarity. A combination of the two factors meant he failed to place in the Group 3 won by Cat Junior. He is unlikely to return to Southwell, but he has a few bridges to repair.

Campanologist lined up fresh and well for the Group 2 over an extended mile-and-a-half and just held on as the Turkish challenger, Pan River, closed him down with every stride in the last hundred yards. King Of Rome continues to perplex, but closer inspection reveals all his best form of late is on a synthetic surface.

It was heartbreaking for Gloria De Campeao followers to see their selection gobbled up close home in the Group 2 over ten furlongs. Having made the running and fought off challenger after challenger, he stretched a willing neck out only for the Japanese filly Red Desire to burgle his lead in the dying strides. Delivered at a crucial moment by Olivier Peslier, she had the form to win; it was just frustrating for those of us that thought we had pulled one out of the fire.

Finally, Alexandros, considered a Godolphin banker despite a hat trick, eased into the lead early in the straight in the Group 2, apparently all set up to win comfortably. This time it was the turn of Presvis to sprint past him and win going away. Some of the shine was certainly lacking from Alexandros this time. It could be his stamina gave out in what was a more strongly run affair than he encountered last time.

We do it all again tomorrow when the card holds possibilities – none more so than Gallagher in the 3.05. I might even give it another try…

AND ANOTHER THING…

IS IT REALLY FIFTY WEEKS SINCE CHELTENHAM 2009? Three hundred-and- fifty days and change since we saw the meeting kicked off by Go Native: the three-way dash up the hill for the Champion Hurdle won by Punjabi; Master Minded in the Champion Chase; the rising star that was Zaynar; the comeback triumph that belonged to Kauto Star and everything in-between and after.

Cheltenham is the most eagerly awaited meeting of the year. The Flat spoils us. There is Newmarket, Newbury and York in the spring; Epsom and Royal Ascot in the summer, the big mid-season all-aged contests of July – the diary overflows. It is a different story for fans of the sport known as National Hunt. Of course there are a couple of pre-Christmas Cheltenham fixtures, the Hennessy, Kempton on Boxing Day, but it seems all roads lead to Cheltenham in March. It is, as described, a festival – a celebration of the season.

For some, rather like the Chinese New Year, the calendar begins and ends mid-March. That means a long time between drinks. The last fifty or so weeks may have been tough for many, good for a few: one thing is sure; most of us will have made mistakes over the period. That is the way of life – just when you think you may have got the hang of it, along comes a reminder that none of us is exempt from error. Mistakes are inevitable. Everyone makes them, especially those that take chances. And it pays to remember that those that never take chances never succeed.

Cheltenham is a chancy affair for the punter. It is probably the hardest meeting of the year. The vagaries of the track place an emphasis on a certain type of animal, meaning it is not always the best that succeed. With that in the back of the mind, punters can often overlook the obvious – assuming there must be easier ways of backing a winner than taking a short-price in a race like the Gold Cup or Champion Hurdle. It is a spiral of deception. We sniff out the value whilst the obvious unfolds under our noses. We back the obvious and witness the unconsidered zoom by up the hill. It is possible to zigzag through Cheltenham without backing a single winner. I cannot think of another meeting where such a scenario is likely. Naturally, we can select winners – but they only pay on the ones we actually put our money on.

Becoming swept away with the euphoria and excitement is easy. Horses with realistic chances are attractive prices. Like the well turned-out woman, they distract from what lies beneath the skin.

There will be any number of forums during the run-up. Erstwhile pundits will quaff wine from large glasses, in some cases coherence diminishing as the evening wears on.

This year may be harder than usual. A desperate winter means we cannot believe all we have seen. Hopefully, the worst of the weather has been confined to the depths of the coldest season. A change is long overdue.

We shall be taking a more in-depth look at the Festival over the next couple of weeks. What we need is a banker around which we can construct the meeting. Kauto Star fails to count. It strikes me, without obvious Irish/ English formlines, the novice events may be very hard to decipher. The Gold Cup looks a re-run of last year. The Triumph Hurdle is a mystery, the handicaps are bound to be thorny, but it is too early to write off many of the other contests.

The Champion Hurdle looks a first-class affair this time round. At the risk of offending, I feel it surpasses last year’s contest. For that reason, I would not be surprised to see Punjabi fail to place. Solwit has impressed in all departments this season. He has improved physically since last term and jumps his obstacles with great accuracy. The fast pace that is ensured will suit him and he is my idea of the winner, although his Irish compatriot, Go Native, has to be respected after what has been a season that has seen him go from strength to strength. Those suggesting he will not come up the hill seemed to have forgotten his win in the opener last year. Solwit could be the golden nugget of a banker that I am looking for. I am not forcing this opinion; I have held it all season after begrudging him his Aintree win last year. Whatever he represented then, he looks the real deal now.

The Royal and Sun Alliance Chase looks another event that bursts with talent. The obvious selection is the fleet-of-foot Punchestowns. However, can he win a slog over an extended three miles at Cheltenham? This race has claimed many a similar contender. Now, were it to take place at Newbury…perhaps Punchestowns would be the good thing he looks at first glance; but it does not and he may not be. The qualities required for a race like this differ from those that ensure victory at park courses. Gritty stable companion, Burton Port, may lack the flamboyance of the favourite, but he stays, he digs in, is tough and can quicken. I feel he is only 25/1 because he stands in the shadow of his high profile box neighbour. For once, housed in a different yard from that of Nicky Henderson’s, his price could be considerably shorter.

On a damp Sunday, a fortnight before the final countdown, I have fired a couple of warning shots across the bows. It remains to be seen who is warning whom. One thing is for sure, after a sodden season, those of us intending to step into the ring in a couple of weeks time need to put in some serious homework between now and then.

AND ANOTHER THING

Feb 2010

AFTER SOMETHING OF A SOJOURN, I stepped back into the ring on Thursday, betting at Meydan. I had identified what I thought were three winners on the card, kicking off with Midshipman. It was a good start. Of course, there was nothing clever about the horse as a selection, but the important things were that I was prepared to back it at a short price because I considered the odds appropriate and, psychologically speaking, the selection won.

I like betting in Dubai because most races contain plenty of dead wood. The Balanchine was a case in point. Only two could win it: Aspectoflove and Zirconeum. I chose Zirconeum. There turned out to be two flaws in this argument. Aspectoflove had already beaten Zirconeum on identical terms and, repeatedly, the formbook is upheld in such circumstances despite all the so-called evidence beforehand that indicates the contrary will be the case. Therefore, Aspectoflove comfortably confirmed earlier form before being mugged in unfortunate circumstances right on the line by last year’s winner – the dismissed Deem – meaning I was wrong on two counts.

My final selection was Swop but by now, with a red line scrawled across the ambitious treble, confidence was waning. Swop is a seven-year-old and was drawn wide – two points that in my pre-race arrogance I had chosen to ignore. The extra furlong was in his favour but, once again, all he could do was plug on at the end, looking as if he wants ten furlongs.

This is a hard game on all levels. When you are winning, it seems easy. However, to win consistently you have to put in a lot of work. This can be hard. Working flat out and then paying for the privilege when you lose means you have to shrug off reversals and keep going. Most people succumb to the temptation to change their approach. They work less and concentrate more on messages. It is a common fault – passing the buck to someone else. It might appear to be the easy way out but it fails to work in the long run. It means ultimately you will be backing the same horses as the rest of the racing world, taking under the odds and therefore, as your strike rate falls, you will lose.

These are crunching times for everyone. Unless you are fortunate enough to have a proper job that pays well, or possess a rare sought-after ability, I am convinced working for yourself is the best way out. The days of selling your labour to someone else are numbered. Working for the man means you will once again take under the odds (or equivalent in pay) as the next in line is always waiting to fill your shoes.

Meydan gave me something of a wake-up call on Thursday. Picking winners is not just a question of looking at the paper and stabbing the card with a pen claiming: ‘That will win that;’ there is much more to it.

Right now, I am the footballer that has been on the sauce, the snooker player that is out of practice, the boxer that has neglected his training before the big fight. In true gambling tradition, I am putting a positive spin on my reversal. I can become the Comeback Kid but it may take a few weeks. Most of all, to be successful at anything, you have to enjoy it and be prepared to go that extra mile, whether in reality or metaphorically.

AND ANOTHER THING

Feb 2010 – Valentine’s

TOMORROW IS ST VALENTINE’S DAY. There is also racing from Exeter, Hereford, Kempton and Naas. On the racing front, I suspect that adds up to a day off – especially if there is a partner in your life; in which case it is a combination of roses, chocolates, underwear (if you are foolish enough), champagne, a meal out and of course, a card.

I have a problem with cards as I resent buying something that is mass-produced in China proclaiming my undying love to someone that refuses to wear thigh boots with a high heel because her toe is playing her up.

It strikes me that the best possible card is one you construct yourself with your own hand; however amateur and basic it may be. Why rely on Fu Chong Wong to express whatever feeling you may or may not have. Surely, a plain card with a heart drawn across its centre with accompanying appropriate words is preferable to a detached commercial sentiment from the Far East. Apparently not! So we buy cards that are emblazoned with the words: To The One I Love, or To The Best Girlfriend/ Boyfriend In The World. How many best girlfriends/boyfriends are there? Basic English suggests there can only be one so it is perplexing that Clintons sell any number of such cards.

Then there is the stupid sentiment that suggests that I will love you more tomorrow than I do today and twice as much the day after that. Cut to the chase why don’t you. Send a card when you feel you have reached the zenith of your love for me. The card you sent me last year means at that time you loved me approximately 365 times less than you do now and will do next year, assuming we make it that far.

You see it is all rubbish – commercial rubbish. And after Valentine’s Day we have Easter, surely a period of reflection if the holiday is to mean anything, as that was the period when Jesus was crucified and then rose from the dead. We celebrate this monumental feat by sending chocolate eggs to each other because that is what convention demands and who are we to defy convention.

Tomorrow is a day to endure. If we play the preordained game, we will either have to whisk our partner to Paris and pay six Euros for a cup of coffee as we overlook the Seine, and three times that for a passable bottle of wine in the country that is the second largest producer of the stuff in the world, or wait patiently for a table at our local eatery. Then we suffer the ignominy of scooping a semi-warm meal from plates just recovered from the dishwasher, having been the receptacles for the previous diners only minutes earlier.

The solution is to stay in, buy a bottle of cava from Tesco and cook your signature dish. That way you might even get to watch a race or two between courses. You must do the washing up, but mercifully that means supervision and eventually your female partner will take over claiming you have made the tea towel greasy and put the plates in the rack the wrong way round.

After lunch, you could try putting on a DVD. Avoid James Bond, Batman, Spiderman and There Will Be Blood. Don’t attempt to show anything remotely intelligent. She will prefer something starring Ben Stiller – he specialises in appearing in daft films – or better still a love story of some kind. That narrows it down somewhat. How about Casablanca, The African Queen, Brief Encounter or Annie Hall. It doesn’t matter if she has seen it before; this will be your film forever, or at least until next week when they race at Ascot. All the better if you have seen it too, as should you momentarily lose concentration, you can always quickly pick up the plot.

Tomorrow is a day of survival and only those prepared will make it. Stumble out of bed in the morning with a hangover and you are as sunk as the Bismarck. You can forget the boots, the stockings, the lacies and the afters in general. They will be reserved for the next man in line who, if he has played his cards right, is down the pub with his mates waiting for a chump like you to foul up so that he can make his move next Wednesday.

AND ANOTHER THING

Feb 2010

IT WOULD BE NICE TO WRITE SOMETHING UPLIFTING. At this time of year, having just paid the heating bills and shivering in the barren waste of the afternoon beneath a hostile sky threatening to dump who knows what, such a task is difficult.

Yesterday, at Lingfield and Southwell, horses acted out a dress rehearsal for a production about the Somme. The ground at Lingfield looked lumpy or cloddy; however, no such official description exists. Suffice to say it was desperate, virtually unraceable; but if horses could drag artillery and provisions through the killing fields of the First World War, they could race in Surrey. They were not so much races as endurance contests won by the last animal standing. Among those passing the auditions were Sarando and Bakbenscher at Lingfield, and the day’s most classy winner, Burton Port, who could be the first Sun Alliance winner to emerge from a race staged at Southwell. We should not underestimate his convincing victory carrying a double penalty as he jumps, stays, and has always looked a natural. There may be those with seemingly better qualifications in the RSA but Cheltenham is unlikely to faze Burton Port.

Today was marginally better with Southwell reverting to Flat racing and Market Rasen at least looking like a racecourse. Fairyhouse and Sedgefield resembled churned up battlefields. Winners came and went, slip-sliding over obstacles, ducking the bullets where possible. I was told to keep a close eye on the last at Southwell – a two-horse race featuring a 1/7 favourite. Such an event seems a long way away at present. And I am not sure what it is I am supposed to be watching. Maybe all will become clear a little before five this evening.

Newbury represents a glimmer of hope for the weekend. The course executive has promised to lay ground covers in an attempt to preserve the turf. Monday started with some promise but quickly turned bitterly cold. Tuesday started cold with the threat of purple war clouds overhead, interspersed with patches of icy blue. At least it was too cold for snow, increasing prospects for a Tote Gold Trophy green light on Saturday.

Trying to pick a winner at present is unappealing, although plenty of well-fancied horses seem to be obliging. Repeat numbers come up on the roulette wheel but they do not inspire confidence. As far as the Tote Gold Trophy is concerned, the useful Spirit River aside, knowing nothing and ignoring form, the two with profiles making them the most likely winners considering trends are Manyriverstocross and Get Me Out Of Here. The former looked a good novice on his debut at Chepstow but has failed to impress in the same manner since and the latter, although boasting an impressive list of ones in his form figures, has yet to encounter anything approaching this class. I suppose with all the obstacles that have to be overcome to stage the meeting, Manyriverstocross has an appropriate name, whilst Get Me Out Of Here would be a fitting winner for the pessimists that may be tempted to conclude betting in these kind of conditions is asking for trouble.

In the time it has taken to write these few words, white shreds of cloud have replaced the black and there are deep pools of blue in between. With three clear days remaining before Saturday, anything is possible. Largely we have ducked the worst of the weather so far, so those relying on seeing top class action at the Berkshire venue should not give up hope. Unfortunately, the village weather guru feels racing has to be doubtful. According to him, winter sweeps back from tomorrow onwards. Then again, somehow or another, he has used up a sizeable dollop of luck today. Firstly, he procured two free tickets for a football match that takes place tomorrow, then, inexplicably, having stated the day held no promise whatsoever, he won two grand punting. Maybe he has used up his luck and judgement in one go. Those are the rules after all are they not. No one is allowed more than a slender ration of good fortune – it is only fortune of the bad kind that is unlimited.

On the plus side, we are halfway through February and it is five weeks to Cheltenham. That means March: the Dubai World Cup, the start of the Flat, Aintree, Easter and all those DIY jobs that have accumulated over the winter. Maybe we will get through this after all…

AND ANOTHER THING

Feb 2010

I FINISHED THE LAST OF THE GIN at 11.00am on the day of my departure. A bottle inside a week sounds bad I know, but this was Egyptian gin – about 15% proof – powerful enough to knock you over if you gulp it down in one hit, but a good slug is only the equivalent of a strong lager. Not that I am advocating drinking copious amounts of alcohol but the bottle (retails for about £2.00) was a gift; one it seemed rude to ignore. Admirel (sic) Gin is an acquired taste; a taste I quickly acquired.

But to start at the beginning: I had gone to Egypt in search of some sun and relaxation. I had chugged down the Nile. Then, in the best traditions of movie-land – where actors eager to secure a part should never claim they are unable to wrestle a crocodile, ride a camel or jump from the Eiffel Tower if the script requires – comes a request to file a report on a subject I am not over-qualified to comment on – that of football. It is the competition known as Nations of Africa Cup. I am no expert, but this was a case of being in the right place at the right time. In a big game, Egypt was to play Algeria in the semi-final on the Thursday and it appeared I was the only guy in town.

Luxor is agog. Flags deck the city. I should be in the streets soaking up the atmosphere; maybe in front of a television shop with all the sets left on; instead I am with the Egyptians at the Sofitel, watching the game in front of a 32-inch LG. There is the gurgling sound of the hubble-bubble pipes, the haze of perfumed smoke, the raw tang of tobacco, the popping of soda cans.

A Paul Robeson look-alike referees the match, which is appropriate as we are on the banks of the River Nile. The referee look like he knows somethin’ but not everything. He awards Egypt a deserved penalty but don’t see the taker hesitate, confusing the keeper, before striking the ball. So the ensuing goal fools the keeper under dubious circumstances. The Egyptian fans know their football. They are jubilant but sense this is no way to win such a prestigious match. Then Zidan breaks and belts the ball into the net to make it two and the hubbles stop bubbling as the fans erupt. Algeria responds by trying to hack their way out of trouble. They are reduced to ten men by the dismissal of one of their star players, Halliche. Ol’ Man River keeps on rolling out the red cards. Algeria loses two more players, including their goalkeeper. They also lose the match by four clear goals. Egypt are set to play Ghana in the final on Sunday.

By now, the locals have taken me to their hearts. We congratulate each other and they mistakenly believe I am a soccer aficionado. We agree the goalkeeper, nicknamed High Dam, is outstanding. We jointly heap praise on Zidan (not to be confused with the French footballer Zidane, or the horse trained by James Fanshawe).

I write up the piece, fooling myself I am actually knowledgeable. No doubt those that visit Old Trafford or Highbury on a regular basis see through such a ruse.

The final on Sunday is dramatic in the way sport can be. To my surprise, a place is reserved for me at the Egyptian end. The Egyptians clap me on the back, some claim I am lucky for their team; others smile and speak broken English. Such open generosity is staggering and I respond with even more broken Arabic. The atmosphere at the Sofitel is softly steamy.

The match gets underway. Both sides are hungry for victory, there is no quarter given or expected. It is Zenyatta’s Breeders’ Cup Classic, Muhammad Ali V Joe Frasier. It is Death on the Nile for Egypt, Heart of Darkness for Ghana. They play in the heat of Angola. The stands are a cocktail of colour. There are voodoo visors, painted faces; straw masks the size of shields. This may not be the best game of football ever seen but it crackles with tension. There is an ever-present thump of drums as both teams spearhead attack after attack at opposite ends. Ghana is quicker but less precise. Egypt slows the pace then surges forward in an arrow of red. Ghana defends then counter-attacks. It is deep into the second half – in the eighty-fifth minute – before Geddo scores a perfect winner for Egypt. High Dam shadows the precious space of Egypt’s goal and makes a match-winning save as Ghana launches a final assault.

My new friends are ecstatic. A score line of 1-0 fails to tell the story. This game has taken players and spectators to the edge. At its best sport provides unsurpassed drama. In a world threatened by drastic change, amid the tragedy that is Haiti, for a while this is the best on offer. There is a chink of guilt, largely felt by many, at such enjoyment when so much suffering haunts a different stage. However, this is Egypt’s moment – they should not reproach themselves for relishing its sweetness.

AND ANOTHER THING

Jan 2010

ANOTHER WHITEOUT DAY – another chance to discover how many friends I have. It seems I have two. Normally, not that I court it; my phone is busy in the mornings. Since the landscape underwent its backwash of white, both my lines and my mobile have been largely quiet. I don’t mind, but it does illustrate that when the going gets tough only true friends stay the distance. Of course, there has not been much to discuss. I have learned that the Nicky Henderson yard cannot wait to unleash a batch of the best novices they have stabled in a long time. A good judge from there agrees with me that Quantativeasing is possibly the best of the older brigade, but does not rule out a couple that are equally good, if not better, emerging once turf racing resumes. Bumpers are notoriously difficult to evaluate, but, here again, the squad at Seven Barrows is reportedly strong. Maybe other big yards will be crowing in a similar fashion, but there is no doubting we have already witnessed firsthand the power that the Henderson stable houses.

So how have you been spending your time during these bleak and blank racing days? I hope that you have not fallen for the carefully laid traps at Southwell and the other all-weather tracks. There was a time, when directed at me, that I scoffed at such comments. All-weather can be profitable I countered. Follow it closely; look for patterns and you can win. Now, something has changed. Possibly it is me. Perhaps I am not putting in the hours so am missing the nuggets and only seeing the dirt. I don’t know. Cobbled together cards, chocked with unreliable and out of form horses are tricky. Some of the participants look inordinately well treated, but that is often merely because they are not the forces of old and have slipped down the ratings as a result.

Green Park is down to run tomorrow at Wolverhampton from an all-time low of 69 – if you take his rider’s claim into account – yet he is far from certain to cash in on such an apparently lenient mark. It does not seem that long ago that we were piling on him in a competitive handicap at the Chester May meeting. In reality, it wasn’t; it was in 2008 – eighteen months ago – when from a mark of 88, he suffered the fate of so many public gambles by getting beat. Bertoliver was the culprit; but now, illuminated by a backdrop of snow, Green Park races off a nineteen-pound lower mark after an abortive attempt at unsuitable Southwell last week. Suited by a tight track, he ought to win really, but the globe might have rotated too many times for Green Park to stage a renaissance at the age of seven. He won twice last year, once in October, once in December, so the spark is still there; however, the question is, can it be ignited to order? This kind of puzzle faces those drawing up what appear to be the best-laid plans just now.

Slumdog Millionaire is on television tonight; Kerry Katona has exited Fat Camp, Danni Minogue is pregnant and some Russian piece of tottie called Katia Ivanova was reduced to tears on Celebrity Big Brother after her fellow inmates claimed she was only on the show because her claim to fame was that she dated guitarist Ronnie Wood. Apparently, Vinny Jones was one of many to say: Wake up Katia I think I got something to say to you. It was all too much for Katia who presumably still finds being jeered at on public television preferable to working at MacDonalds, or back in Moscow’s branch of Spud U Like but WeDon’t Have Because Of a Potato Shortage in the Urals.

What else has happened? Well, David Beckham has found room on his torso for another tattoo; Hannah Waterman has begged Ricky Groves to give her a second chance (to do what I know not) and Tobey Maguire has quit Spiderman. In other words, nothing of any import.

On the weather front, I can pass on what is likely to be the most accurate forecast for the following four or five days. There is a man in our village that was once the undisputed local idiot before I challenged him for the position. Whatever his shortcomings – which include once telling his wife he was popping out for a Chinese and sending her a postcard from Spain three days later – he can predict the weather with uncanny accuracy. His forecast is for a gradual thaw interspersed with a smattering of snow today [Wednesday], followed by a bout of freezing fog in places tomorrow, which will keep the temperatures down. Then it is rain by the weekend, turning the snow to slush, prompting floods in certain areas, but initiating the green shoots of a recovery.

So racing could resume early next week. Oh yes, and, sorry to rub it in, I may be able to catch my planned flight next Wednesday to Egypt. I might even have some money to spend should Green Park win tomorrow.

 

AND ANOTHER THING

SO THAT’S IT THEN…no more ‘11/8 the field,’ or ‘15/8 bar one.’ There is to be a phasing out of the quirky fractions that have survived for so long in the betting industry. Just as horse-and-carriages, trolley buses, steam trains and trams are now defunct modes of transport, so the colourful odds system that has spawned so many phrases from the layers will soon belong in the past.

The world turns and change happens. You know you are approaching middle age and beyond when you resent it. Fractions were ideal in the days known as pre-decimalisation. Once taught at school, people understood that to convert a fraction you divided the numerator by the denominator – or was it the other way round? No, you divided the bottom into the top. Therefore, 11/8 becomes 11 divided by 8, meaning it represents 1 and 3/8ths – a little over 5/4 and a little less than 6/4. From a bet-settling standpoint, 11/8 is evens plus a quarter plus a half. Yes, I see what the wretched people at Racing For Change are getting at. You are not following me are you? It is gobbledegook isn’t it?

In defence of the beleaguered 11/8, 13/8 and 15/8, there used to be eight half-crowns in an old pound, so using an eighth as a measure was not so daft in the days of Oliver Twist. Then, 11/8 to a pound stake returned £2 and 3 half-crowns, 13/8 £2 and 5 half-crowns and 15/8 £2 and 7 half-crowns, or two pounds eighteen shillings and seventeen-and-a-half pence. A half-crown was serious money in those days – why you only got a shilling and several tots of rum if inducted into the Navy.

And if you think that grasping odds against is tricky, imagine the slippery pole that is odds-on. For a start, whilst offering to ‘Lay You 5/4’ at odds-against, bookmakers ‘Take 5/4’ when inviting you to bet at odds-on. And from a settling point of view 8/13 is akin to a figure on Einstein’s blackboard; although it is merely a half plus a quarter minus a thirteenth. Keep up at the back Simpkins!

Okay, it is cumbersome and those of us that understand such formulaic mumbo-jumbo are a vanishing breed – either ironed out by too much racing or heart attack victims: a result of waking up before we go to bed in order to keep pace with the game, whilst faced with ever-spiralling costs. It pains me to admit it, but decimals seem to be more appropriate. For racing is not only for domestic consumption any more, to reap its just rewards it needs to stand on the global stage, and imagine what punters in Sha Tin or Belmont Park make of 10/11.

Every group has its own vernacular. Politics speaks a lingo seldom fully understood, but the code is crackable, as is that used by car dealers and poker players. Racing, however, is full of hidden signals. The calling of a cab, the buckle-end, the taking and laying, the horse that is short, has blown up but leaves no trace of its innards on the turf, the one that has bounced; the list is seemingly endless. Football is a sport that has managed to avoid the web of secrecy racing has spun for itself. Understand the offside rule, when the goalkeeper can touch the ball, and the difference between a penalty and a free kick, and you are on your way to comprehending a football match.

Racing needs half a lifetime’s apprenticeship before the spectator can fully appreciate what the hell is happening. Attendance is expensive; the average punter is a winner behind before having a bet. I am not convinced that any immediate change should commence with the tinkering of the odds system, but accept it is bound to be on any itinerary.

Those of us representing the old guard will just have to get used to 9/11, 9/5 and 13/10. But with no middle-ground between some odds, it is an understandable worry that the disappearance of prices like 15/8 and 85/40 (should be 17/8 in my book) will mean a further squeezing of returns. Whereas odds fluctuate by a half a point once we get beyond 7/2 under the current system, these new proposals offer the opportunity for intermediate easing from 4/1 to 9/2. Horses will slide in stages by the use of 4.1, 4.2 and so on. Then there is the question of each-way betting, something bookmakers would dearly love to abandon.

It is no use complaining. Ben is back. If Ben wants to bet in decimals, his wish will be granted. Just as newly-elected prime minister, Tony Blair, was right to denounce Labour Attorney-General Shawcross for having stated, ‘We are the masters now,’ after the election in 1946, and that the people should control politicians rather than the other way round, so racing ought to be accountable to those that support it. Professional gamblers and bookmakers are contributing but only because it is forced upon them. No one group owns racing or can lay claim to it. Horseracing has been severely mismanaged in the past; we will have to see if it can be put back on track.

As a body, I feel Racing For Change is an overblown, overpaid collection of whiz kids that wouldn’t know Sea The Stars from See The Stars, or why he was called such. No matter, because change is coming and RFC is about to become rich as a result. Change comes to everything if you wait long enough; it appears the scrapping of the old friendly fractions is inevitable. Maybe it is the tip of the iceberg. Change could bring cheaper admittance prices and better food at racecourses, surely the two biggest and spurious issues those attending tracks face.

It may take some time for fractions to disappear altogether. However, an agenda is in place. Assume metres will replace yards, furlongs and miles, and that before long there will be cheerleaders wearing baseball caps in the paddock on big race days.

The show will continue. The trouble is it will continue as it has done without any grass root alteration. On Saturdays, racecourses will still be full of drunks that have too much time on their hands between races. Unsupervised horses will continue to be horses. They will wriggle out of starting stalls, or bolt at the start of National Hunt races, unshipping jockeys as they career down the course. So-called racegoers will become bored after two races, congregating in the bar in rowdy gangs. We will put up with an overdose of racing that threatens to engulf the quality of the good meetings in order for bookmakers to perpetrate the casino mentality they know pays the bills.

Much of the mechanics of racing will be secret. How many infrequent but keen followers of the sport know how to read a formbook? How many know how many lengths a second represents over five furlongs, or how many pounds two lengths equate to over any given distance? How many know the importance of the draw at certain tracks? How many understand the significance of a stable jockey rejecting one horse from that yard in favour of another? Simple examples for those of us used to playing Sherlock Holmes as we attempt to decipher race cards; but a minefield for those tackling the task of trying to find a winner without such knowledge.

Such information should be readily available, not locked away like a State secret waiting to pass the thirty-year rule. There is much to achieve. RFC are yet to convince they are up to the task.

AND ANOTHER THING…

RACING IS A RISKY BUSINESS at all levels. Cheltenham took a massive one on New Year’s Day, first by giving a tentative go-ahead to their meeting at 9.00am; then by confirming, after a second enforced inspection at 11.30 that, as originally stated at the removal of the covers, racing was on. Throughout this process, there was a growing contingent of doubters. Predictably, Tony McCoy, who in a former life would have been in the forefront of the Charge of the Light Brigade and would race on a frozen lake, was one of the big names to advocate racing should take place. Others shook their heads and many trainers voted with their feet by withdrawing runners.

They ran the opener – a novice hurdle – won by the Nicky Henderson-trained Radium. It was clear throughout the race that the going description – heavy with soft patches – was incorrect. Horses were racing as if on ice, which at times they were, as parts of the course had not thawed. Most jumped with caution; few strode out until asked to do so in the closing stages. Notably, the winner was not exempt from this comment but, as a novice, possibly that could be expected.

Immediately after the first, there was disquiet. There followed a lengthy – much too lengthy – inspection as a deputation, led by Nicky Henderson and Barry Geraghty, stalked the course. For the best part of forty minutes, it seemed as if the sight of various officials poking the ground with sticks and attempting to dig heels into the turf was likely to be the zenith of the afternoon’s drama. Richard Johnson hammered the heel of his boot on the track, Nicky Henderson dug at the surface, McCoy and Geraghty confusingly shook their heads and nodded; the Cheltenham executive strutted until, against all expectations, reaching a decision to continue. To the observer, the process was ludicrously laboured and protracted. It seemed that the course was unsafe, something declared by several experienced jockeys and reinforced by wholesale withdrawals. Nicky Henderson took out his potential star Punchestowns and Ainama, but left Sentry Duty in the feature event of the day, the Freedom Hurdle.

Half the field for the next, a 3m 2f chase, defected. The seven participants set off as spectators held their breath. Seven started and seven finished. The decision to stage this race was either brave or stupid. Those that made it pulled it off. Politics played a major part in comments made by several leading trainers. Henderson and King praised and commiserated with Cheltenham in equal measure. Different ground conditions suited different horses and justified withdrawing intended high-profile runners. To any viewer from the comfort of the stands or the warmth of home, it appeared the scales were tipped against the wisdom of racing. Had it been my call I would have abandoned.

By the third event, reduced to only two runners by the defection of Punchestown, the decision to stick it out seemed correct. In the novice chase, Seven Is My Number out jumped Pigeon Island, who runs in snatches under any conditions and, thankfully, both finished apparently sound. Although hardly tropical, temperatures had risen just enough to shift some of the slivers of ice that had caused such concern. The following event was a handicap chase, reduced to twelve participants from seventeen. Three fallers at one of the notorious downhill fences reduced it further, but their exits had nothing to do with conditions that, although far from ideal, were by now acceptable. What must have been a knife-edge call, filled with subsequent tension for those sitting, or pacing in earlier judgement, was effectively over as the famous Chicane greeting for the winner blasted through the loudspeakers across the track.

Making decisions in any sphere is a movable feast, liable to criticism after the soup or before the main course by those on the sidelines. Vindication is due to those that made this one, getting the meeting back on track and completed despite such a delay.

Nevertheless, racing faces an ongoing and difficult situation that needs tackling. At this time of year, with daylight quick to evaporate thus meaning there is little time for frost, snow or ice to thaw before darkness returns, borderline decisions have to be made early. I have long thought we should abandon fixtures if conditions mean it is unraceable at a certain time (decided universally and on a sliding scale as the nights draw out). Under such a rule, Cheltenham’s New Year’s Day meeting would never have taken place. Radium would not have won the novice hurdle; there would have been no extension of Seven Is My Number’s current winning run. The crowd would have been denied two exciting finishes in the handicap chases and the cliff-hanger that was the handicap hurdle won by Wolf Moon. After all that, was the theatre provided by Katchit, Mr Thriller and finally the assassin that was Barry Geraghty on Sentry Duty in the Freedom Hurdle.

Those that withdrew their charges probably by and large made the correct decisions, based on their knowledge of their horses’ capabilities on the ground as they viewed it.

Cheltenham have to be congratulated for holding their nerve and getting it right. Okay, fortune may have smiled on them, but so it does in all successful tight calls.

Possibly, we should look at preventing such a situation from reoccurring but in the light of the outcome today, and the vagaries presented to racecourse executives at this time of year when there is a thin ration of daylight, the decision-makers got it right. And that, from Julius Caesar through to Nelson and Stormin’ Norman Schwarzkopf on the battlefield, to the comparative trifle of what has to be decided at sports venues, is what counts.

AND ANOTHER THING…

RACING IN THE RAIN is like attending a stage show nearing the end of its run on a bad night. You have tickets so feel obliged to go. The players are tired and wish to move on to another project. Yet on both sides of the stage, the raised actors and the sunken audience stick it out.

Newbury on Tuesday was wet. On arrival, the tops of the grandstands were silvery slick, shining in rain that, due to its relentlessness, turned the buildings black and porous-looking by mid-afternoon. But before racing started the course looked cleansed and new.

I went to be sociable, to meet a few friends, to escape the house and give the car a run. It was a mistake. No matter how clean and fresh you are when you leave, an afternoon in the rain results in you feeling dirty and soiled. The cuffs of my shirt became discoloured, my shoes soaked, the leather cold and the heels and soles muddied.

Racing started early. I met my friends in a pool of water by the paddock. We hurried to the bar, exchanged Christmas stories – which did not take long – and watched the first on TV. They drank brandy and beer. I abstained. Going racing only to watch television is illogical, particularly when it is possible to watch it in the warm and dry at home.

Horses raced because they are largely compliant and used to doing our bidding. They looked resigned and miserable, as if required to engage in one last military charge. Water dripped from their flanks and withers. Even the jockeys, understanding the rules and what was at stake on such a richly endowed day, gave the impression a hot bath would have been preferable.

Ruby Walsh and Take The Breeze splashed home in the first, winning by a long way on a day when form threatened to become oblong and distorted by extended winning distances. We all agreed this was not betting weather and the usual snippets of information were ignored. We let Hunterview run in the second but he looked the winner for a long way, jumping well and creeping closer from the home turn. In the end, an ex-Flat horse, he struggled in the ground but finished strongly enough without being able to get to the French import Orzare, a horse that had not been on any list compiled beforehand.

We stepped outside before the next into rain from which there was no shelter. If it did not fall on you directly, it dripped from a strip of guttering, an eave or someone’s umbrella. Early gloss gave way to a dousing as the rain took on a different aspect. What had started as an inconvenience became a nuisance. Rain stung our faces, dripped down the back of our collars, plastered hair to our heads. We retreated to the bar where rain lashed the windows of the restaurant, water bobbling in crowded mercury blobs as it streamed down the glass. Outside it was wood-rot wet. Horses and jockeys trudged to the start of the Mandarin Chase in a filmy haze as if viewed through a liquor-coated brandy glass. The sky was a purple mouth, spewing out rain.
It was still early. I found myself staring at a lady’s bosom. She caught me, wondering if she was standing next to a pervert. I muttered that I was admiring her necklace. She gave me a weak smile but I bumbled on, sounding rather like Lord Oaksey on that famous occasion when he had trapped himself into comparing two ladies on a podium as they presented a prize. The more I said, the worse it sounded. Fitting then that Oaksey’s Carruthers sloshed away with the Mandarin.

Quantitativeasing floated over the sodden track to win the novice hurdle in impressive fashion, making it as difficult for his rivals to land a blow as it is for those who try to spell his name correctly. He looks a top-notch hurdler; even so, Tony McCoy is reluctant to award him five stars. Maybe this brother to Asian Maze has taken him by surprise; maybe he has told JP he is not as good as Belvano, but he sure looked like it in between the rivulets of rain streaming down the steamy windows of the grandstand.

Going racing can be a strange experience for the aficionado – being there but hardly knowing the finishing order and, to a certain extent, not knowing other results. I saw Solwit win at Leopardstown as I thought he would. There was a time when I would have backed him even at the short price, but I am not punting just now. He looks like a serious Champion Hurdle contender.

The Challow Hurdle produced the closest finish of the day when Reve de Sivola slogged it out from the last to outstay Restless Harry and to, a greater extent, Finian’s Rainbow.

By now, the day was a washed out pale rag. Races seemed to come up quickly, making me feel guilty from the comparative warmth of the bar as they kicked off for the Long Walk Hurdle. Rain was still falling, slanting in the faces of scowling racegoers, pinpricking the heads of horses and jockeys alike. Big Buck’s wins but is not keen. He struggles on the ground, runs in snatches, but his strength is evident at the finish. Connections shrug off his apparent reluctance, responding with great patience that he always runs that way. Karabak has sent out a strong signal that he can win a decent prize before the season ends. He travelled best of all for a long way, looking as if, in this ground at least, the trip beat him.

Two races followed. Doctor Pat won the handicap, landing something of a gamble in the process. A big horse wearing yellow colours won the bumper – or he might have finished second – by now, I had stopped paying attention.

We should have left after the Long Walk but lingered too long. The grandstand looked dirty, the turf churned up like a ploughed field, the car park awash – the exit queues were long.

It was a stop-start drive home. Someone had turned on the light at the end of the world, which glimmers in the distance, its faint beam running like a watercolour left to wash itself into the canvas of the day. I head for it in the twilight. Parts of the roads are flooded beneath spindly, shivering trees cowering in the rain.

The car radio is on and there is talk of imminent snow. The racing has been heart-warming but it is too early in the winter to endure such cold and wet. Maybe the weather forecast will prove wrong. Cheltenham on New Year’s Day has to be in some doubt, but the executive there seem confident. I decide it is a meeting to witness from afar.

AND ANOTHER THING

I SHAN’T BE SENDING New Year wishes this time round. No Auld Lang Syne or Happy New Year from me! I did it last year and it made no difference. It is another perfunctory seasonal greeting. Wishing something does not make it so.

Instead, my suggestion is we all analyse what might make our lives better in 2010 and act accordingly. We can achieve this by refusing to act on cue when prompted by those with most to gain. We do not need to Call Now, Vote For Our Favourite Now, or, more poignantly, Bet Now, especially at cramped odds that are advantageous to bookmakers. Just because our betting activity keeps Derek Thompson and a host of racing presenters in business, we do not have to bet at all if it does not suit. I am tired of the betting hype surrounding racing, which suggests that if you fancy or support a horse, you are obliged to back it. Is it not possible to watch and enjoy a horserace without financial interest?

From racing’s point of view, 2009 had its moments, lit up by performances from January onwards in Dubai, and culminating at Santa Anita in November when Zenyatta won an extraordinary Breeders’ Cup Classic. In between there was Kauto Star at Cheltenham and Sea The Stars – a horse that gives the younger generation something to remember.

Racing apart, most of us struggled through a grisly year. It may be difficult at times but, in the long run, it is better to be good to ourselves than to others. I don’t mean we should stop helping our friends or giving blood, but so much of our lives can be spent entangled in events and dramas that we have no wish to take part in or are not of our making.

Dirk Bogarde once told the story of how Brigitte Bardot had cultivated the knack of merely responding to an unwelcome request by saying, ‘Non’. No excuses, no paraphernalia in her refusal, just a curt no. It works and is the perfect antidote to cluttering one’s life with baggage others have chucked our way. If you don’t wish to attend a function, a party, or play the designated corporate game, say no. It is not necessary to quantify rejection of a proposal, like the old sign used to say – Don’t Ask for Credit, As a Refusal Often Offends. A simple no will suffice, and if it doesn’t, then that is a problem for the dim-witted proposer to deal with. Time is rationed – spend it wisely.

On the global stage, politicians need to wake up and smell the coffee. They fail to see – or chose not see – so much that seems blindingly obvious to the rest of us. They still don’t get the expenses scandal. Telling us they acted within the rules is not the answer. If the rules allow them to claim for a second home then avoid capital gains tax when they sell it on, the rules are wrong and those exploiting them should not be in office.

Telling us to stumble around in candlelight whilst office blocks are ablaze like Christmas trees is absurd. We will not prevent global warming by individuals cutting back on travel or switching off the odd light, when one exploded bomb can do more environmental damage than a day’s scheduled flights from American Airlines.

The West has to stop this ridiculous obsession with changing the Hearts and Minds of the bewildered in Iraq, Afghanistan and any other country that has a name ending with ‘Stan’. In those countries, they have their way of living – we have ours. End of…

The argument that we are in Afghanistan to keep the streets of this country safe from terrorists is another piece of nonsense that fails to hold enough water for a cup of coffee. The way to keep terrorists off the streets of our cities is to deny them entry to this country in the first place. That is so simple Aleksandr the Meerkat could have worked that out, with or without coffee to smell. The other pro-argument for our presence is that we are controlling the production of the world’s heroin. Not too successfully it would appear, as consumption in the UK has increased by five percent over the past twelve months. Take heroin – you are likely to ruin your life and eventually kill yourself. That is your choice. With too much time, energy and public money spent on trivia, is that message plain enough?

We are told that without our soldiers, extremists will flood back into Afghanistan; something I admit is a major quandary. However, better we know where the bastards are than be faced with them dotted all over the globe like rats in lairs, waiting to spread their vile doctrine wherever they can. Why, we might even capture Osama Bin Laden, which was the premise for invasion in the first instance.

Immense challenges confront the world; meanwhile time trickles away. We have to shift our way of thinking or else what could be the last century of this planet looms. The biggest problem is one of overcrowding. Allowing a woman in America to turn out eight artificial babies and then to pay her for the dubious privilege is madness. If we continue at this rate, we will eventually exhaust food supplies. There are only so many animals to farm: only so many fish to drag from the sea. Such a shortage might start at Heston Blumenthal’s dreadful Fat Duck restaurant at Bray, where his latest concoction includes whales’ vomit. Before long, it will spread to the real people, whose only wish is to put a meal into their bellies. If Blumenthal wishes to be an alchemist to the idle rich, let him work in a chemical plant.

Eventually, acquiescence on a global scale to our ills will result in either the need for a hard-line totalitarian-run planet by someone of Stalin’s persuasion who can make the necessary decisions, or one that crumbles before the eyes of future generations. Solutions to the world’s problems tripped out by politicians – who postpone rather than cure – are no more effective than the swatting of a single mosquito in Africa in the belief such action will alleviate malaria.

All this occurs whilst we, the masses, consume our own particular brand of opium: playing on Nintendo, fiddling with X-Boxes, breathing every breath of the contestants on X-Factor and Strictly Come Dancing; screaming for football teams and, yes, attempting to decipher what is often the indecipherable, masquerading as racecards, as if winning and losing equates to life and death.

2010 could be a turning point for the world. We are the fortunate children of the universe – the ones that live just the right distance from the ferocious power that is the Sun and generates life. We can still achieve much, apart from improving HD-ready TVs and Blue-ray. It is not too late to solve some of the mysteries that lie beyond the stars we can see and perhaps those we cannot. For, surely, beyond the velvet void, are the answers to life itself. We have become immune to such knowledge, impregnated and immersed in trivia. In the West, we chase the pound, dollar and euro. In the Middle East, there is a hankering to convert the rest of us to Islam. Both parties waste their time. We know what happens to those that hunger for a clutch of ill-gotten gains – they sacrifice the quality of real life. Those that attempt conversion by placing indoctrinated morons loaded with explosives on planes are even worse. Surely, such a lesson was learned back in the Middle Ages with the Crusades.

For sports fans, put the excellent Nick Luck, Steve Mellish, Lydia Hislop, Matt Chapman, Kauto Star, Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United where they belong – in the background. Recognise that issues that are more important need tackling. There is a place for following racing, football and indulging in pleasures of the flesh. I suggest it should not be at the top of any prospective list. I have spent the equivalent of years watching horseracing. It is time that could have been better used doing something more worthwhile. It is too late to take back now, but at least I recognise when being taken for a fool, something I would like to prevent in future.

You may think expressing such earnest and intense issues on a horseracing website exceeds my brief. You may label me as a being akin to a deluded bible-basher revelling in the comfort a pulpit provides. You may be right; and I am not exempt, no doubt being as guilty as most readers in my approach to all I have touched upon. I drink too much – something I am rectifying – already drive a petrol-guzzling car and yet wish to trade it in for one of a higher spec that, frankly, I may want but don’t need. I spend too much time in the air; in short am as selfish as those I am targeting.

The start of a new year is often a time to reflect. A month and a holiday down the line and we all get back to the slog of tackling the next eleven months, for the most part playing the part mapped out for us by others. It need not be that way if enough of us say, ‘Enough, I am not going to take it any more’. To quote the late Michael Jackson, we could start with The Man in the Mirror.

For those of you that have made it thus far in the piece – one you were doubtless unprepared for after a weekend containing so much racing – congratulations are in order along with my thanks. Those nice people in the white coats will be taking me back to the home shortly. From my barred window, after tomorrow, I am likely to see copious amounts of snow; those of you in the Midlands might even be marooned for a while. Maybe, like an ache somewhere in the body, this unforeseen and somewhat unseasonal weather should serve as a warning…

In conclusion, I hope 2010 is a good year, but not so much for us as individuals, but for this blue rock we share. That can only happen if jointly we take stock and react. The lead does not have to come from those in power, many of whom would struggle to operate an ice-cream stand on a beach.

AND ANOTHER THING…

It’s Here…

IT’S HERE THEN! Christmas seems to have hung around for a long time this year. Perhaps it is something to do with the weather or the attempt by retailers and the media to panic us. Whatever the reason, it does seem we all go to a mighty lot of trouble for just one day.

It starts with cards: the decision as to whom one should send to. Then the frenzy when a card from that couple you met on holiday two years ago drops on the mat. Surely they have moved on by now; but no, so you send one back, keeping a long-distance relationship alive and leaving an unanswered question open for next year.

Presents are tricky, but I feel I may have cracked it. Whatever you buy will probably be wrong; after all, just think of your reaction to some of the stuff you receive. So make it something classy (that doesn’t necessarily mean expensive) from a good quality store where the recipient can swop it at a later date for something they would really like. If you are buying a watch for a man, leaving aside the obvious on the price scale ranging from Omega down to Seiko and Citizen – Police and Diesel are your best bets at around hundred quid or possibly less. There are other makes and their watches are fine, but not for the fashion-conscious. The same applies to watches for women, who will probably appreciate affordable French Connection, Betty Barclay or Oskar Emil more than they will some of the more obvious makes.

I do feel sorry for women on Christmas Day. This is the one day when they are expected – totally unreasonably – to put on a one-woman show in the kitchen. Cooking a turkey is no fun, let alone conjuring up all the accessories: the devils on horseback, the sauces, gravy, perfect roast potatoes, sprouts, trifle, pudding; why a nightmare awaits them in that steam-filled kitchen where any lack of precision is punished by the sabotaging of the complete dinner. And why should they be pressurised into walking on this high wire above the range and hob that are waiting to sizzle or roast them alive in the event of mistakes or mistiming?

Chances are the people they are making this sacrifice for will be out of their heads by the time the turkey arrives on the table. The Stella and the Rioja will have seen to that. The dinner could just as well be a Kentucky Fried Chicken. I know I am letting my own sex down here, but us men really do not behave terribly well at Christmas. Assuming our faces don’t fall into our plates of Christmas nosh, our idea of helping is to open copious quantities of wine, find a job to do five minutes before dinner is served, or be in the lavatory as the gravy is beginning to lose some of its steam in its sauceboat. Why do men feel it necessary to absent themselves from the table at a crucial moment?

Having swum through the fog of cooking, the lady of the house is left to call everyone to order and sit them down so that the so-called ‘head of the household’ can carve – or mangle – a perfectly cooked turkey in between slurps of wine from a second bottle. All the precision, the care, the attention to detail, resulting in a feast fit for King Henry VIII, is invariably washed down and away with the taste of grape and grain, until the males in the household sleep through the Queen reading her speech to the nation. The kitchen goddess is lucky if she sees her other half in his true light (or perhaps, if this is a new relationship, she has seen him in that guise and is only just realising what she has let herself in for) until Boxing Day. Then, if he is a racing man, cards of a different type to ones with robins and snow-covered rooftops dominate the day.

This year’s racing fare looks outstanding. It starts on Saturday with the traditional Boxing Day feature at Kempton, along with Grades 1 and 2 at Leopardstown: graded races at Wetherby and Limerick – weather permitting – and gallops on through Sunday, again at Kempton, on to Chepstow and the Welsh National on Monday, and a programme at Newbury on Tuesday enhanced by the inclusion of the Long Walk Hurdle postponed from Ascot. If that is not enough, there is a host of supporting meetings, planned from places like Sedgefield, to keep the homeless, witless and brainless occupied over a concentrated four-day period.

Some of the racing is actually very good. Sizing Europe, Captain Cee Bee, Binocular and of course Kauto Star lay Cheltenham claims on the line. Kauto Star’s task this time in the King George may not be as straightforward as he has faced in preceding years. I keep questioning Kauto Star, which is nonsensical, but I cannot help it – I have caught an incurable disease. As in our dealings with humans, we often form on-the-spot decisions about horses and, even when logic dictates they were wrong, are reluctant to alter them. Kauto Star has proved himself a champion repeatedly and yet I am still trying to get him beat. I am looking at the seemingly much improved Deep Purple – who is surely overpriced, both to win the race outright, or to be the winner ‘without Kauto Star’.

In the Christmas Hurdle, I am not convinced about Binocular who, for whatever reason, fails to deliver on the big occasion. Similarly, I cannot forget the sight of Sizing Europe turning to putty in his rider’s hands at Cheltenham in the Champion Hurdle.

Maybe I shall dream a few winners after a turkey and Rioja overload on Christmas Day. More likely, is a likening to the man that featured in a classic Sir Clement Freud joke…

A man is in the habit of going to the local pub on a regular basis and returning home drunk. As he sets off on a particular Christmas Eve, his wife – who has reached the end of her tether – warns him that if he returns in a drunken state she will leave him. The episode in the pub is a re-run of so many that preceded it. Eventually, so drunk that he vomits over himself, the man sobers quickly, realising the magnitude of the situation he finds himself in. Confessing his predicament to a sympathetic landlord, mine host suggests the man places a crisp £20 note in the inside pocket of his suit. He can then falsely report to his wife that some other drunk splattered his clothing, insisting on presenting him with the money for his suit to be dry-cleaned. This sounds like a fair idea to our man who returns home, zigzagging his way to his front door. Once inside the hall, he is faced with his irate and dispirited wife. ‘No, no,’ cries our man, ‘it is not what it appears.’ He then launches into the rehearsed tirade, ending his speech by fishing inside his pocket to produce the proof – the £20 note. However, he finds himself clutching not one but two such notes.

‘So what’s the other £20 for?’ asks his wife.

‘Aah, that’s from the gentleman that shat my pants,’ replies the drunk.

God bless Clement. Let us hope he reached heaven before the Devil realised he was dead.

Have a good one…

AND ANOTHER THING…

CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!

HAPPY CHRISTMAS

‘CAPTAIN CASH’ of Gilt Edge Racing was in the process of a avoiding a fine from the Inland Revenue; he was attempting his tax return. He did not need to file a tax form to know what sort of year it had been. His shiny trousers and threadbare socks told that story. He had sold his prized Saab cheaply to Mouse – that weasel of a car-dealer in Hayes – and was drinking cava instead of champagne and Spanish brandy in place of cognac.

Things could have been different at Newmarket in July if a short-head decision on a 16/1 shot had gone his way; likewise at the September Ascot meeting about a 10/1 chance that was inched out at a crucial moment. They were his two big potential moments – both sabotaged by fate. Otherwise, it had been a case of one step forward and two back. Naturally, there had been a trickle of winners, although bookmakers, seemingly sniffing out the live ones these days, ruthlessly cut prices to the bone.

Cheques had fluttered through the letterbox, overwhelmed by brown envelopes and curt notes that accompanied dwindling statements from the bank. Gilt Edge Racing had started 2009 in better shape than it currently faced.

Alexandria sat, legs crossed, at the other desk in the small office where she had thumped one thigh over the other so that it swelled invitingly. Captain Cash, or to be more precise, Norman Prince, or to be exact, Norman Whittle, knew a thing or two about Alexandria’s thighs, they being one of four items that had tempted him into hiring her a few years back.

Alexandria had striking legs. A lifetime ago she had been a dancer on a cruise ship. Now she was under no illusion about the way time was burgling her looks. She could no longer compete with the young things on the streets that tottered on flamingo-thin legs to agency after agency for the modelling jobs or the positions in entertainment. Nothing ages a woman’s appearance more quickly than fading face powder, which accentuates the creases and lines it settles on. Mid-afternoon and Alexandria’s make-up was melting, her features almost wolverine: high and bony, slight strain showing through shiny cracks that widened as the day progressed. She had found her level for the time being, but still hankered for a chance to return to something slightly more adventurous than working for an old soak who ran a racing tipping business. She was a long way from the high-life of the luxury liners but Alexandria – aka Sandra – had learned to adapt. The work required a minimum of clerical knowledge and she found the perks (trips to the races, sometimes abroad – even the Breeders’ Cup in California one year) outweighed the downside of her position. She was Norman’s companion during working hours and occasionally away from them. She let him paw her from time to time and once, when she had overdosed on mint julep in America, something more. It only happened that one time and in truth, as neither of them ever referred to the incident, she was not convinced Norman actually recalled its occurrence. Alexandria made the best of working for Gilt Edge Racing. Norman was not a bad soul, so she dressed to please him, doing her utmost to supply what little glamour she could to penetrate what was otherwise a bleak, ship’s cabin of a room that had a darkness of its own; a darkness that settled like dust that was hard to shift even in the bloom of summer. Her skirts were invariably an inch too short, her hair tidy but with a hint of wildness and she always wore high heels.

For Norman, who himself had seen better days, being with Alexandria was like acting out a play on a daily basis. She moved and spoke on cue, leaned across him when he was at his desk, bending down low, or reaching up high when tackling the filing cabinet, bosom tantalisingly close, stockings crackling, filling his senses with perfume tinted by promises of yesteryear. She was Micky Spillane’s Velda, turning Norman into Mike Hammer. Often, when he was with her, he spoke like an American private eye. He even kept a bottle of old scotch in his drawer although he disliked the stuff – all that was missing was the trilby.
‘Don’t look good, baby,’ he said, perusing a balance sheet tipped heavily against him. ‘We lost most of our customers in August and never replaced them after that bad run of losers at York.’

Alexandria was filing a pincer of fingernail. She knew things had to be bad. They were always verging on the desperate when Norman assumed his half-cocked American accent. However, it seemed this was a constantly changing business. One minute it was roses and champagne, the next it was brown ale and a silver container of Chinese takeaway.

Horses were just names to her, much the same as the passengers had been on the liners as they came and went, put their arms round her, had their pictures taken and were replaced two weeks, two months, whatever, by the next intake. It seemed horses were the same. Only the names changed, like the passengers, they all looked pretty much alike. She swivelled her chair to allow Norman a full on view of her legs, an act she found was invariably the best antidote for most of his ills.

Not this time though. Temporarily impervious to her, Norman stared at the figures before him, wondering how he managed to pay the rent on this shoebox of an office in Hammersmith. The answer, which he knew perfectly well, was that he couldn’t afford it – at least not under current conditions – unless he turned the business round in a major way. The problem was he did not have enough clients. That said, on Boxing Day at Kempton Park, he expected to collect on a juvenile hurdler that an informant had told him was a certainty. What he really needed was enough punters to back the horse and pay him a percentage of their winnings to make the deal worthwhile. Yet, as he glanced through the list of possible paying customers, he could hope for no more than six at the most to send him a cheque should the animal oblige. A speedy influx of new people was essential if he were to capitalise on this nugget of news.

The question was, as this was the Monday of Christmas week and Boxing Day was only five days away, how could Gilt Edge Racing expect to recruit a sufficient number of new customers to allow Norman a much-needed payday?
With only one more racing day left before the holidays, time was crucial. There was of course only one solution. Tomorrow, racing came from Bangor On Dee and Southwell. Somehow, Norman realised, he would have to spin a winner out of the last day’s racing before the big day on Saturday. He would place an advertisement in the Racing Post, offering new subscribers a free tip for tomorrow in return for their agreement to back the juvenile for him on Boxing Day at odds of, what, £50? Was that being greedy? He decided not. Asking for any less might jeopardise his authenticity in the eyes of possible recruits and, in any event, this was a desperate last throw of the dice. Those that responded were receiving a free tip and if it won, they would be up for the Boxing Day bonanza bet. Norman decided he would worry about what to tip once he had placed his advert.

He sketched his plan to Alexandria who put her legs away, popped a piece of gum in her mouth and fluttered her eyelashes in his direction. She rang the newspaper whilst Norman feverishly flicked through the Post until he came across the runners for tomorrow. He began looking for suitable candidates.
Three hours later, with all thoughts of completing his tax return put on hold, Norman had eliminated Southwell and, having scrutinised the declarations from Bangor, was feeling edgy. The racing was poor and nothing stood out.
Alexandria had typed a couple of invoices, forlorn reminders to non-payers for the last winner, which was in November, filed a few crackpot letters, and was in the process of re-emerging from an envelope of steam having made two cups of coffee. Norman had decided she made bad coffee, but then he had not hired her for her skills with the kettle.

Norman had scoured the card at Bangor. Each time an interesting horse appeared something stood in its way. There was the one that had not run for eighteen months. The race where a trainer was doubly represented, the stable jockey apparently on the wrong one. There was the horse that had never done the distance; the race that contained a useful ex-French Flat performer – the meeting was a box of tricks straight out of a Christmas cracker. It was also a minefield of mediocrity.

Beyond the window it was dusky, city lights crackling in a false fairground darkness. Norman sat back in his chair, desperation creasing his brow. He dismissed Alexandria for the day; they agreed to meet back at the office at 8.00am, when, he said, he would have a winner for the prospective callers from the advert. Norman unscrewed the cap from the dreaded whisky bottle and took a generous swig. It was cheap whisky and burned its way down his throat. Before he had time to taste it properly he took another mouthful, grimacing as the first swallow came back to hit him.

Cold gripped the streets. Norman chose to walk, knowing it meant a slog to his flat. But he wanted to clear his head so turned away from Goldhawk Road and toward the river. The rawness of the temperature dealt him a resuscitating slap as he felt the rippling cold of the river stirring below Hammersmith Bridge. Slow-moving cars congested the bridge. Norman used the walkway, hands in pockets, giving him a hangdog look. He paused halfway across to lean over the barrier. Behind him were the constant sounds of car engines and of footsteps. A bitter wind carried the noise away, punching a hole in the night. He figured it wasn’t possible to get any colder – it was a cold that gusted clear through him.
He looked at the dark waters below. Lights from the bridge rippled on the black surface. He stared at the oily water, looking for his reflection and in search of some inspiration, wondering where the free winner – the incentive for his Boxing Day coup – was going to come from.

There was no reflection, no inspiration; only darkness and a film of lights in the lapping blackness. He tossed a rare half-smoked cigarette into the void, Mike Hammer style, watching it flicker down to a liquid grave.

AFTER several more drinks the night before at his local, Norman was groggy the next morning but he made it into the office on time. Alexandria was already at her desk, Racing Post open at the advert. She made tea in silence whilst Norman stared again at the Bangor card as if at any minute a sign would appear from the paper, nudging him in the direction of a winner. He drank the tea, which tasted unusually bitter, and waited for the jangle of the phones. By 8.17, all remained silent. Part of him wished the phones would continue idly on the desk. In his desperation, he even contemplated unplugging them. But he knew that before long they would ring, especially in a business where anything that is free is snaffled. Unable to bear the silence and tension any longer, he folded up his paper and turned to Alexandria.

‘I need to go out for a while,’ he said, as if at confessional. ‘Maybe you could take over. To be honest I haven’t a clue what to tip; but we have to give them something. Tell them McCoy’s in the opener and be done with it.’
With that Norman left, promising to be back after the race, at which point he would pay Alexandria off and she could get on with her Christmas.
Norman knew the game was all but up. He would have to squeeze the remnants out of his bank account to pay Alexandria her wages and include a small Christmas bonus. It was only fair, as it seemed he would be unable to offer her any more work after today. He wandered the streets for a while, had a chat with Jaffa the greengrocer and Tooth-Thirty the Chinese dentist. He had coffee at Bogarts and had all but emptied his bank account by mid-morning.
Racing started early. Ladbrokes was busy as he watched Tony McCoy come a distant third at Bangor on what looked like a horse that was as slow to finish as a plumber being paid by the hour.

On the way back to the office he tried to think of a hundred reasons why it didn’t really matter. It was that old game of trying to make the crime fit the punishment rather than the other way round. Racing was not the same. There was too much of it; bookmakers were creaming what money it generated, it was turning sour. And anyway, he had lingered, like an unwelcome lover, for too long. It was time for a new venture. Still, he felt sorry for Alexandria who would face the New Year without work. However, with those legs, something would turn up – it was not as if she was forfeiting a job of substance.

He could hear the phone ringing as he climbed the stairs to the office. It would obviously be someone complaining about the tip. It would be best if he had the phones disconnected and gave the Boxing Day horse to his ‘special clients’ from his mobile.

AS far as Alexandria was concerned, Norman had left her in the lurch. He looked yellow and fatigued when he arrived first thing and was, in her opinion, on the verge of being sick when he threw her his scant instruction before shutting the door behind him. Scanning the paper, Alexandria found the horse she presumed Norman had meant. McCoys was its name and it ran in the first at Southwell. It was a big price in the paper but was the only horse she could find with such a name so, when the first caller rang just before nine, that was the name she gave. She did the same with the man with a wheezy voice that sounded as if he had phoned by mistake and was in search of a sex line. Then came the cockney, a woman (unusual) from Gloucester and a man from Bethnal Green then a Manchurian. She wrote down their names and addresses as best she could, knowing that in the majority of cases she was wasting her time as they were unlikely to ever pay for a winning selection further down the line; however, if only a small proportion of the number of callers returned, the exercise was worthwhile. That was so long as McCoys won or at least went close. She did not know much about racing but that much she did know!

In all, Alexandria took somewhere between fifty and fifty-five calls. There was a point just before midday when it became so hectic she lost count and was unable to take details.

Southwell was on the free-to-air channel (the bill for RUK having proved beyond Gilt Edge Racing’s capacity some months previous) so she watched the race. McCoys broke somewhere in the middle of the pack, where he stayed until, with less than two to race, the leaders seemed to be going up and down on the spot. Conjuring up what looked to her like a sprint, but what was in reality no more than a sustained run in the cloying sand, McCoys hit the front close home to prevail in a thrilling finish. Even more thrilling was the price – 20/1! Somehow, old Norman the Groper (as she called him) had come up with a barnstormer!
As Norman entered the office, shoulders stooping with the affectation of defeat, pockets laden with the final withdrawal from Lloyds, he heard Alexandria mystifyingly telling a caller that it was her pleasure and to be sure to call back on Boxing Day.

Maybe she was doing a deal of her own thought Norman, working something on the side, although he knew whatever it was it could not be associated with horses. The only horses Alexandria knew were the ones that went up and down on a fairground roundabout!

Then, almost immediately, the phone rang again. In fact, it was the woman from Gloucester, pledging life-long allegiance to Gilt Edge Racing and insisting on sending ‘a little something in the post’.

A dumbfounded Norman asked what was happening and when Alexandria, with the innocence of a nun, told him that she had merely followed his inspired instructions, he put two and two together before slumping in his chair to digest the irony of the situation. A sea pounded through his head. First thought was – say nothing. There was no point in handing the accolade to Alexandria who might expect a bonus if she knew what she had done. He loved Alexandria in his own fashion – always had done – but he also knew their relationship could never be more than convivial in her eyes. Even so, there was this overwhelming temptation to kiss her but, recalling what happened last time he did that, he thought it better to do nothing. Sometimes, if you can carry it off, Norman reasoned within the ocean that washed through his brain, it is better to keep quiet when fortune has looked your way.

There was a prickle of sweat on Norman’s brow as Alexandria took another call, flashed him a wink and then scribbled some notes on her pad. Meanwhile, Norman attempted to compose himself.

Once the activity on the phones subsided, Alexandria totted up the amount of callers – give or take – and presented Captain Cash with a full report. It appeared they could expect at least fifty new customers on Boxing Day – more like forty they both agreed – but at least it went a long way to achieving their goal, which was to have a sizeable amount placed on their behalf on the novice hurdler at Kempton. Including the punters that had survived the rocky year, it would mean a sum in the region of £2,500 being wagered without risk.
Norman shrugged, having difficulty breathing let alone containing the whooshing in his head. In all the excitement it seemed Alexandria had failed to notice his astonishment, meaning a quick change in demeanour was all that was required. He murmured something about not feeling too well, in exchange for what he took to be a quizzical look from his assistant.

Alexandria fished in her bag for some Aspirin whilst Norman willed himself back to normality. There followed a hurried set of arrangements. He paid Alexandria all he owed her plus the planned bonus. Within half-an-hour, the drama of the day was locked away in that little office along with its battered furniture, Victorian toilet that only half-flushed, and accompanying cracked basin, as the office door closed and the two of them went their separate ways, agreeing to meet up on Boxing Day morning.

Like jealousy, envy and lust, greed is a strange animal that only sheds its skin when experienced. After the events of Tuesday had sunk in, Norman realised that by whatever means you could apply, he had actually given away a 20/1 winner to a set of strangers, many of whom would simply take the money and run. Of course it was a sheer fluke of the most bizarre kind, but the knowledge that such a thing had happened kept him awake. There were times when he wished the horse had finished second – beaten a short-head like the others that had really mattered. That way he would have demonstrated his skill and connections without actually providing the fortunate callers with a free Christmas present, the like of which was unlikely to be forthcoming for a long time. Now, for the first time, the thought occurred that without the Boxing Day winner nothing had actually been achieved. It was to be a long three days for Norman as he scrutinised the cards for Saturday. The horse ran early in the programme at Kempton and, as with all things earnestly anticipated, Boxing Day morning rushed by.

Norman was at the office before Alexandria who, on arrival, looked as if she had gone without sleep for the run-up to Christmas. She turned up in a Pineapple tracksuit and trainers. The phones were silent for some time. There was a call from someone in Kent just after eight, followed by little action. A little after eleven the phones sprang into life as call after call stacked up. By the time the race was due it was estimated that calls had exceeded expectations – somewhere in the region of sixty – something of a mystery but one Norman did not question.

The horse was well supported in the market, opening at 2/1, closing to 5/4 at the off. He jumped the first couple okay, racing in mid-division, moving up down the far stretch. He ballooned the fourth-last but appeared to lose little impetus. Turning for home he was third, travelling every bit as well as those ahead. Straightening up to face the final two flights, his jockey began to niggle and all of a sudden, as can happen with jumpers, he went from moving smoothly to flattening out. His brown nose gradually eased out of the close-up picture on television and when the long-shot picked him up he was fourth and retreating into the mists of Sunbury.

After the race, a starchy quietness settled over the dusty Hammersmith office. It was as if Norman and Alexandria were an old married couple recovering from a major argument.

For Alexandria it meant a wasted day – she had no conception of the vagaries of horseracing. To her mind if Norman could nominate a 20/1 winner with little known chance, he should have been able to select a short-priced one that performed better than this much-awaited prospect.

Much to Alexandria’s displeasure, Norman lit a cigarette. After she had left, Norman lit another and began emptying the whisky. The phone jangled a couple of times but he let it ring out…

An unexpected 20/1 winner and a certainty that turned out to be a 5/4 loser and nothing to show for it except bills that couldn’t be paid and an office filling with a blue haze of smoke.

Happy Christmas muttered Norman before draining the last of the whisky. It was his last coherent sentence before December 27th.

AND ANOTHER THING…

Dec 2009

I AM BACK. I left in the rain – sloshing through Rangoon, only it was the M25. Conditions were so awful I could barely peer through the windscreen. They were so bad that, concentrating on the way ahead, I missed the Gatwick turn-off ending up at Clackett Lane services.

Time was dribbling fast and I had to get back on the orbital motorway, heading in the other direction competing with much slower traffic. I know it is no excuse – all of a sudden I was reduced to one of those Easy Jet would-be travellers from Airline, expecting to fly after the closing of their flight gate. I had always thought only idiots miss planes. I welcomed myself to the nonexclusive Club Idiot as I limped back the way I had come, watching the minutes tick away, crawling at speeds of less than twenty miles-an-hour at times. In addition, yes I admit it, that was me on the hard shoulder by the side of my car relieving myself. I take no pleasure in this admission and apologise to anyone offended by the sight of a grown man peeing in public. If it is any consolation that is one of the obligatory tasks for members (no pun intended) seeking acceptance into Club Idiot.

I approached a queue-less check-in desk convinced I would be sent back home. I was not intent on advancing my claim to travel, as I was three-quarters of an hour late. I had paid for the tickets a month previously and therefore known what that involved. After all how much notice do we need?

Faced with my bedraggled form, the girl took my bag without much comment. Even if my Samsonite ended up in Bangkok and I in Morocco, I was at least leaving the ground – it mattered little.

The airline exacted retribution on my dim-witted behaviour: the plane was an hour late leaving due to a faulty starter motor. Again, apologies are in order, this time to the remainder of the passengers on the flight, as it was of course my fault. We sat, precious flying time ticking away in our cramped seats, fidgeting whilst an engineer fished about in the spares department for a 737 starter motor. I felt I should have owned up that I was the Jonah responsible. Everything had gone wrong from the moment my alarm had beeped. I had blundered away not one but two opportunities to reverse my navigational error. Even when I had found Gatwick, I missed the long-stay car park bus bound for the terminal by a minute, meaning more of a delay, at which point I was beginning to wonder whether I should be allowed out alone. Stranded in Nottingham, I had once changed a starter motor in an old VW Beetle in the growing dark (my solitary mechanical success to date). I fixed it and heard the car spark into life as the last of the light slipped away. So I was prepared in a sort of: is there a doctor present way to volunteer my services. Thankfully, they were not required.

Four hours later we were in Marrakech. It was raining – my fault again – but nothing as bad as in England, or Rangoon for that matter. I was not expecting much in the way of weather; just warmer than here, but rain spattered the windows of the transfer coach to our hotel.

It was dark when we disembarked. They gave me a fruit punch, which I managed not to spill down my shirtfront, some instructions, a room key and a welcome pack. Later I drank something stronger than punch, and ate a portion of roast turkey. Then I wandered into the theatre to see the entertainment. Little did I know I was it! They yanked five of us from the audience, hauling us upon the stage to perform a series of ludicrous but amusing stunts for those enjoying the luxury of looking on. We were required to don a hat and coat and use a skipping rope, before kissing as many members of the audience as we could without receiving a black eye – double points for kissing someone of our own sex. One of the resident dancers demonstrated Michael Jackson’s moonwalk, which we had to impersonate. Then it was a case of standing up in turn to sing ninety seconds worth of any song. Now, this is tricky: I was back on the M25, hypnotised by conditions, unable to find the exit, or in this case the entrance. We all think we know a few bars of some song or other, but try singing it with the right words. All sorts of vague renditions ran through my head as my fellow contestants fumbled through Frere Jacques, in the case of the Frenchman, some Welsh coalmining song from Taffy that could have been anything; I cannot recall the others; I was too busy trying to ensure I did not dry up. In the end, I found myself belting out Maggie May. For a minute and a half, I became Rod Stewart, at least in my mind. Ronnie Wood was on guitar and Maggie was ‘a pain I could do without’. Two balloons and a Widow Twanky-type outfit followed this, but I have revealed far too much already. A word of warning to would-be X-Factor contestants: everybody looks big on stage; it is how you look away from it that matters.

The next day the sky was as blue as a blue painting. Temperatures forecast to skim the high sixties at best in fact hit the middle-seventies. This continued for a glorious week. Six hours a day of unbroken sunshine in what is dubbed as the Beverley Hills of Marrakech. Off-white skin crisped to toffee.

When the sun went down at the Palais des Congres there was the ninth International Film Festival of Marrakech (FIFM). Fifteen films from such diverse countries as South Korea, Japan, Malayasia, Uraguay, Egypt and even Tajikistan scheduled to flicker on giant screens to compete for the Golden Star. However, this is no parochial exercise, Morocco has always been an important location for film, emphasised by visiting Sigourney Weaver, whose movies, Gorillas In The Mist and Aliens, are among those shown. Christopher Walken is honoured. Orson Welles filmed Othello in nearby Essaouira, where a statue in its square commemorates him. Star Wars and Hitchcock’s The Birds were other notable films shot in Morocco. The Birds is one of several Hitchcock films to light up the amphitheatre in the square. For those of us of the non-beautiful variety, not possessing passes but keen to savour celluloid in the souk, the gauntlet has to be run with the local sellers, thrusting their ‘special price for you my friend’ best bargains in our faces. Persistent sums them up. A persistence that is both intimidating and insistent as they tug at sleeves with all the subtlety of Rottweilers as a thousand eyes look on, keen to take their piece of flesh. John Lewis this is not.

There are two works by Joseph Losey also. There is The Servant, which is excellent, but probably mystifying to a mainly non-western but eager to appreciate audience, and the less exacting The Go-Between. Ridley Scott’s Body Of Lies was to have been screened but a copy is unavailable for viewing for whatever reason, although his association with Morocco goes back some way.

Visitors to Morocco should not expect a crater in the desert. This is a thriving city, full of the modern and the new. Art is represented strongly; both created on canvass and sculpted naturally in the shape of the Atlas Mountains that stand guard, seemingly blue as the San Gabriel range on the outskirts of LA. Marrakech may not be Hollywood yet but it is getting there.

It has been a magical and glorious week. With the internet, anything is possible just now. Most of the time we can live a cyber existence, playing make-believe, travelling the world from the comfort of self-constructed high-backed chairs in front of slim computer screens.

Maybe I am fooling myself after all. So much seemed to have happened during the past eight days, possibly I never actually escaped from that wheel that is the M25. Maybe I did miss the flight and, unable to slink home in disgrace, spent a week eating at Clackett Lane services interspersed with bouts on a laptop. But, no, I have the suntan to disprove this. It may not last much more than a week but the week spent acquiring it will remain.

Maybe this is all an excuse to stray away from racing for this particular piece, but it is difficult to write about a subject you have temporarily divorced. Clement Freud used to take refuge in food and life in Marylebone and got away with it for years!

David Ashforth can pen pieces on ice cream at Salisbury and life in Kentucky. It is a trick writers cultivate from a young age when faced with the task of writing about subjects like – my summer holidays by unimaginative English teachers. Then again, maybe they are sorting the wheat from the chaff, spotting those that can turn round content to accommodate what they wish to address.
I am not comparing myself with those two laudable writers; possibly after another twenty years of practice. Knowing the technique and practising it are deals of a different variety.

Apparently, whilst I was trying to escape from London’s orbital route, the lads had it off at Sandown on Saturday with Eric’s Charm.
Cheltenham in the wind and or rain is on the menu this weekend. I haven’t a clue what is running but intend to catch up. I have had my Andy Warhol moment. Green Wadi – a topical selection – looks worth a second look tomorrow at Kempton.

AND ANOTHER THING

NEWBURY HAD SOME OF ITS FINEST MOMENTS over the last three days.

It started on Thursday with a blizzard of a finish in what was probably only a modest mares’ novice hurdle, but the drama provided by McCoy and Thornton on their respective mounts, Midnight Queen and Miss Overdrive, set up what was to be a not-to-be-forgotten meeting. Riverside Theatre gave us quality in the beginners’ chase.

On Friday, Royal Mix impressed in the opener; Rivaliste proved himself a well-handicapped chaser when winning despite failing to be foot-perfect. Lie Forrit was one for the purists in the Pertemps Handicap Hurdle; then it was back to quality with Punchestowns giving a flawless exhibition in the novice chase. He made it look easy, hopping over his obstacles and winning with consummate ease. Bellvano took the novice hurdle that concluded the afternoon; however, there is work to do with him if he is to realise lofty aspirations. He does not appear a natural but the ability is there.

So to Saturday: Finian’s Rainbow pulverised the opposition in the novice hurdle. It is testament to the talent housed at Seven Barrows that the Nicky Henderson team consider him an embryo chaser. Big Buck’s sauntered away with the Class 1 Long Distance Hurdle under a motionless Ruby Walsh, looking as if he could win an Ascot Gold Cup.

Then came the miracle. It was not just the weight – such a burden has been carried to victory in this race before. It was so much else that Denman had to overcome. For a start, he had to concede lumps to very good handicappers. There was the fibrillating heart, the ignominy of Aintree where he had suffered a fall that made spectators hold their breath for a long few seconds as it looked debatable whether he would stagger to his feet. There were those that thought we had seen the best of Denman. Paul Nicholls was adamant Denman was back and that the fire was burning. The glint was in Denman’s eye, but even so, Nicholls was worried. The fire ignited to a blaze during the race as Denman put his rivals to the sword. They closed, threatening to carry him out on his shield. Not once, but three times, Denman looked beaten; each time he pulled out more. The fire in the eye was reduced to an ember by the end of a gruelling ordeal, but you could still see the glow as a weary Denman returned to the enclosures. If Denman was fire then Ruby Walsh was ice. One of the best jump jockeys of all time, he held his nerve, judged the pace, empathised with his mount and coolly achieved what so many – including himself – thought was unlikely. Newbury was blessed with a glittering array of stars over this, their three-day Winter Festival meeting, and each one shone as brightly as they knew how.

At Newcastle the defeat of Binocular in the Fighting Fifth caused another wave of seismic proportions in the Champion Hurdle betting. Yes, the pace was slow, but if anything that should have helped the speedy Binocular. He is a lightly framed individual that looked very fit. Expected to win, he failed to quicken as Go Native accelerated past the field. Solwit should not be written off just yet, as he has done really well physically since last year. A faster pace will certainly play to his strengths. Binocular has yet to actually bag a big race and it could be the window of opportunity is closing fast in a year when the Champion Hurdle will take a great deal of winning.

Unlike Bellvano, Quantitativeeasing may not have beaten a strong field in the novice hurdle, but unlike his stablemate he looks much more the finished article. He flicks and flashes over his hurdles before producing a final killer turn of foot. He will improve naturally and although he may not be the equal of Bellvano at this moment, come the end of the season it would be no surprise to see him his superior.

But this was a day that belonged to the tank known as Denman. Forget comparisons with the other great weight-carrying performances this race has engendered: those of Arkle, Burrough Hill Lad, Mandarin, Trebolgan and Diamond Edge. For those that saw the Hennessy that he won, witnessed it live or on television, saw the tears in Paul Nicholls’ eyes and marvelled at how kind the gods can sometimes be, this was a day to savour, to say, I saw and I remember. It’s all we can do in this poly-cling-wrapped little world that we have created called racing.

Saturday November 28th 2009: Denman Day.

AND ANOTHER THING….

A BIG WEEKEND LOOMS IN THE GLOOM. It is a month to Christmas or the Boxing Day feature at Kempton, whichever you please. Saturday is Hennessy Day. The crispness of a day about to fade into a smudgy duskiness will twinkle around 2.40. Lights will spill from the stands and glimmer in the odd house by the line of trees that form the boundary along the back straight at Newbury racecourse.

To be precise it is Hennessy Cognac Gold day but the race has achieved that golden seal of approval with the public, that is to say it is known simply as the Hennessy. Others have tried unsuccessfully to dub their name to a race, but this event, perhaps because it is Britain’s oldest sponsored horserace, has eased its way into the Calendar as just that. Hennessy is not part of the title; it is the title. A race run over three-and-a-quarter miles at Newbury is associated with the Irish-French manufacturers of a caramel-looking liquid, which is pure cognac. For some, cognac burns its way into the pit of the stomach, for others it melts its way down the throat and spreads its golden hue through the body like enriched syrup. There are other brands, but Saturday is Hennessy’s day. To borrow an idea from another well-known advert: this is not just brandy – it is cognac.

Oddly, despite limited advertising in diverse fields, Hennessy is a name that others have run with. Rappers in particular seem to like it as a brand. Kanye West, Eminem and 50 Cent have used its title in lyrics. They are not alone. A host of names, all unknown to me, have rattled the Hennessy barrel. They include Nate Dogg (I assume that is rude) and then a cast familiar to only those that could re-programme a DVD player after the digital switchover.

The Hennessy Gold Cup was first run at Cheltenham in 1957 when Mandarin immediately set the standard. Three years later the race was transferred to its present venue in Berkshire, but not before legendaries such as Kerstin and Knucklecracker sealed an event that was destined to become the top steeplechasing handicap of the season. After Knucklecracker had won the inaugural running at Newbury, Mandarin took his second gulp of cognac in 1961.

1963 saw one of the most dramatic contests for the prize. It featured the clash of the titans that were Mill House and Arkle. Both camps were adamant they brought champions to the track and both insistent they would win. Mill House and Arkle were chalk and cheese. Mill House was a big old-fashioned chaser that was nevertheless lightning quick over his fences. If anything, in his heyday, he was probably slicker and faster in the air than the smaller more athletic Arkle. Racing down a foggy straight in the black and white days of television, Mill House established a clear lead, but Arkle was still on the bridle and closing when spluttering over the last ditch three out. There was a groan from his supporters in the stands as Mill House opened up and, to the delight of the local crowd, Fulke Walwyn’s chaser powered away with the prize. Mill House was crowned king, but his reign was short-lived. Those that chose to see detected that Arkle had barely engaged fourth gear when making that howling mistake. The Irish returned home, licking their wounds but with confidence that there would be another day. There was – it came in an epic Cheltenham Gold Cup later that season that saw the two of them duel over the fences that could have been constructed of plywood. They danced over those tricky obstacles, each daring the other. After a breathtaking display of derring-do, it was Arkle that jumped the last three lengths in front. Mill House, on whom Willie Robinson had dropped his whip, valiantly tried to peg back Arkle’s lead. Those that cried rematch were groping on the turf for Robinson’s lost whip. It was over! The Mill House dynasty was halted, prompting Sir Peter O’ Sullevan to exclaim as Arkle began that searching haul up the Cheltenham hill, that ‘This is the champion – the best we have seen in a long time’.

Arkle returned to Newbury to snap up the next two Hennessy’s carrying 12st 7lbs each time. In 1966 he narrowly failed to concede 35lbs to the following year’s Cheltenham Gold Cup runner-up in Stalbridge Colonist, who went on to be beaten only a short-head by Woodland Venture at Prestbury Park.

Not every renewal contained such a hallowed cast but other names to grace the Hennessy role of honour include: Spanish Steps, Charlie Potheen, Diamond Edge, Bregawn, Brown Chamberlin, Burrough Hill Lad, One Man, Suny Bay and Denman. These were all great chasers and this is no ordinary handicap!

This year we see a strange affair. You could argue the card contains false messages. Denman has to carry 11st 12lbs having failed to look the same horse since winning this race in 2007 and the Gold Cup later that season. Those banking on him returning to his best may be relying on the magical wand waved by Ruby Walsh. Grand National winner Mon Mome is an unlikely winner and Barbers Shop has yet to convince over this trip. Perhaps the way is paved for an outsider. Perhaps a forgotten horse – like Denman a ghost of season’s past. It could be the 2006 winner, State of Play, who is bouncing according to his trainer, but only if the ground dries out.

Sticking to 2006 it could even be War Of Attrition – winner of the Cheltenham Gold Cup that year and now only carrying 10st 6lbs. It was not a strong Gold Cup he won, but at the age of seven War Of Attrition had the chasing world at his hooves at the time. Niggling problems have besieged him since, but he did not run like a has-been behind The Listener last time and in fact has never looked as if the glint of battle has been extinguished from his eye.

And 10st 6lbs for a Gold Cup winner that is still in there trading the blows with the heavyweights if not knocking them out and is 25/1; it makes you wonder. Doesn’t it?

AND ANOTHER THING…

THERE WERE NO PALM TREES, no mountains of blue or unbroken skies; there were no million-dollar purses. There was rain, mud, purple clouds and an ever-present chill in the air. This was Great Britain in November. We watched jump racing.

The stars came out and they shone like Take That said they would. As a dreeck Saturday, a world away from the Breeders’ Cup, it could not have been more different, yet it was a day to savour.

Zaynar confounded his stable and those that said a four-year-old could not concede weight to his seniors. He routed the opposition with superior jumping and a lion’s heart. Not the most popular inmate at Seven Barrows, what he lacks in social graces at home he makes up for on the racecourse. They said he was not fully fit. The form pundits said he was incapable of beating the likes of Katchit and Karabak. Zaynar was not supposed to win the Triumph Hurdle either; but then he is not a horse to follow the script. He pounded all the theories into the Ascot turf: jumping, fighting and winning like a very good horse. He and Celestial Halo are part of an exceptional crop from last year’s juvenile hurdlers. Already both look like serious Cheltenham contenders for 2010.

Those that doubted Zaynar ate their words. Those that doubted Kauto Star did the same in a race that will surely go down as one of the best of the season. On ground conditions far from ideal, Kauto Star jumped with ease but looked beaten twice down the Haydock straight. Just when Imperial Commander’s stamina had seemingly run out like sand in an egg timer, Kauto Star went on and jumped the last with the race in apparent safe-keeping. Imperial Commander rallied and in a desperate slog to the line failed by the narrowest of margins to deprive the Gold Cup winner. This was the sort of stuff they write in Hollywood. No one could begrudge Kauto his win, although commiserations ought to be extended to connections of Imperial Commander for taking the champion to the edge of defeat.

It is time for doubters like me to remove the stone from the shoe that serves as a false reminder that Kauto Star has only beaten average pretenders to his throne. It is time to applaud him for what he is. Notre Pere never looked happy in the race. Whatever dawn he represents, it seems like a false one.

There was more. There was Planet Of Sound’s brave revival from a mistake that appeared to cost him the Amlin Chase, won by a revitalised Albertas Run. There was Mr Thriller overhauling a leaden-legged Starluck in the Timeform Hurdle and Ultimate skating away with a juvenile hurdle at Huntingdon.

There was Tranquil Tiger at Lingfield, but essentially this was a day that belonged to the jumping fraternity. The old campaigners, and the new, thrilled the crowds as only they can. It was a day to dream of Cheltenham and Aintree and Sandown and the Boxing Day meeting at Kempton. It was a day to warm the dank, rheumatic hearts of the followers of the winter game. It was a day that promised a glimpse of sun in a winter landscape.

AND ANOTHER THING…

ERSTWHILE PEOPLE TELL ME THAT under certain circumstances the Tote Scoop Six is a good bet to strike. Their reasoning appears to be woolly and based on the premise that at times a rollover creates an artificially high pool. I have heard this argument from gamblers that should know better.

Devised as an alternative to the Lottery, The Tote Scoop Six fulfils its function. More in optimism than hope, small punters fill in tickets that offer a big hit for a minimal stake. Realistically though, the chances of nominating six winners in six different races are high – virtually impossible without the cushion of a massive perm – but still outstrip the chances of winning the Lottery. X marks the spot on the coupon; you pay for the wager and give it no further thought. You have performed one of those little rituals that make up a Saturday morning.

Yet there are those that think this a system they can beat. They form syndicates on the occasions when rollover cash is sloshing in the pool, laying out huge sums, sometimes tens of thousands, in the hope of scooping several million.

For those of you that fail to see the flaw in this logic, allow me to present my case. Firstly, if you lay out £10,000 in the hope of winning, let us say six million, you are betting at odds of 600/1. You must remember that even if you are successful in producing one correct line from your £10,000 stake, £9,998 is sacrificed to obtain that golden win. Of course, there is also always the chance you will lose your entire stake or that the dividend will yield less than you wagered. The stakes are high, the potential return not quite so large when that is considered. After four losing weeks, assuming you still have a bank, if others have snapped up the rollover you could be betting at overall odds of 2/1 or less.

Because the Scoop Six requires you to crack the hardest races of the day, success is dependent on massive permutations of selections. Some handicaps are so feverishly difficult that it is necessary to cover almost the entire field. Obviously, this increases the staking plan until you are almost buying every horse on the card or cards in order to stand any chance of winning. Somewhere along the line you have to rely on solving a race with one or two selections; and because the races are not of your choosing, there is a real chance that the nine-horse race you thought you could boil down to the three form selections does not go according to plan. For the bet to work on all levels the unexpected has to happen. Given six races, it will. Master Minded has to fall at the last and bring down Well Chief leaving Mahogany Blaze to drive a coach and horses through what looked a two-horse event. Now, I know this failed to happen last Saturday, but it can and does.

In short, the Scoop Six is a minefield that offers no value whatsoever to the professional punter on a long term basis and is best confined to Aunt Dolly and her hatpin.

If you think you can back six consecutive winners in an afternoon, any afternoon, not the one that contains the hardest races of the week, then do it! Pick your own races; try it with four races if necessary and confine your stake to a more manageable 50pence or a £1 a line. Devise your own permutation and be content with the returned odds.

On a normal Saturday, the SP odds of a successful accumulator on the kind of races chosen by the Tote for this bet average between two-and-a-half and two-and-three-quarter million to one. That is because there will invariably be at least two chunky priced winners in amongst the roll call. Win and to a £2 stake, you pick up in excess of £5million. Value, what value? Great if you can machete your way through horrendous sprint handicaps or twenty-runner chases, but we all know how improbable that is.

As a society, I fear we are in danger of becoming so manipulated by those that wish us to do their bidding that we no longer function independently.
Vote for your favourite act now!
Press the red button!
Bet now!
Live the lives of people you do not know and who care nothing about you and your ilk!
Pick up a lottery ticket!
Don’t forget the Tote Scoop Six!

We all know YOU and I cannot win the Tote Scoop Six. Those that organise syndicates stand some sort of chance but greatly diminish their odds because they cover so many perms. Someone somewhere will win now and then but it will never be someone you can name. We are back to the monkey and the typewriter analogy. Eventually he will type a few meaningful words but it does not mean he can write.

With all due respect, you only have to look at the individuals that have won the Scoop Six to realise skill was not part of their strategy. There was a nice lady that just went on names, someone else that backed Frankie because he always did in the big races. Without irrational selections haphazardly mixed in with those that make sense, you will never pull off a bet like this.

As I said earlier, if you feel you can name four, five or six winners given enough shots at target, pick the races yourself and perm any one from a hundred for a stake of your choosing. At least if you win you will not be playing a pool system. Tote or Pari-mutuel betting puts the punter at a disadvantage from the start. The tote cannot lose as it deducts its dividend from all stakes received and shares out the rest. It is like the man organising the sweepstake on the Grand National. If there are forty runners and he takes ten pounds from each of his workmates or colleagues and promises to pay the winner £350, who is the overall winner? Okay, one person in forty will receive winnings and perhaps his horse was only a 12/1 chance so has almost tripled what a conventional bet would have yielded. However, a 200/1 chance that fell at the first or refused at the fifth could just as easily have been drawn.

As with the Tote Scoop Six, the only real winner is the person that risked nothing – the stakeholder who, having kept back some of the money taken, will always walk away richer whatever the result.

AND ANOTHER THING…

THIS WEEK HAS CONTAINED SOMETHING OF THE UNEXPECTED.

It started prematurely with David Haye beating the Russian man-mountain that is Nikolai Valuev in a twelve-rounder for the WBA heavyweight crown in Germany. Outpointing a man that has a seven stone advantage is not easy even if he is as slow as a tree.

Gordon Brown spent the week honing foot-in-mouth tactics that seem to be paying off. People now feel so sorry for this leaden political equivalent of Valuev, he is picking up the sympathy vote from a nation famous for its treatment of the underdog. In a week that confirmed Brown is directionless and devoid of leadership skills, we also learned he is close to being a dyslectic. Apparently, a word like ‘great’ is beyond him, being one of many ludicrously misspelled in his letter to grieving mother Jacqui Janes. What with that and his tactless behaviour at the Cenotaph, Brown is becoming the Norman Wisdom of Westminster.

Cheltenham put steeple-chasing into the spotlight on Friday, the first day of their Open Meeting. According to the weather forecasters, this was a fixture doomed to perish beneath, first seventy, then eighty mile-an-hour winds. And if the wind did not blow the fixture across Cleeve Hill, the rain would wash it clean into the high street. As usual, the weathermen were not right. You could say they were half-right if you wanted to be generous, but neither wind nor rain arrived in the foreseen proportions.

So they raced. John Francome and Emma Ramsden bought Christmas presents from the tented village; Alistair Down, back on his home turf, cheered up considerably, particularly as his principal Gold Cup hope, Notre Pere, had crashed out of the Grade 1 Chase the week before at Down Royal. Loosen My Load looked something special in the Grade 2 novice hurdle on Friday. He is big but handles himself as if smaller. He jumps economically and packs a powerful finishing punch – unlike Valuev. In defeating fellow Irish challenger, Some Present, he beat a strongly fancied candidate and looks a horse to follow. Tito Bustillo would have probably been third but for some sloppy hurdling when it mattered. Once his jumping is addressed he remains a fair prospect that should not be underrated.

Saturday’s card was a real box of tricks. There were six races and six winners although nominating them was somewhat elusive.

Brazil beat England in the heat of Doha. Nothing too surprising there, as the Brazilians are the best footballers in the world. Despite that, outclassed and with backs against the wall, England played with credit. As is so often the case our team is at its best when facing opponents that are a notch too good. Although several notable names were missing in our line-up, this result confirms what those of us with long memories have known all along – England will not be winning the World Cup next year.

Sunday saw two notable scalps taken. Master Minded failed to sparkle in the cloying Cheltenham ground, losing to Well Chief, to whom he was attempting to concede ten pounds, but still finishing behind Mahogany Blaze at levels. This represented Master Minded as being a stone below his best form.

It was a similar story for Hurricane Fly at Punchestown, who could only finish third of four in the Grade 1 hurdle. Solwit – whose first three letters have been substituted by frustrated punters in the past – sprinted away from the last to leave the Champion Hurdle hopes of Hurricane Fly in limbo.

Now it is Sunday night and all that remains is for there to be an upset in the X Factor. Apparently, Strictly Come Dancing went pretty much to plan. It seems plain to all that tonight’s evictee should be Lloyd Daniels. But we are dealing with a public vote, so anything is possible…

AND ANOTHER THING…

BREEDERS’ CUP 2009 – SATURDAY

IT IS MORE OF THE SAME. More cloudless skies, that same wobbly haze above the blue mountains; a buzzy atmosphere, less ties round the collars of the locals but one horse on their lips – that of Zenyatta. But this is a quarter before eleven, her appearance is eight races and five hours away. Five hours before the girl has to Go, Go, Go to satisfy the crowds spilling onto the lawns. The palm trees waver, the shrubs blaze yellow and green as horses come out for the Juvenile on turf. Across town, cars cruise nearby Hollywood Boulevard where the back streets are eerily quiet now the working girls are taking a late breakfast. Shutters rattle up on the Rodeo Drive stores; residents in Beverley Hills are taking dips in their pools. Beneath the mountains, the stalls clang open. The Americans get the betting right. It is a re-run of last year. It is Gosden and Dettori, this time it is Pounced. The Americans plunge, maybe because Pounced looks like a film star. His coat gleams and he is big. Dettori secures the golden strip on the inner; Pounced engages a long stride and runs down Bridgetown to record a third success for Europe. Awesome Act lunges late for fourth. Dewhurst fifth, Buzzword finishes fast to occupy the same position. This is the second time Pounced has beaten him, confirming this form is no fluke. Four runs on from a defeat at Ascot by Sea Lord, and Pounced wins the big bucks, grabbing a Grade 2 at the Breeders’ Cup. Frankie is in the zone.

A mint julep later and the sprinters are on the track for the Turf Sprint. This is a tough one to call. The Americans are daunting in this department and they peel off the dollars big time for California Flag. He flashes out of the stalls like a forest fire is licking at his hooves and makes all. He is clear at halfway, picking up flakes of plastic from the favoured far rail. He holds on as the pack frantically try to close. California Flag breaks the Breeders’ Cup record. Gotta Have Her (by Breeders’ Cup hero Royal Academy) slices through the field for second ahead of Royal Ascot second, but American owned and trained, Cannonball.

The pace quickens for the Grade 1 Sprint on Pro-Ride. It after mid-day and hamburger time in town. With form firmed up by the run of Delta Storm behind California Flag, there is money for Gayego, who challenges Zensational for favouritism. Zensational is a blitzer: Gayego a closer. Zensational blitzes but can’t last. Gayego is at the rear, threads through on the inner with what looks like a winning run, but in a finish of heads is only fourth. Dancing In Silks supplies a boil over, inching out Crown Of Thorns and Cost Of Freedom. The prices are big. The result makes no difference to the pool-based Pari-Mutuel, but, after two heavily backed winners, bookmakers heave a sigh of relief. Joel Rosario rides the winner. He talks to the camera however, coming from the Dominican Republic, his English is broken, particularly under such emotional circumstances. He says plenty but we understand little. Come to think of it, isn’t that what most jockeys do!

Pressure is building along with the temperature. Americans that wear ties are loosening them. They seem to have trouble with ties. Most don’t bother; those that do look as if they have picked them up in Century 21 – the equivalent of what used to be C&A. They wear plain ties or ones with obvious patterns, unless they have shopped at Rodeo Drive, where entering a store costs you twenty bucks. Bob Baffert makes a reasonable effort with a pinkish number. His Lookin At Lucky is favourite in the Juvenile but the Devil had a hand in the draw. He is drawn thirteen of thirteen but this apparent disadvantage does not detour punters. This seems crazy in the light of previous results. Lookin At Lucky runs a gigantic race from the outside, closing, closing down the straight, but Vale Of York is perfectly positioned by young Ahmed Ajtebi, making the most of the rail before being switched close home to win for Godolphin. And they have done it with a British sired animal – Vale Of York is by Invincible Spirit. Vale Of York’s victory is also a boost for the form of Elusive Pimpernel and St Nicholas Abbey. Some have called Ajtebi a camel jockey. Some camel – some jockey! Vale Of York has thwarted the American favourite to win at odds of 25/1. Grey Goose, manufacturers of vodka, provide the purse. Many in the stands feel in need of the sponsor’s produce right now.

We are halfway through but if you are British, nearly six thousand miles from home, jetlag is kicking in. The best is yet to come. Three wins for the British over the two days, four for the Europeans and some big shots left to fire. We have arrived at the Breeders’ Cup Mile. It is Goldikova, Zacinto, Delegator. There is Gladiatorus, bidding to become the second Godolphin bus to arrive quickly after such a long wait. Goldikova becomes a queen of Santa Anita and has Freddie Head in tears. Drawn widest of all, she pounces down the stretch under Olivier Peslier who probably knows her better than his wife. It is a great success – Goldikova takes them apart in a sprint finish after a furious pace. The Godolphin bus temporarily fails to show. Gladiatorus runs too freely, Delegator does not stay and Zacinto appears to finish lame. The filly has prevailed against the colts and Goldikova’s success only fuels the fire that is smouldering in the crowd – the thought of a scorching win for Zenyatta. For now it is what would have been at one time an unprecedented five wins for Europe with the threat of more to come.

They have a racing telephone service in America known as The Hammer Line. You call it when you are losing and losing bad. You call The Hammer and he turns your life around by telling you what to bet. I am losing bad and need The Hammer, but The Hammer is a television presenter and is on air. I am eating turf after Zacinto and Gayego today and House Of Grace and Sara Louise yesterday, and cannot pay my hotel bill. It is the Dirt Mile. It is not run on dirt anymore, it is on Pro-Ride. Midshipman won the Juvenile last year on Pro-Ride and came back to form at Belmont last month on dirt. Does that give him a double advantage? I think he will win, but when you start to lose confidence, your judgement goes too. Now I am not sure but it is too late for a rethink. Midshipman runs well but they don’t pay you for running well. He makes the running, quickens twice, but they catch him inside the last furlong. Furthest Land strikes late as he and Ready’s Echo overhaul a tiring Midshipman. This means Ladbrokes and I prove correct in opposing Mastercraftsman. Unlike Ladbrokes, I walk away from this particular piece of strategy empty handed.

This is the Breeders’ Cup. It is not about a whingeing pom, or limey in the USA, bemoaning his fortune or lack of. So it is on to the Breeders’ Cup Turf. Conduit is a confident call from those closest to him. He only has two to beat: stablemate Spanish Moon and Dar Re Mi. On paper it looks a simple assignment. He was in front of Dar Re Mi in the Arc and surely the stable know which is the better between Conduit and Spanish Moon. Put the race through a computer and Conduit will win it every time. Punters and computer alike get it right. Conduit has it tough. Jersey Boy, Presious Passion goes off at a terrific lick, establishing a long lead. He appears to be on borrowed time as they close him down approaching the stretch, but just when a normal horse would have slipped through the field, Presious Passion finds more, taking Conduit to the edge of the pain barrier after he had stumble bummed his way round the final turn. The first two have put in terrific performances.

Now the Classic, the race they have come to see, almost 60,000 spectators. Zenyatta is named after an album by Police. The Americans are sharing every breath she takes. You can feel the crispness of tension spreading over the track as they pack the stands and the lawns. With $5million in prize-money at stake, this is not about greenbacks. Zenyatta is a racing hero, unbeaten in thirteen races and a wonderful looking mare that is sheer Hollywood. She struts from the paddock to the parade. She looks calm, aware she is the star attraction. According to the pundits it cannot be done. She is a mare taking on colts and geldings for the first time. She races from too far off the pace – it is mission impossible. That is how it looks throughout the race after the drama of a double-load. Zenyatta is dead-last after a hundred yards. At no point can she win. She lobs along from a mediocre pace fifteen lengths off the leaders. Then something happens. Turning for home, without her jockey Mike Smith making a move, she closes. She closes and some. She cannot go the easy route so makes a run on the outside. She strolls past one horse after another and hits the front with her ears pricked. It is the most incredible horserace I have seen. Zenyatta finishes as she started. She is a champion in any language. She even eclipses the blue mountains that for a few moments appear to retreat into the haze in homage. I am writing nonsense; it is only a horserace isn’t it? Go girl!

AND ANOTHER THING…

For the first time in a while, I bought the Racing Post yesterday. On the front cover was an unflattering picture of a double-chinned Peter Chapple-Hyam in need of a haircut, and on the back page one of a track-suited Paul Hart, who is apparently the manager of Portsmouth FC and should not be expecting any offers from modelling agencies in the near future. He shared this position with the well-dressed manager of Hull, a certain Phil Brown. Inside was the usual format: racecards – too many for my taste – dog programmes from Hove, Monmore, Romford and some places I had no idea held greyhound racing, like Doncaster, Harlow and Kinsley (wherever that may be). At least there was a picture of a greyhound called Deanridge Ammo, stretching out under the lights in pursuit of a synthetic never-to-be-caught hare. If Harry Findley has anything to do with this particular dog then Deanridge Ammo will make a better name for a horse than Bab At The Bowster. There were the results from Thursday’s cards, a few letters bemoaning the plight racing is in or nearing (I can talk); in all not much had changed since I last had a flick through the paper.

I repeated the dose on Saturday and bought the Post again. This time I got mad. The headline was unimaginative in the extreme: Young Guns Go For It – the title of an old song by that colossus of all eighties pop groups, Wham. The strap-line was not the only thing that belongs in the past. Friday’s paper cost me £1.60 – Saturday’s was £1.90. I know the Saturday paper is always more expensive than those published during the week. But at a time when we are having to tighten our belts, by increasing its price by almost five percent the Racing Post is pushing its luck. More and more companies seem to think they can charge their way out of this recession rather than actually increase standards of service.

A new era was being ushered in according to its editor, a chubby-faced Bruce Millington, yet to be introduced to a razor if his picture represents him fairly. Oh good! What’s more Mr Millington welcomed us to an even better, brighter Racing Post, full of colour and new look racecards with extras like the repositioning of silks on the page, and so much more too numerous to list, it is just like, well, Christmas. I cannot recall the readership of the Post asking for any of this added information. They certainly did not request a price hike.

Of course that is what all the changes are about – being able to justify charging more for the paper. Changes can come and go but one thing that never seems to be static is the price, and it seems to me the Racing Post is reaching its zenith in terms of that. When you add it up, buying the Racing Post every day costs over £60 a month – nearly £900 a year if you have it delivered. That is over four times what it costs to have Racing UK beamed through your television. Quite frankly, that is too much.

We now have a situation where the only daily betting trade paper is hovering around the two-pound mark. By the start of the Flat, one assumes that will be its price – just to round up the numbers neatly you understand. Two quid for a paper without any pictures of near-naked girls within is surely pushing it!

Maybe you are happy to pay the extra. Maybe you don’t mind donating the price of a holiday to the Racing Post. I do. I decided some time ago that its purchase every day was not necessary. I cancelled a standing order at my newsagents and am now capping the amount I am prepared to spend on the paper each week. I don’t care if it is in colour; I don’t care if it comes with a CD of horses telling me when they are going to win. The most I am prepared to part with per week for this publication is £5. That means some weeks I will buy two copies, some weeks three, some weeks none.

Rather like the current strikes being organised by the Royal Mail union, this policy from the Post is outdated. There is such a thing as the internet now and various sites – those run by The Sporting Life and At The Races for example – offer pretty much all I need in the way of horseracing information and they are free.
Businesses such as newspaper publishers, or bookmakers rely on customers becoming creatures of habit, never questioning what they are spending their money on. ‘I always have a bet on a Saturday,’ or, ‘I can’t do without the Sunday papers’ props up many a concern. But when consumers feel they could be taken for a ride and are faced with a newer and brighter priced article, they can turn. And once they turn, they turn in a big way. The Racing Post is not an indispensible tool for punters, it is merely a help. It is possible for us to survive without it – it does not work the other way round Mr Millington!

AND ANOTHER THING…

A BIT LIKE THE NORTH-SOUTH DIVIDE, there is a definite partition between those that follow and like Flat Racing and those favouring National Hunt.

Flat Racing is cricket, with its tented lawns beneath cotton wool skies. Panama hat-wearing clientele sip Pimms as ladies in summer dresses swan around the enclosures, faces shadowed by wide-brimmed headgear, holding long tall glasses of cocktails aloft and entering best-dressed competitions.

National Hunt Racing is rugby. It is dirty, mud-splattered – participants wince in collisions; there is the crunch of bone, the bruising of flesh. Rain spears down, darkness is always close, there is a touch of the brutal beneath the hot toddies and brogues. Horses steam in the cold weather, sometimes returning from races at the point of exhaustion. Down a course pitted by hooves, flattened hurdles need repairing as do fences, holed as if hit by hand grenades. Horses finish at long intervals, plumes of breath misting the air. Worse, there is the ever-present threat of the erection of the green screens. Those that care hang around on grandstand steps, stamping their feet in an attempt to stave off the rod of cold that travels from the concrete, as they watch what is happening a couple of furlongs away, hoping to see the removal of the giant bat wings as a horse struggles to life on trembling legs. The turf is often Passchendaele – brown and crusty. For a while, not all is quiet on the Front. What had started out a few hours after the rise of a watery sun, glinting with the colour of morning, has become a desolate, hostile place for those about to die. Many will return, not all will live to fight another day. Not all injuries are obvious.

Where Flat racing can be graceful – a summer garden party of an occasion – jump racing is raw. Regular race goers know this. They sacrifice the pain for the glory. There is the same edgy tension appreciated by the boxing fan witnessing the ceremony of the lights dimming, as fighters face the lonely moment in a fast-emptying ring after the preliminaries.

To many I will appear as the Nick Griffin of National Hunt racing for such a portrayal. At its best, on a day speckled with sunshine at Sandown or Cheltenham, the sport can supply moments of magic. Slick, fast jumping by proficient, well-schooled performers, partnered by the best jockeys, can draw gasps of admiration from onlookers as they flash over fence after fence. Those witnessing performances from the Kauto Stars of the game, trading blows with rivals from some way out, find it transcending profit and loss accrued from betting.

Horses are christened with nicknames; invariably abbreviating names so that Kauto Star becomes Kauto and Denman plain Den. During the action, there is a kind of hushed suspense from the stands as those negotiating obstacles form a serpent in the distance. Even at the furthermost point of the course, when the snake is only a silhouette, sound carries. Those in the stands (as opposed to the bars) can feel the crunch of the punches; see the birch and timber as it flies like boxer’s sweat, hear the dreaded crack of the killer shot.

Jumping is not for the faint-hearted. Tragedy peppers the winter months. Triumph too. For most, it is hard-fought. As a spectator, you need to be an enthusiast to attend. Often meetings are abandoned on arrival – victims of frost, a deluge of rain or a blizzard. The die-hard jump fan can take it so long as the bar is open and the SIS screens are showing racing from elsewhere.

National Hunt racing is pure sport. Meant to be fun; for Flat fans it is the sort an Inuit has fishing through a hole in the ice. It is often said some horses jump for fun, but few show it when they make the climb to the line. To attend you need a strong constitution and a stronger bladder. It helps to have warm clothing, preferably a cape, mufflers and stout shoes. With few exceptions most course spectators attend to be part of the day’s spectacle. Unlike Flat racing, people don’t go jumping to be sociable. In the depths of winter, with the creeping ghostly onset of evening waiting in the shadows, it is too cold, too inhospitable from two-thirty onwards to stand and talk: a nod, a pat on the back, a shrug after a loss or a thumbs up after a win is the norm.

Without the golden carrot of a spell at stud at the end of a racing career, the only function of a jumper is to race. They ‘earn’ their places in the line up for gruelling contests such as the various Nationals and the ultimate glory that is Cheltenham. For those betting on such contests, a different mindset is required than that employed for Flat racing. Those with a delicate disposition need to divorce themselves from what happens on the track at times. It will happen anyway. Spectators are powerless to alter the inevitable.

It is not my intention to bash National Hunt racing. With the turning back of the clocks on Saturday, the sport gathers momentum in a major way. Flat racing is fizzling to its conclusion. There is a final Newmarket meeting, the Breeders’ Cup and the November Handicap. The stage opens up for the jumpers with a full program between now and Christmas. There is the Charlie Hall, the Hennessy, two excellent meetings from Cheltenham and the Boxing Day extravaganza from Kempton.

Those following the winter game have to shift their approach. Some feel it is easier to win backing jumpers than those racing on the Flat. It is a question of what suits the individual. Last year was a vintage one for jumping. We lost a few campaigners but that is the codicil inscribed on the tablet.

Here’s to another season that thrills and excites with the minimum of casualties. It’s time to exchange that glass of Pimms for a dumpy one holding brandy – preferably Hennessy, whose continued support of one of the season’s major events is much appreciated by all that follow our sport.

I may even have a bet!

HE CAME, HE SAW, HE CONQUORED…

IT STARTED ON MAY 2nd at Newmarket in the Guineas and ended on October 4th at Longchamp in the Prix De L’arc de Triomphe. In between there was the Derby, the Eclipse, Juddmonte International and the Irish Champion.

At distances ranging from a mile, to a mile-and-a-half, Sea The Stars won six Group 1 races, beating rivals trained to the minute to lower his colours. One by one, like gladiators in an ancient coliseum, they lined up. There was Delegator at Newmarket, Fame And Glory at Epsom, and again at Leopardstown, Rip Van Winkle at Sandown, Mastercraftsman at York, and finally those not already carried out on their shields in the Paris sunshine, headed by Youmzain, Cavalryman, Conduit, Dar Re Mi and, once again, Fame And Glory.

Sea The Stars did not build a reputation by beating the same rivals each time – he wore the laurel leaves by beating each in turn. This was no ordinary champion (if that is not an oxymoron); Sea The Stars was a special champion – no right horse on the right day – but a true champion, the like of which draws his sword only once in a while. Comparisons with Nijinsky, Dancing Brave, Mill Reef and Sea Bird are appropriate.

Those that wrestle with the ratings in an attempt to sort out the best of the best waste their time. It is difficult to compare generations, what is not difficult to appreciate is that to win six consecutive Group 1 contests in a single season requires a horse with an extraordinary constitution. Just as success begets success in ordinary life, greatness in sport is equally contagious; in Mick Kinane and John Oxx, Sea The Stars had the perfect partners. Immaculately campaigned by Oxx, brilliantly and confidently handled by Kinane, Sea The Stars was favoured to have such a professional and dedicated team behind him. Oxx was always quietly confident of his charge, Kinane arrogantly aware he was astride something special and one was always conscious of his genuine respect and almost adoration for his mount.

A big handsome son of Cape Cross, by the Arc winner Urban Sea, Sea The Stars never failed to impress in the preliminaries, even outshining the imposing Rip Van Winkle at Sandown. A beautiful athletic mover that cruised toward the head of the field with shark-like ease, Sea The Stars won eight of his nine races, losing only on his debut as a juvenile at the Curragh.

He is gone from public view. His progeny will appear on the racecourse in 2012 when we can expect to see names akin to Moon On The Water, Silver Sea, Light From Afar; maybe We Three Kings.
They have plenty to live up to…

AND ANOTHER THING…

IN THIS BUSINESS, THERE IS NO GOOD TIME TO GO AWAY. That said, sometimes it is a necessity. So I chose to leave for a week’s vacation last Friday, missing the Middle Park and Cheveley Park along with a star-studded weekend card from Newmarket and of course the awesome success of Sea The Stars on Sunday.

I suppose in taking such action I was making a statement about the way I am feeling just now about horseracing in general. The need to get away was greater than the drug of keeping abreast of form at all costs, as the year had slipped from beneath my grasp some time ago. Perhaps my lack of success this season is my own fault; maybe it is due to the fact bookmakers are tightening the prices, thus putting us all in a position when it is harder to win because the percentages are stacked against us. I don’t know, maybe your story is different.

Returning from an endless blue sky to a kind of porridge that spat rain, I was still glad to be back. I suspect I shall find it hard to pick up the threads now that I have lost the habit of betting, at least for now. Looking back on the past week, I doubt I would have made any money to speak of; I would have won a bit, lost a bit more. For now, I have stepped from the treadmill that governs so many of our lives and am in no hurry to get back on. I am sorry to have missed Arc Day – one of the occasions of the season – but I have seen enough to survive without allowing the first Sunday in October to revolve around events in Paris. Sea The Stars does look exceptional and I would have liked to have had the opportunity to have seen the Marcel Boussac and the Grand Criterium – which seemed to be below par this year – but, like being in the bathroom after a good meal the night before, it is kind of irrelevant now.

I understand that Delegator might be stripped of his win in the Celebration Mile, which will come as a blow to Godolphin. There is a big rumour that one of the major bookmaking firms is about to fold. A name has been floated, but it would be unwise in the extreme for me to repeat it here.

The show goes on, picking up where it left off. There are some impossible handicaps at York, some equally hard ones to solve at Ascot and tonight, in a dress rehearsal for the Breeders’ Cup, some of the possible leading lights from the home-team limber up at Belmont Park, Santa Anita and Keeneland. Zenyatta still has that brick wall of form figures that features only 1’s. She should win the Grade 1 beneath the blue mountains of Santa Anita that I shall only be glimpsing from my television screen once again this year.

Having dabbled in an art deal whilst on holiday that nearly came off but from which, as the figures rose, I figured I was swimming beyond my depth, I am back to earth with today’s fare. Maybe I have nominated a winner or two on Bush Telegraph, maybe not.

Politics aside, I cannot believe that Labour should be 14/1 to win the next general election. The Conservatives may be romping away with it on paper, being as they are so far clear in the polls, but as we all know, saying one thing and doing it are two very different propositions. Faced with the choice of electing a party guaranteed to hit the middle and working classes hard, as against the Captain of the Titanic that is Gordon Brown, it is questionable how many voters will actually opt for the grim option of the Tories. Ghastly though the prospect might be, Brown is somehow finding the capital to keep us afloat even if it does mean Britain will be in hock for generations to come. William Hill’s 14/1 about Gordon Brown surviving the slings and arrows of Westminster looks way too big to me. He has too many people on his side, bribed if you like, by the handout system created.

So I start again. Disillusioned, battered; determined to put certain things in my life before racing. Our game is one of trivia. The real stuff takes place in the other world we only read about in the newspapers. There is Iraq and Afghanistan – where certainly in the case of the latter – money and manpower are being poured into an unwinnable situation. It was unwinnable in the forties when the British attempted to defend the Khyber Pass, the story was the same when the Russians tried their hand and could not wait to get out, it is the same now. It is this century’s Vietnam and the sooner we accept that the better.

That has nothing to do with a column about racing. I am sorry there is not too much of that within. I have been away. I may be some time…

AND ANOTHER THING…

THESE ARE EXCITING TIMES, at least according to Racing Uk’s Nick Luck. Tomorrow we have the unbelievable tension of the draw for the Ayr Gold Cup, which means we will know what runs, what will have to target the Silver Cup and what is to be relegated to the Bronze Cup. The draw for the big sprint will be shown live on television. Does it get much more exciting than this?

Imagine it, officials will pull the names of horses out of a box and trainers, or their representatives, will nominate the stall such runners will occupy. Forget X Factor, Strictly Ballroom or Masterchef, this is reality television stretched to its taughtest.

Is it me? Probably! But somehow the words: dry, paint and watch come to mind. This will be a long process. There will be a room full of people dressed in tweeds and riding gear, some in suits, others looking as if they have yet to brush the morning straw from their Puffas. Many of them will try to absent themselves from the whole process to have a quick fag outside.

Those watching this non-spectacle will be witnessing Bingo or the National Lottery but without any clear-cut result. There will be lots of names coming out of the box and there will be a big board on a wall that will gradually fill up with said names and their matching draw numbers. I don’t suppose the officials will call out ‘legs eleven’ or ‘unlucky for some’ and no one will shout House! Similarly we will not be informed that this is the third time since records began that the top weight was called at the fourth time of asking.

Ayr is not a course that places an emphasis on draw unless there has been artificial watering or storms of seismic proportions. So after this ritual we will be none the wiser as to where you want to be on the track, let alone any closer to being able to nominate the winner of any of the Cups in question.

As a spectacle, the draw for the Ayr Gold Cup is unlikely to quicken any pulses. Is this really the best racing can offer? With a Gold Cup, Silver Cup and Bronze Cup – why surely our cups runneth over.

Perhaps I ought to be led away and quietly disposed of for not joining in. I am like the sulky kid in the playground that refuses to pick up the ball. This Ayr Gold Cup hysteria seems to have passed me by.

Desperate to sell the sport at all costs, we have a situation where it is attempting to whip up tension over a process as mundane, as boring, as run-of-the-mill as which horse is drawn where in a set of races only those with a direct line to the Almighty, or have plotted one up for four years and got its weight down to a stone below what it should be, have the remotest chance of solving. I know there will be those that will nominate the winner or even winners of these puzzles. They are will be Daryll Brown, Patrick Veitch, if Hogmaneigh figures, or those that have died prematurely and been revived with the knowledge of what happens a few days after their planned demise.

I cannot bend spoons, predict Lottery numbers and contact the dead. I do not have a runner that I have spent years grooming and scheming over. I have no chance of backing the winner in any of these events so have little interest in where the participants are drawn, and what’s more have no desire to hear those on the Morning Line banging on about it for half-an-hour on Saturday morning.

No, sorry, I know I am a spoilsport, but I can’t get enthusiastic. All I do know is that bookmakers are rubbing their hands in anticipation of a profitable few days and I need to paint that windowsill on the side of the garage.

Do they really bet?

YOU MAY HAVE NOTICED THIS WAS ST LEGER WEEK – a big week for ATR who have the coverage rights to Doncaster. How did they do?

We have to remember that ATR are a free to view channel; well, sort of. I mean you have to have a Sky package to receive them, but that aside they cost nothing when incorporated with the History Channel, The Science Channel or Red Hot Babes. And receiving ATR does provide a good excuse for those quiet moments alone in the den when you are ostensively viewing the must-have coverage from Philadelphia as far as the other half is concerned when in fact it is the latter channel that your eyes are feasting upon. Yes; not all that panting and sighing is a result of the defeat of the last favourite from Saratoga.

In a galaxy far, far away, known as Great Britain in the seventies to be precise, when we listened to every word and syllable from the likes of Genesis, Yes and Pink Floyd, there was a time when people used to hitch-hike. Now, that seems a crazy concept now, the sort of thing that is liable to result in your limp body being reduced to a pulp and discovered in a hole in the ground somewhere in Norfolk. But hitch-hike we did, well some of us. For those unfamiliar with the practice it involved sticking out your thumb on a busy highway, which invited a motorist to stop and give you a lift. If you were trudging your way along a distant road in, let us say Birmingham, hoping to end up somewhere in Surrey, you would think a lift anywhere south of Northampton would be a result. Once inside the vehicle with a driver actually heading south, the expectations of the hitchhiker would rise. Asked where he was headed the answer would be south. Asked where exactly and it would be, anywhere near Guildford. The driver would reveal he is actually going to Guildford, prompting the freeloader to realise there is a higher being after all. On arrival at Guildford, the hitcher would press his luck. Once content with being dropped off anywhere that was closer to Guildford than Birmingham, he now wishes to be dropped by the fifth lamppost somewhere along Onslow village.

Possibly we are guilty of playing the same trick on ATR. Grateful to receive coverage of racing at all, we make it our business to criticise the actual content of hitherto forbidden fruit.

In truth though they are not very good. Obligatory breaks either prefix or suffix their programming. They call them breaks but they are adverts. We can press the red button to stop them but that only leads to a squashed screen and a frantic attempt to regain the full picture to prevent us playing virtual poker. Meerkats rule along with Paul Whitehouse, insurance companies and an ex-actor from Eastenders or The Bill that instructs us to Bet Now with Bet 365. He tells us it is easy. All we have to do is keep betting and Bet 365 will keep paying. It’s funny how these actors all seem to end up telling us what to do. Whoever this vaguely familiar man is, he is not Robert De Niro. Chris Hoy is a cyclist that eats Bran Flakes, British Airways offer a service to Mumbai and Ladbrokes sponsor the whole shebang.

I actually watched a part of an advert this morning showing me how to build a wall using some sort of plastic appliance that measures the amount of required cement and levels off the bricks. I wish…I cannot even hang a picture on a wall. I cannot work a drill or change a tyre. Build a wall – like, yeah, right; even if I could get to grips with this miracle device, what about the foundations? I would end up with a leaning tower or a barbeque that only worked when the wind blew in a north-easterly direction.

I can cope with the adverts, banal and stupid though they are. But do the presenters in the betting booth have to be so condescending? The answer is yes of course, because they have been told their audience are idiots. We are supposed to believe that Enzo (is that his name?) has just laid one horse and backed another and is quids down on the day but is still impartial in his summing up of the race. He has done all this whilst juggling with extremely expensive and sensitive equipment and reading out infantile emails. Of course he has not had a bet. His contract forbids it. But he is right – we are idiots. Idiots for listening. Spend a day with Paul Whitehouse, Michael Parkinson, Enzo and the like, and if you weren’t an idiot before you started you will be by the end of it.

We get the dreaded sentence that the action is fast and furious. It is quantity over quality every time. Why is it ATR seem to think something has to happen at every available moment? Bet now, lose now, build a wall whilst the adverts are on, go to Confused Dot Com, vote for your ride of the week.

ATR had a chance to produce a quality piece of programming this week from Doncaster but they messed it up. We saw a few horses in the paddock but not many. We had the absurd situation of having to endure a split screen at one point as racing from some obscure meeting in Ireland shared its coverage with Doncaster. Enzo told us he had lost money on Mick Kinane in the Park Hill but that it was okay because he would have lost more if Kinane’s mount had won. Enzo did not seem very bothered about any of this, but if pulling in a five-figure salary I suppose he wouldn’t would he?

And why all the adverts for insurance on the racing channels? Punters don’t need insurance, at least not the kind that is being offered. I suppose, going back to the perception we are inherent idiots, it shows what a con insurance really is.

I got to see a renaissance by Godolphin in between messages for Clearasil and Play Stations and all the rest of the nonsense. I glimpsed a few horses going in and out of the stalls and before the action became fast and furious, I even saw a few replays. Jason Weaver said a few words although not enough, the same can be said of Zoe Bird.

I do not really know how ATR got on today as I reverted to Channel Four. At least I saw a few more horses, listened to some banter from Francome and McGrath. There were adverts but different ones.

I think I backed a winner but I am not sure. I am confused dot com.

AND ANOTHER THING…

SEPTEMBER; ANOTHER MONTH LOOMS. August just rather slipped away, don’t you think? There was a bit of Goodwood – split between the end of one month and the start of another – there was York, plenty of other stuff that is lost with the fish and chips yesterday’s Racing Post wraps up and, now the sky is darkening earlier, night racing is ending.

The ninth month starts on Tuesday. September brings us The St Leger meeting, Newmarket shifts back to the Rowley course and Ascot ends the month. Then there is the return of the man who seems to split the racing fraternity. Who started his riding career with Jimmy FitzGerald, progressed to gambling trainer Jack Ramsden, went from one big Newmarket job with Henry Cecil to the biggest of all with Sir Michael Stoute, ending up with the colossus that is Ballydoyle. Kieren Fallon’s fall from grace – his road to virtual ruin – has been extensively charted. Whatever stance you take, the man returns in September. We presume there will be no more Kieren Fallon tipline, no more book promotions, no more pictures in the Racing Post of him pointing a knowing finger at the gullible. On the resumption of race riding, presumably, Kieren Fallon will channel his energies in that direction.

The cynical may contemplate how long it will take before Fallon takes another wrong turn. He is a man that splinters opinion. Some believe him to be the horse-lover he likes to portray – the man incapable of harming an animal in pursuit of sport or pleasure. Others see him as a crook, a soft-spoken liar, prepared to spin the required yarn.

Plenty happens in a couple of years. Fallon won the Epsom Derby three times and countless other big races. In the saddle he was ice-cool, impervious to pressure; out of it he was another human being – vulnerable, greedy, consorting with the wrong people, allegedly mixed up in race-fixing and drugs – in short a man prepared to sell his soul to the devil. Take the horse from beneath Fallon and he was just like the rest of us – one decision away from being an idiot.

This month he receives something few of us get in life – a third chance. Most get two, very few three. It speaks volumes for his perceived ability that after so many personal blunders, Fallon remains a sought after commodity. However, the big jobs are all taken. The Ballydoyle position belongs to Johnny Murtagh – himself a reformed character but a stanch team player and great friend and ally of Aidan O’Brien and family.

Ryan Moore has cemented his position as number one jockey to the Stoute yard. He is almost a replica of Fallon but without the bad bits. He is a dedicated jockey: serious, intent, deadly in a close finish with a sixth sense of where the winning post is. He makes few mistakes and is one of the best jockeys we have seen. He is not likely to be usurped.

Godolphin would no more employ Fallon than turn Meydan racecourse into a football pitch.

Richard Hughes will still be riding for the Hannon team when the sun enters its final orbit.

But Fallon will get rides. His name has been linked with Luca Cumani. There will be spares from some of the bigger yards; hopefully not fodder for the Fallon Tipping Line that he should ditch and not pass to some underling who operates it in his name. The last chapter in the Fallon saga is about to start. This time he needs to get it right.

AND ANOTHER THING…

WRONG NUMBER

IT ALL STARTS with a phone call. This is not any old call; no, it is 3am. I lie in bed listening to the incessant ring, waiting for it to stop but it continues.

Eventually, satisfied I am not dreaming, I stumble out of bed. I lurch in the in the half-light, stubbing my toe and knocking over a table lamp. I blunder on, heading for the phone aware there are only two types of calls received in the dead of night: a wrong number or bad news. I am not properly awake so sleepwalk towards the bird-like chirp, waiting for the twist of fate that means it will stop the moment I pick up the receiver.

Becoming more conscious, the possible nature of the call sets alarm bells ringing in my head. It is too late to be for Fat Choy’s Chinese, a similar number that drunken revellers often confuse with my own at closing time. More sombrely, I think of any next of kin likely to have made this number their last port of call.

I reach the phone as it is still ringing; convinced it will stop as I grab it. I lift the receiver and press the talk button. There is no dead tone. I hear breathing and the wail of a car in the distance on the other end of the line. The voice is brusque. ‘It’s in the 4.00 at Newmarket,’ it says. There is a trace of an accent, Manchester or somewhere at the end of the M1. ‘It is called Seven Sisters. Now repeat: Seven Sisters – 4.00 Newmarket.’

‘Is that the road, the constellation or someone with a family in Ireland?’ For 3am, I figure that is a smart reply.

The caller is not amused, in fact he sounds unimpressed with the response. He sighs as if immune to witticisms.

As for me, I suddenly feel as if I have uttered the predictable Step Inside Love when introduced to Cilla Black, or I have been expecting you to Roger Moore.

‘Who cares?’ The other man’s voice suggests he is alert despite the ridiculous hour. ‘Seven Sisters maximum bet. You got that?’ He finishes his lines with mounting frustration.

‘Yes.’ Now the phone clicks dead.

It is four minutes past three. Wrenched from sleep, I have stubbed my toe, broken a lamp and am suddenly wide-awake. In return, I have the name of a horse running at Newmarket tomorrow from someone unknown. The lamp cost over £150 at John Lewis, the toe is throbbing. The trade-off seems a poor one.

I try to sleep but it is difficult. It is Friday morning. I hear the odd hoot of an owl, the rumble of an early morning truck. I sleep; I wake. Light filters in and it seems I have not slept at all.

Later, over a scant breakfast, unsure whether I had dreamt the nocturnal incident, I look at the paper and see that Seven Sisters is indeed an intended runner at Newmarket. With little to recommend it, the price quote is 12/1. I am unable to find anything else to back. Worn down by lack of sleep, it develops in to a long leaden day. Stupidly, I have £15 on Seven Sisters. I take 10/1. Equally stupidly, she wins.

It is Friday evening and I am £150 richer thanks to some phone call received in the blackness of night. At least I think that is the reason but, like the man that believes he has seen a UFO, I am unsure.

At first it is difficult to sleep. I am tired so it should be easy but my mind is racing. I finally succumb around midnight. The phone rings at two-fifty four. I know that is the exact time because the first thing I do when I hear it is to look at the red digital blocks on my alarm clock. I wake fast, switching on the bedside light and making it to the phone in quick time. It is the same voice – matter-of-fact, flat, the same car is whining in the background.

‘2.00, Newmarket again, Howl At The Moon.’

This time I make no attempt at a witticism. ‘Right,’ I say. ‘Maximum bet?’ I ask.

‘Of course,’ he replies, ‘why else would I phone?’

Why indeed!

The car sounds as if it is about to crash through a nearby window in his hotel room, parlour, or wherever it is he is calling from before he hangs up.

I make some tea and switch on the computer. I have not heard of Howl at The Moon. It is unraced and runs in the maiden. I wonder who this man is and where this type of information comes from. Belatedly, it occurs that he must be confusing me with someone else. This could be awkward. What if Howl At The Moon emulates Seven Sisters and wins? Will this man expect payment? Am I the victim of a scam?

I have £150 as a result of the first winner, so put £100 of it on Howl At The Moon. Part of me hopes it will lose as I feel I may be stepping into some giant pit full of snakes. Howl At The Moon wins at 11/2.

There is no call on Saturday or Sunday night. I have to wait until Wednesday when the phone shatters the stillness at 3.07 am. By now, I am barely sleeping at all and have the phone close to my bed. I am alert and pick it up on its fifth or sixth ring. The voice is the same but there is no car in the background.

‘Pontefract: 3.45 – Sunspot.’

I wonder if I should make conversation but he doesn’t seem willing to speak.

In a replica of all that has happened the line clicks dead, leaving me in the belly of the night with the name of a horse buzzing in my head.

Now I don’t even try to sleep. My heart is pounding. The rest of the night mocks me as it refuses to allow dawn to break. I pace, I jibber, I consider all the options and ramifications. I doze in the chair. I shave with a shaky hand. I eat a slice of toast for breakfast and drink three cups of strong tea. I have £700 in the kitty and place £500 on Sunspot. It wins at 4/1.

This is getting out of hand. No one can give three straight winners at these sorts of prices. I am £3,500 richer and as yet no approach has been made for money. No one has broken my door down in a clichéd piece of movieland where it is plain I am receiving information intended for The Mob.

Sleep is restricted to daylight hours. The possibility of a phone call in the carcass of the night is taking over my life. Two day’s later there is the next call. This time the horse is called Mercury’s Dance and as I put the phone down, I am consumed by the prospect of hitting the bookmakers one last time before confronting the mystery caller and asking why he is letting me in on what has to be extremely privileged information.

Mercury’s Dance is 8/1 and I figure I can afford a grand. I watch the race and he breaks slowly. In truth, it is never seen with a chance. I console myself, after all it was to be expected – a loser was overdue. However, I am still £2,500 up on the deal – whatever the deal is.

Over the next five days, I get two more ghostly calls. Both lose. The bank has dwindled when I get the next message. This time I question why I have been selected as the recipient.

‘Don’t you know?’ the voice asks.

‘I have no idea,’ I reply.

Then, almost as an afterthought, he counters with, ‘That is 277987 isn’t it?’

‘No,’ I say, relieved that this may be an end to situation spinning out of control. ‘It is 277897.’

The phone goes dead. It might be early in the morning but I am able to piece the number together. It is Norman’s number at the The Bladder and Bowel pub. I know it is a strange title for a pub; however, Norman is a strange person. He named it after the two things he thought a public house should most gratify.

That night I pay Norman a visit and have a pint of Old Newt’s Testicles. I ask him about the calls when he gets a quiet moment, uneasy about what the beer I am drinking is likely to do to either my bladder or my bowel.

He laughs at first but his face thickens when he sees I am concerned. ‘That will be Corky,’ he says.

‘Who is Corky?’ I ask.

‘Used to live here. He is in America now, Las Vegas I think. That’s why the calls come at such an ungodly hour. He is on Pacific Time you see. He is a crazy man, the original village idiot. You don’t want to take no notice of Corky.’

‘But the winners,’ I gasp, ‘three big-priced winners.’

Norman leans forward on the bar, wincing as he drains the last of a half of The Hair Of The Hare. ‘What were these winners called, Space Cowboy, Trip To Mars, Saturn’s Rings, that sort of thing?’

Seven Sisters, Sunspot, Mercury… I see, I see, then there was Planet Of Light and, well, you get my drift.

‘Space mad; he doesn’t know anything about it mind, just used to back any horse with a name vaguely connected to the planets or stars. I thought he had packed that all up when the phone stopped ringing.’ Norman gives a chuckle. ‘I guess I will have to get used to him phoning me again now that you have told him he was dialling the wrong number. Care for another pint – got a new one in – they call it Knock me Down with a Mallet.’

I pay for it but take it into the bladder house after one swig and flush it down the urinal, where it seems to mix in nicely with whatever is swilling along the trough.

I have a full quota of sleep that night and up to now have never received another call in the early hours. Every so often, when a horse is running with a heavenly name, I take an interest in its progress. Most of them lose, except of course for Sea The Stars. I guess that horse has made Corky a happy man. I wonder whom he may be calling under the cloak of darkness right now. He has stopped ringing Norman and me.

Maybe on the eve of the Guineas and the Derby someone thought a voice from another world had chosen them to impart privileged information. Maybe, like me, if the relationship with Corky lasted long enough, they only saw through the ruse when losers suddenly appeared.

Isn’t that the way of it though? Why is it we only see things for what they are when they start to go wrong? Or is it just me?

AND ANOTHER THING…

YORK: DAY THREE; but in terms of the year day two-hundred-and-thirty-two. They have not been great days, well not for me anyway.

Courtesy of Gladitorius and Alwaary I am losing confidence, waking up in the middle of the night sweating more than Alwaary did before the Voltigeur. I am a mere mortal again. No, worse, a dumb mortal – though not as dumb as those people on Ebay that cannot spell or punctuate, but sufficiently dumb for my betting failures to spill into my everyday life. Bad decisions spawn bad decisions. I have two messages from the John Gosden yard. I back Alwaary and do not back Showcasing.

You know how it goes, we have all been there but one bad move can have a dire knock-on effect. I messed up a property deal I was asked to play a small part in, let my mouth run away with me one evening. I was well adjusted a week ago, now I am sliding out of control.

My thoughts have wandered and turned to Ebay where no one can spell disappointment or occasion. I look at the cars for sale reckoning that buying a car that turns out to be a turkey is preferable to backing a horse that runs like a camel. At least even a bad purchase leaves its buyer with something. A bad bet means a total loss.

I am intrigued by the reasons people give for selling what appears to be desirable motor cars. Top of the list includes emigrating, the acquisition of a company car and a wife that is pregnant. I like the idea of the first proposition but the last two make little appeal. One cited a move to Cornwall where there are no parking spaces, another a move to London where a car is unnecessary. One would-be-seller had four pictures of his car on his advert, one of them showing the tax disc. Surely if the tax disc is one of four most desirable items to display it says little for the overall quality of the car.

Possibly I am becoming intolerant again. It happens every now and then. Even the Racing Post is starting to annoy me beyond belief. Their headlines are invariably so banal and take no account of how punters may be reeling from what happened the day before. ‘Now It Is Sariska’s Turn’ or something similar was emblazoned across the front of the paper today. Racing is a never-ending show to those that make a safe living from it.

I stared at the ceiling in bed last night thinking of things that annoyed me most. Here is the list I came up with:

The stupid sign I saw in someone’s car proclaiming she was, ‘The Best Mum In The World’. Presumably, just like the drinking mugs that say, Best Dad In The World, they only made one of said item!

In a similar vein, racing presenters that say, ‘This was not the greatest race in the world’. Well, if it was run at Brighton or Pontefract I could have told them that. And if it did not feature Sea The Stars, Mill Reef, Nijinsky or Sea Bird, ditto.

Being talked down to, except when I do actually want something explained to me, like what an Ipod is and whether it will launch me into outer space.

Shop assistants that say, ‘Are You Alright There?’ Why wouldn’t I be? Do they think I have just been woken from a cryogenic state after a two hundred year absence from the modern world?

Waiters asking if everything is okay with my meal, after all they should know. If not ask the chef.

People on the phone who ask me if I have a pen and paper. Like, what am I a cave dweller? Pen and eh paper, oh I don’t know if there is such a thing in my office; let me check.

People that yawn without covering their mouth. I saw a young man sitting with his hand on the thigh of a woman in hot pants, doing it repeatedly on the Tube the other day and was reminded of the song by Joe Jackson that starts with the line, Pretty women with gorillas walking down our street…

Fat people that take up too much horizontal space and tall people (of which I am one) that take up too much vertical space.

Daft tunes on mobile phones like the 1812 Overture or something by Ten, Five or Two Cents, whoever he is.

Calling a motorway crash that holds up motorists for over an hour, in an inescapable tailback, an accident. It is not an accident. Mounting the central reservation and killing an on-coming driver travelling in the opposite direction is murder. The matrix sign should say, Crash Ahead Due to Idiotic and Homicidal Idiot. That describes the person who has just rammed a Peugeot with his untaxed BMW.

I could go on. I am going to take a sleeping pill tonight and forget about the 20/1 chance Scuffle that nearly won at York today. I am not going to look at the ceiling. I am not going to look at Ebay. I might even give the Racing Post a miss tomorrow. Unless of course anyone knows one…

AND ANOTHER THING…

DAY ONE OF THE YORK EBOR MEETING dubbed the best meeting in the world by Derek Thompson. Steady big fella, it is a good meeting but it is not the best. That accolade would probably go to either Royal Ascot or the Breeders’ Cup – especially when held in Santa Anita.

Of course, this York meeting is peppered with top class events – they run three of them today. The Acomb is one of the best renewals I can remember – a genuine Group 3 that may throw up a Royal Lodge winner or, who knows, something even better. There are at least five possible winners, including the very likeable Sea Lord who has improvement to make but may surprise. So this has to be a race to sit out, unless of course you happen to know something that gives you a massive edge.

The second of the Group races is the Great Voltigeur. This year it looks a two-horse affair although the supporting cast is far from useless. Essentially, it seems to be between Harbinger and Alwaary. Harbinger has a profile that is hard to quantify. To quote the old adage: he could be anything; but his beating of a very good handicapper last time hardly equates to Alwaary’s last two efforts when unlucky but still close up in the Princess Of Wales’s Stakes at Newmarket, and then fourth to Conduit in the Group 1 King George at Ascot. Alwaary has the best claims and looks betting material.

As for the other Group race on the day, the Group 1 Juddmonte International, although no fault of the system, four line up of which only two can win. Sea The Stars though is a big draw and one would expect him to prove too good for Mastercraftsman.

For a meeting to have pretension to being the best then surely it has to consist of pure quality throughout. The remaining three races today are handicaps. The card kicks off with a sprint over a distance that is neither one thing nor another in that it is run over five furlongs and change. Therefore, it is not ideal for six-furlong sprinters like Hamish McGonagall, and may stretch the speedball that is Cake.

The nursery at 4.05 is devilishly difficult and the Class 2 Handicap at 4.40 is the sort of affair we are used to seeing on a Saturday at Ripon or Thirsk.

So Tommo is sort of right – something he specialises in – this is a very good meeting, but to label York as the best in the world or even in the country does seem to be stretching the elastic band just a little to far.

However, that said there should be plenty to enjoy and savour over the next four days. It is four days of very good racing. Getting savouring! Above all, enjoy

AND ANOTHER THING

August 2009

RACING FOR CHANGE: Personally, it has got me racing for the exit. It sounds like a new scheme dreamt up to alleviate bottlenecks at supermarket tills. I’ll try it again; perhaps it will catch on: Racing For Change. Nope – more like Racing For A Quick Buck for those that came up with a raft of phrases and ideas without any substance. Words like ‘strategy’, ’emphasise’, ‘key’ and ‘subjective’ appear a lot in this latest think-tank’s document.

It is the same old stuff, treating horseracing as if it is a product to be sold like the latest brand of jeans or must-have shoes. What I find annoying, no what I become incensed over, is the amount being spent to have a non-racing quango prattle on about a subject they seem to know little about. For a start, they are toadying once again to bookmakers, asking if it is alright with them to make certain changes. What has it got to do with bookmakers? They don’t run racing, they think they do, but they don’t. Owners, race-goers and punters make the racing merry-go-round revolve. Everyone else, from trainers, jockeys and vets, right down to bookmakers, feed from the big fish afloat in the water. What we have to ensure is that the fish is basking in the sun, rather than lying inert – dead as Hemingway’s marlin in The Old Man and the Sea.

The notion that big events can be built up, so that suddenly those that had planned to visit Alton Towers will divert to Ascot or York, sounds okay but like just about everything else being envisaged by this body, it lacks bollocks. It lacks anything. This project is just pages and pages of what is desirable without forwarding a remedy. There are a few ideas, most of them crackers, and a list of what racing needs to do. It is all a bit like a body drawing up a paper on how the British Government can get the country back on the rails after the recession. It could say we need to improve the welfare system, sell more abroad, redistribute wealth, kickstart the car industry, combat China and the Far East in production of Barbie Dolls, all without one concrete proposal as to how such a far-reaching objective can be met.

Racing’s current problem is that there are too many meetings, too many poor quality events and too much racing. I will not elucidate further: I have done so on more than one occasion and given suggestions, which in all probability are too sensible to ever be adopted.

So let us try another tack:

Racing For Change. Let us try turning the title round for a start. How about Changing Racing. That must be worth a grand.

To change racing, we need more people through the turnstiles; not just feet on grandstand steps, bums on the barstools, but the right type of people attracted to a racetrack because they are interested in what is on offer, not to witness some false Big Brother House kind of thing.

It is no good selling the possible match between Sea The Stars and Mastercraftsman at York. It is not like a Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier fight. It is not Led Zeppelin at the O2. Neither Sea The Stars or Mastercraftsman is sure to turn up for a start. If it rains, Sea The Stars will stay in his box; if it is bone dry, Mastercraftsman will be similarly re-routed. Ideal conditions cannot be guaranteed in an open-air venue. And, at the risk of stating the obvious, Sea The Stars and Mastercraftsman are animals not guaranteed to play to the gallery on cue.
Changing Racing needs to start at the grass roots.

Look at the racing experience from the moment it starts. The coach or car arrives at the racecourse. How about race-goers being greeted by girls in black pinstripe suits and gentlemen in morning dress with plates of canapes and chilled glasses of Cava for those entering Tattersalls, champagne for those bound for Members.

Once inside the track, how about a CD broadcast over the tannoy, voiced over by Barry Dennis, explaining the difference between 6/4 The Field and 4/1 Bar One. It would also give him the chance to tell ladies why he is not keen on taking £2 each-way bets on Frankie’s mounts.

Just to inject colour, jockeys could have their faces painted. Ryan Moore could have a downturn clown’s smile, Jimmy Fortune coins on his cheeks, Richard Hughes could have a sign on his back saying, ‘I might come late but watch out, I am coming’. Jamie Spencer one that proclaims, ‘I come late; don’t back me if you have a pacemaker fitted’.

Trainers have to prepare a statement beforehand detailing what orders they are about to relay to their jockeys. These instructions are recorded and should exclude the usual expletives and the occasional, ‘Not anywhere near fit enough and wants further anyway. Miss the break and lurk out the back. Make up some ground down the straight but finish no closer than ninth: and while you are lounging around, picking up a riding fee without doing anything, stop gawping at Hayley Turner’s arse!’

‘It can be harder to stop one than win guvnor.’

‘Don’t tell me how to ride racehorses you little squirt. I was in the saddle when you were leafing through job adverts for dwarfs in circuses.’

Now the parade in front of the stands: Horses flecked with sweat on a hot day, stable hands in the same situation, particularly if their punters are on. Let’s have some dressage as the horses prance in front of the grandstands. How about a bit of the Lipizzaner element creeping in. Let’s have Sea The Stars doing a twirl on his hind legs. That would get the audience going. At present the parade is merely a moment of tension for horses, handlers and spectators alike, all hoping that the animal on the end of the rein is reacting calmly to a process that can cost the race. It also allows your best chance for a quick visit to a lavatory if someone will keep your seat or place in the stands.

Lavatories are important at racecourses. The first thing most people do on arrival at the track – unwisely if they are betting – is to make for the bar. Unable to afford wine at inflated prices, it is invariably beer in one form or another. As men know, beer has a habit of making its way from mouth to bladder at an accelerated rate. The sight of women queuing on stairs for the Ladies in the Silver Ring at Ascot, many of them widdling Moet down the steps is appalling. In certain circles such behaviour is known as a golden shower but that is another matter.

Let us have more results that make sense. When any winning horse is a bigger price than 12/1, the stewards should have a look at the result. If the horse in question has not run for three years, comes from Chile, last ran over seven furlongs and has now won over two miles, or has been beaten a total of eighty-eight lengths in his previous attempts, is trained by Stuart Williams and was 50/1 in the morning and is returned at 20/1, the stewards should have the power to throw it out.

Performances by Lady Ga Ga, The Pussycat Dolls, Girls Aloud, Scouting For Girls and Ronan Keating increase the attendance at racecourses by tens of thousands. Why hold such concerts on racedays or nights? Racecourses are natural arenas with plenty of parking space and acres of room. They are ideal venues for concerts in the summer. How about Snow Patrol at Epsom, Athlete at Newmarket, Bruce Springsteen at Ascot? How about turning Goodwood into a mini Woodstock or Glastonbury? Rock on man!

Hang on, who needs racing at all? Sod the racing; let’s have the music, the peace, the love, Bob Dylan, Neil Young and Joni Mitchell.

Changing Racing – that ought to do it!

AND ANOTHER THING…

ONCE AGAIN we are faced with the old chestnut argument. Bookmakers William Hill and Ladbrokes are threatening – and it is no empty threat – to move a large slice of their business offshore. We know the argument, we have heard the rhetoric – particularly from Hills, who as a big firm are a pain in the backside – we also know that any removal of business from Great Britain results in a shortfall in the levy. All this after Ladbrokes were promoting themselves only a month or two ago as being as British as roast beef and Yorkshire pudding, and appealing to punters to support them accordingly as they ploughed profits back into racing.

Perhaps now the BHA will see bookmakers for what they are. They are not racing’s allies; they are only interested in their own welfare and that of their shareholders. This is understandable – they are commercial companies after all. For too long they have passed a half-empty vessel to the BHA which has been described as being full. It is not and never has been. Bookmakers do not have a right to dictate how to run racing.

Up to now, their veiled threats have succeeded. They have managed to write their own prescriptions to the startled and fearful patient that the BHA has allowed itself to become. Bookmakers decree the times of races, the type of races shown on television, they scribble over the fixture list, crossing out here, adding there, banging the table and reminding the BHA that turnover equals levy, which in turn means more prize-money. Turnover is a factor, but the most important factor of all is profit. Pay attention BHA: bookmakers are taxed on profit, from which comes the drip feed that is the levy.

Profit comes from punters, without masking the diagnosis that means punters have to bet and lose. Desperate to prop up a business that is dependent on siphoning cash from punters, bookmakers wish to make winning as hard as possible. They rely on inclement and inconsistent weather and on a top-heavy fixture list of such volume that it can bemuse and bewilder those that try wading through its sheer intensity.

I have stated before that there is too much racing. This is not a new or unique argument. To place it in perspective, let us accept there are two opposite sides to the current discussion that blights racing. There is the bloated fat-cat bookmaker view, and there is the equally selfish and one-sided opinion held by professionals such as myself.

Bollocks to both of us!

How about someone standing up for the ordinary punters and those working within racing – those actually propping up the system. They may not agree with my contention that there is too much racing. If they do not, then fine, my argument should carry no more weight than those of the bookmakers who only contribute to racing’s finances out of the profit they derive.

On the face of it, claiming there is too much racing sounds spurious – a bit like a film fan stating Hollywood makes too many films. Well, not quite. Those wishing to be successful at betting need to be conversant with form lines, so subliminally it is essential to relate the form of horse A with horse B and C and so on. The prospect of wading through six mediocre racecards on a day like today, watching races from 2.10 to 8.35, might seem like a pleasant way of making a living. Add on all the preliminary work involved, the constant droning from racing presenters desperate to whip up enthusiasm, and you have another day that on your deathbed you could look back on and wish you had spent differently. I am not expecting sympathy here, just stating a fact. If I am jaded with this run-of-the-mill diet, imagine how the person that has a choice feels. The problem with the amount of racing we have at present is that it means those taking the business seriously, or even semi-seriously, find themselves overwhelmed and unenthusiastic when picking up the paper each day. Present us with a choice and we will spend our time doing something else, removing a situation that exists to accommodate bookmakers wishing to walk away from the carcass they have left. If you create the beast, it is your responsibility to look after and feed it, not to expect someone else to do that for you.

Bookmakers have bled the industry dry and, currently dissatisfied, are not prepared to pay their dues. So be it. Most of them refuse to lay proper punters a bet anyway. Let them sidle off to Gibraltar, Delhi – can recommend the Connaught Centre for shopping – or to Mumbai, where you get a great curry at the Taj Hotel.

The BHA is culpable here for failing to see through the smarmy bookmaker spiel; however, it is not too late. The idea of two-tiered racing – where lesser meetings are staged outside normal hours and banded together – remains a possibility. Now we have this glut of racehorses it is only fair that, for the sake of the animals and their owners, there is a chance for them to race.

As for the bookmakers’ argument that all of this is government’s responsibility, well they would say that wouldn’t they. They would relish negotiations with a third party. Government, any government, is someone else for them to push around and manipulate. They can tie MPs up in knots once they start bombarding our members in Westminster with misunderstood facts.

It is time for racing to put its house in order. At the risk of repeating myself: sort out racecourse entry fees, increase the standard of catering, kick out the stalls that charge a fiver for flakes of pork between a piece of cardboard masquerading as a bread roll, and get rid of those stupid clowns walking round on stilts.

Develop the excellent series of concerts that we have in the summer. Sort out Great Leighs – punters are happy to bet on all-weather tracks where they know the state of the ground and the effect of the draw. Increase prize-money on offer at what could be our five artificial surfaces. Make more use of these courses that are not as expensive to maintain as turf tracks, most of which, unless they are dual-coded, are under-used and often a mess, especially as we do seem to be in the throes of climate change whether Terry Wogan, verbalising from his ivory tower in Bray, accepts it or not.

Let’s do away with all the hangers-on – yes, including people such as me if necessary – so that only those contributing to the sport derive the benefits. Those with a turnover on Betfair exceeding a certain trading figure should pay a small levy, particularly if they are adopting the role of layer.

Come on, it is not that difficult. We do not need to recruit an Einstein.

Like the government of the day, racing has been living beyond its means. Now is the time to check the chequebook. Courses will have to go; there will have to be a scaling-down of the fixture list.

In today’s Racing Post, David Ashforth has promoted many good ideas (some bad ones in my view) but has talked sense and, more importantly, presented an impartial argument. I am paraphrasing my ideas, many of which I have already stated in earlier articles. David has gone into this subject in detail, although, employed as he is by a publication dependent on advertising, it would be politically incorrect for him to lambast bookmakers in the way I have.

This is not a newspaper and space permits me from offering a diatribe. Nevertheless, David and I are singing from the same sheet.

If the bookmakers don’t like it, they could try living in the real world. Let’s see how Mr Topping of Hills feels when his gas boiler breaks down now.

If bookmakers consider the real world is in Gibraltar, to quote Arnold Schwarzenegger: Hasta la vista Baby – only this time, don’t come back!

AND ANOTHER THING…

ANOTHER MONTH GONE; it seems a long time between drinks. There was a big bet on Goldikova in the Falmouth Stakes that took at least three years off my life. She did everything in the preliminaries you do not want to see a filly do. She swished her tail, broke out in sweat and was reluctant to enter the stalls. On went the hangman’s hood. I could feel a prickle at the back of my neck – if she was sweating, that made two of us.

I held firm. I had placed the bet. I hear too many stories of waverers, advancing then retreating like indecisive generals before battle. Hold on; hold out, the money is down.

Goldikova consents to start, but by halfway is sending out danger signals – another wayward flash of the tail – the ears going flat back. All the form books from both sides of the Channel made no provision for what was likely in the last half of the race. It looks bad. I presume the Betfair price drifts like a cork on a raging sea but I do not look. Hold on; hold out, she is the best filly in the race by some way. Even allowing for any recalcitrance, even allowing for an off day, she wins!

She hits the front, looks like drawing away but they come at her. There is Heaven Sent, Spacious and Rainbow View and they look serious whilst Goldikova is on a jolly – a day out. She wanders from a true line giving them a second chance. Oliver Peslier is inspired. He holds her together. He picks her up from the floor and reminds her it is a working day, but he does not bully her and she lasts. Goldikova has stopped sweating; I am starting. I backed her big – too big. I am too old for this kind of thing.

That was early in July. There followed the inevitable put and take – win a bit, lose a bit more. Take the 20/1 about the 12/1 shot that runs like a 7/1 chance but, as you would expect from a horse that is 7/1 against, fails anyway. It runs well but loses and they don’t give refunds for good efforts.

Then at Goodwood, after a couple of reversals and a short-priced winner, comes the bet of the meeting. Like Goldikova it is not a big price. The message is strong. Time to knock off the 5/2 and the 9/4 – hold on; hold out, Frankie rides – Schiaparelli wins the Goodwood Cup.

The horse looks tuned to the minute just as the message said. The race is over two miles, long enough for the heart to miss a beat or two or hammer its way from the rib cage. There is none of that. Schiaparelli lobs on the heels of the leaders. Frankie exudes confidence. It is as if he has read tomorrow’s paper and knows the result. He commits a long from home on an unproven stayer, but so well is he travelling, he lets Schiaparelli make the decisions. The pair pull clear. Out of the corner of my eye, I see a horse that used to carry the green and red colours of the Aga Khan begin to eat up ground. Mourilyan – you remember the horse we had it off with at Dubai eighteen months ago – is gaining. He closes the lead down but it makes no difference. Schiaparelli stretches his chestnut neck when Frankie changes his hands and it is over. No danger really – two big bets – two wins in the space of six weeks.

Clever eh? If you like! But the success of a season is dictated by the big win at an equally big price. Now had Mirrored won on the same day as Schiaparelli that would have made a big difference. I am not complaining you understand. I held the line, I did what I had to do – I put my money where my mouth was. I won a battle but the war rages on. After a few skirmishes, there is no sign of the tide turning one way or the other.

So it is Tuesday – August 4th and I get a call early in the morning. It is the Tinman. He has a job for me if I care to take it. It is 8.30am and I am in a dressing gown of all things. I never wear a dressing gown in the morning, but I am slopping about in one, drinking tea and waiting for my computer to fire up. I know there are no bets but I am obliged to look if only because I have to put something on Bush Telegraph.

The Tinman wants me to meet him at his place at Newbury. I haven’t even shaved and I can’t leave the house in such a state just in case I bump into Gwyneth Paltrow or Jennifer Aniston.

The Tinman wants me to drive to his place where he will give me a package I am to take to Oxford. I am to leave my car at his place and take the train. A man will meet me round the corner from the station at Oxford and drive me to Macdonalds – a place where not only hamburgers are consumed.

Time is tight. Things go surprisingly well in the bathroom, presumably aided by the knowledge of the difficulties that may lie ahead outside the safety of my bungalow.

I am on the street by ten. I know the drill. I have my small hand luggage with gloves, address book, wallet, and mobile phone. I drive to Newbury in a light drizzle. The worst of the traffic has subsided. I make it in twenty minutes.

The Tinman is not at his place. The lights are out and the door locked. I wait in the car; confident he will show then begin to wonder if he has been picked up. He is late but he turns the corner and is at my car window. He has it – he has it all.

He gives me my instructions. They are the usual: short and to the point. I have done this before when needs must and that is the case now. He gives me the package, all nicely sealed up. I had thought he would give me a lift to the station but too many people are about so it is risky for us to be together. I have to walk to the station in what is left of the rain. I am only wearing a linen jacket (trousers and a T-shirt of course but you get the drift – I am damp outside and inside – this is a sweaty business after all).

I am lucky with the trains. I hop on the one bound for Paddington. I listen to a young guy in the seat across from me. He wears jeans, sweats and trainers and is on the mobile, talking to the girlfriend he is about to meet at Stevenage. He talks her through the itinerary of his journey and tells her he has the CDs and promises they will be snuggling together in the warmth of her bed by early evening. It has been a long time for them – all of a week. Sure, he loves her.
The couple are still talking and exchanging promises of undying love as the train screeches to a halt. As for me, I change at Reading, leaving the lovebirds to their longed-for liaison.

Reading is kind. On platform 8, there is the diesel tick of the train waiting to haul its way to Oxford. I take a seat, running through the instructions in my mind. This time there is the inane laugh of a boy and girl with backpacks. The boy laughs loudly while the girl whispers in his ear before Akon starts up – a tinny sharp sound in a pair of cheap headphones that does him no justice.
I move seats. The train picks up speed then stops at a country station. It does this several times. Even Didcot looks countrified. I check my bag for the umpteenth time, keeping it close by my side, feeling the bulge of the packet within.

We reach the stop before Oxford and I send a text message to the man waiting for my arrival. I tell him I will be with him in five minutes and that I am wearing black trousers, a black T-shirt and black linen jacket – the man in black in fact. I also tell him I have a headache as if that may ease the situation.
Maybe he lacks a sense of humour; maybe he doesn’t care. Maybe, and more importantly, he sees it as being advantageous. He texts back, Ok. I wonder if he texts with his thumbs.

The train rolls into Oxford. Again, it doesn’t look like a city station, more like a place that farmers use after market. There is nothing remotely agricultural in sight. My instructions are to cross the bridge over the railway lines and exit on the city-centre side. I turn right under the bridge in the street but have already seen the car. The shape within is dark – dark as the deed that is about to be done maybe.

I raise an arm and he sees me. He starts the motor and I slide in next to him. At least he is a reasonable size; he doesn’t look as if he works out much as muscles fail to bunch beneath his arms as he swings the steering wheel. But he knows what he is doing. He cuts through the traffic real easy and we are in the MacDonald car park in no time.

We don’t say much. I am thinking fast. I have five, maybe six minutes to do the business. After that it is not possible to rectify any mistakes. I look at the merchandise, seeing if there is a fault. I cannot see any but that doesn’t always mean they do not exist. It could be I have failed to spot them. Time is a jet plane. It always is. That is how this business works. It is in everyone’s interest to be speedy. Hold on; hold out, the money is down.

I try a sample but you only get a few minutes. You would spend longer deliberating over a shirt in Debenhams.

I check the body, now it is time for the mechanics. The car drives nice. He counts the money and within seven minutes, I am behind the wheel of a strange car – a top of the range Peugeot – and on my own. I cannot find the electric window switch or the air-con although the man demonstrated that both worked.

It is hot. Goldikova sweat runs down my neck and forehead. I am reluctant to try any old switch in case the boot flies open. Somehow, I find the right one for the windows, letting a spray of fine drizzle in. Then I fiddle my way to the air-con and get that started so can close the window.

The car is in fifth and taking out the lorries like they are standing still. We hurtle part way down the A34 until I get her under control.

The Tinman likes the car. It is better than he expected. It cost a lot of money but I am glad to return to my Mazda. It knows me. It drives itself and has a soft way of taking me round the bends.

I am home in time to discover they have abandoned Chepstow.

AND ANOTHER THING…

IT IS wretched to be gratified with mediocrity when excellence lies before us. These were the words of Isaac Disraeli, father of the British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli.

Appropriate for the situation we find ourselves in on the racing front just now. Somehow, the mundane saturates the fixtures. The racing programme is spread thinly because of the clamour to create a plethora of meetings. On the Friday before the King George and Queen Elizabeth, we have racing from three Group 1 tracks: Ascot, Newmarket and York. The result is mediocrity at courses where we have a right to expect better.

If the BHA feels this is the way to go, so be it, but the signs are they are not taking punters with them. Money bet on racing equals profit for bookmakers and that equates to Levy payments which are down, doubtless because of the credit crunch, but also because the prospect of wading through six meetings a day is too much for punters, be they professional or amateur. Once punters start to lose track of form lines they find themselves in the betting wilderness.

Somebody has to take stock of the situation or else racing is in danger of becoming a victim of scavengers feeding from the kill. I am talking about the journalists, the racing presenters, the tipsters – those like myself that have, in all honesty, a buffer to fall back on because we are in the privileged position of being able to make a living without risk.

I do not wish to repeat myself, but essentially the tail is wagging the dog and that has been the case for too long. We all have our own remedies for kick-starting interest in racing and regenerating its finances. What is certain is that the current course is not the right one to pursue.

Tomorrow we have one of the great mid-summer events in the calendar – the King George and Queen Elizabeth at Ascot. This is one of the best races of the year. Invariably run with no draw bias, it is a fair test of champions and a precursor to the remaining Group 1 races of the season. It is also in some cases the final chapter in the career of the best. It was to be Nashwan’s winning swansong. It cemented the reputations of Dancing Brave, Troy, Grundy, The Minstrel, Swain and Dylan Thomas to name a few. The role of honour is as impressive as that advanced by the Prix de L’Arc de Triomphe.

Golden Sword heads the current Classic generation, but having been comprehensively beaten by Fame And Glory in the Irish Derby looks short of the standard set by the older generation. Conduit and Tartan Bearer will be tough to beat. If one doesn’t win, the other will and it is my contention Ryan Moore has called it correctly by opting for Conduit.

So there is no mediocrity at Ascot tomorrow, at least at 4.25. Quality is spread thinly between the three major meetings however. There is surely no need to have racing from Newmarket and York in support of what should be a standout card at Ascot. Sadly, the supporting card, although designed to complement the big race, fails to meet its brief. The prize-money is there but because there are rich pickings elsewhere, Ascot stands in the shadows when it should blaze in light. There is a £100,000 Group 2 at York along with a £50,000 sprint handicap, which is fair enough for those unable to make the journey south. But do we really need the cards at Newmarket, Salisbury and Lingfield?

Maybe we do. I don’t, but I am not important; that is if I am in the minority. But if I am in the majority, which according to my fellow professionals I am, then perhaps the voices of myself and my contemporaries should be heard.

Possibly some of you would like to lend your weight to the argument. Is there too much racing? Do you feel it is an elitist sport run for the benefit of the few to the detriment of the many?

Let us know what you think. Your voice matters. Without it, the authorities can continue to batter their way through the route they have taken for the last five or six years at the behest of bookmakers, forever claiming more racing means more betting and therefore more Levy. Bookmakers do not have racing’s interests at heart. They care only for themselves, just as Tesco are not concerned for workers in India or for farmers in Norfolk or Dorset. Such is capitalism – the system we live by. It is our choice, but it is important we see it for what it is.

On a more upbeat note: Conduit and Curtain Call look solid contenders for the two major races of the day, Isaac Disraeli permitting.

AND ANOTHER THING…

THERE IS A STORY THAT GOES THUS: A woman tourist in New York asks a police officer how she gets to Carnegie Hall. ‘Lady, you gotta’ practice,’ was the succinct and wisecrack reply.

I guess it was the sort of thing smart-ass New York cops used to say in 1952 when they twirled their batons, wore their pistols low, Gene Kelly sang in the rain, and the city was considerably less safe than it is now.

I know what you’re thinking: What has this got to do with horseracing? The killer words in the police officer story – those that make it work and amusing – are that the woman asks how she gets to Carnegie Hall. She doesn’t ask directions, it is the word ‘gets’ that turns the tale into what it is.

In my case, the word that applies to one of my pieces is practice. You see when it was first mooted that Karl Burke was entangled in the BHA inquiry into corruption, I was quick to point out that he seemed an unlikely suspect. I leapt to his defence quicker than a Court of Human Rights lawyer seeing a river referred to as a dyke.

If you are going to shoot your mouth off in a column, you need to be right. I had two chances and as things stand, it looks as if I played red when I should have played black. Karl Burke was disqualified for twelve months today after a BHA inquiry into race-fixing. The BHA postponed the start of Burke’s sentence until the day after his appeal date – 28th July – and this was where it seemed the ice was cracking beneath them. Such an apparently benevolent approach was apparently adopted to ‘prevent irreparable damage to Burke should he appeal’.

This sort of logic was enough to make any mad axe-man sharpen his instrument – The Needle and the Damage Done to quote Neil Young.

The diatribe went on to state that the Appeal Board had the power to decide whether to extend such a period should Burke appeal. Next came some jargon about how this action should not be construed as encouragement by the Panel in favour of any appeal Burke might choose to make.

The allegations against Karl Burke are – without hiding behind rules and their numbers – that:

(1) He supplied inside information to Miles Rodgers about six of his runners that Rodgers subsequently laid on Betfair.

(2) Burke associated with a disqualified person in Miles Rodgers, who is now warned off for life.

(3) Burke misled the BHA in the course of their investigation.

Without being in possession of the facts, I made the diagnosis that Burke was an affable trainer caught in no man’s land, attempting to expand a reasonably successful operation, and as such was an innocent victim consorting with characters he may privately wish to avoid.

On July 2nd, Burke’s position changed. He made substantial admissions to the BHA, hoping that such plea-bargaining might lessen his punishment. He admitted supplying information to Rodgers in exchange for the pieces of silver associated with transactions of this type. There were one or two mitigating circumstances regarding land and other peripheral issues, but the damning admission here is the fact that money changed hands. Once money is accepted, the point of no return is reached. Karl Burke can now be found at that point. Such a situation should serve as a warning to us all.

The BHA still has charges of its own making to answer. Unlike the miscreants it has pursued it is not guilty of any crime other than mutilating the English Language on a regular basis, issuing regular incomprehensible statements unworthy of an elementary mock GCSE paper.

The week has started badly.

Racing is currently trundling from one inauspicious venue to another. There is the added spectre of ground change making predictions harder than they should be for the time of year. Most punters are currently shying away from betting. Bad for racing, bad for the Levy – bad for business at a time when the money lemon is already running dry of juice.

On the equine front, Utmost Respect, winner of a quarter of a million pounds, died in surgery on Sunday after a routine operation to remove gravel from his foot. His death left his trainer Richard Fahey distraught. If there is any consolation in the demise of Utmost Respect it is that his death was not a direct result of racing but officially caused by peritonitis.

The Cheka is reportedly stiff following his promising return at Newbury last week after eleven months on the sidelines. Once again, the bounce factor appears to have wobbled into view.

On a more positive note, Ghanaati apparently worked well at Newbury racecourse today in preparation for one of the major mid-summer targets open to connections.

This weekend Ascot stages the King George VI & Queen Elizabeth II Stakes. As an event, it is one of the jewels in Flat racing’s crown. The roll of honour is impressive but recent years have seen the quality of the race decline for no apparent reason. Its strength is often dependent on a potent three-year-old challenge which is sadly lacking this year. It presents the Derby winner with the chance to cement his excellence against his elders but there will be no Sea The Stars this year for obvious reasons. Conduit is a worthy favourite and looks overpriced at 7/4. This is his time of year and this looks like a race with his name embossed on its illustrious list.

As an event the King George remains one of the best in Europe. It will return to its rightful position just as the sport will continue. Currently it is going through a storm that’s all.

To quote Gene Kelly: Dum de dum dum dum dum dum de dum dum!

AND ANOTHER THING

THE SOUND OF A JAZZ BAND on a racecourse has now joined the list of items I dislike most. That means it is on a par with ‘Baby On Board’ signs in cars and the buggies that go with them. Old bangers or Chelsea Tractors parked next to my sports car in a multi storey. People that say Byeee and Thankk You on the phone as if they have a speech impediment; people that say kids instead of children; people that cannot say hospital without overemphasising the ‘P’; people that say aitch instead of ‘H’ – people in general really. To make it simple, right now it is the damn human race including myself.

That is just for starters, I could go on but won’t. Maybe I should have a word with Rick Wakeman and see if there is a spot coming up on Grumpy Old Men.
But a jazz band at Newbury. Why? Whose idea is it to promote racing in such a way? You want to see horses race across a strip of grass you go to a racecourse. You want to see jazz you go to Ronnie Scott’s or New Orleans. I fail to see the correlation. I am sure the band that Newbury hired is very good. But with the rain slanting down like a shower of Saxon arrows, wet shoes and a raincoat that has seen better days, Louis Armstrong – God rest his soul – would have had his work cut out.

Flat racing in the rain is like watching a movie with subtitles. You wonder what the hell you are doing at the track just as the person in the cinema, if he is honest, is desperately trying to decipher a plot he has to half-read and half-view, however arty the film may be.

I did not have to wrestle with the maiden to take 6/5 about the obvious winner in Emerald Commander. It was the only bet I struck at the track. Although I had travelled a trivial seven miles, it seemed nonsensical to venture out at all in order to punt a horse I could just as easily have backed from the comfort of home.

It struck me that if you are about to travel on the day the world is destined to end a racecourse should not be your destination. When I left to make the short run, more to keep the car ticking over than anything, the weather seemed reasonable. Four miles down the road and the sky was the colour of a witch’s hat. Worse, it was purple, swollen with enough rain to drown whole segments of Berkshire. I continued, sloshing through that puddle that always forms by the Swan roundabout. Having splashed through it, I felt obliged to splash out of it. I should have detoured to Tesco, bought a bottle of decent wine and something to put in the oven, and then turned round.

This was Hennessy Gold Cup weather. There were no hurdles or fences on the racecourse. The ground that I told everyone who asked would be on the soft side of good was already soft before the first race. I began to sympathise with the weathermen, realising if I failed to get it right by leaning out of the window within hailing distance of the track their chance was negligible.

The lederhosen men started to tune up then blast into their repertoire. Of course, they did not wear lederhosen or eat bratwurst but they might as well have. That was how out of place they were. No one slapped a thigh unless it was to brush the dripping rain off the hem of a raincoat, although I saw a smartly dressed woman slapping a man’s hand away from her shapely thigh in the members’ restaurant, but that is another matter.

I began to wonder if listening to a jazz band in the rain and waiting to back an even-money shot in a maiden was an appropriate way to watch the world check out. Newbury is not exactly one of life’s fleshpots and it occurred there was not much else to do as the rain that threatened to wash us away continued to spear our faces.

What do you do as a darkening sky that threatens to draw a deathly cloak over our planet?

I backed Emerald Commander. So did anyone else that could be bothered to leave the comparative comfort of the grandstand or fish around in damp pockets for a Nokia.

As we all know Emerald Commander won. Perhaps we were in for a reprieve. The growling clouds parted for a few moments after that and there was the vaguest glimpse of blue. Ryan Moore was in blue silks speckled with mud as he came back in, still squinting against the machine gun fire that was the rain.

Going to Newbury races was madness. Nothing against the racecourse but why was I spending Armageddon backing a horse that was racing in a deluge, winning money that I could not possibly spend?

Somehow the afternoon survived. They took Showcasing out of the next. The band played on like the four-piece on the Titanic and horses continued to slosh from point A to point B.

It was all somewhat pointless in its own way. Word reached us that the M25, the M1 and the M4 were virtually gridlocked. In this little handkerchief of the globe, news of such magnitude is largely irrelevant but it gave us something to mull over.

Someone told me Bobby Charles would win the opener at Newmarket and that was followed by a message that Invincible Isle was fancied in the Turf TV Handicap later on the card. I already thought she would win as I did not fancy the apparent dangers, Shabib or The Scorching Wind. Whilst others were fornicating their final hours away or making their peace with whichever god they suddenly decided was their best bet, I decided to go out in a blaze of glory and risk half of my winnings on Invincible Isle. That was silly but the day had started in that mode and ended in the same way.

I watched Invincible Isle cruise to the front a furlong out only to be swept aside by my no-hoper Shabib in the last furlong.

I had left the racecourse by then with a Scott Joplin number still ringing in my ears, or was it the rain? Either way it was a crazy way to spend what could have been my last few hours on this planet.

AND ANOTHER THING

THEY SAY A WEEK IS A LONG TIME IN POLITICS. Actually, it is a long time in any sphere. I have had an enforced break since Saturday; now, on Thursday evening, having been divorced from racing, I feel as if I am starting all over again.

I left after one of the horses I was convinced was booked for a big handicap this year when conditions turned in his favour won at Ascot. The thing was that five furlongs on good ground was not ideal for Sonny Red. That was the formula I was looking at on Saturday morning, but rain at Ascot combined with the skill of a jockey that knew Sonny Red well in Richard Hughes, meant he duly won his handicap over his (and everybody else’s) minimum trip. The other problem for me was this handicap was not the one I had in mind. I suspect it was not the one Dandy Nicholls had in mind either. That is incidental; the damage is done. Now Sonny Red will be racing from a higher mark. It is arguable he remains well handicapped, but not as well as before. The milk is spilt, the boat missed; making it difficult to become excited about something like the Stewards’ Cup, for which I presume he will be one of the market leaders, particularly if there is some juice in the ground.

I do not know if Sariska was impressive in the Irish Oaks. Was she? The ground was in her favour and it was against Midday.

There was Group racing at Deauville – the show rolled on without me. That is what happens. Racing is a juggernaut that stops for no one. Take your foot off the pedal for a few days and you find yourself travelling on a different road.

I gather the elements played havoc. Reading today’s Racing Post the Levy payments from bookmakers is likely to plummet next year. I have said it before and reiterate – punters are not fools. Right now, they are wary. They know how a sudden change in the weather can sabotage their betting. At Ayr, apparently, there was the sight of horses slipping and sliding on the greasy home turn, resulting in a potential disaster.

Word reached me that the Cecil camp thought they had a certainty at Yarmouth on Tuesday, but a deluge some fifteen minutes before racing meant the ground changed. At least that was their excuse for a dismal run.

I am writing this under a swollen purple sky that throbs with rain beyond the window of my office.

Come Racing – Have a Bet – It’s all good fun. Right!

Trouble is it is fun at a price. I suppose most fun comes at a price. I cannot say I remember. However, fun is the operative word here. Backing horses that fail to give you a run is not fun. Racing competes with activities guaranteeing good times. Book for a concert there are no surprises. Coldplay, Snow Patrol and Bruce Springsteen deliver what they promise. They don’t run out, slip up or have off days. The difference is such groups consist of humans that understand what is at stake. Horses cannot comprehend they may be one run away from a plate in Paris. Frankly, most of them don’t give a bugger how they run.

Horseracing is haphazard. Right now, I am tired of haphazard. There is enough of that in life without paying for the privilege.

I guess it shows that I knotted a set of sheets together and shinned down the wall of the prison. They soon caught me. They bundled me in the back of the Black Maria and slammed the doors. They drove me back to where I belong and locked me in my cell. That is where I am now.

For the present, I am looking at racecards written in Mandarin. I am listening to racing presenters full of enthusiasm bolstered by a fancy wage telling me what to take from mundane races for next time. But I am not sure there is anything to take from such events except to wonder why I am watching them in the first place.

Sorry, it would appear I am going through a cynical phase. It is nothing another Goldikova will not cure.

AND ANOTHER THING

Is taking a few days off but hopefully some inspiration will be forthcoming after my return on 16th July.

 

AND ANOTHER THING

ON SATURDAY, the bright young thing that serves in the paper shop told me to have a nice day. She kind of sang the message at me as young people tend to do nowadays. For a moment it annoyed me in the same way that people suddenly chirping, ‘Byeeee,’ do on the phone. It is as if they have no other way of ending a conversation other than with some falsity that then renders the preceding exchange null and void. It suddenly downgrades what should have been an honest interlude into some practiced routine.

She asked me if I wanted the Harry Potter DVD that accompanied the Daily Mail. I scowled. If it had been Rod Steiger in The Pawnbroker or Humphrey Bogart in Casablanca, but not Harry bleedin’ Potter with his flying Ford Anglia. I used to have one of those cars years ago and I couldn’t get it to start let alone fly.

Have a nice day. Why should I? Why can’t I have the sort of day I usually have: mediocre at best, or, even better, a bad one? Yes, we all know how to cope with a bad day and it gives us an excuse to drink too much at the end of it.

What constitutes a nice day anyway? Winning the Lottery – not applicable in my case as I don’t take part. Being propositioned by some woman that looks as if she has just stepped from a film set? I am more likely to win the Totescoop thingy, which I can’t be bothered to fill out let alone attempt to win! Backing four winners out of five in a super yankee (do not want to appear greedy). Not even possible as I am not having a yankee.
Then I gave her parting greeting some thought, concluding that wishing someone a nice day is about the best thing that can be bestowed.
Having a nice day is about spending it with people you wish to spend it with, doing things you wish to do and not regretting its passing. Having a nice day is about climbing off the conveyer belt that is the drudgery of routine and work, about wiping the blackened soot from the brow and feeling fresh and clean and able to utilise the most precious of all gifts that we have – time.

Now I am sounding like a bible-basher. But there is some truth there. Life is short, it is not a drill to quote Fleetwood Mac, it flashes past quickly and there is no second chance. It is the one bet we strike that cannot be changed. We become what we make ourselves and have to live with the consequences.

Those of us not strapped into body armour or pecking in the dirt for a scrap of nourishment have no excuse not to have a nice day. Yet ungrateful bastards that we are we begrudge someone actually wishing such an outcome upon us.

We complain about the weather, Jamie Spencer, the fact Main Aim’s impetus was interrupted in the July Cup; but does any of that really matter?

I think her name is Helen. I guess she is sixteen going on seventeen but that she does not know the song from The Sound of Music. She is button-bright and needle-sharp. She wears a lot of black and is permanently chirpy. She is small enough to fit into my pocket. I think it might be a good idea if in the absence of having her in person I take her words, wrap them in a metaphorical handkerchief and put THEM in my pocket. That way I might find myself better equipped to deflect the trivia and the nonsense that prevents us all from having a nice day.

And Another Thing…

Passengers

July 09

THERE IS AN OLD ADAGE THAT COUNTRIES receive the television they deserve. I suppose you can extend such a statement to just about everything.

Currently, some are bemoaning the outpouring of grief shed over Michael Jackson. Those that compare his death with other tragic events miss the point. We do not know the people in Camberwell or the soldiers in Afghanistan. We feel pangs of sorrow of course but it is a detached kind of mourning. The likes of Michael Jackson and Princess Diana have been in our living rooms and, here is the point that often gets missed, to an extent we played a part in their creation. We as consumers clamoured to be served by the brand we helped to devise; our needs altered the complexion and the character of the individual that put our requirements before their own.

Therefore, without perhaps analysing the situation, when their lives end prematurely or badly we adopt part of the guilt. As consumers, we decide what we want and what we do not. We wanted Michael Jackson and Princess Diana on our terms. They sacrificed part of their personalities to oblige. So to those proclaiming the Michael Jackson memorial service as tacky or over the top, perhaps they should understand that those taking part were merely paying their respects and possibly expressing their regret in any unwitting part they played in the unfortunate demise of a music legend.

I realise this is a weighty beginning to a column that is supposed to be the equivalent of a foaming cup of espresso. Philosophy akin to Friedrich Nietzsche is an unlikely ingredient for such a piece of froth after all.

We live in a world we appear to have mastered, at least for the moment. In the affluent consumer and capitalist-driven West, the dollar and pound rule. We end up getting what we deserve. We want to live in Neverland, we get Michael Jackson; we want to live in never-never land, we get Gordon Brown. We want a princess to captivate the world and out-sparkle the true blue-bloods of the Royal Family we get Diana.

We want to see ordinary people made into stars overnight and share in their emotion, their pursuit of a dream that will largely last as long as a comet streaking across a night sky, we get X-Factor, Britain’s Got Talent. We want to see so-called celebrities in the raw, stripped down to the bones of reality we get I am A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here.

We want politicians to tell us what we want to hear regardless of cost, we get the current mob running the country. There was a time when politicians did what they thought was right. Now they do what they think is expedient. I do not know one person that swallows the expenses argument currently being trotted out by our members in Westminster. There is a distinction between not breaking the law and doing the right and decent thing. Those that have abused the system are not worthy of the system they purport to uphold.

I do not know one person outside racing that supports blood sports. In our isolation, we and a bunch of jockeys, anxious to hone their riding skills, may feel it is acceptable to tear across the countryside and allow creatures to be ripped to death on the fangs of dogs. Those advocating this ought to consider themselves in a minority group. Whether or not the fox or the deer is a nuisance is irrelevant. The message those that wish to pursue such a pastime send is that they enjoy the thrill of the chase and the kill to such an extent that they will use a convenient fact to further their lust. They are no better than those turning up in Mexico and Madrid to see bulls slaughtered in a bullring. Or those rich big game hunters that will pay to travel to Africa in order to shoot doped lions released in the line of fire, backed up by ‘white hunters’ aiming high powered rifles at the unfortunate beast in case Wilbur Wyoming 111 panics or misses the obvious shot. It is what is known as the bravery of being out of range.

The Conservatives, gaining ground fast in the forthcoming election stakes, have pledged to rescind the law passed by Tony Blair (the last honest prime minister we had) outlawing hunting – a bill that was actually popular with the people.

I am not sure where I am going with this. Maybe I am guilty of cashing in on a platform, however small, that allows me to speak my mind.

Tonight on a lesser stage than those mentioned earlier, Kempton will run a horserace to the accompaniment of Rossini’s William Tell Overture. What Rossini would have made of such a thing is unknown. I suspect if he had a sense of humour that he may have chuckled quietly.

I do not know what racegoers will make of this tonight. Will they be racegoers or mere passengers along for the ride?

On reflection that is all any one of us has become in an age obsessed with the surreal: passengers.

Perhaps it is time some of us questioned the fares we are paying and the direction in which we are heading.

AND ANOTHER THING…

JUNE 2009

IT WAS A TIME OF WHIP AND SPUR: racecourses were slimy, decrepit venues. Aside from the gentry, they were largely filled by libertines, rogues and lowlife. There was a market atmosphere. Bookmakers frequently welched. Liars, cheats and vagabonds bet with stolen money. They drank vile liquor, swore, urinated where they stood, brokered dodgy deals, bartered animals and possessions in order to wager and pursue pleasures of the flesh.
Racehorses were undeveloped, oddly shaped creatures. Their heads were too small for long bodies, making them a cross between horses and greyhounds. They raced low to the ground, jockeys rode long, using vicious whips, digging steely spurs in the flanks of their mounts to make them race faster.

It was the Georgian Era: a time of madness and change – the era responsible for Gainsborough, Samuel Johnson, Jane Austen, Coleridge, Wordsworth and Keats. Coincidentally, vaunted satirist and painter William Hogarth died in the same year that one of the great racehorses of all time was born – in 1764.

Eclipse staggered to his feet on trembling legs wet with birth on April 1st of that year but he was no fool. He was named after a solar eclipse on his birthdate. His sire was Marske and his dam Spilletta so the event in the heavens was auspicious, as without such an occurrence an amalgamation of his parents’ names may have resulted in one of the most influential of all horses being called something like Marsilletta or Spillske. Eclipse was to become the name synonymous with racehorses centuries ahead.

Eclipse made his appearance as a racehorse five years after his birth – at Epsom. A ne’er-do-well by the name of Captain Dennis O’Kelly (his rank being subject to variance) – for our purposes we shall accord him with the rank of Captain – had spotted the immense promise shown on the local gallops by Eclipse and bought a half share. Pumped up by the prospect of taking the Epsom bookmakers to the cleaners, O’Kelly could not resist crowing as he splashed money from one board to another. Asked what he thought the outcome of the race would yield, he blasted the retort: ‘Eclipse first – the rest nowhere”. In certain circles, this phrase is still in use. This was not the buffoonish bravado it might seem today, as at that time if a horse won a race by more than a furlong the opposition was deemed to be nowhere. O’Kelly’s prophecy was proved to be correct as Eclipse came home alone without the crack of the whip or the glint of spur, items never used on him throughout his eighteen races, all of which he won.

Eclipse won nine races in 1769 – including the City Silver Bowl, four different King’s Plates, at Ascot, Canterbury, Lewes and Lichfield. Ironically, while he was gaining in stature, a certain Napoleon Bonaparte was born in Corsica – but more of that later.

Fearless and embattled gambler O’Kelly made a fortune betting on Eclipse. The horse never actually contested the best races, as they were restricted to horses belonging to members of the Jockey Club. But such was the manner of his victories, carrying huge weights and beating his opponents point blank, it was generally assumed he would have beaten any rival put before him.

Even had the Jockey Club relented in their exclusivity, they would never have allowed Captain O’Kelly to rub shoulders with their ranks. O’Kelly was married to Charlotte Hayes who kept a brothel in Southwark. Many of her ladies featured in what was the prostitutes’ handbook, Harris’s List Of Covent Garden Ladies, or Man of Pleasures Kalendar (sic) – containing the most celebrated ladies of pleasure frequenting Covent Garden and other parts of the Metropolis.

Harris dubbed himself the Pimp General of All England – a title later assumed over two hundred years later by David Sullivan, founder of the Daily Sport. The little directory was priced at two shillings and sixpence and sold over a quarter of a million copies, a vast amount – particularly considering the cost of the publication – equivalent to a week’s rent.

Purchasers read reviews of the ladies that waited in dusty darkened boudoirs. There was Miss Love from Tottenham Court Road – a fine hairy piece. Nancy Bucket of Westminster – who could flay with amazing grace – and Madam Dafloz of Soho who allegedly possessed a certain cleanliness in the Netherlands. Clients were warned off Lucy Patterson as she was characterized as being as lewd as goats and monkeys – a vile bitch. Pol Forrester was said to have breath worse than a Welsh bagpipe and readers were advised to swerve the contaminated carcass that was Miss Young.

O’Kelly frequented this world. Eclipse was of bluer and truer blood. When he retired to stud he sired about 344 foals, his influence on the bloodline being responsible for between 80 and 90% of all racehorses in existence today. So those from Wolverhampton to Ascot possess genes that can be traced back to Eclipse. Truly the daddy of the racehorse, Eclipse sired Derby winners and the victors of some of the most important races of the period. But his most famous descendent was not a racehorse at all, but Copenhagen, the charger of one Napoleon Bonaparte, the man born at a time when Eclipse was literally first, whilst the rest were nowhere.

As a racehorse, Eclipse would struggle against the breed he helped spawn and refine today. He was no animal of glass and porcelain. He was forged in bronze and iron.

Now, two hundred and forty years since the day Eclipse stepped forth on a racecourse, the race named in his honour is to be run this Saturday. It promises to be a momentous memorial. The field is suitably strong and one that would make Eclipse proud. Sea The Stars faces a tough task if he is to win, as three-year-olds often falter against the older generation. But great three-year-olds win the Eclipse. And that is what this race is all about – greatness. A fitting memorial for one of the best of all time.

AND ANOTHER THING…

June 2009

SACRE BLEU! The French are at it again! I have nothing against our continental neighbours; in fact, I quite like them – as much as one can like the French. However, what was Sunday all about?

Allow me to explain. In order to fox us Brits, the French have a different system of loading their horses. They adopt the Japanese method and read from right to left. So on a right-handed course such as Longchamp you want to be drawn low. Pay attention at the back it is not that complicated. Low, far rail, high out in the middle of the ocean so to speak. So think Ascot (right-handed), where you want to be high on the round course (heaven knows what you want to be on the straight these days) and reverse it for Longchamp.

On the straight course, where they run the L’Abbaye, they load from left to right, therefore low on the inside rail, high on the outside. Crazy but that’s the way they do it.

This Sunday at Saint-Cloud, which is a left-handed track, they loaded from left to right. Spanish Moon was drawn ten, which I thought would be a good draw next to the rail. Not so my petite amour – non! Spanish Moon was on the outside, as he would have been in this country. Thanks to Ryan Moore it made no difference, but what is going on here?

I thought the idea of the European Union was to promote uniformity. Okay, forget the British: we are a law unto ourselves. We insist on driving on the left, eat burgers and chips, have dinner at six o’clock when those on the continent are decanting a bottle of Chablis or Rioja. In this country, never mind the decanting, just get it open – a screw top is preferable, saves all that mucking about with a cork and an opener. We can demolish a bottle of wine in twenty minutes; it only contains four miserable glasses after all.

Whatever our shortcomings as a nation in comparison to the French – lousy train system, no dress sense, bolting our food, watching rubbish reality shows on television, living in a tiny cramped island that we insist on making even more cramped by importing as many immigrants as we can – we do have a comprehensible system of loading horses in the stalls. That may be one of our few claims to fame – it could even turn out to be our only one in the coming years – but what are the French thinking? Two systems for one track is bad enough, but then to have a completely different one at another venue is barmy. Perhaps someone will correct me here, but I know what I saw with my own eyes on Sunday. Unless I am going crazy (not impossible), they loaded from left to right at Saint-Cloud.

You might conclude it makes no difference, however it does. This is another example –thankfully from another country for a change – of there being a law of exclusivity for the sport of horseracing. Surely knowing the positioning of the draw is important to any would-be bettor. Perhaps everyone that bets in France is conversant with this haphazard way of positioning horses and stalls. I don’t know, and the fact they don’t seem to run as many thirty-runner handicaps as us may mean it matters less. But matter is does, so come on French Galop, how about sorting this out.

AND ANOTHER THING…

Mr Nick Rust of Corals is lamenting the fall in betting turnover. You know what they say about rust never sleeping: take a look at today’s cards Mr Rust and see if you can, in all seriousness, nominate a sensible wager.

You have six meetings in Britain to choose from and one in Ireland. Forget selections – ideas for others to pick up and run with – is there a horse contained within any of the meetings that tempts you personally to confidently risk your own money? If so, let me know what it is.

Take Folkestone: by and large it is the usual rubbish and we have the vagary of the draw to contend with. We assume we want to be drawn low on the straight course but rain may change that. The 4.15 is not a bad event. You could make a case for Halsion Chancer but all his wins have been on the Polytrack. We assume Mabiat will be favourite at probably cramped odds.

Chester – over to you again Mr Rust. You are the one complaining about the turnover: What should I back? Simplification after a 72 day lay-off? Course winner H Harrison at the age of nine? Have I missed something?

Newmarket on Friday night. I wouldn’t mind going for a few beers and to listen to the band. But is there a bet? Avertor in the 9.10 – that will win won’t it? For a stay at home punter, does he really sabotage a Friday night to back a horse in the 9.10 when he could be out with his mates or taking the missus for a meal?

What about Too Tall at Doncaster in the 4.35? Showed promise as a two-year-old but disappointed last time over a mile. Dropped back to seven furlongs. Is tonight the night Mr Rust?

NEWCASTLE: Yippee! it is the Gosforth Cup. Six of them are handicapped to dead-heat. Hitchens looks capable of winning this sort of race but you would think six furlongs would suit better. So what is it to be: Hamish McGonagall, Cheveton, River Falcon, Pvershooz, Indian Trail or Captain Dunne? What price I have not named the winner?

This is why turnover is suffering Mr Rust. Punters are not the idiots you and the rest of the bookmaking fraternity seem to think. If they fancy a gamble they might as well do so in style and stand in a casino, with a beer in hand and one eye on the girl in fishnets. So over to you Mr Rust, you’re the clever man, what should I back today?

AND ANOTHER THING…

TODAY’S RACING NEWS POSES MORE QUESTIONS THAN IT ANSWERS. For a start there is the anticipated demise of Setanta, leaving Racing UK as a stand-alone channel. This means subscription levels revert to £20 per month, which as far as I, and presumably countless others are concerned, means an actual increase of £5 per month for racing coverage. In making this claim I am wiping out the now defunct Sentanta sports package that was essential in order to receive what most of us wanted – actual coverage of horseracing. Therefore, we are £5 a month worse off.

May I remind you that some twenty years ago, those of us betting and trading from home had only one option if we wished to receive live pictures. We had to subscribe to SIS, costing some £500 a month if I remember rightly. Where did the money come from? Blowed if I know, but I paid it. Of course that meant I received complete coverage of all racing. But with the advent of ATR, a Sky package that allows you to view it on a free-to-air basis means complete coverage of all horseracing in Britain, Ireland and major events in France and America are a button’s press away for the cost of about £40 a month –actually less than buying the Racing Post daily. Sign up for the telephone scheme that allows you to make free calls and maybe the deal is not so bad after all. It certainly looks more attractive than that once offered by SIS in a galaxy far, far away. In addition, it seems we will be able view archive footage from RUK, so that those of us hankering to have lives outside the square footage of our offices or that corner beneath the stairs can actually sample the delights of the outside world and catch up on what has occurred when we return. We can even uncork a bottle of wine or pull a ring on a can of Holsten as we do so, safe in knowledge the alcohol will not make any difference to our betting patterns. Maybe it is not such a bad deal after all.

The excellent James Willoughby (needs no endorsement from me) asks what has gone wrong with Godolphin. This is a delicate subject to raise. Godolphin is crucial to British racing so telling it like it is can be tricky. The performance of the boys in blue has been poor for a number of years now. Actually, it has been abysmal if you consider how much money they chuck at their operation. I like Sheikh Mohammed and think his wife, Princess Haya of Jordan, bridges many a gap between the Muslim and non-Muslim world in the most charming fashion possible. I wish Godolphin well. I long to see the royal blue colours return to their rightful place and that is in the winner’s enclosures at the Group 1 courses on a regular basis. It will never happen whilst Godolphin continue to thread the same well-worn path that has led them in the wrong direction over the last seven or eight years. Arab culture dictates that the greatest asset any employee possesses is loyalty. Employers reciprocate that mindset so sackings are rare. One has to conclude such thinking is the serpent in the sand that is biting Godolphin in the jugular.

A change in policy is required. Godolphin has to stop throwing money at their problems. They have to stop purchasing American yearlings at inflated sums unless they wish to race them in the USA. Horses by Street Cry, Seeking The Gold, Danzig etc are great-lookers but invariably unsuited to European conditions, at least at the highest level. And they don’t stay middle-distances. So the chances of them winning the Derby, the King George, the Arc or any of the great mid-summer competitions is slight-to-negligible.

What is required is a total change of policy, partly instigated as I write, but one that should be accelerated. European stallions to rival Coolmore are essential. The purchasing policy of Godolphin is in need of a total overhaul. Buying half-successful two-year-olds like Skanky Biscuit at inflated prices is not about to turn their fortunes round. Whoever was responsible for that decision, when it was clear Skanky Biscuit’s juvenile form did not exceed Group 3 at best, should be answerable. I know it is not the Arab way, but a non-Arab within the Godolphin organisation ought to be able to circumnavigate that. Is there not just the whiff of a group of Godolphin operatives becoming very rich at the expense of the greater cause?

It is easy to snipe from the sidelines. Looking at what Sheikh Mohammed has achieved displays his talents and foresight as being considerable. Dubai is a world showplace rivalling and possibly surpassing Miami Beach. He took control of his racing empire and founded Godolphin from nothing. Look at the success story that was Nad Al Sheba and is to become Meydan. But it is possible that the sheikh’s thirst for global equine domination has meant he has taken on too much. Sometimes concentrating on one or two projects you have a grip on is preferable to diversifying into many that you do not.

On a day peppered by questions, the Racing Post asks: What sort of gambler are you? They suggest there are four types and list them in today’s paper. I am about to simplify this question by answering that there are two: winners and losers. Currently, Tom Segal apart – wasn’t he great in that film where he played the cook? – most of us fall into the latter category. The strange thing is I cannot put my finger on what is wrong. All I do know is that there is no way I could afford the SIS package now and that Godolphin are not alone at present in finding racing an expensive pursuit.

AND ANOTHER THING…

STANDARDS ARE SLIPPING. Royal Ascot opened on Tuesday with a bonanza day of racing and dramatic finishes.

Day two and the crowd was sparse, the weather windy, car park picnics were held in a Carry On Regardless manner as storm clouds grumbled overhead. Then there was a collision between a horse carriage and a police prison van. Quite what a police prison van was doing at Royal Ascot was unclear. Of course, the Australians were on the course so perhaps they had something to do with it.

Then Dandy Nicholls instigated a swearing match by insulting the starter for withdrawing his unruly Bencoolen – one of three that played up before the Royal Hunt Cup. In the aftermath, it was difficult to tell Bencoolen and Dandy Nicholls apart. Both seemed to be on a short fuse. With the field for the Hunt Cup virtually loaded, Docofthebay was the ringleader of the fracas. He decided to exit his stall via the gap at the top, which is not a good idea – sparking off several other horses that seemed to think it was. Roaring Forte certainly liked it as a concept. Bencoolen took it as his cue to behave badly. This put the starter in a difficult position. With the field loaded and racegoers’ binoculars trained on the row of stalls at the mile start, three horses threatened to wreck proceedings. Wisely, the starter got Roaring Forte and Docofthebay out of the way, lost patience with the recalcitrant Bencoolen, and despatched the remaining runners, leaving the three miscreants literally sitting on the dock of the bay.

Trying to organise twenty-eight runners at the start is no easy task. There is a danger that too much time can be spent on horses that play up, at the expense of those that have followed the game plan and are standing still in their stalls. It is the old expression about the squeaky wheel getting all the grease. The starter was right to use his discretion and remove the offending equines as soon as possible in order to get the event underway. Dandy Nicholls has been known to resort to the F-word as an adverb or adjective on many an occasion. Perhaps he just likes adverbs and adjectives. He claimed the starter, Peter Haynes, pushed him in an adverbial manner.

The Americans decided to invade. Last time they came here en masse, they brought nylon stockings and cigarettes, now it was with blinkered two-year-olds that could have been mistaken for the mounts of jousting knights. However, they ran very fast and won two of the juvenile events.

Thursday passed without incident, at least at the time of writing. To the immense relief of the Ballydoyle team who seemed genuinely nervous beforehand, Yeats put on a Gold Cup performance that delighted the crowd.

In the evening they opened Ffos Las. The statue looks very nice and the track came in for a good deal of praise. Non-speakers of Welsh have no idea what Ffos Las means. It is to be hoped Weatherby’s do. I suppose it means Ffos Las, or perhaps someone with a stutter named it. Ffos Las is a timely reminder that there can be fewer less rewarding skills than being a speaker of the Welsh language. Learn Japanese or Spanish and you can get a job as a translator, or in a bar in Tokyo or Madrid. Learn Welsh and all you are likely to achieve is to order a pint in a pub with an unpronounceable name where they also speak English. Hardly worth the trouble really is it boyo?

But well done to all concerned at Ffos Las. Mick Fitzgerald described the new racecourse as the Newbury of Wales. Perhaps they will twin the two places. On second thoughts, as a nearby resident, I hope not. We get many Welsh coaches arriving at Newbury for the races and most of the occupants arrive with a pronounced stagger. Some of them don’t even mange to exit the coach.

We have enough village idiots in and around Berkshire – I have even been known to fill the breach during holiday periods myself!

AND ANOTHER THING…

THERE WAS A TIME WHEN you knew your place when going to Royal Ascot. I certainly knew mine – it was in the Silver Ring. Admittance was ten shillings and for that you got to see the royal procession. When the racing started, horses would flash past you with two furlongs remaining. On the round course, they were just entering the straight. The race would be about to start in earnest as they thundered towards the closing stages and disappeared away from you, almost becoming blobs in the distance. It was anyone’s guess who was in front. You became an expert in horses’ bottoms in those days.

Royal Ascot and I go back a long way. I used to attend a nearby school and invariably managed to bunk off for the week. I should have known no good would come of it. Before going off (or on) the rails, I caused my English master to entertain high hopes. He thought someday I might emulate our mutual literary hero, Ernest Hemingway; unfortunately, Geoffrey Brooke trained the only high hopes I knew. It helped that my English master was a racing man. I told him we should back Remand in the King Edward. Ridden by Joe Mercer, he beat Derby runner-up Connaught who had almost lasted at Epsom until Sir Ivor swooped. Of course, I could not bet but Mr Bazelgette could and did for both of us. We backed Remand at 9/2, Summer Days in the Queen Mary, Twilight Alley in the Gold Cup, who did the unthinkable under Lester Piggott in that he made all in a race over 2m 4f. We backed losers as well. Some of the names have gone, water colours left out in the rain, along with the cherished white racecards with the crown emblem on them that I kept for a quarter of a century.

Those four days in June were the most magical for me. I was like the kid in the classroom during the war, watching the fighter planes scrawling the sky in combat beyond the schoolroom windows.

Names like Pandofell, Sagaro, Trelawney, Lochnager and Waterloo float in the clouds of my mind. Maybe I have mistaken some of them. It was a long time ago… The jockeys included Scobie Breasley, Joe Mercer, Ron Hutchinson, Bill Williamson, Doug Smith and Lester Piggott.

Royal Ascot was a piece of magic then. I was young; the names were enchanting. These days schoolboys will not be star struck by this sort of thing. There is too much in the way of distraction, what with video games Ripping It Up In Paradise, and Nasty Bastards blowing up half of Los Angeles on their laptops.

I cannot see Gladiatorus or Mastercraftsman igniting the imagination in the same way as Sovrango did back in those black-and-white days. They were days when the experience that was Royal Ascot started as soon as you boarded the coach and shared the Green Noon with fellow passengers. That was the Racing Post of its day, published late in tall and wide print and available at midday as the name implied. The coach buzzed with excited optimistic chatter. It could have contained a gaggle of chimpanzees on the way to the races. It returned from a funeral in virtual resigned silence on the way home.

Excitement mounted during that tramp across the Heath. Tipsters were allowed then. There was Two Bob Harry and Jay Lewis and Ras Prince Monolulu, all straight out of the Archie Rice school of vaudeville. They would attracts vast crowds and tell their stories, leading up to the final sell, consisting of a piece of folded paper with the names of two or three tips, all surprisingly accurate but usually including a selection in the last race, allowing their authors to vanish in the event of a reversal.

Some of the tipsters would have top hats or wear jockey silks. They would spread paraphernalia on the ground. There would be a big blown up sepia picture of a Derby winner being led in, and they would point to a speckle-faced kid holding the reins, saying, ‘See, that’s me, leading in Crepello,’ maybe it was Pinza or Hard Ridden. The real face and the make-believe face bore no resemblance. It mattered not. They were worth half a crown just for their entertainment value.

Then there were the doom merchants, hoisting placards proclaiming The End Is Nigh. They extolled the wickedness of gambling and avarice and jealousy. Fanatics wishing we would all see their point of view – turn round and return home to meditate.

I knew more about racehorses than I did Shakespeare. I forgot my Latin, lost the rudiments of French after a year. I was a willing sheep to the abattoir. I left much of my education on that course: four days at the Royal meeting and one at the Heath meeting on the Saturday.

I became the school bookie; I listened to Noblesse win the Oaks on a transistor radio whilst the rest of the class were conjugating verbs. In short, I squandered the best part of my formulative years balancing books, converting fractions into percentages, learning how to settle bets, trying to pick winners.

We all have to have someone else to blame in life. It is never our own fault. I blame Queen Anne, Royal Ascot and Mr Bazelgette. None of them is culpable. I was the victim of beginners’ luck. I made some money when it would have been better had I lost. By the time I had realised what a heady concoction I had drunk, it was too late. Hemingway’s writing touched a generation – his books still sell. Only now, a lifetime later, can I see where I went wrong.

AND ANOTHER THING…

SOMETIMES I FIND MYSELF CHECKING THE DATE. I invariably read the paper early in the morning. At such an hour, with my brain gradually switching into gear, anything is possible. I read items in the Racing Post and for a split second it could be April – April 1st in fact.

Such a report appeared in today’s edition. David Hood of William Hill, a bookmaking firm, is enthusiastically backing the idea of bullet races – those run over a distance of two, three, or, at most, four furlongs. Mr Hood has shown on more than one occasion that his knowledge of horses, as opposed to horseracing, is limited. He is Hill’s director of racing – gobbledegook for one of the men in charge of increasing his firm’s profits. He is a company man; any contribution from him that affects the future of the sport should be approached with that in mind.

The notion that staging races over two furlongs, with participants catapulted out of the stalls and then subjected to frenetic rides from jockeys flailing whips for their duration will not bother Messrs Hood and the conglomerate that is Hills. Packing half a dozen or so of these events into a programme will create another set of results for Hills. Six more spins of the wheel; six more chances for the punter to be wrong on something he is not conversant with.

So-called bullet races will place strain on the equine partakers. Those advocating the staging of such contests should be prepared for the sight of animals hobbling past the winning post, assuming they all make it that far.
The races themselves take place in the blink of an eye – roughly ten seconds a furlong. As a punter, lose track of your selection and you will probably only know where it has finished when the announcer reads out the role call. If the authorities, and they should be the BHA not bookmakers, find it necessary to enhance the racing experience, they could start by making everyday cards more appealing. I have made my thoughts known in previous articles on this subject: two-tier racing, more prize-money, Class 5 and 6 handicaps tacked on the end of an extended card so that racegoers can arrive and leave when it suits.

This latest idea is one of a daft series currently floated as racing desperately tries to attract more spectators as if it is a product liable to improvement by constant tinkering. Horseracing does not need to be run to a backdrop of a brass band playing the William Tell Overture – or the theme from The Lone Ranger – whatever your perspective. Such gimmicks are unnecessary. Racegoers do not need to turn up dressed as vampires, or jockeys ride in the nude. Horseracing is not a product it is a sport. We are not manufacturing razor blades or motor cars here, needing updating to match competitors.
Today we have five meetings in Britain. It is naive to believe they can play to full grandstands. There is not that much wrong with racing unless you don’t happen to be interested in it, in which case why are we bothering to try and sell it on a false ticket?

On the same subject, it would appear that the imminent collapse of Sentanta means RUK will need to undergo an overhaul in order to survive. They are an excellent station that covers racing with a good deal of intelligence and in-depth knowledge. Like ATR, at times they are beleaguered by too much racing, meaning the viewer is whisked from one meeting to another at the speed of light without time to draw breath – let alone work out whether he is at Goodwood or Hamilton. It is another example of quantity exceeding quality. Those of us bombarded with commentaries, banter (however erudite), prices, non-runners, horses running loose, two races in progress on a split screen, find the whole experience exhausting. Sometimes you wish you could turn the TV off just to get some peace. I know of viewers that switch the sound to mute and merely watch the pictures. Saturation coverage is in no-one’s interest and needs addressing, particularly on days when there is a major meeting. How many viewers stayed with RUK last week on Saturday when they could have received uninterrupted coverage of Epsom from the BBC? It is a problem for both channels but one they need to confront.

The words from the anchor man starting the day’s coverage with, ‘We have a busy schedule today,’ is reminiscent of the old sketches from The Two Ronnies who used to begin with the: ‘And in a packed show tonight,’ before launching into a tirade of set pieces and jokes. Do we really want that situation from the two racing channels? Horseracing is not meant to be a joke – to some it is serious. Perhaps it is time to allow the customer the choice so that he is not subjected to watching everything that moves.

RUK face a tough few months and it is conceivable we may lose them in their current form. I for one wish them well.

Of course, both channels face interruptions from advertisements. Some may say ATR face interruptions from their advertisements with occasional horseracing. It should be borne in mind however, that they are free to air. Without a constant barrage from insurance companies et al Channel 415 would be blank or contain a shopping service.

Some of the adverts treat us as fools. Do we have to receive a command to Bet Now and Call Now by Bet 365? Blue Square instructs us to Do It Now. Whatever happened to please and thank you or a little subtle coercion?
Finally the millionth word is about to be introduced into the English Dictionary. Possibly, it will be something to do with computers or modern technology; linked to Facebook or Twitters.

From a racing point of view, it could be a Hoodism. Definition: Something promoted as being in the majority interest; but whose implementation would be of benefit only to those making the proposal.

Sunday June 7th

AND ANOTHER THING…

Epsom V Belmont and Chantilly

Only one winner?

THIS WEEKEND we had the opportunity to exchange styles as three major horseracing events took part.

We had the most English of all occasions in the Epsom Derby, where there was a dress code. I quote: Visitors to the Queen’s Stand are required to wear black or grey Morning Dress with top hat. Alternatively, service dress or full national costume is obligatory for gentlemen. End of quote. Those unable to attend in any form of such proposed dress or not understanding the word obligatory need not apply for tickets. Ladies are to wear formal day dress, or trouser suit, with a hat or a substantial fascinator. Again, those not conversant with a fascinator (no idea myself) need not apply.

In the Grandstand, a less stringent but equally enforced code was expected. Jacket and trousers with a collared shirt were essential. No trainers, sportswear, sleeveless vests or bare tops allowed thank you very much. Smart denim was acceptable but had to be devoid of tears or rips. Best stick to the suit from Next.

Prices for Derby Day: Queen’s Stand – £95 – Grandstand £55.

Transportation from London via the train: Depart from Waterloo or London Victoria. I thank you!

Belmont insisted on attire as opposed to a dress code. Gentlemen were to be elegant (no Old Navy then). Casual jeans, beachwear, tank tops, tee shirts, shorts, sweatshirts, tracksuits were not permitted.

In the Box Seats, suits or sports jackets were required as were ties. Ladies had to wear skirts or slack outfits (it is assumed they mean outfits incorporating slacks here).

In the Grandstand, shirts and shoes were the order with nothing else stipulated; however, I did not see any men dressed in just the two items mentioned.
Fans were allowed to bring coolers into the backyard of the grandstand, also at the Top of the Stretch Picnic area. No alcoholic beverages were to be brought to any part of the track.

Prices for admission were: Clubhouse – $20 – General Grandstand $10.

Transportation from New York to Belmont Park in Long Island via the train from Penn Station, which is right next to Madison Square Garden and virtually opposite Macy’s on Seventh Avenue.

The Prix de Jockey Club was run at Chantilly, a beautiful racecourse with a cream-coloured château as its backdrop on the edge of a forest.

There is no dress code, as being France it is considered unnecessary and vulgar to make such a policy statement. What next – a guide to fine wines? The French do not need instructions on how to dress after all. Hermes is de rigueur but Yves St Lauren an acceptable alternative. Versace and Prada are tolerated, along with Valentino, but essentially one is expected to wear a creation by a French designer.

There is a standard price of admission: 8 Euros.

Chantilly is some thirty miles from Paris. Trains run regularly from the Gare du Nord in Paris.

Epsom is a surprisingly picturesque racecourse surrounded by a lush belt of green, built on a crest of a hill. From the top car parks, your eyes skim across the jagged outline of London, seeing the London Eye and the new arched Wembley Stadium. Of course, being England, the areas of the racecourse are subtly separated. Dress as well as price and your ability to comprehend the words obligatory and fascinator segregate those on the stands. Then there are always various picnic areas, closer to Epsom high street than the racecourse. Slap in the middle are the downs themselves, playing host to a variety of vagabonds, gypsies, hen and stag dos, open-topped buses, shysters and welchers.

The Derby was run under a patchwork sky. There was a deal of decorum, with the crowd only becoming animated during the last quarter of a mile as Sea The Stars began to assert. After the race he made his way to the haloed enclosure reserved for Derby winners – perhaps the most coveted spot on the whole of the racecourse. This was his moment. He transcended dress codes and designer labels as, washed down and applauded, he stood, the one that had come through the ranks to become King of the Downs.

For a small country we are good at staging the big show with glorious understatement although we know how to charge. It is a strange contrast to our lack of propriety elsewhere. At football matches, on the streets on a Friday night, on holiday in Spain and Greece, and when in groups, we as a nation behave badly, particularly when hearing the hiss of a beer can or the pop of a wine cork.

The last leg of the American Triple Crown – a trio of races packed into a six-week period – the Belmont Stakes, was a somewhat different matter. The scooped out bowl of a track is littered with green John Deere tractors, dirty Dodges and sand-splattered Chevrolets trucks. Horses are ponied to start by a group of desperados – Peckinpah’s Wild Bunch scowl as they lead the players to the gates. Horses are loaded to the sounds of the rodeo as the handlers holler. There is broken sunshine. Horses pass the stands, then race yellow buses on the adjacent road; a concrete bunker flashes by. There are more tractors and pick-ups; a band of green trees before they swing back to the grandstand full of mainly New Yorkers, slightly more restrained than racegoers at Keenland and Pimlico where the first two legs of this unique treble were run.

The clouds are burnt off and they run the Belmont in bright sunshine. The wrong Bird wins. Summer Bird finishes off the best in a race where the generous pace results in those in front at the turn running on the spot in the last furlong. Dunkirk and the storybook character that he has become, Mine That Bird, fight it out for second. Mine That Bird has been a credit to himself and all concerned since winning the Kentucky Derby as an unheralded and unrecognised finisher by one commentator. A 50/1 chance that day, he was favourite for the Belmont and let no one down. He has done a lot of running in a short time.

Americans make a lot of noise and give the impression they are unsure how to behave. But there is no undercurrent with them. You would have to be very unlucky to be shot on a city street somewhere, but the chances of it happening here are probably greater. At least in America no one will bad-mouth you in the middle of the day for no reason or pull a knife.

At Chantilly, they started with reasonable weather. Already easy ground became easier with the advent of a downpour just before the Prix Paul de Moussac. The big château suddenly looked speckled with the blackened stain of rain as they made the top turn in the Prix du Jockey Club. They splashed home in the mist and rain, Le Havre beating Fuisse in an all-Gaelic finish. That man, Aidan O’Brien trained the third, Westphalia, whilst the Aga Khan’s Beheshtam ran with great credit on only his third ever run in fourth. Already a winner over a mile-and-half, he looks ready for a step back up in trip and as if he will progress further.

Vodka won a Group 1 in Tokyo, a city where space is limited and it helps to like raw fish.

So it has been quite a feast of racing this weekend. How did we fare? Pretty well all things considered. The spectacles that are Epsom on the first Saturday in June, Royal Ascot later in the month, and that haven in a crook of Sussex that is Goodwood in August, remain quintessentially British. As a country we may be going down the Swanee, charting hostile waters on a rudderless ship steered by a deluded captain – he still doesn’t get it does he? It is not about finishing the job he started, it is about giving way to someone more capable. That aside, the white cliffs may be crumbling into the sea, but we can still stage a pageant like no one else.

AND ANOTHER THING

Three big days…

FORGET THE MUSIC AT KEMPTON, grunting men in grass skirts at Sandown, so begins a big three days for the thoroughbred.

It all kicks off at Epsom on Friday with two Group 1s: The Coronation Cup and the Oaks. They are fascinating events but what sort of edge they offer the punter is debatable. Maybe we can consider opposing the front three in the betting in the Coronation Cup. Youmzain is a habitual loser, Look Here will be tested to her absolute limit and Ask looks more of a stayer than a quickener. With Frozen Fire making little appeal, that leaves us with Duncan, Eastern Anthem and Buccellati. Perm any one from three…

The Oaks is trickier unless you have a strong opinion. With the promised rain that may have provided her with a steadying anchor not having materialised, Sariska is a big filly to be plunging down the hill. Rainbow View is another box of tricks; Midday is solid but could be vulnerable, whereas the message for Phillipina, although hard to justify, cannot be ignored.

For breeders the heavy stuff starts on Saturday. The prize-money for the Derby is only the beginning. The winner has a potential value of ten million pounds; an income that flows long after the winning purse has been spent on a sculptured water feature in the garden, a new swimming pool and the latest Masserati.

For Coolmore, winning the Derby can swing the pendulum of their season. If pressed they would probably prefer a colt by Galileo [Rip Van Winkle] to win rather than one by Montjeu [Fame And Glory]. But then Galileo’s prowess as a sire does not need enhancing. Montjeu’s stock can be temperamental. He is a bit like Hawk Wing but nowhere near so bad. Naturally, buyers are wary, so he could do with a big winner. It’s a funny old game though, because once a stallion acquires a reputation it does tend to stick. Whatever Ballydoyle/ Coolmore would like, as with the rest of us, once those gates clang open at a quarter to four on Saturday, what unfolds is out of their control.

They Run for the Carnations in New York at about eleven o’clock our time. If I can hitch a lift in Michael Tabor’s private jet, I should just about make it, but it will be tight. I am sure Michael remembers me. At Newmarket, I guided him away from the grandstand when Rishi Pershad had sparked off the fire alarm by lighting a cigarette in the press-room. At Epsom, I cleared a path for him to enter the winner’s enclosure after Soldier Of Fortune last year. I congratulated him after Rags to Riches had won the Belmont. He is bound to recall that.

The roll of honour for the last leg of the American Triple Crown is impressive. Actual Triple Crown winners include Citation, Secretariat, Seattle Slew and Affirmed. Others that have won the Belmont before achieving greatness at stud feature Lemon Drop Kid, A P Indy and Man O’ War. This year’s most likely winner is Mine That Bird. He cannot achieve anything at stud except watch as he is a gelding. Having seen the film of him winning the Kentucky Derby, and finishing second at Pimlico, two things spring to mind. The first is that even the most prestigious American racetracks resemble cattle markets. There are sheds everywhere, Buicks and Pontiacs race the horses on nearby roads and there are cars plonked in the middle of the track. The crowd shouts in that high-pitched American way as the horses exit the stalls and they just keep shouting and hollering throughout the race. Nobody wears a tie, some say Chip Woolley packs a piece in his pants and jockeys get very animated if they win. But being America, they have not even pulled up before microphones are thrust under rider’s noses. They tried that with Lester Piggott when he came in on Teenoso and he told them to eff off!

I did say there were two things that sprang to mind. The other is that Mine That Bird is reminiscent of Sir Ivor, only more dramatic. He still has a silly name but gets himself completely detached from the field early on. He was so far back at Churchill Downs that, as a 50/1 shot, it appeared he was merely running to form. Then all of a sudden he starts to motor, faster than the Buicks and Dodges on the adjacent highways. He is like an extra in a movie. You can hear Tarrantino shouting: ‘That’s it, now move the kid on the horse up through the field. Pass one horse after another and tell them to slow it down up front.’ Out of nowhere, splattered with kickback, comes this flying Bird that has been mined in the depths of New Mexico.

Then on Sunday, it is the French Derby from genteel Chantilly. Subdued shouting in Chantilly, plenty of gentlemen in ties, ladies in hats, champagne from, well, Champagne.

Now if we are to have a glut of racing this is the ticket. Forget Catterick, Bath, Musselburgh, Newcastle, Wolverhampton, Hexham and wherever else they are racing from this weekend. This is more like it…

DEATH OF A LEGEND

SOMEHOW, we think it will not happen. It seems that certain members of the human race are on this planet for good. Of course that statement is true for each one of us, never questioning our mortality until suddenly, like a car that is without an engine, something goes wrong.

It can often be too late then; but as human beings, we have some sort of in-built protective chip that prevents us dwelling on our demise. ‘We all got to die – just a question of when,’ was a great line spoken by Paul Newman in the film Hombre. But few of us accept it until we reach the brink. In laconic Newman style, I guess that’s what keeps us putting one foot in front of the other.

Generations from all occupations have their icons, the untouchables, those that cannot wither. Kirk Douglas, Doris Day and Peter Falk will never die. Except they will, but will leave a handprint on Sunset Boulevard and Kodak-shot pictures, just as Edward G, Cary Grant and Clark Gable did before them. So they will live on, only in a different form.

Vincent O’Brien was a slightly-built soft-spoken man that could have been your granddad, or a kindly doctor. He considered his words carefully and let the horses he trained do the talking. Some of them wrote volumes.

The newspapers will itemise everything from Early Mist’s Grand National, through six Epsom Derby wins, to the final cut that was Royal Academy’s Breeders’ Cup triumph in New York. Looked upon as a sprinter, trained by a seventy-three-year-old wisp of a man from Ireland, and ridden by a has-been champion jockey in Lester Piggott, Royal Academy’s victory that day was pure Damon Runyon.

We know the stories; we know the feats that O’Brien and Piggott shared. Those that do not will be enlightened by tomorrow’s reports. I do not see it as my job here to catalogue the deeds and write the words that will be all over the newspapers tomorrow. I have only met Lester Piggott once and have no anecdote to relay about Vincent O’ Brien. Here, like the rest of you, I am a mere bystander.

I know Vincent O’ Brien founded Ballydoyle, scooping it out of a potato field. I know he was the father figure of the new trainers – epitomised by Aidan O’Brien today, who is no relation. He was the quiet man that planned and meticulously thought out how to penetrate a horse’s mind so that it would produce its best. Very few failed to respond, as no pebble was left unturned.

He discovered the Canadian bloodline that was Northern Dancer and from it came one of the great Derby winners in Nijinsky.

Seeing some old footage of Lester Piggott on board Nijinsky, I was astonished how good Piggott really was. He sat motionless on a horse, perched like a Cossack standing on the back of a steed. He let all that power beneath him tick over without so much as an inflection from the saddle. Confidence between horse and rider was supreme even when the stakes were at their highest.

Piggott was always from that mould, but I suspect the influence of Vincent O’Brien had something to do with his faith in the animal beneath him. Some saw that as a quiet arrogance.

There was no arrogance from Vincent O’Brien, or from the man inheriting the vision that is Ballydoyle today.

Vincent O’Brien was a past master at what he did. He did plenty. He changed horseracing in the same way as Muhammad Ali changed boxing.

This is our little world, full of names that mean little or nothing to those outside it. Sometimes our world – the world of racing – swells and puffs out its chest when it realises what some of its members have achieved. That is the case now. Today we are big with pride. We remember Vincent O’ Brien as possibly the best trainer there has ever been of a racehorse. And when we look back, in many cases at film or at frozen, grainy photographs from a faded black-and-white world long gone, it reminds us of what was. What can still be; what in fact is.

He chose Derby week to make his exit. Vincent O’ Brien the man is dead – aged ninety-two. Vincent O’ Brien the trainer leaves a never-to-be-forgotten legacy.

AND ANOTHER THING…

A Rare Racing Holiday ..

I AM TAKING A COUPLE OF DAYS OFF. This makes me feel guilty and consumed with a need to explain. Racing on Tuesday and Wednesday does not look up to much, so I hope I can get away with this and it does not meet with disapproval. Sometimes a break is more important than working on autopilot. A couple of days in the sunshine – I am not leaving the house – hopefully will have a refreshing effect. I feel more will be achieved by pottering in the garden and listening to Steve Wright on Radio Two rather than another shift of our erstwhile friends on the two racing channels.

‘Every body needs a little time away’ was an opening line from a song by Chicago. They went on to say, ‘You are a hard habit to break’. Both sentiments seem appropriate right now. Perhaps age is slowing me down. We are barely a third of the way through the current Flat season and already I am flagging.

I did not watch a race today and intend to take the same course of action tomorrow. If the phone fails to ring with a message of some description, two blank days will be a record. Now all I need is a tune and I can send the song to Chicago. Of course they are not called records anymore. I am not sure what they are called; is it CDs or downloads? Whichever, I am sure you get the connection.

If it is any consolation to those of you blackened by the coalface, I am working after a fashion. I am researching a piece on the Derby. I have written this, cut the grass, washed the car and scanned Ebay. Yes, I know that does not warrant an accolade but these two days will be a welcome break.

Consequently, as I recharge my batteries and try to hatch a plan of attack on the old enemy, I am hoping that after two days of uninformative and ditchwater-dull racing, the meeting at Sandown on Thursday night will present a betting opportunity or two.

Then it is the weekend, then Derby week, then I am having a new bathroom fitted, which means I can cease slopping out (good practice for my next abode some might say) and flush the toilet again. Too much information there I feel.

Before we know where we are Royal Ascot is upon us and then it is all systems go.

I feel better for this confession.

But already I can see I am premature. I may have escaped Tuesday, but Strike the Deal runs on Wednesday at Lingfield and there is the Hilary Needler at Beverley in the evening.

Better make that one day off…

Bush Telegraph will be loaded as usual in the morning.

It’s a hard habit to break alright.

AND ANOTHER THING…

Too Much Racing?

… and a sleeping gamble awakes!

THERE WAS SO MUCH RACING on Saturday I ended up dizzy. Something was happening every few minutes and after a concentrated start on my part, I began to fall apart as the day unfolded.

Racing is considerably bigger than I am and if the racecourse turnstiles are clicking enough times, then good for them. But is it realistic for the two racing channels to try and keep up with so much action? It did not take long on Saturday for Beverley and Catterick to scupper any schedule RUK had hoped to meet. In the blur that was the action, horses at both tracks independently unshipped jockeys, ran loose, delaying starts that meant the two feature meetings – Haydock and Newmarket – were under threat of appearing on a split screen. Even if they managed to squeeze the rest of the program in on time, we were being switched from meeting to meeting with little chance of digesting what was happening.

Years ago, in another time and space, there used to be days when they staged two, perhaps three meetings a day. In those days, with no satellite racing, betting offices were full of punters. The lucky ones would sit on stools; most would stand on a snow carpet of discarded betting slips. Courtesy of Extel, or to give it its proper title the Exchange Telegraph Company, commentaries would crackle from a lopsided box on the wall. Of course, we punters had no idea what was happening and the commentators – reading from ticker-tape care of Wells & Fargo – or relaying a commentary from some bloke on the top steps of a distant grandstand, would try to make the racing sound exciting. Somehow it was. Because you had no idea that your horse could not possibly win from two out, there was always hope. You listened with baited breath for the announcer to give it a mention as a strong finisher. Anything was possible. Even when they crossed the line, the race had taken place in another galaxy as far as you were aware. It was not unheard of for an announced result to be amended with the magic words: ‘Mistake in colours – there is an alteration at Leicester – the result is now…’ Miracles occurred in those dark, smoke-filled betting offices that resembled cattle trucks and were located on the fringes of towns for fear their presence would corrupt everyday folk.

Entering a betting shop in those days was akin to signing up to a club for the underprivileged. We were all the in the same boat. The managers hated their work, the cashiers were always on the lookout for customers with unworn leather soles on their shoes, meaning maybe they could take them out to a Chinese and actually pay the bill rather than scarper out the lavatory window.

Races were run at respectable intervals. There would be a sudden last minute rush as the horses went into the stalls. Punters stormed the counter, waving slips in the air rather like passengers trying to make it onto a crammed train carriage. There were no secrets then. Your yellow under-copy of the betting slip was there for all to see, as was the cash you slapped on the counter. Although different punters had backed different horses, each wished the other well. Even the manager, pale-faced, constrained by company rules and therefore worried there might be an argument at any given moment, seemed to be benevolent in his attitude to customers.

We had time to talk between races and after they had run. Complete strangers would exchange opinions based on the riding of a horse they had never seen in a race on a track they had no knowledge of. But there was always that map in the Sporting Life, so they spoke in informed terms. Piggott left it too late they would agree; Mercer went too soon. They had no idea what either jockey had done. Discussion about a muffled race transmitted from a planet named Pontefract was as pointless as dissection of Portman Park today. But it made no difference. The yellow slip would join the rest of the pile on the floor as the boardman pinned up the sheet containing the runners for the next race.

The whole process was more leisurely, less clinical and certainly, although not in the slightest informative, more exciting. But the thing was we had time: time to talk, to compare our hard luck by showing each other betting-slips containing three winners and one loser. Time to ask the cashier out on a date – invariably declined – with a resigned shake of the head. On one occasion, Measly Veasley asked one of them if they wanted to go racing on a day off, and was then surprised when I likened the offer to asking a cinema usherette to go to the movies. We laughed, we commiserated, we studied the so-called form in the Sporting Life and Chronicle. We were in Dreamland and did not have to travel to Margate to get there.

Now the shops are empty, save for people playing Coin Vegas. You can see where your money is going from an early stage. The horse won’t enter the stalls, is ten lengths adrift from halfway.

It is the sheer volume of televised racing that is such a drain on the senses. We flick through the pages of our racecards, try to figure out which station we need to be on, miss something we wanted to see, see something we don’t, featuring Michael Parkinson offering us a free pen just for enquiring. There is no time to go to the bathroom, make a cup of tea or press the right button on Betfair. It is just a thought guys. If the authorities insist on staging six meetings an afternoon, show just the main three and screen the rest when appropriate. Prioritise so that the major meetings are accorded the space they deserve. Let Steve Mellish, Graham Cunningham, Eddie Freemantle and Tom Ryan talk, all under the steely but impish gaze of Lydia Hislop. Let me fill the kettle and empty my bladder. Give my batteries on the remote a chance. Let me not miss Celtic Sultan, only realising he ran and won at 9/1 ten hours after the achievement.

I see there has been a run on Rip Van Winkle for the Epsom Derby. If he wins I guess his name will look better in the history books than Mine That Bird’s does after winning the Kentucky Derby. Rip Van Winkle is the sort of name journalists like. He writes his own headlines. He was a fictional character invented by Washington Irving. After drinking copious amounts of liquor with some mountain people, Rip van Winkle slept for twenty years, meaning he missed the American War of Independence, which is one way of avoiding the draft.

So for tipsters possibilities are endless: Rip Van Winkle To Put Opposition To Sleep. More simply, and surely most likely in a variety of papers: Rip Van Winkle The Nap. Rip Van Winkle To Sleepwalk To Derby Win. And if he loses: Rip Van Winkle fails to stir. Rip Van Winkle dozes whilst Sea The Stars roars to glory.
Apparently Rip Van Winkle, the horse, has been doing anything but slumbering at Ballydoyle. His work has prompted an in-the-know gamble. Nevertheless, there is a realistic chance he may not win through lack of stamina. By Galileo but out of a Stravinsky mare, the worry for his supporters could be that, if working with middle-distance inmates, he will possess too much speed making the work deceptive. The question is: can that speed be harnessed over a mile-and-a-half? Tellingly, his next two Group 1 engagements are in the St James’s Palace Stakes over a mile at Ascot and the Coral Eclipse at Sandown.

One way or another, the sleeping giant that is Rip Van Winkle may be on the verge of awakening.

 

AND ANOTHER THING…

Have they tried to sex up Racing too much?

IN THE SORT OF DELUSIONAL WORLD inhabited by MPs, bankers, freeloaders and daydreamers, this is how it goes: You are in the Starbucks along Great Portland Street. You have a cappuchino topped with too much cream and you are sitting on a high stool with a small counter to yourself.

You look up and this girl, a prototype of the most attractive, most desirable female you could have concocted on a computer, is looking straight at you and smiling. You return a sort of weak, just-swallowed-a-neat-shot-of-lemon juice mixture of a squint and a gurn her way, and hunch over your foaming cup of coffee. The smile could not have been for you; she must be attempting to interact with someone behind you. Only that is not likely, unless that person is beyond the window as your back is to the wall. You give it a minute or two and shoot a glance upwards, noticing that tantalising wisp of a smile still lingering on her mouth. It is a mouth to die for. She is a woman to die for; the sort to make you gamble items you cannot afford to lose. She is Gwyneth Paltrow, Jennifer Aniston, Meg Ryan and Michelle Pfeiffer rolled into one. She is the sort of woman you watch on the movie screen – not so much with lust – but with a knot of admiration in your stomach. She warms your heart, jerks your tears and rouses a deep unrequited passion. And now she is sliding, like a cat from a rooftop, away from her stool in a rustle of a blouse, a crinkle of stocking, straightening her pencil skirt and heading your way, coffee in hand.
So now you are in Quentin Tarrantino, Woody Allen or Andy Warhol territory. This is not the real world. James Blunt enunciated the real world: you see the perfect woman on a subway, on a bus or train and by the time you figure out what to say the moment has passed. So you sip the froth from your cappuchino and straighten your tie and try to think of something witty to say. You wonder how James Bond, Batman or Spiderman would handle the situation that is about to arise. James Bond would take it in his stride, pull out a stool for the lady, and say, my name is Bond, James Bond. But your name is not James Bond – Williams, Trevor Williams, doesn’t sound the same – and that is Bond’s line anyway. Batman would look preoccupied and ask if she were Catwoman in disguise. Spiderman would just climb up the wall.

No, something better is called for. Quentin Tarrantino would stage a hold-up. Crazies with Magnums [the gun not ice-cream] would burst in and start shouting profanities. Woody Allen would mumble something equating to, as he is a sex-god he is used to women accosted him. But he would make such a statement in a jokey self-depreciative way that only he could get away with. Andy Warhol would offer her a joint.

Maybe it is all a mistake and you will not need to say anything as she is about to buy a granola bar and leave. But no, she is slinking toward to you. There is to be no nutty bar – the target is you.

She sits on the stool by your side and says Hi and you mumble back and then somehow you are talking.

There is more to come. The world has stopped turning, work is on ice, everyone you have ever known has vanished in a mist.

So now the situation moves on. You have bought a ticket to fly and the plane is leaving the airport so you are powerless until you reach your destination.

She takes you to her flat. It is clean and tidy but she is already raking her nails down your back and tearing the buttons from your Diesel shirt. She does things to you and with you that you have not even read about.

She says things that make as much sense as a speaker at a convention for Hogwarts. It doesn’t matter, she is piloting you away from life as you know it. This is more than fifteen minutes worth of fame, it is a lifetime crammed into a moment. You take it because it will never come again and you are not even sure it has come now. The experience is so sensational it must be some sort of illusion. It has to be but it doesn’t matter because it has broken the stagnant humdrum spell that is normal life. This is a one in a lifetime experience, real or imagined, that normally happens to other people. The fact you are unable to differentiate between the two cannot tarnish the encounter.

Incredibly, it continues. You are involved with a woman that you would only normally get close to if you happened to pick up a fashion magazine with her face on its cover.

Night after night, day after day, she tears at your clothes, parades before you in uniforms, doing things to you in the bathroom, the kitchen and the bedroom. She says all the usual things that women say. You know they probably mean nothing but you don’t care. You are the best lover she has ever had – something no one else has ever told you – so on form the statement is dubious. She babbles on as if reciting War And Peace, but you are mature enough to keep a sense of proportion. It is as you imagine life would be with a Thai bride, although she is no moon-faced Asian woman from Bangkok falling in love with you in thirty-six hours in order to secure a UK passport.

Your activities continue unabated. Two, three, four times a day. You are a different man, finding inner-strengths you thought you did not possess.

One night you decide to have a drink with a few male friends in the pub on the corner of Great Portland Street with Devonshire Place. This suggestion goes down badly. She has plans that involve a silk blindfold and a pair of pink handcuffs. You relent.

The next night you attempt to see the same friends in the same venue but this time her plans include a tub of Ben and Jerry’s.

The following night she wants you to put on a cape and mask and you really fancy a London Pride. You try to tell her a little of a good thing goes a long way; less is more, a little of what you fancy does you good, but too much can be overkill. She does not get it. You go out for that pint and soon after your relationship rolls downhill.

Today, we are expected to don the blindfold for Brighton and Newcastle, become the cape-crusader for Newmarket then lock the cuffs onto the bed head for Pontefract and Haydock tonight. It is Friday. Friday night and we are required to watch horseracing if we are taking our jobs seriously.

No disrespect to the presenters on the racing channels, who by-and-large are excellent, but do we want them in the background for seven hours as we channel hop, make notes, strike bets and try to look at tomorrow’s cards before it all starts again after a night’s sleep? Horseracing at present is like a rollercoaster that you get on but cannot get off. It is the mother-in-law that has moved in for a weekend but stays for nine months. It blathers on endlessly seven days a week. Even Sundays promising to offer a day off contain trials from France or Ireland – messages for maidens at Carlisle. Sometimes working in racing is like serving a prison sentence. It is the clutter that is annoying: the unfathomable big-field handicaps full of ‘ghost horses’ that could be a stone wrong one way or another. Horses that could win if they came back to ancient form of three years’ ago; those with little or no form that suddenly, as if a new engine had been inserted in a 1.0 Corsa, take off and roar down the motorway at a hundred miles an hour. Whose-turn-is-it-today handicaps, races so poor that connections can gain more by betting for or against their runners than aiming for the prize-money. The list goes on…

The fixture list needs fixing. The tail should no longer wag the dog. Those days when there are one or two meetings to savour on one racing channel whilst the dross is served up on the other are a delight.

Horseracing should not be Bally’s in Las Vegas. Bookmakers have had their way for too long, influenced the gullible BHA too often. Less IS more. Serve up the same dishes every day and consumers will tire of the menu. We are asked to gorge ourselves at an endless buffet. Sometimes we want a light fish lunch, a glass of crisp wine and a sorbet to follow, rather than turkey, ham and steak all on one plate that is overflowing as we weave our way back to our tables.

It is time for racing’s leaders to come to some independent sensible conclusions. Those with business acumen do not need to tender out to be told what course to take.

We need two-tiered racing. The better meetings should take place at prime times. Those cards containing Class Five and Six events should be staged out of the way and treated as a separate entity. We already have a sort of natural selectivity with places like Southwell attracting animals largely unable or unfit to race on turf. The downgrading and shuffling away of some tracks that can race in the middle of the morning or, under floodlights, in the middle of the night, would present those owning the lower class of horses the chance to race their animals without infringing on the better meetings. Is there anything more annoying than waiting for some mundane event to be run before squeezing in a decent race at Sandown or Newbury?

Even the most exciting situation palls in the end. Racing is reaching its limit. Bookmakers may think it is clever and profitable to saturate punters with race after race but eventually, as punters find they are missing what is happening, losing track of form lines and making mistakes as a result, interest will wane. Either way, turnover will suffer.

Try to sustain the unsustainable, run by a body of people that do not understand the psyche of the punter and it becomes a recipe for disaster.

That Starbucks moment only lasts so long.

AND ANOTHER THING…

INTERNATIONAL RACING kicked off in major style on Saturday. Just before 11.20pm our time, they ran the Preakness at Pimlico, won by a filly called Rachel Alexandra. Those that thought Mine That Bird swam home last time in the Kentucky slop to fluke the Derby, had to swallow a dollop of mud as he pressed the filly and nearly pulled off a momentous double. The well-publicised journey of Mine That Bird from New Mexico, in a horse trailer, is already looking like a movie. The three-year-old gelding is handled by Bennie L Woolley who wears an outsized black cowboy hat and, according to some, packs a piece, which may or may not have been in evidence in his waistband after the Kentucky Derby. It seems unlikely he would have passed the security boys with a Magnum stuffed down his jeans. More likely, he was pleased by the win. If they do make a movie of the Bennie ‘Chip’ Woolley story, Burt Reynolds may be in the frame to take the long shots. Woolley, who has a reputation for drinking and fighting, is described as a “bad ass”. Burt may be a bit long-in-the-tooth to play a bad ass these days, but he could be Chip’s butt double at least. The other half of the duo from Sante Fe, Mine That Bird, looked something of a bad ass himself as he took the filly to the wire. Someone who is not a bad ass, Steve Asmussen, trained the winning filly, ridden by Calvin Borel, the jockey aboard Mine That Bird at Kentucky but who jumped ship for the Preakness. It is a story that will run and one can imagine the Hollywood scriptwriters scribbling as I speak. The tale of a trainer with a broken leg, driving a horse with less form than he had, from the dust of New Mexico to Bluegrass Country, and then on to South Carolina, writes its own dialogue.

At Sunday lunchtime, with the smell of Bisto emanating from most British homes (why is it everyone else’s dinner smells better than yours?), they were about to start the first of two Group 1s in Kranji – the KrisFlyer International Sprint, won by Hong Kong-trained Sacred Kingdom with Godolphin’s Diabolical in third. Kranji is a district in Singapore, a country where it rains a lot and is kind of steamy in a variety of ways. The rain kept off long enough for the turf to be described as good. Singapore is famous for having the best airport in the world – Changi is certainly better than Heathrow and Newark. The country is also known for Singapore Slings, one of the best drinks in the world, especially if downed in Raffles Hotel, where they cost in the region of £12. The cocktail consists of gin, more gin, apricot brandy, Benedictine and soda. If you fly Singapore Airlines, they will serve you unlimited quantities free so long as you behave yourself, thus alleviating in part the fare. Singapore is a buffer to the Far East. It is spotlessly clean, expensive, but they serve freshly-woked food on the roadside that is edible and so hot it is germless. There is Orchard Road, Little India and the Chinese girls used to wear silk kimonos split up to their thighs just like that woman in Dr No. Unlike her, they used to offer short time, something I imagine they do no longer.

An hour after the sprint came the Group 1 Singapore Airlines International Cup. Dubai World Cup runner-up, Gloria De Campeao, prevailed from fellow desert exiles, Presvis, who was unlucky in running, and Bankable.

Then the international equine stage rolled on to Longchamp where it had rained a lot, causing a couple of surprises with comprehensive defeats of Coastal Path in the Group 2, and of Breeders’ Cup heroine Goldikova in the Group 1 Prix d’Ispahan. There was another Group 1 on the card, as there was at Capannelle in Italy, whilst they staged a Group 3 at Baden-Baden in Germany. And all this after the excitement of the European Song Contest the night before.

In this country, there were three meetings. At Ripon, where you can buy hotdogs, burgers and mushy peas, the best we could offer was a Class 2 Handicap worth eleven grand to the winner. Assuming he escaped in one piece, William Haggas took the purse back to Newmarket. There were two jump meetings beamed to the betting offices to keep the homeless, the confused and those waiting for their asylum applications to be resolved, happy. There were more tailed off horses than actually completed at Fakenham and Market Rasen.

In Ireland, one of the maidens at Navan was called the Fun For Kids Maiden. Already I sense the ‘new racing era’ creeping in. This maiden was only fun for those that backed Big Game Hunter. I noticed that Beverley were trying extra hard to sound as if they were enjoying proceedings last week. The racecourse commentator was giving a good impersonation of a toffee-nosed Redcoat; but there was a hunch that a Damoclesian sword was hanging above him as he reeled off all the incidentals normally left out.

One thing racing presenters can do is address the problem of non-runners. From a selfish point of view, the current system of 48-hour declarations is a boon. I remember peering at Teletext, ticking off those not accepting, incorrectly at times – less likely these days with a computer – but the chance to calculate races in advance without having to sort out what actually runs saves so much time. However, with fluctuations in the ground there are often a host of non-runners. So why, why, do racing channels – Channel Four being as guilty as any – rattle through the list as if announcing train departures at Waterloo.
We need time to find the race guys; we have to cross the said horses out. Stop garbling. There are occasions when the complexion of a race changes completely, particularly from an each-way point of view. Never mind the Fun For Kids maiden, they shouldn’t be betting anyway; this sort of thing needs emphasising. Those of us so-called professionals tend to have other means of updating the situation, but how does Daily-Mirror-Dennis feel when he has backed a horse each-way to find the field is down to seven and he is on the first two only?

Note to the BHA: Can I have my hundred grand now please?

AND ANOTHER THING…

Who really goes racing?

(… and who needs Harrison Fraser???)

WELL, WHICH ARE YOU, Brian or Ben? According to a public relations company named Harrison Fraser, called upon to increase racing’s share of the current spectator market, horseracing is monopolised by Brian. He is “a bit boring, traditional, thinks he is old-fashioned, with friends that talk in a language others don’t understand, can be arrogant but when you get to know him, can be fascinating”. Brian is a well-educated Mick Easterby on a good day. He wears country clothes, has mud on his boots, is pompous, sexist, arrogant and old school. He probably owns a shotgun that he is likely to use if you stray onto his estate in Cumbria.

According to said company, paid £250,000 to unearth such findings, what racing needs is another character altogether – Ben. He is younger than Brian, dresses casually but is smart; in short he is mixture between the Tony Blair of ten years ago and Gordon Gekko from Wall Street. He looks like he could appear in an insurance advert or as if he sells Aston Martins for a living. He is confident, athletic, powerful, trusted, cool and fresh – the list is never-ending. Ben has plenty of desirable attributes, so many he sounds like a pain in the arse. Maybe Brian shot him there last time he was in Cumbria.

David Fraser – presumably half of Harrison Fraser – presented this expensive seminar, which is the culmination of nine months brainstorming. There are no prizes for guessing who Mr Fraser (or should that be Davie baby) aspires to be. He is Ben, although he wears glasses, something the almost-perfect prototype has not got to as yet.

Having been paid so much money and with the promise of more to come, it is incumbent on Harrison Fraser to produce some recommendations. A few of them, which I am paraphrasing in case you nod off, include: recognising racing is in the entertainment business, courting new customers, giving them what they want, modernising racing lingo, cashing in on racing’s possible sexy image and having the confidence to succeed.

That is quite a lot to absorb. The Life Of Brian is over then. The future is all about Ben. Quoting Monty Python, could Ben become the equivalent of Bruce, the ubiquitous Australian in one of their sketches when everyone Down-Under had that name.

Attend the races and it could be a case of, ‘Hello Ben, how’s it going then?’
‘Alright Ben; how is it with you?’

‘Good; got a grand out of that city deal yesterday. Do you want a new motor? Got a nice Beamer we took as deposit against an Aston the other day. It’s good and clean – leather seats, low mileage.’

‘Nah thanks Ben, still got my Merc. Leather seats, low mileage. Let me know if you get an Aston though, know want I mean…’

‘Right Ben – will do. I look after my friends, you know that.’
‘Hello, here’s Ben, alright Ben? Know anything?’

‘No Ben, how about you Ben, any news?’

‘Might know something later, when I speak to Ben.’

‘Here; who’s that geezer in the corner eating his sandwiches, drinking out of that hip flask and picking his nose?’

‘Oh, take no notice of him, that’s just Brian. Don’t know why they let him in.’

‘They should keep his like in Tatts. Look, he isn’t even properly dressed. He’s wearing a suit with a tie. What a tosser!’

‘Come on let’s go find Ben.’

‘Yeah; right.’

Harrison Fraser are doing pretty well out of racing’s perceived image problem. However, let’s hang on for a second. Has anyone that has compiled this list of the sport’s shortcomings actually been racing and considered the problems it faces. Let me make it simple for them.

Professionals aside, only four types of people pay to go racing. First, there are those that like the sport, enjoy and understand horses, watch them in the paddock and know what they are looking at. They recognise a good horse when they see it, can become emotional when witnessing a stirring finish, appreciating when a racehorse digs into his reserves and then some in an attempt to do what it was bred to do – that is to win. They might bet a bit, but on the big days would still turn out if the practice were outlawed because horseracing is their hobby. To them, seeing a classic horserace, as opposed to a Classic horserace, is the same as old Bert travelling to Birmingham to see the latest Lamborghini at the motor show.

Second, there are the boyos that fancy their chances and are having a bet. They have drawn a grand out of the ATM, which they reckon they can turn into three. They travel to the races with their mates, laugh a lot, talk loudly and are on their first glass of beer ten minutes after the gates have opened. After somewhere between their sixth and tenth pint, or their second bottle of wine or equivalent, they are likely to become unpleasant, particularly if the grand that was in their pocket has worked its way into someone else’s.

Thirdly, there are those that are going for the craic – whatever the craic happens to be. They could be on a stag or hen do; they are going to have a laugh at all costs and the horses are incidental. After somewhere between their sixth and tenth pint, or second bottle of wine, they are liable to turn unpleasant, particularly if their bets have all lost and the bird they tried to chat up is accompanied by her husband.

Fourth are those that are determined to have a nice day and are prepared to pay for the privilege. They may be in a box if they are lucky, or have booked a table at one of the panoramic restaurants, thus removing themselves from the second and third category of race-goers. They eat from a limited menu, drink wine or champagne at exorbitant prices and are a dying breed right now. They have the sort of disposal income that means they can blow what amounts to a holiday budget for an average couple on one day’s racing.

The trouble with racing as opposed to other pastimes is that not much happens in between the action. Horses walk round the paddock – which is only of interest to the aficionados – they canter to post then race. The process is repeated half-an-hour later. How is the uninitiated supposed to fill in the gaps?

‘Three more lagers, two white wines and a light and bitter please luv.’

Watch football, rugby, cricket or even motor racing and once the action starts, it is action all the way. Going racing for the novice is tantamount to attending a Coldplay concert and listening to Chris Martin sing Yellow and Fix You before he takes a twenty-minute break to resume with Viva la Vida.

Like it or not, horseracing is betting-driven. That is its big problem as far as spectators are concerned. Because if you support Manchester United or Arsenal, going to watch them play and lending your support is enough to supply you with a roller-coaster of emotions. Unless you have some reason to support Fame And Glory or Paco Boy, go racing and you have to buy your kicks by laying your money down. Do that and see your selection trail home ten lengths behind the leaders a few times and it will occur there are better ways to spend a Saturday afternoon.

So horseracing faces plenty of obstacles. It can buy spectators at the weekend by lowering entrance prices and serving copious amounts of alcohol. But do we really want people slumped over the rails and mouthing obscenities at Johnny Murtagh, returning from what the jockey knows is a poor ride, telling him he is an effing excuse for a jockey when in fact he is one of the best in the world? The idiots who catcalled the jockey and have presumably never sat on a horse in their fat miserable lives, should have had the nous to realize that a falsely run race was always a possibility in a three-runner affair, and their money would have been better invested on one of the two other participants not dependent on stamina. But of course that is asking too much, it is much easier to slag off Johnny Murtagh – one of the gentlemen of the weighing room.

I get the feeling that those clever people at Harrison Fraser would be better employed flogging Bacardi Breezers in city bars. Their comments on racing, comparing it with motor racing for example, show a lack of knowledge. I can’t say I wish them well because I don’t. I resent the fact they have received a quarter of a million for telling us the bleedin’ obvious. They are like the generals that visit the mess hall whilst the troops are eating. They may think they understand what life as a private soldier is like, but only know the theory. Having a forkful of chicken and tasting the rice pudding gives them no idea what life away from the silver service of the Officers’ Mess is like.

It is the money I resent. It is racing’s money, squandered in my opinion, at least based on what I have seen so far. Let’s have a word with Sir Alan Sugar and see what he and his Apprentices can come up with. It should not take nine months and certainly will not cost £250,000.

As for racing’s present situation, it is not all bad. We all agree there is too much racing. Most people that have a shred of care for horses feel summer jumping is stupid. Fatalities may not concern fat beer-swilling spectators hanging over the rails and swearing at Johnny Murtagh, but they are not good for the image of horseracing and certainly do not provide family entertainment.

We all agree that corporate hospitality does help but also that ordinary entrance fees need reducing. Caterers ought to have their prices pegged. They are taking too much from race goers for modest fare. They should increase the standards of the food and drink they supply or lose their franchises.

On the subject of an image problem, who dreamt up the current Victor Chandler campaign? There are these grainy old pictures dating back sixty years according to the bookmaker himself, and we see him emerging from the black-and-white crowd in yellow glasses, just like the bloke that is about to ask you if you want to see some risqué pictures.

It is the old joke. Have you any pictures of your wife in the nude?

No.

Would you like to see some?

Maybe as we approach 2010, nine years after Arthur C Clarke predicted Man would have reached Jupiter and had his first brush with the Creator of the Universe, it is not just racing that needs to take an inward look.

Politicians are rapidly realising the game is up. We are sick of royalty, footballers and celebrities looking like halfwits.

We still have one of man’s best friends in the racehorse. We have some of the best racecourses in the world and our major meetings encourage visitors from throughout the globe. We have Sheikh Mohammed and we have Princess Haya of Jordan. We have Frankie Dettori, the Newmarket Stud, Ballydoyle, Sir Michael Stoute.

Add any other names you see fit. I am not sure we need Ben – I am not sure we need Harrison Fraser.

And Another Thing…

The Perfect betting Beast

May 09

IN THIS BUSINESS there is no shortage of advice: people with time figures, paddock notes, systems that run on your computer, loading, clicking, then spewing out winners whilst you study a holiday brochure. All too easy for words! Except it is not!

Forget all the gimmicks, the only way to back winners is to study the form and try to find a horse that is value and then, as icing on the cake, receive a piece of news that confirms you are not chucking your money down the drain if you back it.

We are all so intent on finding the perfect betting beast that sometimes we fail to see the wood for the trees. Much is made of value and prices, but the emphasis ought to be on picking winners. Finding a horse that is twice the price you reckon it should be is only of use if it wins. Plenty of horses are overpriced, but it doesn’t make them win. Sometimes it is far better to identify a horse that looks like a sure-fire winner and worry about the price later.

Whilst wearing my sensible hat, I have another point to make: adjusting your stake upwards to accommodate the price of a selection can and often is a grave mistake. You think a horse will win but it is only 7/4. You are not in the habit of backing horses at 7/4 but think this one should probably be about 11/8 and will definitely win. So this is the exception (funny how many exceptions exist in life). To compensate for its price, you increase your stake. This is understandable but unwise. It is something we have all done, but the problem with such action is that it is motivated by greed and even perfect bets get beaten. It is much better to back it for your normal stake and be content with a small profit rather than shoot for a big one.

Circling around on the periphery like a shark, waiting for the perfect wager, can mean you lose the habit of betting and gradually become less and less inclined to bet at all. It may sound like an obvious statement to make, but betting is essentially gambling; that means every time you strike a bet you are taking a chance. I suppose it is possible to have ten meticulously constructed bets a year and for six of them to win, but it is not something you should count on. For that reason, most people spread their liabilities by betting regularly, sometimes in hope rather than confidence. The perfect betting beast is carefully concealed; it lurks in the undergrowth and only shows itself occasionally through its camouflage.

I spotted the perfect betting beast yesterday and backed it. I backed it at 7/2, then 4/1 and, then, rather nervously, because it was plain that this horse was somewhat obvious yet was drifting, again at 9/2. This horse could not get beaten. She was a three-year-old filly that had run well against seasoned older sprinters last time, was lightly raced enough to improve but did not need to, and had the all-important advantageous draw at Chester. I was struggling to find a flaw in my argument. The market move against her was disconcerting but it surely only guaranteed I would win even more.

Well it would have, except she did not win. The horse in question was City Dancer and it took her one minute to transform herself from the perfect betting beast into just another beast amongst many. She missed the break, forfeited the advantage of her draw, was last but two approaching the straight, then took off, mounting a strong late challenge that almost but not quite propelled her to the front. She gave away at least three lengths and was beaten less than one.

Backing horses is not an exam. Bookmakers do not give you a consolation prize when you lose. Frankly, and irrationally, I think they should take some pity and say: Good effort. You did not deserve to lose, we will refund part of your stake for almost passing with flying colours and we look forward to your next attempt. You may sit the exam again.

If I am to sit the exam again today, it will have to be with Duncan in the first at Ascot. I know the price is short but I fail to see, with the possible exception of Steele Tango, what can beat him. The question is, do I consider him the perfect betting beast even though he is only 7/4 and ‘Carry On Regardless Matron’, or wait for something that is likely to win a bigger pot next week?

That is the constant dilemma. There is always the possibility that we overlook the obvious whilst waiting for that elusive creature to pop its head over the bushes in the near future. Someone who used to talk a lot of twaddle most of the time once proffered to me the expression: Don’t lose the substance for the shadow – wise words from someone that would have been a court jester in a former life. It was also proof that even a buffoon has at least one piece of wisdom secreted within. The same man seemed incapable of dressing himself properly, regularly made a fool of himself, and eventually met with a sticky end. No, this is not the Gordon Brown story, it is proof that, like the one-trick pony, or the monkey with the typewriter, we can all talk sense sometime, however inherently stupid we may be in the long run.

Duncan….trick or treat? What do you think…

AND ANOTHER THING…

May 2009

IT HAS BEEN QUITE A WEEK! You peer through the fog of winter, shovel the snow, take a holiday and just about manage to drive home from the airport before the weather closes in and it seems that Flat racing is half a world away. A few months later it starts, then it splutters, then starts again, then falters, then – bang – you wait for the Classics and suddenly two of the allotted five are over. Just like that. In a weekend the 2,000 and 1,000 Guineas are gone, reduced to statistics in a form book. No more ante-post voucher-clutching, no more speculation – it’s over!

You wait all this time and suddenly, just like everything anticipated, sheer momentum takes over. No time to savour the moment; we now know that Sea The Stars has won the 2,000 Guineas and Ghanaati the 1,000.

The result of the colts’ Classic was foreseeable. Sea The Stars may not have been everyone’s idea of the winner, but had to be on any sensible short list. But Ghanaati; no, I am sorry, having won one race on the all-weather and with a name no one understands, I have to say she belongs in the Mon Mome category. Therefore, sentiment for Barry Hills aside, we will just have to demote her and give the race to something else.

How about Fantasia? That should go down well with the public and encourage turnover on the Derby and the Oaks. And they are no more than a month away – think of it – in just four weeks that means we have only one Classic left and by then, well they have a saying in Yorkshire: The last horse home in the St Leger has snow on its tail. That means my horse will have ice on its tail if most year’s results are anything to go by. No, worse, it will be in the deep freeze.

But for now, we have waited all this time, rather like that metaphorical person at the bus stop, and all the Classics come by at once.

On Saturday night they ran for the roses. That means the Kentucky Derby to you and me. They raced at Churchill Downs on dirt over a mile-and-a-quarter in conditions more suitable to a quad bike than a racehorse. With so much slop plastered over the horses, why anything could have won it – and it did. This particular anything was 50/1 shot Mine That Bird, or so we are told; although the horses looked as indistinguishable as mud-wrestlers. A cowboy called Bennie Woolley, wearing a black hat and hobbling on crutches, was the trainer of Mine That Bird. Bennie had driven the horse for twenty-one hours all the way from the state of New Mexico in the back of a pick-up truck, just to stun himself, the jockey and the American racing world with an unconsidered mustang called Mine That Bird.

What sort of a name is that? What does it mean? When the name was registered, did the owner, having slammed one too many tequilas on a bar in Sante Fe, slip up. Was the intention to call it Mind That Bird? That is daft enough – but Mine That Bird – was it a case of two more big ones over here Maria and two drinks as well – just doesn’t mean anything. How about Find That Bird, Mind That Turd; even I’ll Take The One With Hooters, but Mine That Bird…

And there is another twist to relate. The owners of Mine That Bird – I cannot stop saying it now – come from the UFO capital of the world – namely Roswell. I don’t suppose it is possible that Mine That Bird did not make the journey in the back of a truck at all but was beamed down from another galaxy far, far away.

Nope, throw it out partner on the grounds of it having a silly name. Pioneerof the Nile finished second, now that’s what I call a proper name for a horse. I also went down the Nile on such a boat once. I travelled well but like the horse did not venture very far when everyone else was dashing around at the crack of dawn to visit one temple after another. I stayed on the Pioneer of the Nile to listen to the river lapping on the side of the boat, which I had pretty much to myself. Mine That Bird had the straight pretty much to himself once he got in the clear. I wonder if his trainer will fly him back to New Mexico now that he has a bit of disposable income.

Now we are at Chester and this weekend they run the Derby and Oaks Trials at Lingfield and the two French Guineas at Chantilly on Sunday. As we have decided that Fantasia is the winner of the 1,000 at Newmarket, is it appropriate to supplement Rainbow View for the French equivalent? Then again, possibly the Entente Cordiale does not stretch that far…